myrrhcat wrote...
I remember that earlier in this thread, someone made the common (and utterly played-out joke) somewhere along the lines of "gee, you guys are so crazy to want equal representation for EVERYONE, why don't we just put a [black, albino, handicapped, transgender woman] on the cover?" Or whatever list of "minority attributes" they could think of off the top of their head.
The thing is, that'd be great to see. I know it's easy to forget when you're a regular vanilla-ass straight white dude, but people who belong to all of those demographics do exist... and you're not better or more important than them... and representing them isn't unrealistic at all. BECAUSE THEY EXIST.
Before this thread gets locked, I think it's interesting how much effort gets put into attempting to delegitimize this question, because I think the people who make these threads realize they don't have an answer for it.
When you start demanding equal representation for non-"dudebros" (again, I think it's wonderful how much this gets thrown around to stereotype male gamers), where do you draw the line? Shall we have one protaganist of each ethnicity that could be created or are in a country the game will be marketed in? Is one woman sufficient, or do we also need a woman of each race? Do we attempt to display transgender people as well? Can we take just "one of each" and use them to represent everybody, or do we also need to have all possible combinations? What about when sexuality enters the fray? Do you propose to have thirty or forty different versions of the same character on the cover, so that everybody is represented "equally"?
A cover displaying artwork or something besides a protaganist is sounding pretty good right now, isn't it?
Modifié par TheBlackBaron, 04 juin 2013 - 02:00 .