Aller au contenu

Photo

I Support Mages


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1113 réponses à ce sujet

#201
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

dragonflight288 wrote...


Elves? First peoples already gladly would burn mages for being mages see kirkwall and asunder so i think that you overestimate peoples history proves that.So i don't see a problem.


Cullen also mentions that the templars have been losing popularity increasingly, and it was just as likely they would get the door slammed in their face as be welcomed with open arms. And Thrask in Act 1 mentions that he's constantly surprised at how much support mages get from non-magical people.

In Kirkwall, there wasn't a lot of support for killing mages for the sake of being mages, except from Meredith and the extreme templars. All the nobles at the beginning of Act 3 simply share whatever views the Champion espouses, so I can't really count them when they have no set opinions of their own. And in Asunder, it was Lambert and extreme templars again who pushed killing/tranquilizing mages. Hardly conclusive evidence on the greater population.

As it stands now, however, it's hard to say which faction is least liked. Mages will always be feared by many non-mages, but the Red Templars look like they'll set the tone for how all templars will be perceived, as raiders, bandits and murderers if their attacking a village is anything to go by.

And i said already for grey wardens we need few mages we can give them few new born mages to train and that will be enough.


Two things wrong with this. Grey Wardens only recruit the best. Most people don't survive the joining. Giving them cast off mage children won't work for that reason alone. The Grey Wardens would be forced to somehow come up with the materials, the housing and the educational facilities needed to raise these mages and teach them to master their powers while also fighting the darkspawn, so the mage mentors would be likely too busy to train the kids.

Another reason this won't work is that if you kill all the mages except for the few children given to the Wardens, who would have the training and knowledge to train the new generation? Only Tevinter would, and that's no an option for anyone who wants to teach mages against the dangers of blood magic.

Only problem is veil as you said but it can be fixed by grey warden mages that i mentioned before so my solution is good and ends problem.


Only most mages would still be dead, whether from your purge or from the Joining itself, and Wardens are committed to fighting the darkspawn and staying out of all other concerns, so they likely would only get involved with the veil tears if it got in the way of being a Grey Warden and fighting darkspawn.



1)well:
-)We have elves genocide no one cares as well they are part of that like for example when one elf killed someone.
-)Where do you have that peoples i didn't see them
-)meredith herself stated that peoples will want mages blood
-)nobles at best want put meredith down at worst kill mages.
So no i don't think that would be problem for most peoples just for few.
2.Well you don't have to be grey warden only mage to prepare joining i am wrong?So idea is just control that few mages and teach them how prepare ritual thats all their support in fight isn't required so not much about cost.
3.I doubt that apocalypse would be great for fighting darkspawn and doing that would be good for relations with other nations

#202
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 584 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...
Actually, it is canonically possible to protect mages from becoming possessed reliably - by magic. The Litany of Adralla does this as one of two effects. It's just unwieldy and has a short duration, but since it's proven that it's possible, I wonder why nobody has thought of putting more resources into research.

The Litany of Adralla does nothing to prevent possession. What it does is counter attempts at blood magic which include mind control. Wynne will say so in DAO and Lambert will corroborate this in "Asunder".
Obviously, if blood magic is being used to entice a mage, it can be useful. But there are other ways of mages being possessed.



I contend that it is not the primary goal of the Chantry to protect people from possessed mages, but to retain control over mages in order to use them to expand its influence. The protection claim is just a convenient justification.

Are you capable of presenting examples of when the Chantry used mages to expand its influence?

Otherwise, some more research would've been done into the effects of the Litany of Adralla.

Of course, it doesn't help that you have do study blood magic for that. Oh, the horror!

The Chantry already uses blood magic in the creation of phylacteries and thus, there is no reason to assume they'd be squeamish over the Litany.
It's more likely further research into it has not yelded results.

The statement that it isn't possible to protect against possession is patently false.

it is not. It is possible to prevent demons from using blood magic to help entice mages but demons would still be able to overpower mages and forcibly possess them and there would still be many mages who might make deals with demons.
Just because it's possible to deny one weapon on a demon's arsenal, that doesn't mean there are ways of protecting against actual possession. Ultimately, there is absolutely nothing that can prevent a demon from entering a mage's body beyond the will of said mage.

