Modifié par dava6711, 27 juin 2013 - 06:29 .
computer opinions?
#26
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 06:26
#27
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 06:50
#28
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 09:41
chester1662 wrote...
I would choose the one from Walmart. Good CPU, it's a NON-k i5, so it's more difficult to OC than the K version, also how much you can OC will depend on the MB chipset. It's seems the case has good air flow. Problem is they don't give any information about MB, PSU, HDD and RAM quality.
PS sorry for my english.
I know it's off-topic, but I thought I'd point out that this entire post only has one grammatical error, and I bolded it (it isn't even that bad of an error anyway.)
You don't have to worry about your English, dude, it's fine
#29
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 10:35
8 gigs ram
asrock z77 extreme 4 motherboard
Radeon HD 7850(could go for GTX 660Ti as well)
seasonic 520w PSU(Wouldn't need more than that)
Oh and Non-k CPUs are negligibly OCable and Intel>>AMD for gaming at least.
That's my build, you could switch around a few parts according to your budget.
#30
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 10:52
...a screwdriver to it and dismantled it to sell on ebay to fund my self-build. My latest self-build took me maybe 8 hours, including installing OS and majority of my software. I would never buy store bought again. The time issue is a problem, but I'd rather have that investment and really have confidence in the PC.
Good advice above, make sure you have a really good MOBO and CPU, plus an SSD for your OS. The rest can be upgraded as you need, that core triumvirate is vital though.
#31
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 11:08
Guest_Aotearas_*
frankles wrote...
I bought a cheap PC world PC once, and then I took...
...a screwdriver to it and dismantled it to sell on ebay to fund my self-build. My latest self-build took me maybe 8 hours, including installing OS and majority of my software. I would never buy store bought again. The time issue is a problem, but I'd rather have that investment and really have confidence in the PC.
Good advice above, make sure you have a really good MOBO and CPU, plus an SSD for your OS. The rest can be upgraded as you need, that core triumvirate is vital though.
Holy crap, eight hours? What did you do to take that long?
Anyway, my advice generally is:
If you find a "deal" for a PC, check the individual components. If any component is not listed, don't buy it, because it's probably crapware to skim the price. If all is listed, search for the components individually. Both to get to know their respective solo market price and to see what exactly their specs are.
If the components are of sufficient specs and quality to you and the price is adequate (as in you wouldn't get it much cheaper buying the parts individually (factor delivery cost in!)) then you might go for the pre-build one.
However it is generally advisable to set yourself a budget and then search for parts and combinations, then build it yourself. You have 100% component and quality control, warranty goes for individual components so you don't have to ship the entire PC around if for example only the PSU has some hiccups. Also, manufacturer warranty is always better than retailer warranty, because they get the job done, not declare "we found no error" and send it back to you, still broken, even if you gave them instructions on where the problem is and how to fix it (happens all the time!).
Plus, a selfbuild PC is usually cheaper than prebuild ones anyway and you can dictate the synergy yourself.
Also, the obligatory:
DO NOT BUY FROM ALIENWARE EVER!
They charge outlandish prices for their horribly unoptimized builds (i7 CPU, but entry level GPU and declare it a high end gaming PC, those liers!) use crappy hardware (ever wondered why they don't list the PSU in their product details?) and even if the build was somehow sensible for what you actually want, you can get the very same build, even pre-build, someplace else for SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper.
Alienware are rip-offs. Period.
#32
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 11:49
QFTNeofelis Nebulosa wrote...
frankles wrote...
I bought a cheap PC world PC once, and then I took...
...a screwdriver to it and dismantled it to sell on ebay to fund my self-build. My latest self-build took me maybe 8 hours, including installing OS and majority of my software. I would never buy store bought again. The time issue is a problem, but I'd rather have that investment and really have confidence in the PC.
Good advice above, make sure you have a really good MOBO and CPU, plus an SSD for your OS. The rest can be upgraded as you need, that core triumvirate is vital though.
Also, the obligatory:
DO NOT BUY FROM ALIENWARE EVER!
