iakus wrote...
I remember the good old days when Bioware made class exclusive quest chains. And there were more than three classes too.
YMMV on whether you thought the quests were good.
The Templar perspective
Débuté par
Lotion Soronarr
, juin 06 2013 01:57
#1076
Posté 17 juin 2013 - 10:46
In Exile
-
- Members
- 28 738 messages
YMMV on whether you thought the quests were good.
Retour en haut
#1077
Posté 17 juin 2013 - 11:00
Il Divo
-
- Members
- 9 749 messages
In Exile wrote...
iakus wrote...
I remember the good old days when Bioware made class exclusive quest chains. And there were more than three classes too.
YMMV on whether you thought the quests were good.
Likewise for the classes. Having 8 classes to choose from doesn't really help much if you dislike DnD 2.0 to begin with.
Modifié par Il Divo, 17 juin 2013 - 11:01 .
#1078
Posté 17 juin 2013 - 11:05
Iakus
-
- Members
- 30 241 messages
In Exile wrote...
iakus wrote...
I remember the good old days when Bioware made class exclusive quest chains. And there were more than three classes too.
YMMV on whether you thought the quests were good.
Point being, class exclusive content can be done.
Heck Bethany/Carver were arguably class exclusive content.
#1079
Posté 21 juin 2013 - 11:02
Lotion Soronarr
-
- Members
- 14 481 messages
IanPolaris wrote...
Yes but IMHO Bioware tried to deceive us. The examples were atypical and the information that told us this could be found, but only with great difficulty. It is clear (at least to me) that Bioware was deliberately using atypical and skewed examples in order to 'convince' the player that these were typical mage experiences when they were not without explicitly saying so. I think it was part and parcel in DA2 to try to make the mages look worse and more dangerous than the lore really justifies.
-Polaris
Not really.
Because lore-wise mages and demons are more dangerous then the gameplay suggests.
#1080
Posté 22 juin 2013 - 07:57
LobselVith8
-
- Members
- 16 990 messages
Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Not really.
Because lore-wise mages and demons are more dangerous then the gameplay suggests.
Except the examples provided in Dragon Age II didn't match the lore at all. Like the example of abominations being summoned creatures.
#1081
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 22 juin 2013 - 08:05
Guest_Puddi III_*
Guest_Puddi III_*
-
- Guests
No! YMMNV. Druid is awesome, FACT.Il Divo wrote...
In Exile wrote...
YMMV on whether you thought the quests were good.
Likewise for the classes. Having 8 classes to choose from doesn't really help much if you dislike DnD 2.0 to begin with.
#1082
Posté 22 juin 2013 - 08:24
Lotion Soronarr
-
- Members
- 14 481 messages
LobselVith8 wrote...
Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Not really.
Because lore-wise mages and demons are more dangerous then the gameplay suggests.
Except the examples provided in Dragon Age II didn't match the lore at all. Like the example of abominations being summoned creatures.
Yes, DA2 frakked the lore in may ways.
Altough technicly a mage could bring in demons by tearing the veil.
Abominations..not so much.