Modifié par MisterJB, 08 novembre 2013 - 05:13 .


#203
Inprea

Inprea
  • Members
  • 1 048 messages
I support the mages. I do believe that a mage does pose some danger as we have seen some mages be turned into abominations quite quickly when pushed. Some methods of control and training are required but what has been demanded of the mages is just too much. Taking a child from their mother because that mother happens to be a mage, murdering or locking away mages that aren't gifted enough to be given a shot at the harrowing and even those mages that are considered gifted enough may die during, restrictions on what they may study, spend their wealth on or if they can travel and the very limited privacy. These are all things that are part of the system and for me they're enough to justify a rebellion.

I'm not the type of person to expect a human to set, suffer and possibly die while others try to talk out the differences. Especially whenever I imagine a young mother having her child stolen from her, taken to who knows what end because she's a mage.

I guess I differ from mage supporters though in that I'm an isolationist. Rather then expecting mundanes to live with mages among them I favor the idea of forming a community that is initially mages only and those who are comfortable living among mages. It's not like mages number in the millions after all and there is plenty of unsettled land so surely there is a place that's well away from others that the mages could make a home. We even saw in awakening that some mages can influence plants so they should be able to prepare a self sustaining community very quickly. My only fear is that others would become jealous of their prosperity and attack their community out of envy and spite. Hopefully the mages would have the wisdom to prepare an appropriate defense.

I wonder how many mages would have to work together to cast a mystic nuke.

Modifié par Inprea, 08 novembre 2013 - 05:09 .


#204
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

MWImexico wrote...

@TheKomandorShepard :

Not everybody hates mages, even in Kirkwall, a lot of citizen expressed their discomfort about Meredith's politic, you can speak with them in the begining of the act 3. Even Cullen says so (before that, if I remember well) : the opinion public tends to empathise with the hardship of the mages.

Also, there is a lot of cultural differences between the dwarf society, the Dalish one and the humans one. Even between humains : would you say that since slavery is accepted in Tevinter, then the rest of the world should sudenly accept to do the same in their own country? Just like that?
What is considered fair in one country don't change so suddenly, something has to happen before that. I think that, if the chantry stays neutral about that matter, there is a lot of chance that the opinion of population will be divided.

Well, I also suppose that the tear in the veil could actually be something big enough to generate hartred into some people's mind. I guess I will wait and see how all this happen during the game, because maybe it's going to be obvious that the mages (as a group) are not responsible and maybe they also could become a powerfull asset when the inquisitor will try to fix it?

Anyway, who is supposed to eradicate all the mages? The templars? Instead of that, wouldn't they be more usefull elsewhere, like fighting demons and protecting the population?  

Edit : Hu? I didn't know the nobility in Kirkwall has always the same opinion of Hawke. Then I guess that what I said before about that will only be true for the people who stood up against Meredith at that moment. 


Sorry i didn't notice your comment so i answer now.
First you are taking a little naive attitude but i will reach that point so 
1.Not everyone many yes and as you know that if you play as pro-mage hawke and support orsino they will want put down meredith not help mages if you play as pro templar they will want put down mages.Peoples wanted kill mages because anders actions so hardly it is in case.

2.Many cultural differences?Perhaps but culture can be taught not that they born with their culture dwarves are practically only small humans and are driven by that same things can we agree on that?Now for example in your culture burning peoples on the stack is bad but in some cultures that may be not bad thing so thing is about your VP and i don't see peoples in thedas will have problem with that.

3.Yes slavery would be accepted as long you aren't victim not that practically peasants were slaves and they accepted and monarch was a god.Yes in our current times we would need something to happen to accept genocide but not in thedas

4.Chantry can stay neutral but peoples will hate mages because they are different and are abomnation bomb even in more idealistic settings peoples like blame mage even if that isn't in case.

5.And now i reached veil topic and here where naive part starts when you assumed that if mages aren't responsible for veil peoples won't hate them but even if they aren't they will best prove are gossiping peoples in dao and about mages helping just see dao even when they helped with blight peoples still hate them and that was in qunari case as one elf said "did humans will be grateful for our help or maybe will treat that as something obvious and forget about it".

