[quote]AresKeith wrote...
[quote]EmperorSahlertz wrote...
The Templar Order left the Chantry. If a Templar chose to remain loyal to the Chantry, he would no longer be a Templar.[/quote]
They would still be Templar's if they chose to stay with the Chantry
[/quote]
"Templar" is technically a title belonging to the Templar Order. Since this Order left the Chantry, anyone of the order who remained with the Chantry would no longer be part of the Order, and therefore not a Templar anymore. They'd still share the same skillset sure, but not the same title.
[quote]The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
Eh, when you hear about beatings, rapings, illegal Tranquilizations, and poor Templar oversight... I think one mage going "It's not soo bad" doesn't amount to much.
Now, it'd be a different story if all of the douche Templars we killed had an effect on the Circle. Rooting out the weeds, as it were.
But nothing really changes, alas.
[/quote]
Well, technically several mages can say this line, since any unnamed mage walking around the Gallows can say it. It is after all a randomly generated line. I wouldn't put too much into the frequency of these lines. What they are supposed to convey, is that even in Kirkwall loyalist exists, who would downplay the horror, and Libertarians who would exaggerate it.
[quote]The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
[quote]MisterJB wrote...
I do think an argument between me an Eluvianix would produce better results than one between me and Raijin. At least, it would be interesting and we would only resort to the barest minimum of name calling.
[/quote]
I'd definitely enjoy seeing that.
There are a few people I'd enjoy having a discussion of that sort with, myself. EmperorSahlertz, for instance, or Dave of Canada.
And you, my friend!
[/quote]
Likewise good sir. I do however from time to time try to be as obnoxious as possible. But that is only because I believe that provocation is one of the best tests of character in existance.
But hoenstly what is this? I am gone for a few hours and suddenly everyone grows soft? Bring back the hate dammit!
[quote]Lotion Soronnar wrote...
[quote]EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Their physiology is tough enough for them to survive a crossbow bolt.[/quote]
Except they would be hit by 10.
Because Kirkwall is a massive city with a metric crapton of armed men.[/quote]
Assuming the Qunari would be stupid enough to allow to be caught in a position where Kirkwall could be allowed to bring their numbers to bear. I see no such reason. If the Qunari were ever to take such an engagement, they would do so with a Viddathari meatshield.
[quote]Lotion Soronnar wrote...
[quote]
Besides, the Viddathari are there to be hit.[/quote]
The scrawny, manlunrished, underequipped elves with practicly 0 combat experience?[/quote]
Yes exactly those. They are cheap, expendable and makes wonderful mess of things. They are not true soldiers like the other Qunari, but they get the job done. Mainly the job of being a meatshield for the actual Qunari....
[quote]Lotion Soronnar wrote...
[quote]
And an elite force can conquer what many times their own number of normal soldiers couldn't. [/quote]
Because clearly Kirkwall doesn't have elite forces of it's own? Like...veteran guardsman..templars...mages... the many mercenary gangs?[/quote]
The City Guard is certainly NOT an elite force. Actually the perfomance we are witness to throughout the game is subpar. They show they are a terrible millitary unit. Perhaps they are adequate law enforcers, I wouldn't know my expertise is in military, but they are certainly terrible soldiers.
The Templars and mage make up the only reliable professional force, but they are countered by the Qunari forces.
Mercenaries are, as always, not to be trusted. They are as likely to run away/abandon the battle, as they are to join the enemy. They fight for coin. And coin can't be enjoyed if you aren't alive to spend it. The mercenaries who lived in Kirkwall probably left during the fighting, perished, or didn't make any real impact on the fighitng.
[quote]Lotion Soronnar wrote...
[quote]
The Templars and mages could probably have put up a fight on their own, but they were not likely to succeed. Without Hawke that is. Hawke changed everything.
[/quote]
Hawke is a tool and didn't hcange anything. The Tempalrs alone could have beat hte living snot out of the qunari.
The Arishok was suicidal.
[/quote]
Wether you like Hawke or not makes no difference. Hawke was the deciding factor in the Battle of Kirkwall. Had Hawke not been present the Qunari would have taken Kirkwall. The Qunari would probably not have been able to hold it (I doubt the rest of the Free Marches would allow it), but they could certainly take it.