Aller au contenu

Photo

The *I support the Templars* Thread V2


4643 réponses à ce sujet

#76
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

Morocco Mole wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

I would support the Templars if they acted more like Ser Thrask, Ser Otto, Samson and Emeric and less of Ser Alrik, Cullen, Ser Karass and not but least Meredith.


Except Cullen is the most reasonable and intelligent Templar in DA2? I know this says a lot about how terribly written DA2 is, but its true.


If Cullen was the most resonable and intellectual Templar in DA2 then i'm nominting Carroll to be the most intelligent Templar in DAO. At least Carroll was funny whereas Cullen..... I want to print out Bioware logo and start punching it for not giving me the option to kill him for irritating me with his dumbness.

#77
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 582 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...
Ser Thrask,

 Was ok with blood magic and couldn't tell his co-conspirators were Abominations.
Worst Templar ever.


Ser Otto,

 Brave and selfless man but didn't give his opinions regarding mages.

Samson

 Was helping apostates escape which goes against the role of the Templars.
Altough he seems to have seen the light by Act III "Give mages freedom, and they'll go bad."


Emeric

 Didn't give his opinion on mages.

The Templars you seem to support either went against everything the Templars stand for or never even gave their opinion regarding mages; at which point, unless they were 100% against the isolation of magic-afflicted people, I'm sure you would no longer support them.

Your support seems to require the Templar Order disbanding and becoming something else entirely. We're not interested in it.

Modifié par MisterJB, 21 octobre 2013 - 05:15 .


#78
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages

Star fury wrote...

Morocco Mole wrote...

Except Cullen is the most reasonable and intelligent Templar in DA2? I know this says a lot about how terribly written DA2 is, but its true.


Cullen was also the worst templar extremist in DA:O. Speaks volumes about DA2.

Not really considering you only talk to a few of them, and not one of them are really dealing with mages except for two, the other being Gregoir. 

#79
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

MisterJB wrote...
 Was ok with blood magic and couldn't tell his co-conspiratores were Abominations.
Worst Templar ever.


Thrask was NOT ok with blood magic. He said it himself that he was against the use of it.


 

Was helping apostates escape which goes against the role of the Templars.
Altough he seems to have seen the light by Act III "Give mages freedom, and they'll go bad."


So what if he was helping apostates escape? Other Templars were doing the same thing. Look at what the Templar Order did to him. He was thrown out of the Order because Meredith caught him exchanging letters between a mage and his sweetheart.

Sorry I just can't seem see the wrongfulness that this man did.  His later comment was an ignorant statement that shouldn't be taken seriously. In ACT III the mages wern't free. They were fighting for their freedom. If that is being bad then I guess everyone who fights for freedom is bad.

Didn't give his opinion on mages.

He didn't give his opinion on mages, but his determination to capture the serial killer who was killing women was good enough for me... especially slight in the fact that Knight-Commander Meredith had specifically told him to end his investigation. Had she not done this perhabs she would've gotten her evidence that she needed to use against Orsino.

The Templars you seem to support either went against everything the Templars stand for or never even gave their opinion regarding mages; at which point, unless they were 100% against the isolation of magic-afflicted people, I'm sure you would no longer support them.

Your support seems to require the Templar Order disbanding and becoming something else entirely. We're not interested in it.


I support templars who views mages as people, not as weapons or tools like in the mindset of Cullen. I want them to actually show legitimate concern for the people, and not be driven by past bad experience. Ser Otto was blinded by a blood mage... but do you see him hating mages? Do you see him acting dumb like Cullen or taking the same approch like Meredith? No hes a level headed guy who refuse to let the incident that happen to him drive him crazy.

The Templar Order does need to change. As of right now their is no Order because many of them abandon their own duty to serve the Chantry to cause chaos against innocent mages.

Modifié par Lord Raijin, 21 octobre 2013 - 05:02 .


#80
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 582 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...
Thrask was NOT ok with blood magic. He said it himself that he was against the use of it. 

According to Samson, Thrask allowed his co-conspirators to summon the dead which is only possible through blood magic.
Beyond that, he failed in his duty to protect the people because he allowed Abominations to roam free and in his duty to protect mages because they were being possessed under his care and he was even killed by the very people he wished to help.
In resume, Thrask was a failure and the worst Templar ever.

So what if he was helping apostates escape?

If you help apostates, then you are acting against the duty of the Templars. Ergo, you're not a Templar.
Support them all you want but you're not supporting Templars.
 


Other Templars were doing the same thing

And they are equally guilty.



Look at what the Templar Order did to him. He was thrown out of the Order because Meredith caught him exchanging letters between a mage and his sweetheart.