6.You are asking about current mages or future mages i m against chantry and templars so they can kill each other and better if they will kill demons when they will fith with each other.If we talk about future mages simple guard will be sufficient.

#205
Icy Magebane

Icy Magebane
  • Members
  • 7 317 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Icy Magebane wrote...
If this were true, the Tevinter Imperium would never have existed.  At some point, we all need to accept that it is possible for mages to avoid demonic possession.  History has proven this.


False. A flawed logic.

Mages can avoid demonic possesion...but there is no method, no training, no trick to it and no way to tell. It's a combination of many unpredictable factors.


Where is the false logic?  The Tevinter Imperium has been ruled by mages for hundreds of years.  If the magisters were greatly succeptible to demonic possession, there's no way that their nation wouldn't erupt into chaos.  Furthermore, the ability to tell whether a mage is possessed is dependent on the power of the demon.  Pride and desire demons are more likely to be able and willing to maintain this facade, whereas sloth and rage demons are far less so... and if the archons and magister lords are routinely possessed by pride demons but cause no harm to the people, what difference does it make anyway?  Because I thought the problem with demonic possession was that demons like destruction, violence, and going on rampages.  You say that Tevinter's stability isn't an indication that its rulers are capable of retaining their free will and independence from demons.  Let's assume that's true (although I disagree).  If they are possessed, but cause no harm to anyone, then what's the problem?

The majority of our knowledge of demonology is filtered through the Chantry's ban on research, so how can you be so certain of what is and is not possible?  Especially in light of an advanced nation, ruled by mages, which is not inherently chaotic.  Keep in mind that they have been at war with the Qunari for 300 years, and even so they have maintained much of their political, economic, and military might.  This would not be possible if they also had to contend with frequent outbreaks of abominations.

#206
MWImexico

MWImexico
  • Members
  • 370 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...
5.And now i reached veil topic and here where naive part starts when you assumed that if mages aren't responsible for veil peoples won't hate them but even if they aren't they will best prove are gossiping peoples in dao and about mages helping just see dao even when they helped with blight peoples still hate them and that was in qunari case as one elf said "did humans will be grateful for our help or maybe will treat that as something obvious and forget about it".


Hu? When did I said that? I think you are assuming a lot, especially if you think that, if enough people hate the mages then it's ok to kill them all.

But ok, I guess I have nothing more to add about that for now.

#207
Hellion Rex

Hellion Rex
  • Members
  • 30 037 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Also, conventional wisdom says that to lose control to a demon is the result of "giving in to temptation". Nice way of shrouding the truth in religious metaphor. Play DA2. By the account of those who were turned by the demon in the Fade sequence, it's more the result of a mental influence, one that heightens passions and desires until they become all but irresistible. Protect against that mental influence - which should also be possible based on the same mechanism used by the Litany of Adralla - and the number of possessed mages should drop sharply. 

The statement that it isn't possible to protect against possession is patently false. The widespread belief that this is so is also extremely convenient for the Chantry.

Losing to temptation is hardly religious metaphor. It simply means letting our base emotions and instincts guide our actions. 

Also, if it was as easy as studying the Litany of Adralla, then they would have figured out how to protect against that already. 

And possession is different than the way our companions were manipulated during the Fade quest in DA2. Possession is when a demon holds a person's "fade self", their spirit, trapped within the Fade. There is a difference between the two situations, and using the Litany to disrupt mind control is not the same as preventing full on possession.

#208
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

MWImexico wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...
5.And now i reached veil topic and here where naive part starts when you assumed that if mages aren't responsible for veil peoples won't hate them but even if they aren't they will best prove are gossiping peoples in dao and about mages helping just see dao even when they helped with blight peoples still hate them and that was in qunari case as one elf said "did humans will be grateful for our help or maybe will treat that as something obvious and forget about it".


Hu? When did I said that? I think you are assuming a lot, especially if you think that, if enough people hate the mages then it's ok to kill them all.

But ok, I guess I have nothing more to add about that for now.


