Veruin wrote...
eluvianix wrote...
Cullen is my everything. Don't you dare say anything to tarnish his glorious magnificence.
Pfft, take him. You can take all of them. I don't care for any of them.
Pffft. I will take them all. Keep your mangy mutt.
Veruin wrote...
eluvianix wrote...
Cullen is my everything. Don't you dare say anything to tarnish his glorious magnificence.
Pfft, take him. You can take all of them. I don't care for any of them.
Hazegurl wrote...
It sucks that DA2 had to go to the extreme in its portrayal of everything. I wish the Tranquil Solution was a little more reasonable. Such as, The rite to tranquil unruly mages or mages showing signs of unruliness after their Harrowing. It would have been a chance to offer up a decent debate about whether such an act is necessary while also taking into account for how wild Kirkwall has become with all the blood mages running about and plotting. Instead the writers had to make Alrik a rapist creeper who thinks all mages should be made tranquil so he can rape easily. *sigh*
Hazegurl wrote...
It sucks that DA2 had to go to the extreme in its portrayal of everything. I wish the Tranquil Solution was a little more reasonable. Such as, The rite to tranquil unruly mages or mages showing signs of unruliness after their Harrowing. It would have been a chance to offer up a decent debate about whether such an act is necessary while also taking into account for how wild Kirkwall has become with all the blood mages running about and plotting. Instead the writers had to make Alrik a rapist creeper who thinks all mages should be made tranquil so he can rape easily. *sigh*
Modifié par FreshIstay, 22 décembre 2013 - 05:57 .
Darth Brotarian wrote...
I don't subscribe to magic being a genetic trait. It would leave too many questions such as how such a genetic trait has been so widespread throughout thedas? How the quanri who had no contact and possible cannot concieve with humans have mages within their society?
How tevinters genetic material has not deteriorated/inbreed over these years to have strange effects on the magic genes?
Veruin wrote...
Do we even know of a couple that are both mages and had a child? Excluding wardenXMorrigan?
LDS Darth Revan wrote...
Congratulations Warden Z, you are the first person I've ever seen, even among Pro-Templars, who approved of Alrik's Tranquil Solution. I honestly thought I'd never see the day when the most abhorrent plan shown in the Dragon Age games to date would see support. And I'm not even a Pro-Mage person.
Modifié par Lotion Soronnar, 22 décembre 2013 - 11:32 .
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
There
might be an extremely cynical, pragmatic practical appliclation of the
Tranquil Solution, but it is still inhumane, unjust and just plain
wrong. It is the wrong way of handling the entire situation, despite the
results it might garner.
Modifié par TheKomandorShepard, 22 décembre 2013 - 12:16 .
Basically anything else is a better way of handling the situation.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
There
might be an extremely cynical, pragmatic practical appliclation of the
Tranquil Solution, but it is still inhumane, unjust and just plain
wrong. It is the wrong way of handling the entire situation, despite the
results it might garner.
Because? I guess you will give us better soulution if that is wrong way of handling that situation.
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Basically anything else is a better way of handling the situation.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
There
might be an extremely cynical, pragmatic practical appliclation of the
Tranquil Solution, but it is still inhumane, unjust and just plain
wrong. It is the wrong way of handling the entire situation, despite the
results it might garner.
Because? I guess you will give us better soulution if that is wrong way of handling that situation.
Modifié par MisterJB, 22 décembre 2013 - 12:49 .
As I said BASICALLY anything would be better. I am not surprised you failed to comprehend that word. Especially since one of your fevered scenarios specifically is about doing nothing which explicitly means NOT handling the situation at all, which therefore doesn't even fit the what I was saying.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Basically anything else is a better way of handling the situation.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
There
might be an extremely cynical, pragmatic practical appliclation of the
Tranquil Solution, but it is still inhumane, unjust and just plain
wrong. It is the wrong way of handling the entire situation, despite the
results it might garner.
Because? I guess you will give us better soulution if that is wrong way of handling that situation.
Rly? release mages world will burn , lock them in one place and just wait them to start turning into abomnation and waste resources to watch them instead hunting them and see how many we will have meredith sisters and broken circles... and well all this with beautiful rebellion that spread destruction... so survival is the best option.
