I Support Mages
#751
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 12:12
Fanatics being in charge never works.
#752
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 12:13
Modifié par Rebel Wolf, 15 décembre 2013 - 12:15 .
#753
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 12:15
I'm going to play the Inquisitor, and I will support whoever I damn well pelase. And I am fairly certain, so certain that I almost dare guarentee, that I will still be able to complete the game, even if I kill every single last mage I possibly can. Just as I am fairly certain that I can complete the game even though I killed every Templar I possibly could. Funny how that works, with no right chocie, and such huh?Rebel Wolf wrote...
If you think supporting templars will solve anything so are you.
Fanatics being in charge never works.
#754
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 12:16
Not the point.EmperorSahlertz wrote...
I'm going to play the Inquisitor, and I will support whoever I damn well pelase. And I am fairly certain, so certain that I almost dare guarentee, that I will still be able to complete the game, even if I kill every single last mage I possibly can. Just as I am fairly certain that I can complete the game even though I killed every Templar I possibly could. Funny how that works, with no right chocie, and such huh?Rebel Wolf wrote...
If you think supporting templars will solve anything so are you.
Fanatics being in charge never works.
You are supporting an abusive system.
#755
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 12:20
#756
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 12:24
They are picked for zealotry,they steal children from thier mage parents and brainwash them to kill mages.
Modifié par Rebel Wolf, 15 décembre 2013 - 12:26 .
#757
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 12:33
Rebel Wolf wrote...
But it is true,templars were raping and abusing the mages.
They are picked for zealotry,they steal children from thier mage parents and brainwash them to kill mages.
Some, not all. Just as some mages choose to turn to blood magic for personal gain and evil.
#758
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 12:39
Murders an entire tower of people because they "might" be blood mages,there were children in both the kirkwall and ferelden towers.
Took the Amell warden from his home and sent him all the way to ferelden for no reason so he could never see his family again.
Put the Amell warden against a freaking pride demon [the strongest one] while he was still an apprentice.
Enough abuse yet?
Oh,and they are huge hypocrites "magic is meant to serve man"
Good job doing that confined to a tower.
Modifié par Rebel Wolf, 15 décembre 2013 - 12:45 .
#759
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 12:47

This is how it should be.
The First Enchanter runs the Circle, Not the Chantry. The First Enchanter gives orders to the templars.
Modifié par Lord Raijin, 15 décembre 2013 - 12:49 .
#760
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 12:48
#761
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 12:50
No, the Knight Commander still runs the Templars within the tower, but the First Enchanter should be allowed to give orders to Templars if need be.Lord Raijin wrote...
This is how it should be.
The First Enchanter runs the Circle, Not the Chantry. The First Enchanter gives orders to the templars.
Modifié par eluvianix, 15 décembre 2013 - 12:50 .
#762
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 12:53
No religion should have the power to lock someone away,these templars are trained to think mages are evil and they have a divine right to punish them,that is the problem.
Modifié par Rebel Wolf, 15 décembre 2013 - 12:54 .
#763
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:01
eluvianix wrote...
No, the Knight Commander still runs the Templars within the tower, but the First Enchanter should be allowed to give orders to Templars if need be.Lord Raijin wrote...
(snipped the photo)
This is how it should be.
The First Enchanter runs the Circle, Not the Chantry. The First Enchanter gives orders to the templars.
No, I was trying to explain how things should be run. The Circle should be run by mages. The First Enchanter should be the one to call ALL of the shots, not the Knight Commander. While they still command the templars it is the First Enchanter that should be their superior. The only time that the Knight Commander can run the show is if the First Enchanter dies, becomes ill to the point where he/she could not perform their duties, or somehow become an abomination.
Modifié par Lord Raijin, 15 décembre 2013 - 01:02 .
#764
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:06
That's pretty much how it works in Tevinter, and on the whole, Tevinter is not a nice place for non-mages.Lord Raijin wrote...
No, I was trying to explain how things should be run. The Circle should be run by mages. The First Enchanter should be the one to call ALL of the shots, not the Knight Commander. While they still command the templars it is the First Enchanter that should be their superior. The only time that the Knight Commander can run the show is if the First Enchanter dies, becomes ill to the point where he/she could not perform their duties, or somehow become an abomination.
#765
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:08
They could heal or protect so many but instead are abused by zealots.
#766
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:11
Sure, but they need controls beyond their word. There must be templars in some form, and they can't take orders from the Circle.Rebel Wolf wrote...
Mages should be allowed to be useful.magic is a gift.
#767
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:14
How many does the chantry have to murder before they will been seen as evil?
#768
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:16
This is how it should be.
The First Enchanter runs the Circle, Not the Chantry. The First Enchanter gives orders to the templars.
...that's EXACTLY how Tevinter came back to its strength, by giving the Mages control of the Templars (though they went about by first taking the Chantry).
And Irving does not command the Templars by himself. At best, he's so respected there that the Templars will consider his word synonymous with Gregoir's, but if Gregoir says anything they'll still follow him.
#769
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:20
#770
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:21
#771
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:23
I had creation spells,and lots of primal for fighting icky darkspawns.Medhia Nox wrote...
@Rebel Wolf: I'm curious - did you take Spirit Healer and the Creation healing spells for your mage?
#772
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:24
#773
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:25
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
This is how it should be.
The First Enchanter runs the Circle, Not the Chantry. The First Enchanter gives orders to the templars.
...that's EXACTLY how Tevinter came back to its strength, by giving the Mages control of the Templars (though they went about by first taking the Chantry).
And Irving does not command the Templars by himself. At best, he's so respected there that the Templars will consider his word synonymous with Gregoir's, but if Gregoir says anything they'll still follow him.
Well technically neither did those Templars have the means to retaliate either. Outside of some rare exceptions, like Lambert, by and large, Templars in Tevinter cannot counter magic.
#774
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:26
Even my blood mage had healing spells.
I played a dalish shapeshifter/arcane warrior.
And a human/blood mage shapeshifter.
Modifié par Rebel Wolf, 15 décembre 2013 - 01:28 .
#775
Posté 15 décembre 2013 - 01:26
Medhia Nox wrote...
@Rebel Wolf: I'm curious - did you take Spirit Healer and the Creation healing spells for your mage?
My mage was an evil blood mage, according to the laws of the Chantry, and he saved all of Ferelden from a flying tainted old god dragon that was guilding an army or Darkspawn.





Retour en haut