They charge outlandish prices for their horribly unoptimized builds (i7 CPU, but entry level GPU and declare it a high end gaming PC, those liers!) use crappy hardware (ever wondered why they don't list the PSU in their product details?) and even if the build was somehow sensible for what you actually want, you can get the very same build, even pre-build, someplace else for SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper.
Alienware are rip-offs. Period.
If you want Gaming Laptops buy Asus.
#33
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 01:16
Guest_Aotearas_*
Midnight98 wrote...
QFTNeofelis Nebulosa wrote...
frankles wrote...
I bought a cheap PC world PC once, and then I took...
...a screwdriver to it and dismantled it to sell on ebay to fund my self-build. My latest self-build took me maybe 8 hours, including installing OS and majority of my software. I would never buy store bought again. The time issue is a problem, but I'd rather have that investment and really have confidence in the PC.
Good advice above, make sure you have a really good MOBO and CPU, plus an SSD for your OS. The rest can be upgraded as you need, that core triumvirate is vital though.
Also, the obligatory:
DO NOT BUY FROM ALIENWARE EVER!
They charge outlandish prices for their horribly unoptimized builds (i7 CPU, but entry level GPU and declare it a high end gaming PC, those liers!) use crappy hardware (ever wondered why they don't list the PSU in their product details?) and even if the build was somehow sensible for what you actually want, you can get the very same build, even pre-build, someplace else for SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper.
Alienware are rip-offs. Period.
If you want Gaming Laptops buy Asus.
I hear MSI makes decent high end laptops too, though then again I'd generally advise against using a laptop for gaming. They can do it, for sure, some of them can even do it really good, but that performance comes with a very expensive pricetag.
#34
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 02:22
#35
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 02:39
Guest_Aotearas_*
Koenig888 wrote...
There are lots of online guides around on how to build a good DIY system. I would just mention to ignore all the advice about getting the 660 or 660 Ti. The 660 series have been replaced with the 760 2 days ago. btw if you are going with a pre-built, you will be stuck with Windows 8. Personally, I would prefer Windows 7 or even good old Windows XP.
Actually, I've seen quite a few benchmarks where the GTX 660Ti performed on par, if not even slightly better than the GTX 760. Depends on what games you play of course, so do your usual research and then look for the price. If you can get a GTX 660Ti cheaper than the GTX 760, it may just be worth it.
Both are powerful cards for their price and will run most games maxed on 1080p with stable fps around and above 60.
Essentially, if you buy a GPU right now rather than later, the GTX 660Ti might be better for you, because the direct competition with the 760 can cause retailers that still have them in stock to decrease their price quite significantly if you're lucky.
#36
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 02:40
Koenig888 wrote...
There are lots of online guides around on how to build a good DIY system. I would just mention to ignore all the advice about getting the 660 or 660 Ti. The 660 series have been replaced with the 760 2 days ago. btw if you are going with a pre-built, you will be stuck with Windows 8. Personally, I would prefer Windows 7 or even good old Windows XP.
GTX 760 is ~5% faster than 660Ti. It's just the annual model re-numbering by Nvidia (and AMD). If the 660Ti is cheaper because of inventory blow-out, it'd be a better value.
Same with Intel CPUs. Anandtech stated there's only been ~7% boost since Core iX-2xxx generation. There's no need to go with the absolute latest unless the price is about the same.
Also, Windows 8.1 this fall should be a solid replacement for Windows 7. People seem to forget that there have been significant back-end improvements, like to the file system, in Windows 8. Once the GUI is useable again, there's no reason to revert to Window 7.
#37
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 03:15
Koenig888 wrote...
There are lots of online guides around on how to build a good DIY system. I would just mention to ignore all the advice about getting the 660 or 660 Ti. The 660 series have been replaced with the 760 2 days ago. btw if you are going with a pre-built, you will be stuck with Windows 8. Personally, I would prefer Windows 7 or even good old Windows XP.
XP only uses DX 9.0c. The new consoles are DX11 capable, so we should see an increament in the number of games(console ports) using DX11. Unless this computer he's trying to build is just for ME games.
#38
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 03:25
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
frankles wrote...
I bought a cheap PC world PC once, and then I took...
...a screwdriver to it and dismantled it to sell on ebay to fund my self-build. My latest self-build took me maybe 8 hours, including installing OS and majority of my software. I would never buy store bought again. The time issue is a problem, but I'd rather have that investment and really have confidence in the PC.