"Well, I also suppose that the tear in the veil could actually be
something big enough to generate hartred into some people's mind. I
guess I will wait and see how all this happen during the game, because
maybe it's going to be obvious that the mages (as a group) are not
responsible"

maybe im readint too much but this look like you mean that.
You could also define word "ok" because i don't care about non-mages or mages hate i only explain that solution where one side not ends screwd by other is imposible so crushing one side will end that which well take your preferences.In my side it is simple mages are bad business (even with that i will probably as mage) not only they are losers in this conflict but also competition and danger as abomnations and they can provide me a very little so smartest option just kill them all. 

#209
HiroVoid

HiroVoid
  • Members
  • 3 680 messages

Icy Magebane wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Icy Magebane wrote...
If this were true, the Tevinter Imperium would never have existed.  At some point, we all need to accept that it is possible for mages to avoid demonic possession.  History has proven this.


False. A flawed logic.

Mages can avoid demonic possesion...but there is no method, no training, no trick to it and no way to tell. It's a combination of many unpredictable factors.


Where is the false logic?  The Tevinter Imperium has been ruled by mages for hundreds of years.

Or were they demons that took the forms of mages? :ph34r:

#210
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

HiroVoid wrote...

Icy Magebane wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Icy Magebane wrote...
If this were true, the Tevinter Imperium would never have existed.  At some point, we all need to accept that it is possible for mages to avoid demonic possession.  History has proven this.


False. A flawed logic.

Mages can avoid demonic possesion...but there is no method, no training, no trick to it and no way to tell. It's a combination of many unpredictable factors.


Where is the false logic?  The Tevinter Imperium has been ruled by mages for hundreds of years.

Or were they demons that took the forms of mages? :ph34r:


Yes im sure they didn't notice mass destruction and turning everyone into abomnation:whistle:

Modifié par TheKomandorShepard, 08 novembre 2013 - 10:15 .


#211
MWImexico

MWImexico
  • Members
  • 370 messages
I meant : people will not hate the mages for the tear in the veil if it's obvious for them that the mages are not responsible for that. That doesn't mean they won't hate them for other reasons.

TheKomandorShepard wrote...
... i only explain that solution where one side not ends screwd by other is imposible so crushing one side will end that which well take your preferences.In my side it is simple mages are bad business (even with that i will probably as mage) not only they are losers in this conflict but also competition and danger as abomnations and they can provide me a very little so smartest option just kill them all. 

I think you can't be sure of that but that's your opinion, I get it. The way I see it, there could be strategical advantages in not destroying the mages. Also moraly speaking, I dislike that. If there is a way to not end up destroying one faction or another, I will take it. Your vision seems defeatist in my point of vue.

#212
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

MWImexico wrote...

I meant : people will not hate the mages for the tear in the veil if it's obvious for them that the mages are not responsible for that. That doesn't mean they won't hate them for other reasons.

TheKomandorShepard wrote...
... i only explain that solution where one side not ends screwd by other is imposible so crushing one side will end that which well take your preferences.In my side it is simple mages are bad business (even with that i will probably as mage) not only they are losers in this conflict but also competition and danger as abomnations and they can provide me a very little so smartest option just kill them all. 

I think you can't be sure of that but that's your opinion, I get it. The way I see it, there could be strategical advantages in not destroying the mages. Also moraly speaking, I dislike that. If there is a way to not end up destroying one faction or another, I will take it. Your vision seems defeatist in my point of vue.


Peoples thought that mages plotting with darkspawn in dao so even if that isn't their fault peoples will think that.Well if you think that way i can't stop you but im sure that will end that what was before rebelion or even more restrictions on mages or will go toward tevinter side when you will get at best uncertain ending i will get certain good ending at least in that conflict or if conflict will be resolved in dai. 

#213
MWImexico

MWImexico
  • Members
  • 370 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...
Peoples thought that mages plotting with darkspawn in dao so even if that isn't their fault peoples will think that.

I don't remember that but I suppose you are talking about gossips, not that relevant in my opinion.

TheKomandorShepard wrote...
... but im sure that will end that what was before rebelion or even more restrictions on mages or will go toward tevinter side when you will get at best uncertain ending i will get certain good ending at least in that conflict or if conflict will be resolved in dai. 

