Anders As A Returning Character For Players Who Kept Him Alive In DA2
#151
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 09:10
#152
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 09:18
#153
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 09:22
#154
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 09:24
That I can understand. I've never seen it as him being naive or dumb, just maybe Anders was THAT full of himself.
#155
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 09:28
#156
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 09:40
#157
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 10:06
So if those two meet Varrics probably more likely to shoot Anders than talk to him.
Modifié par RepHope, 14 juin 2013 - 10:08 .
#158
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 10:15
Doesn't matter, every Mage, Templar, or innocent who dies because of this war, dies because of Anders. You can say his goals are noble, but Anders was the one who pushed things over the edge. Everything that happens as a result is on his head, Anders even says so himself (For all the good it does Hawke)Xilizhra wrote...
-Much harder to sneak inside.The tragic thing is that others paid for his mistake, most of them, like I said in my previous posts, passive priests. How is that justice or vengence? It's beyond me why he didn't just blow up the Templar quarters in the gallows, opting instead to massacre the innocent.
-Blowing up the mages is too risky.
-It'd look like Circle aggression against the templars, which it isn't supposed to be, but one rogue provoking templar aggression against the Circle.
-All we saw die in the Chantry were templars and their commander-in-chief anyway.
#159
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 10:43
Anders didn't truly starrt the war. Meredith and Orsino started it really when she invoked the Right of Annulment.RepHope wrote...
Doesn't matter, every Mage, Templar, or innocent who dies because of this war, dies because of Anders. You can say his goals are noble, but Anders was the one who pushed things over the edge. Everything that happens as a result is on his head, Anders even says so himself (For all the good it does Hawke)Xilizhra wrote...
-Much harder to sneak inside.The tragic thing is that others paid for his mistake, most of them, like I said in my previous posts, passive priests. How is that justice or vengence? It's beyond me why he didn't just blow up the Templar quarters in the gallows, opting instead to massacre the innocent.
-Blowing up the mages is too risky.
-It'd look like Circle aggression against the templars, which it isn't supposed to be, but one rogue provoking templar aggression against the Circle.
-All we saw die in the Chantry were templars and their commander-in-chief anyway.
Anders just took out the Chantry , because even though the Grand Cleric could post pone this, the war was always...always going to be there between Templars and Mages. Anders just took out the way of peace.
Not like I'm saying murdering Elthina , Templars, and the Chantry Priests/Priestess that were in there is good. I thoroughly dissaprove.
But Anders isn't all at fault here.
#160
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 10:44
Freaking gingers, man.
#161
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 11:41
#162
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 11:45
Dovaaa wrote...
Anders didn't truly starrt the war. Meredith and Orsino started it really when she invoked the Right of Annulment.RepHope wrote...
Doesn't matter, every Mage, Templar, or innocent who dies because of this war, dies because of Anders. You can say his goals are noble, but Anders was the one who pushed things over the edge. Everything that happens as a result is on his head, Anders even says so himself (For all the good it does Hawke)Xilizhra wrote...
-Much harder to sneak inside.The tragic thing is that others paid for his mistake, most of them, like I said in my previous posts, passive priests. How is that justice or vengence? It's beyond me why he didn't just blow up the Templar quarters in the gallows, opting instead to massacre the innocent.
-Blowing up the mages is too risky.
-It'd look like Circle aggression against the templars, which it isn't supposed to be, but one rogue provoking templar aggression against the Circle.
-All we saw die in the Chantry were templars and their commander-in-chief anyway.
Anders just took out the Chantry , because even though the Grand Cleric could post pone this, the war was always...always going to be there between Templars and Mages. Anders just took out the way of peace.
Not like I'm saying murdering Elthina , Templars, and the Chantry Priests/Priestess that were in there is good. I thoroughly dissaprove.
But Anders isn't all at fault here.
Of course he is. He blew up the Chantry so that the war could happen. He killed all those people specifically so she would invoke the Right and I'd probably be more inclined to say that more blame could be put at his feet because Meredith was already driven mad by the idol.
Modifié par Jedi Master of Orion, 14 juin 2013 - 11:46 .
#163
Posté 14 juin 2013 - 11:54
From my interpretation, Varric's character was not a huge fan of genocide, so I'm pretty sure Anders' heinous acts of terrorism in the name of vengeance may have somewhat damaged their friendship.
Who knows though? Varric could have been totally open to the horrific murder of a bunch of innocent chantry goers...
#164
Posté 15 juin 2013 - 12:25
It was Anders attack on the Chantry and Hawkes actions that caused war. If Hawke helped the Mages it shows the Circles that the Templars can be defeated, and I forget what happens if your pro-Templar. But Whose to say if things would've gotten that far without Anders. Remember why he did it? "To remove the chance for compromise". Anders forced a confrontation , and so any harm that happens as a result is Anders's fault.