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
As I said BASICALLY anything would be better. I am not surprised you failed to comprehend that word. Especially since one of your fevered scenarios specifically is about doing nothing which explicitly means NOT handling the situation at all, which therefore doesn't even fit the what I was saying.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Basically anything else is a better way of handling the situation.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
There
might be an extremely cynical, pragmatic practical appliclation of the
Tranquil Solution, but it is still inhumane, unjust and just plain
wrong. It is the wrong way of handling the entire situation, despite the
results it might garner.
Because? I guess you will give us better soulution if that is wrong way of handling that situation.
Rly? release mages world will burn , lock them in one place and just wait them to start turning into abomnation and waste resources to watch them instead hunting them and see how many we will have meredith sisters and broken circles... and well all this with beautiful rebellion that spread destruction... so survival is the best option.
The Circles have worked just fine for 900 years in their containment of magical threats. When was the last huge magical calamity, barring the Kirkwall bombing, that you seem to claim must have been widespread incidents? That's right, there weren't any. Thanks to the Circle.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
As I said BASICALLY anything would be better. I am not surprised you failed to comprehend that word. Especially since one of your fevered scenarios specifically is about doing nothing which explicitly means NOT handling the situation at all, which therefore doesn't even fit the what I was saying.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Basically anything else is a better way of handling the situation.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
There
might be an extremely cynical, pragmatic practical appliclation of the
Tranquil Solution, but it is still inhumane, unjust and just plain
wrong. It is the wrong way of handling the entire situation, despite the
results it might garner.
Because? I guess you will give us better soulution if that is wrong way of handling that situation.
Rly? release mages world will burn , lock them in one place and just wait them to start turning into abomnation and waste resources to watch them instead hunting them and see how many we will have meredith sisters and broken circles... and well all this with beautiful rebellion that spread destruction... so survival is the best option.
Only way to "handle" that situation is to eliminate the enemy any others are ineffective so unless bio will put another deus ex machina there is no way and that what makes that much better than other options what i pointed were options that are possible circles don't work because they are too lax and if we make circles more restricitive to the point that mages are no danger i doubt that would be for them fate better than death and it will take only money. So nope elimination of danger is always best solution...
Modifié par EmperorSahlertz, 22 décembre 2013 - 01:09 .
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
The Circles have worked just fine for 900 years in their containment of magical threats. When was the last huge magical calamity, barring the Kirkwall bombing, that you seem to claim must have been widespread incidents? That's right, there weren't any. Thanks to the Circle.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
As I said BASICALLY anything would be better. I am not surprised you failed to comprehend that word. Especially since one of your fevered scenarios specifically is about doing nothing which explicitly means NOT handling the situation at all, which therefore doesn't even fit the what I was saying.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Basically anything else is a better way of handling the situation.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
There
might be an extremely cynical, pragmatic practical appliclation of the
Tranquil Solution, but it is still inhumane, unjust and just plain
wrong. It is the wrong way of handling the entire situation, despite the
results it might garner.
Because? I guess you will give us better soulution if that is wrong way of handling that situation.
Rly? release mages world will burn , lock them in one place and just wait them to start turning into abomnation and waste resources to watch them instead hunting them and see how many we will have meredith sisters and broken circles... and well all this with beautiful rebellion that spread destruction... so survival is the best option.
Only way to "handle" that situation is to eliminate the enemy any others are ineffective so unless bio will put another deus ex machina there is no way and that what makes that much better than other options what i pointed were options that are possible circles don't work because they are too lax and if we make circles more restricitive to the point that mages are no danger i doubt that would be for them fate better than death and it will take only money. So nope elimination of danger is always best solution...
And mages are not "the enemy" in any way shape or form. The mages are victims just as much as any mundane. The mages cannot help be who they are, however their conditions presents a threat, that must be contained. But mages are still people and deserve just as much respect as any other man, woman or child. However the unique conditions means that they must live under unique conditions.
Modifié par TheKomandorShepard, 22 décembre 2013 - 01:21 .
And how do you think the situation would ahve looked if the Circle had not been there at all? All you manage to do right now, is just further displaying your own inability to comprehend the use and application of the Cirlces, and what they ahve done throughout the centuries for Thedosian civilization.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
Worked? hah maybe they worked but awfully how many we had RoA in 900 years?How many apostates ,blood mages and abomnation we seen during just 10 years ,pretty much army of them.How many peoples killed by mages we have well even more... Pretty much you could try imprison hulk in normal prison smiliar effect.
