Aller au contenu

Photo

Same-sex romance


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
415 réponses à ce sujet

#351
handheld

handheld
  • Members
  • 479 messages

finc.loki wrote...

handheld wrote...

finc.loki wrote...

SurfaceBeneath wrote...

finc.loki wrote...

Really?

So stating an opinion that happens to be different from you is trolling.
How convenient.

From now on , everyone that doesn't agree with me is a troll /sarcasm.

I would argue you're the troll here since you don't even bring up a counter argument, but just flame, that is definition of trolling.


Oh, I'm sorry. I assume when someone posts a completely unintelligent opinion berefit of any actual substance that they are trolling and not just tragically stupid.

I humbly apologize and take back my statement that you were trolling.


I have now realized that i have dragged on a argument that ended a couple posts back and am now feeling stupid and shall apologize to Handhelds forumite companion for my rudeness and i also apologize to Handheld for being ignorant of the fact the argument ended.

I hope Handheld finds compassion in his heart to forgive a fellow forumite such as myself.




Handheld has edited your post to reflect the truth.

Handheld also forgives you as Handheld does not harbor hate for any of his fellow forumites.


Are you serious?

Did you not see how she/he was offending me by calling me unintelligent and stupid.
I guess the sarcastic " I apologize" went over your head there Handheld.

Do not edit my posts, it speaks for itself.

Don't ****** me off as well Handheld.


Handheld edited your post because as an a adult you should have left it well enough alone yet you responded to a childish insult which Handhelds forumite companion surfacebeneath recognized as a mistake and yet you still followed up with another childish insult and a mockery of the post.

Handheld is not taking sides however Handheld wishes more could act like adults and leave well enough alone.

Pointless insulting is pointless thinks handheld.

#352
handheld

handheld
  • Members
  • 479 messages

SurfaceBeneath wrote...

finc.loki wrote...

Thank you for proving and admitting that you're the troll.

Also, why would anyone be banned for having a different stance/opinion, last time I checked this forum is not run by ****'s?
Here's a notion, how about you actually learn what "forum" stand for.

Quite frankly, you're quite easy to argue with since your comments are devoid of any arguments and filled to the brim with tripe.
That said, it is also self evident that "arguing" with you is pointless for above mentioned reason.

Have a nice day!;)




I absolutely troll anyone whom I feel deserves it. I've not denied it at any time in the past.

To handheld:
I hope this kind of post explains to handheld why reverse trolling is many times the superior method of dealing with trolls. If you actually make a coherent argument against them, they just fall back to their trollish instincts and attempt to invalidate whatever points you may have made by backpeddaling and name calling. Notice how he ignores everything I stated in my actual counterargument which was filled with many good points and instead calls both of us names? Honorless forumites deserve no honor.


Handheld knows surfacebeneath knows that all forumites are honorable and Handheld cannot take sides but as Handheld said before adults know when to leave well enough alone Handheld expects that surface beneath understands what Handheld is saying and will let children be children.

#353
Keltoris

Keltoris
  • Members
  • 1 526 messages
Handheld, we can only teach them so much so fast.

#354
handheld

handheld
  • Members
  • 479 messages

Keltoris wrote...

Handheld, we can only teach them so much so fast.


But... Handheld wishes to be on everyones side..... :(

#355
ic1pher

ic1pher
  • Members
  • 13 messages
Every time I tried playing through M/M I just couldn't. It's too much eeeeh... But I do support it. I just don't see such a huge market for it at the moment. As the straight female ratio increases, things may change.

#356
Keltoris

Keltoris
  • Members
  • 1 526 messages

handheld wrote...

Keltoris wrote...

Handheld, we can only teach them so much so fast.


But... Handheld wishes to be on everyones side..... :(

It's good on paper, I know. :?

#357
Rogue-Element

Rogue-Element
  • Members
  • 430 messages
I like how Bioware made a game like DA:O more "open minded" by having M/M and F/F romances. Would be to bad if they didn't have this in ME2.



I've read several post in this topic that said they've been dropping major hints on the fact that Tali would be romance able, anyone got a link to these hints?

#358
SurfaceBeneath

SurfaceBeneath
  • Members
  • 1 434 messages

handheld wrote...

Keltoris wrote...

Handheld, we can only teach them so much so fast.


But... Handheld wishes to be on everyones side..... :(


I hope that handheld does not take anything I say in offense, as I hope handheld knows that handheld only has my highest esteem, but handheld cannot please everyone. Telling someone they are behaving as a child, true though it may be, can be considered trolling of a different sort and will be considered as such.

Basically what I'm trying to say: Enemies are everywhere!

