MisterJB wrote...
Opulence is not a sign of wealth; that's just like saying that just because a man dresses well, he is obviously rich. Rather, the purpose of opulence is to give the impression of wealth and prestige which is necessary if one's words are to be heard and respected. It's why kings don't dress like peasants.
It's not "necessary" at all. It is a
useful tactic for aweing the ignorant peasantry into submission and preventing them from examining the subtance of your words and deeds with any sort of critical thought.
Not to mention, "extravagant opulence" is an exageration. Even the Chantry in Denerim; the capital; was smaller than many of the buildings in the Market District. Certainly, much, much smaller than Fort Drakon which was erected by Magisters. the One in Kirkwall? Another one built by mages on the back of slaves.
We don't know what's inside the Denerim Chantry, because the oh-so generous Grand Cleric bans outsiders. There could be any manner of treasures inside. Not to mention all the Chantry sisters in DA:O walk around in golden robes.
Oh, and the Lothering Chantry? They stayed behind to help the people evacuate.
When a greedy man hoarded his goods, who was about to call the templars have him distribute them to the needy? A Sister.
Yes, how thoughtful of that sister to demand charity from another while giving nothing herself. The Chantry in Lothering is stuffed with books and candlesticks and other valuables. Good Sister Nagatha should've led by example and traded Chantry treasures with the merchant so she could distribute the needed supplies herself.
Even if their display of wealth is necessary to "command respect", there are more pressing matters. Lothering is in line to be razed to the ground regardless, and they can always find new baubles later.