Who is that Masked Man wrote...
The army and the police have not sworn vows to serve a religious institution that teaches that "owning weapons" is evil and wrong.
"Weapons" do not have agency. They cannot jump up and kill you by themselves, nor can they force anyone to pick them up and use them to do harm.
The army and the police do not make it their policy to destroy any "weapons" they find and kill anyone they find "holding a weapon."
But if those things were true, and the police decided to ignore their own avowed religious convictions and trust a bloodthirsty, sentient, superpowerful weapon rather than negotiate with an unarmed "criminal" who they are trying to arrest, then yes, I would say that would be massive hypocrisy on their part.
Incorrect. You are condemning my suggestion for it involving using something that we condemn mages for using.
There are laws against owning certain weapons that the military uses that can grant you jail time meaning that people are most certainly being condemned for using guns. Therefore, if you will condemn the templars for it, you must also condemn nearly every civilized country in the world.
The differences between guns and demons are irrelevant to his subject.
Or we can simply accept that just like there are certain weapons whose destructive capabilities are so great that require special care that can only be provided by certain organization and that is no hypocrisy.
Let me break it down once last time: Your plan is for the templars to refuse to even negotiate with the mages and instead... while the world hangs in the balance... try to locate some exceptionally stupid yet extremely powerful demon who can somehow be convinced to close that giant tear in the veil, but then be killed afterwards before it can do any harm.
And you call this "smart."
Unlike mages, demons are politically neutral and lack an history of conflict with non-mages which means reaching an agreement with it will be easier. They are also less complex than an entire population of individuals which means its goals can be more easily prodicted and countered. They also lack allies meaning one can trap one demon and not fear a rescue mission.
One demon or even a small group; even if they escape; are liable to cause less damage than whatever concessions would be granted to mages. Also, if mages do not participate in the saving of the world, they also can't pull up the sympathy card in the aftermath.
Relatively speaking, it is the smarter choice. Circunstances may change that but I am not so willing to allow the entire world to be held hostage to the readyness of mages.
I cannot over stress how much I disagree with that assessment.
You're free to do so. I disagree with yours.
Goodbye, Mister JB. This is not a debate worth having.
Bye.
Modifié par MisterJB, 01 juillet 2013 - 09:25 .