Modifié par SurfaceBeneath, 18 janvier 2010 - 01:07 .


#359
handheld

handheld
  • Members
  • 479 messages

Keltoris wrote...

handheld wrote...

Keltoris wrote...

Handheld, we can only teach them so much so fast.


But... Handheld wishes to be on everyones side..... :(

It's good on paper, I know. :?


But... But... Handheld wants to be the good guy..... :blush:

#360
Keltoris

Keltoris
  • Members
  • 1 526 messages

handheld wrote...

But... But... Handheld wants to be the good guy..... :blush:


/Paragon-five

But trust me, sooner or later, someone will get bitter because you're helping them as well.


SurfaceBeneath wrote...

Basically what I'm trying to say: Enemies are everywhere!


WILL THEY DESTROY YOU?!

Modifié par Keltoris, 18 janvier 2010 - 01:08 .


#361
Gnomejello

Gnomejello
  • Members
  • 32 messages
Have they really confirmed 6 romances? I remember reading that there were 3 female romances, but no word on male romances.

While it feels nice for symmetry to say that there are six, in my experiences these things aren't always so nice and symmetrical. Males could get four. One could even be gay. Thane might even be the new Zevran. (that's my bet, anyway.)

I would be really interested in any evidence that I was wrong.  Preferably presented in a polite manner.

Modifié par Gnomejello, 18 janvier 2010 - 01:12 .


#362
SurfaceBeneath

SurfaceBeneath
  • Members
  • 1 434 messages

Gnomejello wrote...

Have they really confirmed 6 romances? I remember reading that there were 3 female romances, but no word on male romances.

While it feels nice for symmetry to say that there are six, in my experiences these things aren't always so nice and symmetrical. Males could get four. One could even be gay. Thane might even be the new Zevran. (that's my bet, anyway.)

I would be really interested in any evidence that I was wrong.


Casey said that he "believed" there to be 3 romance options for each. However, there has been nothing confirmed at this point other than that we know for sure that Thane, Jacob, and Suze are romancible and that Miranda is as next to confirmed as you can get.

#363
handheld

handheld
  • Members
  • 479 messages

SurfaceBeneath wrote...

Gnomejello wrote...

Have they really confirmed 6 romances? I remember reading that there were 3 female romances, but no word on male romances.

While it feels nice for symmetry to say that there are six, in my experiences these things aren't always so nice and symmetrical. Males could get four. One could even be gay. Thane might even be the new Zevran. (that's my bet, anyway.)

I would be really interested in any evidence that I was wrong.


Casey said that he "believed" there to be 3 romance options for each. However, there has been nothing confirmed at this point other than that we know for sure that Thane, Jacob, and Suze are romancible and that Miranda is as next to confirmed as you can get.


handheld agrees Miranda is basically confirmed with all the others though not officially but Handheld knows better.

Handheld thinks that perhaps it will be Samara who is romanceable as that would be interesting an asari (the punisher if you will indulge Handheld) justicar who has forsworn all types of personal gains and children to hunt down evil becomes your space hug buddy.

Handheld would very much like this.

#364
Keltoris

Keltoris
  • Members
  • 1 526 messages
/Samara-fan-five for Handheld

#365
Gnomejello

Gnomejello
  • Members
  • 32 messages

Rogue-Element wrote...

I like how Bioware made a game like DA:O more "open minded" by having M/M and F/F romances. Would be to bad if they didn't have this in ME2.

I've read several post in this topic that said they've been dropping major hints on the fact that Tali would be romance able, anyone got a link to these hints?



http://forums.bestbu...ript/td-p/89183

Guest-56: is Tali a romance option?

CaseyH-ME2:
In ME1 Tali was kind of a young character, on her "pilgrimage", so she wasn't a love interest option. One cool thing ME1 players will notice is that the characters they know and love from the first game have grown up and moved on a bit. Tali is more mature now. We were surprised to see how many people were interested in her as a love interest, given that she wore a mask, was an alien, and as one of our team members said, she had "chicken feet". Will she take things further with you?  There's a great story there, but I won't spoil it for you! 


I wouldn't call this "confirmed", but I suspect this is what people are referring to when they call it "confirmed."

Modifié par Gnomejello, 18 janvier 2010 - 01:23 .


#366
SurfaceBeneath

SurfaceBeneath
  • Members
  • 1 434 messages

handheld wrote...

handheld agrees Miranda is basically confirmed with all the others though not officially but Handheld knows better.

Handheld thinks that perhaps it will be Samara who is romanceable as that would be interesting an asari (the punisher if you will indulge Handheld) justicar who has forsworn all types of personal gains and children to hunt down evil becomes your space hug buddy.

