Quote the Raven wrote...
I hope there are reasons to support and oppose both in Inquisition.
The last thing I'd like to see is a clear division between good guys and bad guys.
Modifié par Il Divo, 13 juin 2013 - 01:06 .
Indeed, but it seems that they do.sandalisthemaker wrote...
Il Divo wrote...
sandalisthemaker wrote...
I would never advocate killing all mages, but doing so wouldn't solve anything anyway.
More will always be born.
Well, I assume the way the scenario was being posed, the point was that it would be a constant reinforcement kinda deal, rather than a one shot solution.
Edit: But then, if it ever got to the point where we did have enough control to kill any/all Mages when we choose, it would probably be doable that the Circles could be reinstated. Or some other, hopefully better system.
This would result in the systematic slaughter of children.
Do not want.
Xilizhra wrote...
That you prefer genocide over defeat.
sandalisthemaker wrote...
Il Divo wrote...
sandalisthemaker wrote...
I would never advocate killing all mages, but doing so wouldn't solve anything anyway.
More will always be born.
Well, I assume the way the scenario was being posed, the point was that it would be a constant reinforcement kinda deal, rather than a one shot solution.
Edit: But then, if it ever got to the point where we did have enough control to kill any/all Mages when we choose, it would probably be doable that the Circles could be reinstated. Or some other, hopefully better system.
This would result in the systematic slaughter of children.
Do not want.
Modifié par Mr.House, 13 juin 2013 - 01:10 .
Il Divo wrote...
But I'm also assuming Xil's scenario means that our options are either Mage freedom (as per any other citizen) or Templar control. Given the choice between those two and given the Connor scenario, I'm inclined to say far more children (and adults too) likely died in Redcliffe than would have happened if Connor had been dealt with early.
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 13 juin 2013 - 01:12 .
Mr.House wrote...
They would not happen anyways it's going to be a simple decision, support Templars and restore chantry or support mages and destroy chantry. Despite my wants for a neutral path or making a better system it will not be complex it will be a simply choose side A or B.
Crap like what Xil posted will never happen, she simply wants to fulfill her agenda.
Lol i remember that.Dave of Canada wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
That you prefer genocide over defeat.
The ends justify the means.
Il Divo wrote...
Quote the Raven wrote...
I hope there are reasons to support and oppose both in Inquisition.
The last thing I'd like to see is a clear division between good guys and bad guys.
Personally, with so much focus already placed on the Mage-Templar conflict in DA2, I'm hoping that what we get in Inquisition is more than just choosing whether the Mages or Templars help us save the world. The conflict is getting a little tiresome.
I really hope it's not simple and it's not a simple pick side A or B, but really at this point? I'm far more intrested in the in-fighting between nations and the veil being torn asudner, way more intresting then the boring mage/templar conflict, hopefully it's finished in DA3.Quote the Raven wrote...
Il Divo wrote...
Quote the Raven wrote...
I hope there are reasons to support and oppose both in Inquisition.
The last thing I'd like to see is a clear division between good guys and bad guys.
Personally, with so much focus already placed on the Mage-Templar conflict in DA2, I'm hoping that what we get in Inquisition is more than just choosing whether the Mages or Templars help us save the world. The conflict is getting a little tiresome.
True.
I'm also hoping there's going to be a little more depth and not just a simple choice. I mean it would basically be a repeat of the final choice in DA2.
It will probably be the central conflict but other groups and factions will no doubt be drawn into it which hopefully means lots of variation and conflict.
Modifié par Mr.House, 13 juin 2013 - 01:14 .
Ah two false choices.Xilizhra wrote...
That you prefer genocide over defeat.Sutamina wrote...
what do you think is your point?
Quote the Raven wrote...
Il Divo wrote...
Quote the Raven wrote...
I hope there are reasons to support and oppose both in Inquisition.
The last thing I'd like to see is a clear division between good guys and bad guys.
Personally, with so much focus already placed on the Mage-Templar conflict in DA2, I'm hoping that what we get in Inquisition is more than just choosing whether the Mages or Templars help us save the world. The conflict is getting a little tiresome.