I suppose that here "good" is a matter of perspective. =]

#214
lil yonce

lil yonce
  • Members
  • 2 319 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Actually, it is canonically possible to protect mages from becoming possessed reliably - by magic. The Litany of Adralla does this as one of two effects. It's just unwieldy and has a short duration, but since it's proven that it's possible, I wonder why nobody has thought of putting more resources into research.

The litany doesn't prevent possession, it disrupts spell casting, mind control spells as the Warden used it. Uldred mind controlled mages into accepting possession, and tortured them into submission if their will was so strong he couldn't do the former. The litany was helpful in defending against possession that situation only because it wasn't a choice like it typically is.

I contend that it is not the primary goal of the Chantry to protect people from possessed mages, but to retain control over mages in order to use them to expand its influence. The protection claim is just a convenient justification. Otherwise, some more research would've been done into the effects of the Litany of Adralla.

Expanding their influence is one absolute benefit, but I think its a bit cynical and also naive to say its the only reason mages are kept in Circles.

Also, conventional wisdom says that to lose control to a demon is the result of "giving in to temptation". Nice way of shrouding the truth in religious metaphor. Play DA2. By the account of those who were turned by the demon in the Fade sequence, it's more the result of a mental influence, one that heightens passions and desires until they become all but irresistible. Protect against that mental influence - which should also be possible based on the same mechanism used by the Litany of Adralla - and the number of possessed mages should drop sharply.

Demons only manipulate what's there. They offer you something too good to be true, exactly what you want, but you want it so bad, you'll do what you have to do to get it. Manipulation is subtle, but it isn't mind control like blood magic complusion.

The statement that it isn't possible to protect against possession is patently false. The widespread belief that this is so is also extremely convenient for the Chantry.

It isn't impossible, but I don't think its entirely preventable. What Lotion said, "Possesion is about willpower, personality, temptation and emotional stability. Those are fluid and changing, they are not fixed values. "

#215
sangy

sangy
  • Members
  • 662 messages
I'd like there to be strong points in DA:I for both sides. This way you play as you wish. I really felt like mages were extremely mistreated in DA2. Yet at the end of the game you almost didn't want to side with them at all. Yet still, you didn't have a strong reason to side either way. Overall a bitter-sweet ending.

I am replaying both DA1 and DA2 as a mage and planning on starting DA:I the same. I'm looking forward to hopefully a great storyline from beginning to end. DA2 gameplay as mage is so much fun.

Yeah, I support the mages.

#216
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages
A confession that I agree with.

Image IPB

#217
HiroVoid

HiroVoid
  • Members
  • 3 680 messages
Except if they're using blood magic well, they've obviously practiced it. Last I checked the magi origin, mages didn't just suddenly get how to use spells, and Jowan obviously learned it at least through books, if not practicing (which is implied).

#218
Crazeegamer

Crazeegamer
  • Members
  • 138 messages
even though I think Mages have a finer line to walk than Templars, I still side mostly with mages, but there's a % out there that seem weak to the temptation that is blood magic..But if you can somehow not transform into a demon or get possessed then some blood magic can't hurt..right? lol

Alas, Mages have my support!!

#219
Gold Dragon

Gold Dragon
  • Members
  • 2 399 messages
Not every mage will use Blood magic.


:wizard:

#220
HiroVoid

HiroVoid
  • Members
  • 3 680 messages
From World of Thedas quoted from 'sandalisthemaker'.

Here we go. World of Thedas page109:

"Mages who experiment with blood magic are more susceptible to demonic spirits, such as pride demons and risk becoming abominations by way of possession."

There is also a excerpt in the form of a letter on that page "Responsible Blood Magic" written by a magister:

"And what of Magister Calanthus, that fool who believed he could make himself the 'Ascended Man' with blood magic? Thirty-three slaves died in that rite, and Calanthus became an abomination so horrific that his apprentices tore out their eyes at the sight of him."

Apparently, merely casting a powerful blood magic spell while shedding lots of blood runs the risk of instantly turning the caster into an abomination.

I believe there was also something about how more death and such strengthens blood magic, so there's that too.

#221
TK514

TK514
  • Members
  • 3 794 messages

HiroVoid wrote...