Handheld would very much like this.


I am going to have to disagree with handheld on this point. I think Samara would be better as a non-space hug buddy
so as to make Asari seem like less of a 2 dimensional race who are made to be romanced.

But I respect handheld's wishes and do think that Samara is a very attractive and interesting lady.

#367
handheld

handheld
  • Members
  • 479 messages

Keltoris wrote...

/Samara-fan-five for Handheld


handheld himself also thinks that biotic lady has magical asari biotic bed powers.

#368
finc.loki

finc.loki
  • Members
  • 689 messages

SurfaceBeneath wrote...

finc.loki wrote...

It is really ignorant and pathetic to attack a person that is of different mind/opinion and say he is a troll or unintelligent.
Among intelligent people it quickly become apparant who is lacking the intelligence.


I'm not attacking you for having a different opinion. I'm attacking you because you've an opinion that can't be supported by any actual facts. 4 for 4 of the last Bioware games did have homosexual romances of some kind (Juhani in KOTOR, Sky and Fox in JE, Liara and the entire Asari race in ME, and Zevran and Leliana in DA:O), and so saying that it's not some kind of interest among Bioware to include these kinds of romances because they appeal to a limited playerbase (which again is not just the gay and bi community but also many of heterosexuals who enjoy these romances as well) is blatently ignoring Bioware's actions in the past. It also presents an argument that is easily attacked by saying that Bioware should not include other minorities in their games due to "lack of interest". By this logic, should Bioware remove all dark skin shade options in exchange for more lighter skinned options that would appeal more to the white gaming audiance since the black gaming audiance is statistically much lower than whites? No. Should the option of a female Shepard be taken away since statistically much fewer people will play a female Shepard than a male? Again, no. Should all female LIs be taken away since the percentage of people who romance male NPCs is going to be dramatically lower than the percentage of people who romance female NPCs be? No again. And it's ridiculous to say so. However, these are the kinds of rebuttals the "lack of interest" argument has to contend with.

I hope that handheld approves of this method of counterargument, as I tried very hard to make something that would please handheld.


Well look at that.

You actually made a post with arguments,nice!
If only you would have started out that way, so much sillyness could have been avoided.

There might not be a lack of interest on Bioware's part to make full on gay romances.
But apparently, it is not a big enough interest to include it in this time around.

In an earlier post , someone stated and showed a snippet of a comment made by a developer that the "market" is not large enough to warrant that inclusion in the game if they or on a time budget.
This is what I've been saying that it is still in a minority, except here on the forum with all the threads left and right.
This is just a very vocal group on these forums, that does not necessarily reflect the general populace view.

If it meant that other stuff/levels doesn't get excluded from the game in order to fit in a gay romance, then by all means, include it.

I've seen many threads where there is outright hatred against Bioware cause of the exclusion of gay romance.
It is getting overboard, you just stipulated that Bioware has had gay romance in almost all of their games.
Isn't that a good thing then? Oh, how quickly they forget....

Btw, the "opinion, not supported by facts", well, that is just it isn't it? An OPINION. :whistle:
I've never claimed I presented "facts" I had several times stipulated that it is my opinion.
As they said, "learn to separate facts from opinions"

However the part about them not thinking it is a big enough deal to warrant gay relationship in the game when under time constraints, also speaks for the fact (their word) that it wasen't a large enough player base that would want it over another level.

The F/F is more popular, at least here in the forum, out in the world of majority I do not know.

As someone said earlier, perhaps they should make a DLC out of gay relationships, it would be a good way to truely measure the interest beyond these forums for such a thing.

It also presents an argument that is easily attacked by saying that
Bioware should not include other minorities in their games due to "lack
of interest". By this logic, should Bioware remove all dark skin shade
options in exchange for more lighter skinned options that would appeal
more to the white gaming audiance since the black gaming audiance is
statistically much lower than whites? No. Should the option of a female
Shepard be taken away since statistically much fewer people will play a
female Shepard than a male? Again, no


Nice, where it not for one simple rebuttal.
Making a skin color, takes far less time and effort that making up a whole gay romance story, throughout a whole trilogy.
Also, you said "remove" skin shades etc, gay romance according to Bioware was never even IN the game.
So by using an argument like that we could argue ad infinitum.

All in all I think Bioware goes by what interest the majority of the people that buy the game.

I have no problem with adding gay romance as long as it doesn't mean less attention or one less level due to time constraint.
The developers said it right, 10-20% (pick a low number), would have an interest in gay romance, 100% would have interest in more game play.
In the real world gay romance doesn't interest a majority, take it as you want but that is just how it is.

