[quote]In Exile wrote...
[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...
I know there's a Circle in Orlais (although the lore seems to consistently change in regards to how many Circles there actually are, and where they are located), so I think the conflict would be focused mainly in that region. [/quote]
Whether or not there is a Circle in Orlais doesn't mean that the Empire itself will be drawn into a dispute betwene the templars/mages, even with the civil war going on. [/quote]
I was talking about where the mages and templars might clash with one another, since I don't believe there's a Circle of Magi in the Dales. The nation seems to house human settlements along the water and a resort for the ruling family, so I think the region could deal with the elven conflict exclusively in the actual game.
[quote]In Exile wrote...
[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...
The Circles of Magi exist throughout the Andrastian kingdoms, with templars stationed in those regions, so I imagine the fighting would break out all over. I think that's why Varric talks about the world being on the brink of war. [/quote]
But that still doesn't mean that (i) the war would last forever, (ii) the war would involve the actual nations, versus remain extrateritorial; (iii) all of Thedas won't just declare an Exalted March against the mages and elves. [/quote]
We don't know how long the war will last, but I'm sure the mages and templars are committed to their goal, so I doubt it'll be short. I don't doubt the war could involve the kingdoms where the war is taking place, in one form or another. And I'm thinking that having Orlais sitting between an independent Dales and possibly two pro-mage kingdoms (Ferelden and Nevarra via hypothetical mage ruler filling the vaccum of power) they would be less inclined to declare an Exalted March against the elves or the mages.
[quote]In Exile wrote...
[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...
Humans don't need to be massacred to be resettled, but that's not really the discussion here. [/quote]
Only in the magical fantasy world that you live in will people abandon their home for 700 years because an invading army demands that they do, so they can live in exile... where, exactly? [/quote]
We've had this discussion over and over where I explained this, and as I pointed out previously in this thread, this isn't what I was discussing. I even underlined that I was talking about an independent Dales, with the elves being their own masters, instead of living under Orlesian rule.
[quote]In Exile wrote...
What do you think is going to happen when armed elves show up in front of your home and say "Leave or ... ?"
What do you think the "..." means? And what do you think the people there are going to do when they try to steal their homes, their land, and send them all into exile? [/quote]
It means forcible relocation. However, this isn't part of the ongoing discussion, so I see little reason for you to bring it up when I already know where this is going to go before we even start.
[quote]In Exile wrote...
[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...
Helping the elves reclaim leadership of the Dales could establish an ally in the region, [/quote]
Why would the human mages want to help a group that has nothing in common with them acquire political power that they could use against them on racial lines? The entire reason that they're fighting the war is oppression and bigotry. [/quote]
There are a number of reasons why. I even pointed out having an ally in the region when you consider the threat that Orlais and the Chantry of Andraste might pose. A kingdom where the elves can be their own masters, where they won't be purged by humans in impoverished slums for rallying against the injustices they face. The elves can reclaim their kingdom and live as equals, rather than being limited to servants or slaves. Where they can be free to worship their own gods again, without being prohibited by Chantry law like they are in the Andrastian kingdoms. That would be the point and the premise behind an independent elven kingdom.
[quote]In Exile wrote...
[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...
which might be possible if an alliance is brokered between the People and the independent mages. [/quote]
Again, why would human mages side with elf mundanes for the sake of elves at the expense of humans? [/quote]
I'm not sure why you're taking the approach that an alliance is impossible. There are many hypothetical scenarios where the mages and the Dalish could become allies. If apostate Hawke romanced Merrill and was encouraged to become a leader to the mages by Anders (via "You truly are the leader we have waited centuries for" in the Gallows at the conclusion of the game and his suggestion to become a leader earlier on in the game), I already have one. Generally speaking, we have human and elven mages among the ranks of the newly autonomous Circles, and I'm sure that both groups could use allies for their respective goals.
[quote]In Exile wrote...
[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...
Having the elves on one side and the mages on the other could weakn Orlais' position to attack either one, which could be part of the premise behind a hypothetical alliance between the Dalish clans and the mages of the autonomous Circles. [/quote]
Or it could be a single to every mundane in Thedas that it's the time to put aside national differences and unite against the greatest threat to the human mundanes since the Blight.
The worst thing you can do in a war is give people a common cause based on what the paranoid racist lunatics fear. [/quote]
I'm sure the Mage-Templar War (that could be a continential conflict since the Circles were all over the continent) and the Orlesian civil war over the throne is going to complicate those hypothetical scenarios.
[quote]In Exile wrote...
[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...
I'm going to simply ignore the genocide comment, because it doesn't have anything to do with what I actually said. [/quote]
How exactly are the mages going to rule over Nevarra? If it isn't forced resettlement - which counts as genocide - then it's going to be through autocratic oppression and a Nevarran Imperium. [/quote]
I suggested a mage protagonist taking the throne, which is no different than Alistair or Anora claiming the throne of Ferelden (except the obvious fact that the new ruler would be a mage in this hypothetical scenario). I don't have the facts concerning Nevarra rulership, so I'm honestly not certain what's involved in having someone actually claim the throne. I did point out that there were rumors about the throne to Nevarra needing a new ruler since the current King is already an old man, as well as the fact that most speculation concerned Cassandra since she is a member of the Pentaghast family, and the current King of Nevarra is Markus Pentaghast. Depending on who the new protagonist is, it could be possible.
[quote]In Exile wrote...
[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...
I already addressed the rumors about the throne for Nevarra being a possibility, which is the point (although the rumors tend to focus on Cassandra as a canidate instead of the protagonist, given her family name). Similar to the Cousland Warden becoming the King-Consort or the Queen. Again, it's entirely hypothetical, but I suppose it would be one way to make sense of the "human only" limitation of the new protagonist. [/quote]
Political instability in Nevarra is very differnet from an autocratic mage empire in Neverra. An Amell couldn't become King of Ferelden. [/quote]
We don't even know who the new protagonist will be, so it's not quite the same thing.