From World of Thedas quoted from 'sandalisthemaker'.



Here we go. World of Thedas page109:

"Mages who experiment with blood magic are more susceptible to demonic spirits, such as pride demons and risk becoming abominations by way of possession."

There is also a excerpt in the form of a letter on that page "Responsible Blood Magic" written by a magister:

"And what of Magister Calanthus, that fool who believed he could make himself the 'Ascended Man' with blood magic? Thirty-three slaves died in that rite, and Calanthus became an abomination so horrific that his apprentices tore out their eyes at the sight of him."

Apparently, merely casting a powerful blood magic spell while shedding lots of blood runs the risk of instantly turning the caster into an abomination.

I believe there was also something about how more death and such strengthens blood magic, so there's that too.


There is.  Same page, even.

#222
dragonflight288

dragonflight288
  • Members
  • 8 852 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

dragonflight288 wrote...


Elves? First peoples already gladly would burn mages for being mages see kirkwall and asunder so i think that you overestimate peoples history proves that.So i don't see a problem.


Cullen also mentions that the templars have been losing popularity increasingly, and it was just as likely they would get the door slammed in their face as be welcomed with open arms. And Thrask in Act 1 mentions that he's constantly surprised at how much support mages get from non-magical people.

In Kirkwall, there wasn't a lot of support for killing mages for the sake of being mages, except from Meredith and the extreme templars. All the nobles at the beginning of Act 3 simply share whatever views the Champion espouses, so I can't really count them when they have no set opinions of their own. And in Asunder, it was Lambert and extreme templars again who pushed killing/tranquilizing mages. Hardly conclusive evidence on the greater population.

As it stands now, however, it's hard to say which faction is least liked. Mages will always be feared by many non-mages, but the Red Templars look like they'll set the tone for how all templars will be perceived, as raiders, bandits and murderers if their attacking a village is anything to go by.

And i said already for grey wardens we need few mages we can give them few new born mages to train and that will be enough.


Two things wrong with this. Grey Wardens only recruit the best. Most people don't survive the joining. Giving them cast off mage children won't work for that reason alone. The Grey Wardens would be forced to somehow come up with the materials, the housing and the educational facilities needed to raise these mages and teach them to master their powers while also fighting the darkspawn, so the mage mentors would be likely too busy to train the kids.

Another reason this won't work is that if you kill all the mages except for the few children given to the Wardens, who would have the training and knowledge to train the new generation? Only Tevinter would, and that's no an option for anyone who wants to teach mages against the dangers of blood magic.

Only problem is veil as you said but it can be fixed by grey warden mages that i mentioned before so my solution is good and ends problem.


Only most mages would still be dead, whether from your purge or from the Joining itself, and Wardens are committed to fighting the darkspawn and staying out of all other concerns, so they likely would only get involved with the veil tears if it got in the way of being a Grey Warden and fighting darkspawn.



1)well:
-)We have elves genocide no one cares as well they are part of that like for example when one elf killed someone.
-)Where do you have that peoples i didn't see them
-)meredith herself stated that peoples will want mages blood
-)nobles at best want put meredith down at worst kill mages.
So no i don't think that would be problem for most peoples just for few.
2.Well you don't have to be grey warden only mage to prepare joining i am wrong?So idea is just control that few mages and teach them how prepare ritual thats all their support in fight isn't required so not much about cost.
3.I doubt that apocalypse would be great for fighting darkspawn and doing that would be good for relations with other nations