One would be a fool to go by what is posted by "hardcore fans" on a gaming forum and think that is a majority opinion.

#369
Rogue-Element

Rogue-Element
  • Members
  • 430 messages
Awesome Thanks Gnomejello, was afraid my post was going to be overlooked with all the posting going on in this thread.



Should be interesting to see how they've developed Tali. There's major potential for story in a romance sense.

#370
handheld

handheld
  • Members
  • 479 messages

SurfaceBeneath wrote...

handheld wrote...

handheld agrees Miranda is basically confirmed with all the others though not officially but Handheld knows better.

Handheld thinks that perhaps it will be Samara who is romanceable as that would be interesting an asari (the punisher if you will indulge Handheld) justicar who has forsworn all types of personal gains and children to hunt down evil becomes your space hug buddy.

Handheld would very much like this.


I am going to have to disagree with handheld on this point. I think Samara would be better as a non-space hug buddy
so as to make Asari seem like less of a 2 dimensional race who are made to be romanced.

But I respect handheld's wishes and do think that Samara is a very attractive and interesting lady.


Handheld himself agrees she is attractive Handheld however found liara to be Naive for a lack of a better term And perhaps if samar was a romance option perhaps you would have to give her a reason in the first place to even think about it then you would have to work on it further to make it into something else.

handheld thinks that would not make the asari seem so two dimensional yes.

#371
SurfaceBeneath

SurfaceBeneath
  • Members
  • 1 434 messages

Rogue-Element wrote...

Awesome Thanks Gnomejello, was afraid my post was going to be overlooked with all the posting going on in this thread.

Should be interesting to see how they've developed Tali. There's major potential for story in a romance sense.


I for one am interested in Tali in a non-romantic stance as well and am really interested to see her develop. If Tali is romancible, I really hope they allow those who do not romance her to get just as much out of her character development as those who do.

#372
finc.loki

finc.loki
  • Members
  • 689 messages

handheld wrote...

finc.loki wrote...

handheld wrote...

finc.loki wrote...

SurfaceBeneath wrote...

finc.loki wrote...

Really?

So stating an opinion that happens to be different from you is trolling.
How convenient.

From now on , everyone that doesn't agree with me is a troll /sarcasm.

I would argue you're the troll here since you don't even bring up a counter argument, but just flame, that is definition of trolling.


Oh, I'm sorry. I assume when someone posts a completely unintelligent opinion berefit of any actual substance that they are trolling and not just tragically stupid.

I humbly apologize and take back my statement that you were trolling.


I have now realized that i have dragged on a argument that ended a couple posts back and am now feeling stupid and shall apologize to Handhelds forumite companion for my rudeness and i also apologize to Handheld for being ignorant of the fact the argument ended.

I hope Handheld finds compassion in his heart to forgive a fellow forumite such as myself.




Handheld has edited your post to reflect the truth.

Handheld also forgives you as Handheld does not harbor hate for any of his fellow forumites.


Are you serious?

Did you not see how she/he was offending me by calling me unintelligent and stupid.
I guess the sarcastic " I apologize" went over your head there Handheld.

Do not edit my posts, it speaks for itself.

Don't ****** me off as well Handheld.


Handheld edited your post because as an a adult you should have left it well enough alone yet you responded to a childish insult which Handhelds forumite companion surfacebeneath recognized as a mistake and yet you still followed up with another childish insult and a mockery of the post.

Handheld is not taking sides however Handheld wishes more could act like adults and leave well enough alone.

Pointless insulting is pointless thinks handheld.


I defended myself and I responded to that post WELL before any false apology.
Did it not occur to you that I was making this post when he/she "apologized".

Since you're not the one who was attacked you are not the one to JUDGE if I would deem it an apology.

I am an adult. How would I cease to be an adult just because I defend myself.

He/she insulted me and DID SO even in the "apology" comment.
If you're not clever enough to read between the lines , that is hardly my problem.

Also, if you attempt to mitigate/mediate in a fight between him/her and me, you'd best do so without taking a stance and without insulting me.

The person just stated that my opinion was "unintelligent" and then go one and call me "tragically stupid".

So in your mind, that is an apology? I should also just lay down and not respond in kind.

Give me a break.

If you can't be neutral stay the hell away...

I didn't see you editing his/her post?

I guess you are too blind to see the person went from calling me a troll and apologize for that, to insulting me calling me dumb and tragically stupid.
I hate to see how people apologize to you and the level of insult in their apologies you accept...

Modifié par finc.loki, 18 janvier 2010 - 01:34 .