Modifié par RepHope, 15 juin 2013 - 03:27 .
#165
Posté 15 juin 2013 - 12:26
She invoked the right because of Orisino and her accusing him of hiding the blood mages in the tower.Jedi Master of Orion wrote...
Dovaaa wrote...
Anders didn't truly starrt the war. Meredith and Orsino started it really when she invoked the Right of Annulment.RepHope wrote...
Doesn't matter, every Mage, Templar, or innocent who dies because of this war, dies because of Anders. You can say his goals are noble, but Anders was the one who pushed things over the edge. Everything that happens as a result is on his head, Anders even says so himself (For all the good it does Hawke)Xilizhra wrote...
-Much harder to sneak inside.The tragic thing is that others paid for his mistake, most of them, like I said in my previous posts, passive priests. How is that justice or vengence? It's beyond me why he didn't just blow up the Templar quarters in the gallows, opting instead to massacre the innocent.
-Blowing up the mages is too risky.
-It'd look like Circle aggression against the templars, which it isn't supposed to be, but one rogue provoking templar aggression against the Circle.
-All we saw die in the Chantry were templars and their commander-in-chief anyway.
Anders just took out the Chantry , because even though the Grand Cleric could post pone this, the war was always...always going to be there between Templars and Mages. Anders just took out the way of peace.
Not like I'm saying murdering Elthina , Templars, and the Chantry Priests/Priestess that were in there is good. I thoroughly dissaprove.
But Anders isn't all at fault here.
Of course he is. He blew up the Chantry so that the war could happen. He killed all those people specifically so she would invoke the Right and I'd probably be more inclined to say that more blame could be put at his feet because Meredith was already driven mad by the idol.
And then Orisino and Meredith yelled at eachother, blahblahblah, and then Orsino went to get the grand cleric. That was when Anders stepped in, blew up the chantry and that. And then Meredith fully demanded the Right.
#166
Posté 15 juin 2013 - 01:14
#167
Posté 15 juin 2013 - 05:01
Jedi Master of Orion wrote...
When Meredith invokes the Right she justifies it as being a direct response to Anders actions. SHe does so both when she first announces it and when she demands Hawke join her and when Orsino asks her to stop.
Meredith does not give rat's @ss when you keep Anders alive. one mage means nothing to her when she can mass murder all the rest.
#168
Posté 15 juin 2013 - 08:23
#169
Posté 15 juin 2013 - 11:56
Of course, all of that is assuming he's actually sane and in command of himself, which I personally think as a bit of a longshot. I recall a line, I think in Act 3, where he said he was having trouble telling the difference between himself and Justice/Vengeance. I can't imagine that's gotten any better unless he's found a way to send Justice/Vengeance back to the Fade. If that's even possible. In my head canon he has, rather sadly, become just a different kind of Abomination. Remember, demons are Fade spirits just as Justice is.
#170
Posté 15 juin 2013 - 12:25
You're only looking at the short term. If we side with the mages in this war, we can ensure that their existences in the future will be far better than ever before.I mostly murderknifed him after my first playthrough but I wouldn't be opposed to pulling that particular save game out and importing it into DAI if we get a chance to make Anders face the full consequences of what he did. Because I can't imagine that he's made the mages' lives much better. In fact, with a full scale war and the knowledge spread throughout the land that a mage is the cause of all this trouble (taken down to the most basic level because that's the message that's more likely to be spread than anything complex), I'd imagine mages are living precarious, fear-filled and very short existences.
#171
Posté 15 juin 2013 - 03:42
#172
Posté 15 juin 2013 - 03:49
Jedi Master of Orion wrote...
Well if you side with the templars and manage to get to fight at your side he plans to kill himself afterward
Wonder if he did kill himself.
#173
Posté 15 juin 2013 - 06:39
At the expense of everyone else's existences.Xilizhra wrote...
You're only looking at the short term. If we side with the mages in this war, we can ensure that their existences in the future will be far better than ever before.
#174
Posté 15 juin 2013 - 07:57
#175
Posté 15 juin 2013 - 08:03
He was evil. He was a threat. He had to be neutralized!
But I don't think it was enough.
In Inquisition, I want to go into the fade to kill Justice, so that he cannot bond with anyone alive or dead. That way Theadas can be rid of that evil abomination.
I know that Dragon Age is a morally grey universe with many dubious actions. But there is no way that destroying a building with innocent people is "morally grey". It's down right evil.
As Isabella put it "what about justice for the innocent people who get killed in the process"? Yes what about those innocent people?
Modifié par Abraham_uk, 15 juin 2013 - 08:06 .





Retour en haut