1.)
a. Where is stated anywhere that people don't care if elves are all slaughtered? If the elves are gone, where would the humans get their servants?:P
b. What people are you referring to? The ones at the beginning of Act 3 who support whoever Hawke supports? Is so, that's the nobles standing around after Hawke oversees Orsino's and Meredith's debate, and if you click on them, they talk aloud and agree with whatever position Hawke took.
c. Meredith had been trying to get a Right of Annulment for some time. If Kerras lives past Act 1, he mentions that Meredith was going over Elthina's head and was appealing directly to the Divine. -- But more importantly, Meredith had the guilty person in front of her. It was Anders. Meredith's duty as a templar is not only to protect the world from mages, but also to protect the mages from the world. Meredith created a hypothetical mob in order to justify her Right of Annulment. She doesn't use blood mages, abominations or even a conspiracy on Anders' part. Only the mob, who aren't there at the moment, who have no real idea what happened, and doesn't exist yet, as her justification.
If Meredith did her duty, and shut down the Gallows, asked Aveline to see to it that a riot didn't form while she searched the Gallows, and if a mob did form, organize her templars to protect the mages from attacking and killing those who weren't involved with the bombing, I would've supported her in a hearbeat, and would've helped search the Gallows thouroughly.
d. The nobles are completely fed up with Meredith having all the political power in Kirkwall, and Meredith's policies revolved completely around mages and how dangerous they were to the city that no one could talk about how to run the city without also talking about how the Circle Mages are being treated. I think most nobles simply wanted the reason Meredith was using to stay in power gone so she would lose the authority that kept them from running the city in the first place.

2. ) You're not wrong, but where would the mages get their training in the first place if you've already killed all the Senior Enchanters, Enchanters and all experienced mages? The Wardens dont have a lot of mages on hand, and the ones they do would be way too busy to stay back at the keep to train children or play babysitter. They would be out in the field, fighting darkspawn.

The only way this would be even close to feasible if there were plenty of mages on hand who could train these children so there would always be mages to prepare a joining, but then where would those mages be if they aren't Grey Wardens? Probably in a Keep living their lives with no Circle's and no Templar's, or out in the world, and that leads us exactly back to where we are before your idea of killing nearly every mage alive at birth, or as soon as their magical talents manifest themselves.

And costs will always be an issue. Lyrium will be required, added into the stipends the Wardens already get from their individual countries, and it's been shown time and again that many nobles, after a century or so following a blight, begin to feel that Wardens are a drain on the nation's coffers, many simply choose to believe that darkspawn are no longer an issue, and work to limit how much money the Wardens get. Happened before Sophia Dryden became Commander of the Grey, it happened in Ferelden before the blight, and even then, for the vast majority of it, most people didn't think it was a blight at all. And even up to the end, people were still questioning whether Wardens were needed.

I think you're underestimating how much it'll cost, and how popular Wardens are. They are not very popular at all except after they save everyone from a blight.

3.) Who knows how the devs will take it, but if the templars attack the Wardens (as was strongly implied in the trailer) then that would mean the Chantry and its templars would lose very valuable allies against the demons, whether the Wardens are wiped out or if they decide to go to war against those who keep them from doing their duty, which in turn would only compound the problem.

#223
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

MWImexico wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...
Peoples thought that mages plotting with darkspawn in dao so even if that isn't their fault peoples will think that.

I don't remember that but I suppose you are talking about gossips, not that relevant in my opinion.

TheKomandorShepard wrote...
... but im sure that will end that what was before rebelion or even more restrictions on mages or will go toward tevinter side when you will get at best uncertain ending i will get certain good ending at least in that conflict or if conflict will be resolved in dai. 

I suppose that here "good" is a matter of perspective. =]

1.Not revelant well if you say so but we were talking what folks feel about mages so then it is revelant.:whistle:
2.Well in that conflict for rest of the world it will be best outcome well but my character won't care what is good for thedas only for him.

dragonflight288 wrote...


1.)
a. Where is stated anywhere that people don't care if elves are all slaughtered? If the elves are gone, where would the humans get their servants?[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/tongue.png[/smilie]
b.
What people are you referring to? The ones at the beginning of Act 3
who support whoever Hawke supports? Is so, that's the nobles standing
around after Hawke oversees Orsino's and Meredith's debate, and if you
click on them, they talk aloud and agree with whatever position Hawke
took.
c. Meredith had been trying to get a Right of Annulment for
some time. If Kerras lives past Act 1, he mentions that Meredith was
going over Elthina's head and was appealing directly to the Divine. --
But more importantly, Meredith had the guilty person in front of her. It
was Anders. Meredith's duty as a templar is not only to protect the
world from mages, but also to protect the mages from the world. Meredith
created a hypothetical mob in order to justify her Right of Annulment.
She doesn't use blood mages, abominations or even a conspiracy on
Anders' part. Only the mob, who aren't there at the moment, who have no
real idea what happened, and doesn't exist yet, as her justification.
If
Meredith did her duty, and shut down the Gallows, asked Aveline to see
to it that a riot didn't form while she searched the Gallows, and if a
mob did form, organize her templars to protect the mages from attacking
and killing those who weren't involved with the bombing, I would've
supported her in a hearbeat, and would've helped search the Gallows
thouroughly.
d. The nobles are completely fed up with Meredith
having all the political power in Kirkwall, and Meredith's policies
revolved completely around mages and how dangerous they were to the city
that no one could talk about how to run the city without also talking
about how the Circle Mages are being treated. I think most nobles simply
wanted the reason Meredith was using to stay in power gone so she would
lose the authority that kept them from running the city in the first
place.