Meredith overeacted a little bit but the bane of a man who can't get his fix ranks less in my eyes compared to that of the people the mages he helped can hurt; which actually includes the mages themselves.
Remember Olivia who ended up possessed in a slave galley? She would have been safer in the Circle.

His later comment was an ignorant statement that shouldn't be taken seriously.

Of course, the only ones who should be taken seriously are those who support your point of view.
Samson realized the true danger mages pose in Act III. Better late than never.



In ACT III the mages wern't free. They were fighting for their freedom. If that is being bad then I guess everyone who fights for freedom is bad.

Redutio at absurdum. If a group of criminals fight for their freedom, is the situation equivalent to a group of women caught in a sex trafficking ring attempting to leave it simply because they both fight for their freedom?
And if one group is making passionate speeches while the other is wiring bombs to children's waists; will the situation be equivalent because they both claim to fight for "freedom"?

Thrask helped mages leave the Circle and, the next thing you know, the dead and Abominations are walking around.

He didn't give his opinion on mages, but his determination to capture the serial killer who was killing women was good enough for me... especially slight in the fact that Knight-Commander Meredith had specifically told him to end his investigation. Had she not done this perhabs she would've gotten her evidence that she needed to use against Orsino.

Emeric was a good man but, without knowing his vew of mages, one can't determine his worth as a Templar.

I support templars who views mages as people, not as weapons or tools like in the mindset of Cullen. I want them to actually show legitimate concern for the people, and not be driven by past bad experience. Ser Otto was blinded by a blood mage... but do you see him hating mages? Do you see him acting dumb like Cullen or taking the same approch like Meredith? No hes a level headed guy who refuse to let the incident that happen to him drive him crazy.

The Templar Order does need to change. As of right now their is no Order because many of them abandon their own duty to serve the Chantry to cause chaos against innocent mages.


Of all the Templars you seem to support, some were against the Circle and others showed initiative only against demons or the worst of mages.
It is a fact that one of the duties of the Templar Order is to deal with mages by isolating them from those they might harm or that might harm them. If the Templar Order you support is one that keeps mages on the streets then, you are not supporting the Templar Order. You are supporting some other organization; it may even be called the Templars but, if it serves a different function, then it is not the Templar Order.
Hence why those of us who do support the actual Templar Order as we have seen it are not interested in what you view as "support".

And, as far as we know, Ser Otto might have hated all mages. We never saw him interact with one.

Modifié par MisterJB, 21 octobre 2013 - 05:35 .


#81
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 990 messages

MisterJB wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

So what if he was helping apostates escape?


If you help apostates, then you are acting against the duty of the Templars. Ergo, you're not a Templar.
Support them all you want but you're not supporting Templars.

 
Does this mean that if Cullen is a companion, and he works for a mage Inquisitor (including for tasks that aid the mage rebellion), then you wouldn't consider him to be a templar?

Modifié par LobselVith8, 21 octobre 2013 - 05:40 .


#82
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Hazegurl wrote...
It would be awesome if they figured out a way to do what they do without lyrium. No more addictions, perhaps it could pave the way to handling mages who practice blood magic.


Too perfect.
There is ALWAYS a price to pay for power.

For mages it is demons.
For templars its ilyrium adiction.

#83
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 582 messages
If a police started aiding criminals, should I consider him to still be a policeman simply because he stills wears the badge?
Cullen would be a lyrium-afflicted person in that situation but no, not a Templar.

#84
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

I continue to wonder about responses to my idea about reforms.


1. Mages are segragated for everyones protection, so that might be tricky.
2. No. Secularity is irrelevant and unnecessary. Not to mention impractical.
3. Yes. Altough I'm not sure what secrets you're talking about.

#85
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests
I really have no idea why people keep saying Thrask was a model templar. The man was an idiot

#86
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

MisterJB wrote...
According to Samson, Thrask allowed his co-conspirators to summon the dead which is only possible through blood magic.
Beyond that, he failed in his duty to protect the people because he allowed Abominations to roam free and in his duty to protect mages because they were being possessed under his care and he was even killed by the very people he wished to help.

In resume, Thrask was a failure and the worst Templar ever.


Wrong. You can summon the dead without using blood magic. You can animate the dead by using spirit spells. The mage that killed him was not possessed but flat out crazy. Where do you get the notion that Thraks was allowing Abominations to roam free? please provide me a scene, or a quest, to which you claim so.


Meredith overeacted a little bit but the bane of a man who can't get his fix ranks less in my eyes compared to that of the people the mages he helped can hurt; which actually includes the mages themselves.
Remember Olivia who ended up possessed in a slave galley? She would have been safer in the Circle.


