garrusfan1 wrote...
uh we don't even know what happens or what causes it. also when a lot of death happens in one place it rips the veil no mages needed. also the whole point of the anti mage and pro mage argument is whether they should all be punished for the few that turn bad. like should the circle in kirkwall be slaughtered because of anders who wasen't even part of the circle destroying the chantry. basically should a few bad people make the rest be prisoners
Let's dispense with the Kirkwall characters, because that was bad writing, even if it portrayed Mages as insane. DA2 made me want to hammer my head into the desk.
As to the Circle point. The Circle remains a comfortable life, away from the trials of the world. Or are Mages also being given the freedom to starve, like any normal pesant?
2 points are pertinent. Poor oversight, with Meredith having a clear vendetta, but also Orsino allowing a proliferation of Maleficar within the Circle itself. For all Ander's involvement he was a catalyst in a situation which illuminated the excesses and the secretive nature of the Mages, and the issue of having a Kinght Commander in a position where her passed history calls her objectiveity into question.
From, that the Circle is not an issue, nor is the Templar's function. Unless you wish to start barring mges from aspects of society, and the simple practical impossibility of policing Mages roaming freely round Thedas with all the inherrent threats both magical and mundane (being used as a living weapon)
Veil tears are opened by A) Magic and

lots of bloodshed. I think it's safe to say Mages will be involved in both these scenarios.