Good advice above, make sure you have a really good MOBO and CPU, plus an SSD for your OS. The rest can be upgraded as you need, that core triumvirate is vital though.
Holy crap, eight hours? What did you do to take that long?
SNIP
I'm a bit disabled so my arms/legs have issues and I had to take rest breaks to preserve strength for moving the damn thing about
Good point though, if you don't have to transfer software/files over your LAN it probably only takes 4 hours (for me) to build and do first run through of a PC.
Also, if budget is tight get a really good GPU later and stick to a mid-range 660 card. I have a 560Ti and it runs everything on full, I only have an i3 3220 CPU and 8GB RAM, but I have a kick ass Asus mobo and a good PSU. And an intel SSD. Reason for my upgrade: old system has 8800GT card which kept having hard crashes while playing ME3MP. This was *not* acceptable so I built a new one!!
#39
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 03:46
http://www.cyberpowerpc.com/
Got mine from here, they do a good job if you can't or don't have the time to build one your self.
#40
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 03:50
chester1662 wrote...
Koenig888 wrote...
There are lots of online guides around on how to build a good DIY system. I would just mention to ignore all the advice about getting the 660 or 660 Ti. The 660 series have been replaced with the 760 2 days ago. btw if you are going with a pre-built, you will be stuck with Windows 8. Personally, I would prefer Windows 7 or even good old Windows XP.
XP only uses DX 9.0c. The new consoles are DX11 capable, so we should see an increament in the number of games(console ports) using DX11. Unless this computer he's trying to build is just for ME games.
Still, if you're also playing older games, it's worth keeping an xp around for dual booting and gaming on those.
#41
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 04:46
There's something to be said for being able to just walk into a store and grab one off the shelf, though, if real life takes up a lot of your time.
#42
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 04:48
#43
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 04:53
NuclearTech76 wrote...
Aren't AMD processors kind of crappy compared to Intel?
Not that I've ever been able to tell, and I've used both at different times in my life/career for both server and desktop applications. If I were purchasing the system I'd find decent technical reviews for both processors.
#44
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 05:10
NuclearTech76 wrote...
Aren't AMD processors kind of crappy compared to Intel?
If you are going for a GPU'less build, the AMD APU's are a good choice. If you are really on a budget this can be a viable option, granted you won't be playing anything on max settings, it will alllow you to play on par with consoles for about the same price as one.
#45
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 05:20
Guest_Aotearas_*
NuclearTech76 wrote...
Aren't AMD processors kind of crappy compared to Intel?
That would be incorrect to put it that way.
AMD CPUs have a better affinity towards multi-threaded applications due to their architecture, yet there aren't much such applications someone using a PC in their price range would use. Or for a better argument, people that really need multithreaded computing power usually go for the more expensive and more powerful i7 Intels with their hyperthreading.
What is correct is that AMD CPUs are slower than Intel chips as they have lower IPS. This is also the reason why some more expensive quad core Intels (i5) can somehow compete with the hexa or even octa core AMD CPUs (FX 6XXX or FX 8XXX).
Also, most people that say AMD is "crap" come from a high end background, as in playing lots of games or generally out of the enthusiast clientel. Gaming for example is very single-thread intensive, bue to engine restrictions in most games, they run vastly better with two or four threads that are being fed by powerful cores, rather than running six or more threads fed by weaker cores. In fact almost all games up to now were only able to run a maximum of four threads, though the change to 64bit engines changes that now.
What AMDs are brilliant for are business applications, like Excel and the such. There they are relatively cheap, but powerful CPUs that can simply crunch away multiple threads at the same time where you'd need a much more expensive Intel CPU to do the same amount of work.
In short:
AMD CPUs are decent entry and midrange gaming CPUs and excellent business user CPUs, but not powerfull enough to really cram out gaming performance, especially when paired with powerful GPUs, which they tend to bottleneck a bit.
They are the budget CPU, which is exactly the market AMD is aiming for atm. Intel is more powerful as in possessing more raw computing power, but you also pay for that a good bit.