Or better yet why don't we put people like the two men who was about to assault Olivia in the Circle where they can't harm another person again. Mages aren't the problem. It's non-mages like the two men that taunts innocent mages who just want to live their live. Why do

Of course, the only ones who should be taken seriously are those who support your point of view.
Samson realized the true danger mages pose in Act III. Better late than never.


What about the King Alistairs talk about how the biggest threat against the city was Meredith, and guess what? He was right. The true danger wasn't the mages, it was Meredith and her tyrant act against mages. Mages were turning to blood magic to protect themselves against their jailers, and I find nothing wrong with it either.

I suppose when you look at photos such as this
Image IPB
in your mind you think that the besiged mage was the bad guy, and the templars are some kind of hero.

Redutio at absurdum. If a group of criminals fight for their freedom, is the situation equivalent to a group of women caught in a sex trafficking ring attempting to leave it simply because they both fight for their freedom?
And if one group is making passionate speeches while the other is wiring bombs to children's waists; will the situation be equivalent because they both claim to fight for "freedom"?

Thrask helped mages leave the Circle and, the next thing you know, the dead and Abominations are walking around.


What does that have to do with Mages who's being forced by the Chantry to live in total isolation from the rest of the Thedas? If you want to see real criminals take a look at your bros Ser Alrik and Ser Karras. Both are sexual predators who abuses their authority to put harm against innocent mages. Threatening them with the Rite of Tranqulity if they disclose their crimes to other people, and using the Rite in such illegal way, and then sexually abusing them for their own pleasure.


Emeric was a good man but, without knowing his vew of mages, one can't determine his worth as a Templar.


Makers breath we actually agree to something! Yes he was a good man... He gave the finger to Meredith and kept on his investigation, which unfortunatly killed him. Had Meredith allowed him to contuine, and let him have some backup he would still be alive.

Of all the Templars you seem to support, some were against the Circle and others showed initiative only against demons or the worst of mages.
It is a fact that one of the duties of the Templar Order is to deal with mages by isolating them from those they might harm or that might harm them. If the Templar Order you support is one that keeps mages on the streets then, you are not supporting the Templar Order. You are supporting some other organization; it may even be called the Templars but, if it serves a different function, then it is not the Templar Order.
Hence why those of us who do support the actual Templar Order as we have seen it are not interested in what you view as "support".

And, as far as we know, Ser Otto might have hated all mages. We never saw him interact with one.


The Circle is a prison and Mages who are in the Circle haven't been convicted of any crime in the court of law. The only crime that they commited was being born with magic. Templars who actually cherish humanity would feel sorry for these mages, and have the ambition to help them to live better lives. These templars I support and respect.

The templar order and the Chantry needs a good wakeup call and realize that their method for controling the mages has failed, and look at where we are at now. Everyone is rioting up a storm. Templars are snorting up red Lyirum and turning into giant red monsters, and who knows what rebel seekers are up to.

Image IPB

Templars (Red templars I suppose) harassing a camp sight of apostates.

Modifié par Lord Raijin, 21 octobre 2013 - 09:50 .


#87
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

Morocco Mole wrote...

I really have no idea why people keep saying Thrask was a model templar. The man was an idiot


“This isn't how it should be. Mages and Templars should work together; against demons.” -Thrask

Yeah hes an idiot alright. Hes such a fool for wanting both Mages and Templars to work together. How could I not see this?

#88
Jedi Master of Orion

Jedi Master of Orion
  • Members
  • 6 910 messages
I thought Thrask was one of the best examples of a templar until he openly sought the aid of blood magic in his little insurrection. Ideally mages and templars should work together, but in his eagerness to depose Meredith he seemed to forget his original duty.

So I think he was kind of both an ideal templar and an idiot.

Modifié par Jedi Master of Orion, 21 octobre 2013 - 09:58 .


#89
Sir DeLoria

Sir DeLoria
  • Members
  • 5 246 messages
Greagoir is a true model Templar. He sees both sides equally, respects the mages and only invokes the right, when it is absolutely necessary.

He's a little over-cautious and short tempered, but his ideals are rather noble.

#90
Sir DeLoria

Sir DeLoria
  • Members
  • 5 246 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

Morocco Mole wrote...

I really have no idea why people keep saying Thrask was a model templar. The man was an idiot


“This isn't how it should be. Mages and Templars should work together; against demons.” -Thrask

Yeah hes an idiot alright. Hes such a fool for wanting both Mages and Templars to work together. How could I not see this?


