I mean that if we play his character straight - someone who wasn't completely power-hungry from the start and didn't conspire with Arl Howe from quite early on to knock off Cailan, making him more or less an irredeemable villain - then Loghain essentially blunders from idiot move to idiot move.
The only display of tactics we see is pretty unimpressive, the political manuevering we see is kind of comically self-destructive, and the theories floating about that he was being played like a fiddle by Howe make him look generally inept.
On the other hand, if we assume him and Howe were in it from the start we can sidestep the incompetence problem, but then we run into the iredeemably evil problem (like Howe himself).
I disagree. It doesn't make them irredeemably evil. Morally questionable, sure. Unscrupulous to the extreme, without a doubt. But even if they both planned it from the start, their biggest flaw was underestimating the Blight and overestimating the Orlesians. Which may land on the side of incompetence again, but if we consider that the Blight wasn't real and Cailian was inviting ache skiers into the country for no warranted reason at all, suddenly they are actually saving the country, despite resorting to slavery, torture, assassination and kidnapping. All very bad things... but not that bad if there was no Blight and the alternative was Orlesians butchering and raping women's me children across the countryside.
Loghain simply believed in the threat he had seen firsthand (the brutality of the Orlesian armies) over the threat he hadn't (the Darkspawn and Blight). Which isn't a terrible position to take - real military experience over myths and legends - but it was the wrong one, for the (very) worse.
Modifié par Fast Jimmy, 10 septembre 2013 - 01:41 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