2. ) You're not wrong, but where would the mages get
their training in the first place if you've already killed all the
Senior Enchanters, Enchanters and all experienced mages? The Wardens
dont have a lot of mages on hand, and the ones they do would be way too
busy to stay back at the keep to train children or play babysitter. They
would be out in the field, fighting darkspawn.

The only way
this would be even close to feasible if there were plenty of mages on
hand who could train these children so there would always be mages to
prepare a joining, but then where would those mages be if they aren't
Grey Wardens? Probably in a Keep living their lives with no Circle's and
no Templar's, or out in the world, and that leads us exactly back to
where we are before your idea of killing nearly every mage alive at
birth, or as soon as their magical talents manifest themselves.

And
costs will always be an issue. Lyrium will be required, added into the
stipends the Wardens already get from their individual countries, and
it's been shown time and again that many nobles, after a century or so
following a blight, begin to feel that Wardens are a drain on the
nation's coffers, many simply choose to believe that darkspawn are no
longer an issue, and work to limit how much money the Wardens get.
Happened before Sophia Dryden became Commander of the Grey, it happened
in Ferelden before the blight, and even then, for the vast majority of
it, most people didn't think it was a blight at all. And even up to the
end, people were still questioning whether Wardens were needed.

I
think you're underestimating how much it'll cost, and how popular
Wardens are. They are not very popular at all except after they save
everyone from a blight.

3.) Who knows how the devs will take it,
but if the templars attack the Wardens (as was strongly implied in the
trailer) then that would mean the Chantry and its templars would lose
very valuable allies against the demons, whether the Wardens are wiped
out or if they decide to go to war against those who keep them from
doing their duty, which in turn would only compound the problem.



1)
-)Well then when they gladly slaughter them i doubt that society would have problem with total extermination and servants that same way like in our world human servants.
-)They won't want help mages or care about them if you are pro mage they want get rid off meredith not support mages if you support meredith they want get put down mages.
-)It doesn't matter first peoples would wand kill mages because it is human nature and it would be good
opportunity for folks to put their hate on mages what meredith did doesn't matter in this topic. 
-) I didn't see their tears about how meredith treats mages only that she control kirkwall when in tavern topic is that meredith is insane one guy states that she is a hero so nope i didn't see that.
2.Mercenaries mages , independent tevinter mages we don't need much to train and also i don't see few mages which can be easily controled problem and no one said they will be free they will be in warden control prepare joining and well we have books and experience.  And why we need lyrium lyrium is needed for mage if he fighting and can't cast spells or want go to the fade and mages will be prepare joining nothing more.
3.Im not with chantry and templars so that won't be problem only problem may be corypheus but if warden are destroyed i can create new wardens as long we have ritual.  

#224
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...


Where have you been for the last few months?

#225
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 584 messages

HiroVoid wrote...

Except if they're using blood magic well, they've obviously practiced it. Last I checked the magi origin, mages didn't just suddenly get how to use spells, and Jowan obviously learned it at least through books, if not practicing (which is implied).


Besides, it's not simply a matter of "if mages are attacked, they'll use blood magic". Life is hard, painful, stressful. Life will, by itself, back you against a wall. And then will a mage resist the temptation of using blood magic or demon summoning?
Connor is a good example. He underwent something every will suffer eventually, the loss of a loved one; but whereas a non-mage might cry and move one, Connor summoned a demon, placed his father is stasis and killed dozens of people in the process.