He was a fool for co-operating with blood mages. 

#91
The Hierophant

The Hierophant
  • Members
  • 6 898 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

Morocco Mole wrote...

I really have no idea why people keep saying Thrask was a model templar. The man was an idiot


“This isn't how it should be. Mages and Templars should work together; against demons.” -Thrask

Yeah hes an idiot alright. Hes such a fool for wanting both Mages and Templars to work together. How could I not see this?

Thrask kidnapped Hawke's sibling or companion while allowing the mages he worked with to summon demons.

lolz @ should work together against demons.

#92
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 582 messages
[quote]Lord Raijin wrote...
Wrong. You can summon the dead without using blood magic. You can animate the dead by using spirit spells. The mage that killed him was not possessed but flat out crazy. Where do you get the notion that Thraks was allowing Abominations to roam free? please provide me a scene, or a quest, to which you claim so.[/quote]
Just play the quest again. Hawke asks Samson if the mages used blood magic to ressurect the dead and he confirms it and also that Thrask knew but looked the other way; Alain will use blood magic in front of you; Grace will turn into a damn Abomination.


[quote]Or better yet why don't we put people like the two men who was about to assault Olivia in the Circle where they can't harm another person again. Mages aren't the problem. It's non-mages like the two men that taunts innocent mages who just want to live their live.[/quote]
1-It's unfeasible to place the entire non-magical population in Circles; not that Tevinter hasn't tried.
2-Non-mages aren't as dangerous on an individual basis which means they don't merit the same restrictions.
3-Non-mages can be disarmed.
4-Non-mages are not as susceptible to demonic possession.
5-The Circle also exists to allow non-mages to remain dominants in their own societies.

[quote]
What about the King Alistairs talk about how the biggest threat against the city was Meredith,[/quote]
 Alistair's sole brain cells hangs on for dear life inside his skull.

[quote]He was right. The true danger wasn't the mages, it was Meredith and her tyrant act against mages.[/quote]
 Really. You mean it was Meredith who blew up the Chantry and set the city on fire? I sure didn't notice it.

[quote]Mages were turning to blood magic to protect themselves against their jailers, and I find nothing wrong with it either.[/quote]
The one single mage that turned to blood magic to escape any "jailer" was Alain. Every other had ulterior motives.

[quote]
in your mind you think that the besiged mage was the bad guy, and the templars are some kind of hero.
[/quote]
And why shouldn't I? We know nothing about the situation.
You're the one making wild assumptions based on your biases.

[quote]
What does that have to do with Mages who's being forced by the Chantry to live in total isolation from the rest of the Thedas?[/quote]
You said that if someone who figths for his freedom is bad, then everyone else who does the same must also be bad.
I tried to show it to you how you're making a ridiculous generalization by giving examples of different groups that fight for freedom but who do it for different reasons and use different methods.
Just because the mages fight for "freedom", that doesn't automatically make them "good". There are a myriad of factors at play here.

[quote]If you want to see real criminals take a look at your bros Ser Alrik and Ser Karras. Both are sexual predators who abuses their authority to put harm against innocent mages. Threatening them with the Rite of Tranqulity if they disclose their crimes to other people, and using the Rite in such illegal way, and then sexually abusing them for their own pleasure.[/quote]
Non-magical society: A Templar rapes a mage and has to conceal his crime for fear of punishment.
Magical society: Danarius continously rapes Fenris for years while conducting painful experiments on him and it is absolutely legal and socially acceptable because Fenris is a lowly slave and Danarius a powerful magister.

You got no moral high ground.

[quote]
Makers breath we actually agree to something! Yes he was a good man... He gave the finger to Meredith and kept on his investigation, which unfortunatly killed him. Had Meredith allowed him to contuine, and let him have some backup he would still be alive.[/quote]
Had Quentin been in the Circle; not only would Emeric be alive but also every woman he murdered.

[quote]
The Circle is a prison and Mages who are in the Circle haven't been convicted of any crime in the court of law. The only crime that they commited was being born with magic. Templars who actually cherish humanity would feel sorry for these mages, and have the ambition to help them to live better lives. These templars I support and respect. [/quote]
You're either missing the point or avoiding it.
I couldn't possibly care less what you think about the Circle. You are against it, fine. I could defend it in many ways but I suspect I would be wasting my breath.
But it's in the job description of Templars to uphold the laws of the Circle. The Templars you respect are those who go against these laws. This thread was made for supporters of the current Templar Order and what you are supporting are no the Templars but templars that go against the Order. Hence, why we are not looking for your "support".

You know what? I am actually going to adress the whole "crime of being born with magic".

