Aller au contenu

Photo

Control or Refuse for ParagonShep?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
465 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Bill Casey

Bill Casey
  • Members
  • 7 609 messages
I choose Refuse and we still win, regardless of what Bioware says...

#27
Galbrant

Galbrant
  • Members
  • 1 566 messages
I don't think destroy is paragon.... brutally pragmatic but not paragon.

#28
Bill Casey

Bill Casey
  • Members
  • 7 609 messages

MegaSovereign wrote...

That's a really small minority of Geth, I don't think Kenny was talking about them.


You didn't read his post then...

#29
teh DRUMPf!!

teh DRUMPf!!
  • Members
  • 9 142 messages

KENNY4753 wrote...

Also Control is worse for Geth than destroy. Geth either become slaves in control or the die free in destroy (and can possibly be rebuilt)

oh and before you say anything about controlling Geth let me finish.

1. post Rannoch there are still Reaper controlled Geth. Tevos says this over vid-comm

2. In Control Shepard simply replaces the Starchild. Meaning Shep controls what the Catalyst controls. Including the reaper-controlled Geth


And?

There are many organics it controls as well.

Reapers can release control of their thralls, though (the end of ME2 shows this).


I dont thing of slavery as very paragon.


Then why did Paragon Shepard let a self-admitted batarian slaver (Charn) walk free in Bring Down the Sky DLC?

:lol:

Let's not forget the paragon option of Legion's loyalty mission, either.

Im pretty sure a lot of slaves in the 1800s would rather be dead.


Unless one is incredibly weak-willed, a sucky life does not so "surely" entail wanting to die.

Modifié par HYR 2.0, 15 juin 2013 - 01:54 .


#30
KENNY4753

KENNY4753
  • Members
  • 3 223 messages
I was mainly refer to them Megasovereign althought I believe control should have controlled all Geth since the crucible apparently doesnt discriminate

#31
MegaSovereign

MegaSovereign
  • Members
  • 10 794 messages

Bill Casey wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

That's a really small minority of Geth, I don't think Kenny was talking about them.


You didn't read his post then...


You're right, I skimmed it and I thought he said Geth with Reaper-code.

I guess you could apply some headcanon and say that the Reaper-controlled Geth returned to Geth consensus.

#32
KENNY4753

KENNY4753
  • Members
  • 3 223 messages
@HYR

they can release control of their thralls true but do they in Control?

also Shep should control those indoctrinated too

and I dont agree with the BDtS thing either. letting a slaver live is not paragon just as brainwashing the heretics is wrongly considered paragon

#33
MegaSovereign

MegaSovereign
  • Members
  • 10 794 messages

KENNY4753 wrote...

I was mainly refer to them Megasovereign althought I believe control should have controlled all Geth since the crucible apparently doesnt discriminate


Well there are plenty of reasons why I believe that not all synthetics are controlled. The Catalyst was pretty thorough in his explanation of the pros and cons of each ending and I think that's a pretty big detail to leave out. Also, in the Control ending EDI appears to be behaving normally.

#34
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests
Paragon Shep has a vested interest in getting into everyone's problems and meddling. Control fits well. They are "Paragons" after all. Shining examples of behavior and whatnot. Having a massively powerful form like the Reapers is a tempting prospect for some people like that.

Renegade Shep just doesn't give a **** enough to control people. Probably rejected half of their quest offers. Probably ruined alliances, things of that sort. Renegade Shep doesn't even care to instruct EDI, and tells her they are the last person to ask for advice.

Modifié par StreetMagic, 15 juin 2013 - 02:03 .


#35
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23 806 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

KaiserShep wrote...

I guess it really depends on how one sees it. For me, there is absolutely nothing I find valuable in the other options, regardless of what the epilogue tells us. My suspension of disbelief stops dead right there. 


Meaning that the epilogue is telling lies, or that it isn't talking about the important stuff?


