BackdoorPaco wrote...
Comparing the joining to lyrium is relevant. Both offer perks that counter what the user, be it templar or grey warden, is designed to fight. Of course, the Ser Wesley example is a prime example of that. He is a templar, and as such, doesn't have the tools to fight darkspawn. The same goes for a grey warden fighting a mage, though that may be more dependent on said wardens background.
The chantry could use mages to hunt down other mages, but that would be like sending a criminal to capture another criminal. There would be bias that would go against the original intent of capturing the rogue/runaway mage. And that would be bad. ![=]](https://lvlt.forum.bioware.com/public/style_emoticons/default/sideways.png)
I don't find the relevance behind it. The Grey Wardens undergo the Joining ritual to become immune to the posion whereas the templars intentinally get addicted to lyrium to develop an artificial power to use for the sole purpose to harass mages who want nothing more than to live their life in peace without the Chantries supervision.
Mages are treated as prisoners because they were born with magic, and thus are forced to take drastic actions to fight for their freedom. The Darkspawn were created by the Broodmothers to cause total destruction against humans/elves and Dwarves.
The Grey wardens have no choice whereas the Templars could choose not to fallow under the Chantries laws and just let the poor mages live their own life without getting heavily involved in it.
How can mages use their own Makers gift to serve men when the Chantry is too afraid to let it happen?