#373
handheld

handheld
  • Members
  • 479 messages

finc.loki wrote...

handheld wrote...

finc.loki wrote...

handheld wrote...

finc.loki wrote...

SurfaceBeneath wrote...

finc.loki wrote...

Really?

So stating an opinion that happens to be different from you is trolling.
How convenient.

From now on , everyone that doesn't agree with me is a troll /sarcasm.

I would argue you're the troll here since you don't even bring up a counter argument, but just flame, that is definition of trolling.


Oh, I'm sorry. I assume when someone posts a completely unintelligent opinion berefit of any actual substance that they are trolling and not just tragically stupid.

I humbly apologize and take back my statement that you were trolling.


I have now realized that i have dragged on a argument that ended a couple posts back and am now feeling stupid and shall apologize to Handhelds forumite companion for my rudeness and i also apologize to Handheld for being ignorant of the fact the argument ended.

I hope Handheld finds compassion in his heart to forgive a fellow forumite such as myself.




Handheld has edited your post to reflect the truth.

Handheld also forgives you as Handheld does not harbor hate for any of his fellow forumites.


Are you serious?

Did you not see how she/he was offending me by calling me unintelligent and stupid.
I guess the sarcastic " I apologize" went over your head there Handheld.

Do not edit my posts, it speaks for itself.

Don't ****** me off as well Handheld.


Handheld edited your post because as an a adult you should have left it well enough alone yet you responded to a childish insult which Handhelds forumite companion surfacebeneath recognized as a mistake and yet you still followed up with another childish insult and a mockery of the post.

Handheld is not taking sides however Handheld wishes more could act like adults and leave well enough alone.

Pointless insulting is pointless thinks handheld.


I defended myself and I responded to that post WELL before any false apology.
Did it not occur to you that I was making this post when he/she "apologized".

Since you're not the one who was attacked you are not the one to JUDGE if I would deem it an apology.

I am an adult. How would I cease to be an adult just because I defend myself.

He/she insulted me and DID SO even in the "apology" comment.
If you're not clever enough to read between the lines , that is hardly my problem.

Also, if you attempt to mitigate/mediate in a fight between him/her and me, you'd best do so without taking a stance and without insulting me.

The person just stated that my opinion was "unintelligent" and then go one and call me "tragically stupid".

So in your mind, that is an apology? I should also just lay down and not respond in kind.

Give me a break.

If you can't be neutral stay the hell away...

I didn't see you editing his/her post?



Handheld didnt edit Surface beneaths post because surface beneath didnt attack handheld as you have.

handheld asks why are you bringing this up again this is the second time the conversation has ended and you brought it back up again Handheld will now end the conversation a 3rd time with all parties are wrong Helga the massage krogan is right and Helga the massage krogans word is law.

#374
Gnomejello

Gnomejello
  • Members
  • 32 messages

SurfaceBeneath wrote...

Rogue-Element wrote...

Awesome Thanks Gnomejello, was afraid my post was going to be overlooked with all the posting going on in this thread.

Should be interesting to see how they've developed Tali. There's major potential for story in a romance sense.


I for one am interested in Tali in a non-romantic stance as well and am really interested to see her develop. If Tali is romancible, I really hope they allow those who do not romance her to get just as much out of her character development as those who do.


I think one thing romancers might get that non-romancers don't get... is romancers might get to see Tali's face. 

#375
finc.loki

finc.loki
  • Members
  • 689 messages

SurfaceBeneath wrote...

finc.loki wrote...

Thank you for proving and admitting that you're the troll.

Also, why would anyone be banned for having a different stance/opinion, last time I checked this forum is not run by ****'s?
Here's a notion, how about you actually learn what "forum" stand for.

Quite frankly, you're quite easy to argue with since your comments are devoid of any arguments and filled to the brim with tripe.
That said, it is also self evident that "arguing" with you is pointless for above mentioned reason.

Have a nice day!;)




I absolutely troll anyone whom I feel deserves it. I've not denied it at any time in the past.

To handheld:
I hope this kind of post explains to handheld why reverse trolling is many times the superior method of dealing with trolls. If you actually make a coherent argument against them, they just fall back to their trollish instincts and attempt to invalidate whatever points you may have made by backpeddaling and name calling. Notice how he ignores everything I stated in my actual counterargument which was filled with many good points and instead calls both of us names? Honorless forumites deserve no honor.


I did not ignore your post at all.

I didn't see it until I posted my comment.
As you can see above I did respond to your post that actually did have arguments in them and not just trolling.

You and handheld has to take into account that the person need some time to respond, especially if responding to to people at once.