No, I don't believe that the epilogue is trying to deceive anyone. My problem is that whatever believability I had left was spent at the options given. There's no good reason I'd consider control or synthesis to be good options in any way, judging from every event that led to this encounter, due in large part to the fact that the package comes with surviving reapers, which I would find to be 100% unacceptable. 

#36
KENNY4753

KENNY4753
  • Members
  • 3 223 messages
You may have misunderstood. I meant that when the endings were being made BW shouls have made control control all synthetics to even out destroying killinfg them all. I know BW decided to make control look better and I think they messed up there

#37
Auintus

Auintus
  • Members
  • 1 823 messages
Between your two options, I'd say Control. Choosing certain failure isn't paragon or renegade. It's just stupid.

#38
jtav

jtav
  • Members
  • 13 965 messages
@MegaSovereign

But Refuse does have the speech, which seems very principled/stupid. It's the whole, I won'r compromise aspect. I kind of want to drop an anvil on Shep's head here, so I'm not concerned with results.

#39
teh DRUMPf!!

teh DRUMPf!!
  • Members
  • 9 142 messages

KENNY4753 wrote...

and I dont agree with the BDtS thing either. letting a slaver live is not paragon just as brainwashing the heretics is wrongly considered paragon



You say that as if the paragon path was so admirable and straight-shooting to begin with. Kinda cute. ^_^

#40
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 283 messages

jtav wrote...

@MegaSovereign

But Refuse does have the speech, which seems very principled/stupid. It's the whole, I won'r compromise aspect. I kind of want to drop an anvil on Shep's head here, so I'm not concerned with results.

Refuse reeks of Lawful stupid.

#41
KENNY4753

KENNY4753
  • Members
  • 3 223 messages
Well it was sort of straight shooting. pick the upper dialogue choice. thats pretty straightfoward.

I guess my definition of paragon is different than BWs in somecases. Oh well...

#42
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 144 messages

KENNY4753 wrote...

neither. destroy is the paragon way



#43
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests

Steelcan wrote...

jtav wrote...

@MegaSovereign

But Refuse does have the speech, which seems very principled/stupid. It's the whole, I won'r compromise aspect. I kind of want to drop an anvil on Shep's head here, so I'm not concerned with results.

Refuse reeks of Lawful stupid.


Not really. It's a small way of saying the game sucks.

Not that anyone is listening though. It's just for self-satisfaction.

#44
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 283 messages

KENNY4753 wrote...

Well it was sort of straight shooting. pick the upper dialogue choice. thats pretty straightfoward.

I guess my definition of paragon is different than BWs in somecases. Oh well...

This mindset is why paragon/renegade needs to go, like now NOW!

#45
KENNY4753

KENNY4753
  • Members
  • 3 223 messages
@Steelcan dont get me wrong i am not one of those ppl who choose the upper option just bc it will give paragon points. I choose what I think it best. I do not have a full paragon/full renegade game. My post was sarcasm.

#46
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 283 messages

KENNY4753 wrote...

@Steelcan dont get me wrong i am not one of those ppl who choose the upper option just bc it will give paragon points. I choose what I think it best. I do not have a full paragon/full renegade game. My post was sarcasm.

Then i apologize, but this mindset is fairly prevalent.

#47
Guest_Dobbysaurus_*

Guest_Dobbysaurus_*
  • Guests
Destroy is the only way to go.

#48
KENNY4753

KENNY4753
  • Members
  • 3 223 messages
no apologies needed and I agree that the way the system is is flawed big time. I dont mind the idea but they should do something to improve it

#49
SeptimusMagistos

SeptimusMagistos
  • Members
  • 1 154 messages

Bill Casey wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

I don't think the Geth are controlled. You see the same Geth/Reaper slide if you choose Synthesis and destroyed the Quarians on Rannoch.


But there are Reaper controlled Geth when you pick Control...


They can be freed just by having the Reapers in question move out of range.

#50
frostajulie

frostajulie
  • Members
  • 2 083 messages

StreetMagic wrote...

Paragon Shep thinks he/she knows better than everyone, so Control is fitting.

this is how I justify an option not refuse for paragon shep she's a very arrogant I know best kind of person.