#46
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 05:20
However, intel vs AMD is a different story. Intel processors will kick AMD's ass in benchmarks, and things that take lots of raw CPU power like video encoding, protein folding calculations, BUT NOT GAMING. Gaming is generally not very CPU heavy, strategy games and some very "large" games (like mount and blade) are cpu heavy because there are a lot of calculations going in in the background. However, a game like mass effect 3 uses very little cpu power.
I would wholeheartedly recommend building your own computer. It doesn't take that much knowledge, as long as you match up your CPU socket with your motherboard pretty much everything else is compatible. Newegg has some great videos on how to build a computer, you can find them here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxaVBsXEiok
Building a computer will save you money, because usually so called "gaming computers" include many superfluous add ons that don't really do anything and are just there so they can charge YOU more money. Most gaming PC's have i7 processors, way overkill on the CPU department, then they have cheaper GPU's. This is backwards for what a gaming PC should have. Also, most pre built machines include multiple 1 TB hard drives (some people may need a 3 TB RAID setup but not many) and also many include 16gb of RAM. This is necessary for some things (heavy photoshop work comes to mind) but you NEVER need more than 8gb RAM for gaming.
I would recommend you buy an AMD quad core, and a GTX 760. The rest of the components are really up to you, though I wouldn't recommend paying more than 75 dollars for a case, as there are perfectly good ones for ~50 dollars. Last, most GPUs come with a recommended wattage that your computer should be able to pump out. For instance, a GPU might claim it needs 600w of power supply however you can easily get away with 500w. The recommended wattage is usually way higher than it needs to be to avoid liability issues, also to take into account that some people are running really power intensive things other than their GPU on their PC.
Alright, hope I helped and thank god there isn't a character limit
#47
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 05:51
You "build" your own, so you know what you are getting, when purchasing from their web site. You can also buy them "pre-built" from retailers, but then if you have specific GPU/PSU/mobo/CPU preferences, you might not get what you want.
In checking out component prices to build my own and buying one from them, the difference was trivial. I shopped a lot of different computer makers. As others have said, Alienware is not the place to buy. Check out CyberPowerPC and see how their prices/specs compare to what you've been looking at so far.
#48
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 05:54
I think I had a GTX 650 Ti 1 GB picked up and budgeted but I have no idea what I need.
I think current specs are:
i5-3570k
ASRock Extreme 4
NZXT Tempest 210 ATX Mid Tower Case
#49
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 06:07
NuclearTech76 wrote...
Radeon supposedly is capable of more FPS but is more susceptible to microstutter (whatever the hell that is) supposedly there is software to fix that. Nvidia is supposedly smoother yet has lower FPS capability. Anyone want to spell out in English WTF that means and how it impacts current and possibly future gaming performance?
I think I had a GTX 650 Ti 1 GB picked up and budgeted but I have no idea what I need.
I think current specs are:
i5-3570k
ASRock Extreme 4
NZXT Tempest 210 ATX Mid Tower Case
As far as I know, microstutter becomes a real issue in Crossfire(Radeon) or SLI(Nvidia) setups, and yes, it's more noticable on Radeon Crossfire. So I think as long as you aren't running a Dual-tri-quad GPU setup this is not a real problem. Maybe someone can correct me if I'm wrong.
In this article, second paragraph is a short explanation of what microstuster is.
www.overclockers.com/micro-stutter-the-dark-secret-of-sli-and-crossfire/
#50
Posté 27 juin 2013 - 06:10
NuclearTech76 wrote...
Radeon supposedly is capable of more FPS but is more susceptible to microstutter (whatever the hell that is) supposedly there is software to fix that. Nvidia is supposedly smoother yet has lower FPS capability. Anyone want to spell out in English WTF that means and how it impacts current and possibly future gaming performance?
I think I had a GTX 650 Ti 1 GB picked up and budgeted but I have no idea what I need.
I think current specs are:
i5-3570k
ASRock Extreme 4
NZXT Tempest 210 ATX Mid Tower Case
Here is the one I just built with those same 3 parts. Asking gamers what you should get as far as AMD or Nvidia is like asking "what is an average BSN player" here. You will get multiple responses which are mostly based off personal experience and loyalty.





Retour en haut