I'm sure you're aware there are many restrictions that come with living in society. Don't go here, don't park there, walk a certain way, don't own this object, don't consume this, etc, etc, etc.
Why are these restrictions there? Because they are necessary so that society may exist; so that humans may co-exist.
Now, do these restrictions apply only if someone has given evidence of being dangerous? For instance, is my inability to own a tank dependant upon me having already used a tank to harm someone? No, the restrictions applies unniversaly and since birth.
Why? Because people are dangerous. So, we restrict our freedoms so as to provide security.
And in Thedas, mages are more dangerous than normal people. Logically, shouldn't their restrictions also be harsher in order to reflect this increased danger they represent to others?

[quote]
turning into giant red monsters,[/quote]
 If there is someone who has experience in turning into giant monsters, it's the mage side.
I think I'll just start using your arguments. "A mage made me do it, it's not my fault."

[quote]
Templars (Red templars I suppose) harassing a camp sight of apostates and blood mages.
[/quote]
Posting pictures you consider sad is not an argument. It's appeal to emotion; emotional blackmail.
It has no effect on me whatsoever.

#93
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 990 messages

Necanor wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

“This isn't how it should be. Mages and Templars should work together; against demons.” -Thrask

Yeah hes an idiot alright. Hes such a fool for wanting both Mages and Templars to work together. How could I not see this? 


He was a fool for co-operating with blood mages. 


Some Grey Wardens are blood mages. Using blood magic doesn't automatically make someone evil, and it's logical some mages would use this school of magic when templars can nullify ordinary magic.

#94
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 582 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...
Some Grey Wardens are blood mages. Using blood magic doesn't automatically make someone evil, and it's logical some mages would use this school of magic when templars can nullify ordinary magic.

No, blood magic doesn't automatically make someone evil (it takes some time for that).
But if you're leading a rebellion founded on the basis that mages can be trusted and deserve more humane treatment, having them do blood magic the minute there aren't Templars watching over their shoulders is not going to win hearts and minds.
Thrask was an naive idiot and paid for it.

Modifié par MisterJB, 21 octobre 2013 - 10:43 .


#95
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests

Lord Raijin wrote...

Yeah hes an idiot alright. Hes such a fool for wanting both Mages and Templars to work together. How could I not see this?


He's an idiot for kidnapping Hawke's sibling, romance, friend whatever in an attempt to blackmail you and working with bloodmages. He may have had good intentions. But he went about doing them in the most idiotic way possible and got killed for it.

#96
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 990 messages

Morocco Mole wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

Yeah hes an idiot alright. Hes such a fool for wanting both Mages and Templars to work together. How could I not see this? 


He's an idiot for kidnapping Hawke's sibling, romance, friend whatever in an attempt to blackmail you and working with bloodmages. He may have had good intentions. But he went about doing them in the most idiotic way possible and got killed for it. 


It never made sense for Thrask to think that Hawke was working with Meredith if he publicly opposed Meredith; then again, it never made sense for Cullen to ignore Hawke's warning about Anders' plot against the Chantry, especially with Anders standing right next to Hawke, but the plot failed to make sense sometimes.

#97
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests

It never made sense for Thrask to think that Hawke was working with Meredith if he publicly opposed Meredith; then again, it never made sense for Cullen to ignore Hawke's warning about Anders' plot against the Chantry, especially with Anders standing right next to Hawke, but the plot failed to make sense sometimes.


Probably because DA2 is very badly written and character motivations don't even make any sense about 80% of the time.

#98
Jedi Master of Orion

Jedi Master of Orion
  • Members
  • 6 910 messages
Well if you sided with Orisino at the start of act 3, Thrask's goons think you're spying for him rather than Meredith, and he's not a friend to Meredith but he's not willing to start an open rebellion until Meredith and Anders force his hand.

#99
Reaverwind

Reaverwind
  • Members
  • 1 724 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

Morocco Mole wrote...

I really have no idea why people keep saying Thrask was a model templar. The man was an idiot


“This isn't how it should be. Mages and Templars should work together; against demons.” -Thrask


You mean, templars and mages should work together to kidnap siblings for leverage? Yea, sounds like a model templar, NOT. 

#100
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 895 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

Morocco Mole wrote...

I really have no idea why people keep saying Thrask was a model templar. The man was an idiot


“This isn't how it should be. Mages and Templars should work together; against demons.” -Thrask

Yeah hes an idiot alright. Hes such a fool for wanting both Mages and Templars to work together. How could I not see this?


You know why people call him an idiot and it is not for that quote. But then again, you probably think that what happened to Thrask was an accident. Image IPB