Mages are NOT trying to kill you. Mages are NOT the enemy. Again, the very fact that amges ahve existed for several thousands of years, and the world is yet to end, simply proves that you are vastly exaggerating the threat mages pose.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
Everything that tries to kill you enemy especially if that can destroy world in any moment victims or not every of them is unstable nuclear bomb and contain that doesn't have sense because it can't be controlled as pretty much that should be proved at this time if you played 2 games.It doesn't matter if they are peoples or not but if other human is massive danger ,you remove him for good thinking otherwise is simply naive and caused that what we see now in thedas...
Mages havn't even been in any major conflicts as a faction of their own. Nor ahve they lost any such conflict that you claim to have existed. Unless you are talking about the Annulments, in which case the mages have been fighting a force specialized in dealing with mages and magic, and have probably not had time to prepare themsevles.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
Edit
As far mages don't have massive use they lost every their fight so it is just bull they don't privde much use unless nuclear bomb that destroys everything including you is useful simple technology is more secure than mages and is much more useful than them deal with that. And yep elimination of danger is best solution thedas proves it
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
And how do you think the situation would ahve looked if the Circle had not been there at all? All you manage to do right now, is just further displaying your own inability to comprehend the use and application of the Cirlces, and what they ahve done throughout the centuries for Thedosian civilization.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
Worked? hah maybe they worked but awfully how many we had RoA in 900 years?How many apostates ,blood mages and abomnation we seen during just 10 years ,pretty much army of them.How many peoples killed by mages we have well even more... Pretty much you could try imprison hulk in normal prison smiliar effect.Mages are NOT trying to kill you. Mages are NOT the enemy. Again, the very fact that amges ahve existed for several thousands of years, and the world is yet to end, simply proves that you are vastly exaggerating the threat mages pose.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
Everything that tries to kill you enemy especially if that can destroy world in any moment victims or not every of them is unstable nuclear bomb and contain that doesn't have sense because it can't be controlled as pretty much that should be proved at this time if you played 2 games.It doesn't matter if they are peoples or not but if other human is massive danger ,you remove him for good thinking otherwise is simply naive and caused that what we see now in thedas...
That does not mean that mages do not pose a threat. It simply means that YOU fail to understand the lore as it is presented to us.Mages havn't even been in any major conflicts as a faction of their own. Nor ahve they lost any such conflict that you claim to have existed. Unless you are talking about the Annulments, in which case the mages have been fighting a force specialized in dealing with mages and magic, and have probably not had time to prepare themsevles.TheKomandorShepard wrote...
Edit
As far mages don't have massive use they lost every their fight so it is just bull they don't privde much use unless nuclear bomb that destroys everything including you is useful simple technology is more secure than mages and is much more useful than them deal with that. And yep elimination of danger is best solution thedas proves it
As a matter of fact, if we look at Tevinter, mages prove extremely useful in most conflicts, since Tevinter has been beaten and battered for almost two thousand years, but they have never lost any conflict so far. The oldest nation of Thedas is run by mages, so why EXACTLY has that nation not yet succumbed to the apocalyptic threat that you claim mages pose?
FreshIstay wrote...
Well the writer's (and alot of people at bioware) themselves are people who can relate to extreme issues. The lead writer is gay and the majority of his team consists of Women. Gaider himself said they write things loosely based on their opinions of real world social issue's so It doesn't suprise me they go to extremes to convey their points within the context of the World they created.
eluvianix wrote...
Veruin wrote...
eluvianix wrote...
Cullen is my everything. Don't you dare say anything to tarnish his glorious magnificence.
Pfft, take him. You can take all of them. I don't care for any of them.
Pffft. I will take them all. Keep your mangy mutt.
MisterJB wrote...
Tranquilizing all mages is taking things
a step too far. That doesn't change the fact, however, that mages must
be contained or human society will return to the days of the old
Imperium with non-mages being either slaves or second class citizens.
It
is understandable for mages to wish to be free; it is human nature to
wish for more; but not justifiable. And, ultimately, the non-mages have
no other options: if mages win their freedom, they will lose theirs, not
just the freedom to but the freedom from.
Medhia Nox wrote...
@Lord Raijin: What I find interesting - is that you ask for temperance, but applaud radicalism.