True.
I'm also hoping there's going to be a little more depth and not just a simple choice. I mean it would basically be a repeat of the final choice in DA2.
It will probably be the central conflict but other groups and factions will no doubt be drawn into it which hopefully means lots of variation and conflict.
Modifié par Il Divo, 13 juin 2013 - 01:17 .
jaza wrote...
Zjarcal wrote...
loltemplars
The space bar is hard to find isn't it?
Actually, no. My scenario doesn't have a single set ending in that manner, there are other possibilities. All that matters for this scenario is that the templar agenda requires killing every last mage.Il Divo wrote...
sandalisthemaker wrote...
Il Divo wrote...
sandalisthemaker wrote...
I would never advocate killing all mages, but doing so wouldn't solve anything anyway.
More will always be born.
Well, I assume the way the scenario was being posed, the point was that it would be a constant reinforcement kinda deal, rather than a one shot solution.
Edit: But then, if it ever got to the point where we did have enough control to kill any/all Mages when we choose, it would probably be doable that the Circles could be reinstated. Or some other, hopefully better system.
This would result in the systematic slaughter of children.
Do not want.
Likely so.
But I'm also assuming Xil's scenario means that our options are either Mage freedom (as per any other citizen) or Templar control. Given the choice between those two and given the Connor scenario, I'm inclined to say far more children (and adults too) likely died in Redcliffe than would have happened if Connor had been dealt with early.
Seboist wrote...
Templars are the can of Raid needed to deal with the Mage vermin.
Ah so a bias scenario.Xilizhra wrote...
Actually, no. My scenario doesn't have a single set ending in that manner, there are other possibilities. All that matters for this scenario is that the templar agenda requires killing every last mage.Il Divo wrote...
sandalisthemaker wrote...
Il Divo wrote...
sandalisthemaker wrote...
I would never advocate killing all mages, but doing so wouldn't solve anything anyway.
More will always be born.
Well, I assume the way the scenario was being posed, the point was that it would be a constant reinforcement kinda deal, rather than a one shot solution.
Edit: But then, if it ever got to the point where we did have enough control to kill any/all Mages when we choose, it would probably be doable that the Circles could be reinstated. Or some other, hopefully better system.
This would result in the systematic slaughter of children.
Do not want.
Likely so.
But I'm also assuming Xil's scenario means that our options are either Mage freedom (as per any other citizen) or Templar control. Given the choice between those two and given the Connor scenario, I'm inclined to say far more children (and adults too) likely died in Redcliffe than would have happened if Connor had been dealt with early.
Mr.House wrote...
I really hope it's not simple and it's not a simple pick side A or B, but really at this point? I'm far more intrested in the in-fighting between nations and the veil being torn asudner, way more intresting then the boring mage/templar conflict, hopefully it's finished in DA3.
And after this conflict was handled in DA2 I really have no high expedations on naything but a simple choose Templars or mages and go kill eachother.
Il Divo wrote...
I'm getting some Fallout: New Vegas vibes. You had the NCR and Caesar's
Legion, with a few factions on the side to deal with as well. But like
House points out, at this point I'm more interested in international
conflicts and seeing how the Grey Wardens fit into all this. What's fun
about the Grey Wardens is that since they're so delibrately apolitical
(in theory), it's interesting to see what happens when they're dragged
into politics.
Modifié par Quote the Raven, 13 juin 2013 - 01:30 .
Mr.House wrote...
Ah so a bias scenario.
It's a hypothetical, I didn't necessarily expect it to happen.Ah so a bias scenario.
Which is funny because I've never advocated doing that to Cullen in DAI.Youth4Ever wrote...
I expect to stab Adrian to death with a dull spoon.
Youth4Ever wrote...
I expect to stab Adrian to death with a dull spoon.
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 13 juin 2013 - 01:42 .
Guest_Morocco Mole_*
Xilizhra wrote...
That you prefer genocide over defeat.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut