[quote]Greylycantrope wrote...
[quote]HYR 2.0 wrote...
Now what info did I blatantly ignore? You brought up, what, two quotes? I showed how they don't disprove me.
That the Catalyst can focus the energy says nothing of his power over said energy's effects.
That was a conclusion you leapt to. Bottom line: there is not one line in-game that states clearly the Catalyst has a hand in the three options you are given at the end of the game. There
are quotes that say the options are from the Crucible.[/quote]
That we know he's aware of the current design thanks to TIM, the current design according to you includes his ideal solution, he's aware this thing has the capablity of employing his ideal solution before docking and the Reapers are still shooting at it?[/quote]
TIM was working on his own thing, not the Crucible. He didn't inform them of its designs, that I recall, just what the plan was insofar as using it. Well, he did think it would give him the power to Control, but it could be that he came seeking to implement his own "control" tech into it, or something (whatever was giving him the power to control Shep/Anderson).
[quote]He says the Crucible proves his solution won't work anymore but he's still trying to fight to maintian it? That makes no logically sense. It's not as clear cut as you're suggesting.[/quote]
I dunno. I just headcanon that it has some sort of jamming tech or Reaper IFF-like thing keeping the Reapers from identifying it while it's plugged into the Citadel/Catalyst. I'm not claiming to know this one, though.
Again, 'never said this was perfect.
[quote]Except that he can turn it off, synthesis exists as an option, and a few other things I'll get to further on.[/quote]
To the first: we already knew the Crucible -- whatever it was to do -- was useless without the Catalyst.
[quote]
[quote]You can keep insisting this all you want, but that doesn't make it true. There is canon content that says it's from the Crucible. Of my 8 quotes I provided, 6 say flat-out that the options come completely or at least in part from the Crucible. I found 0 quotes that say they come even in part from the Catalyst's doing. 6 > 0. Nothing egotistical about that fact. Until other people gather more evidence for their claims than I have, they cannot rationally claim theirs is as good as mine.[/quote]Which I already said can be up to interpreation if you consider the the Crucible can be maniputed. I'm saying he's using to Crucible towards his end, not that he's completely bypassing it. Think of Control and Destroy as batardized versions of the originally desired effect, and synthesis as something thrown in when the undamnaged Crucible gives him enough power to do so. Synthesis having a greater power draw seems logical as it's the more abitious. Honestly you're banking a lot on your quotes just having the term Crucible in them. It's never explicitly stated where to options come from, just that you can use the crucible to achieve them, and yes there is a distinction between the two. An analogy: I can use the DA Character Creator to upload different avatars to my profile, that's not what the program was designed for but it can be used to bypass site policy and suite my whims to a certain extent. This is what I'm talking about, the Crucilbe is a infrastrure intended for some purpose, but the Catalyst manifulates that infrasturture towards his own whims, he still needs to use the device to achieve them but it's not being used in a manner that was intended. So you have a 6 that can still go either way.[/quote]
I get what you're saying, in fact. The issue I'm having is this: everything that people use to assert the notion -- that the Catalyst has any kind of hand in what the Crucible gave us -- boils down to... suspicion (of the Catalyst). I would accept that suspicion if there were any quote saying (clearly) "Beware: the Catalyst will alter the effects of the Crucible to his liking" or something to that effect. Without it, suspicion that he's pulling the strings is unfounded, IMO.
... which is why I don't accept flipping the quotes I provided into what's effectively the opposite. There should be good reason to believe he's pulling the strings before trying to alledge that he's doing it at all.
I would also ask how/why he could "bastardize" Control.
He either wants it, in which case it's fine the way it is, or doesn't, in which case he wouldn't allow it to work as it did.
[quote]
[quote]Actually, it makes
more sense that the connection to the 'relays would work given a Citadel AI. 'Not like the Citadel has a mind of its own that, when the Crucible plugs into it, it's going to know to focus the energy it emits into the relays. Without the Catalyst's targetting calibrations, then, the Crucible becomes useless (hence "turning off").[/quote]
That's a fairly big design flaw you'd think someone like the Prothean VI would mention about it, I mean he just tells us to plug the thing in, (he also mentions the he's
supposed to integrate with the crucible, so the VI not some random AI is supposed be the guiding intelligence for the Citadel, but that's not who we end up talking to), and we can just hack the most AI in existance without know he exists or it's design, can we? Overide his will completely, we can't even handle hacking the Geth which are primitve in comparison.[/quote]
I remember that. I figured Vendetta's job was to do what the Catalyst did.
Maybe he would have appeared on that console had Shepard not passed out before using it.
I'm not so what to make of the "Crucible changed me" thing, exactly, but now that you bring it up, that quote makes the idea that he has any power over it even harder to believe.
[quote][quote]As I recall, Leviathan stated that he raised an army to do his dirty work. You know, kind of like he does right now.[/quote]
Yeah and guess who mind controls the army. Indoctrination adversly effects the mind trusing a bunch of brainwashed grunts to handle the complex process initally seems unlikely.[/quote]
Sure, but relying on indoc'd grunts means he can't really do it himself. Not really.
Apparently he doesn't design everything to his total control. Citadel?
[quote]1. Actually it did, we today can use synthetics DNA for data storage, (seriously, google if have the time it's pretty damned cool), this is how ideas and concepts like language can be passed on. Even the Rachni have something like genetic memory so it's not that strage of a concept within the ME universe. Even the Reapers are built on the idea that the genetic structure contains the knowledge of a harvested species.[/quote]
The MEU also contains the concept of instant "hybridization" from organic to synthetic.
And...
[quote]2. No but they can be less vague about the exposition before hand,
Shep:Say I don't remember anyone trying to program something like synthesis into the Crucble
Catalyst:well you see *exposition*[/quote]
[quote]4. It's sci-fi there's going to be things made up, but those made up things are usally the guiding rules for whatever fictional universe you're setting up. Just like when people threw a fit over midichlorians, when star wars was originally set up as Science fantasy. You have to adhear to the premise you yourself set up. When things don't fit that premise people take notice.[/quote]
... I forgot what got us here. Huh.
[quote]The Catalyst still needs to use to Crucible to initate his plans, therefore if it's damaged he can less of the device to manipulate. (refer to above about power draw and how that might factor in to his ability to implament changes)[/quote]
Again the difference lies in what we can know and what we cannot know.
We can know EMS affected the state of the Crucible.
We cannot know if this damaged Crucible gets tampered with upon docking.
[quote]I don't find the discussion annoying just the subject to a certain extent. I understand why you're having fun going back and forth over this, just saying why some people might not feel the same about the concept of people trying to explain how to "get" ME3 as a whole. Merely offering some perspective for consideration nothing more.[/quote]
Okay then. Don't say I didn't warn you.
Modifié par HYR 2.0, 24 juin 2013 - 01:04 .