In what way is her behaviour inconsistent in LotSB? The ideal of "perfection" is something that was deconstructed from her introduction. Like, forreal, if I were so desperate for help with a life decision that I needed to turn to a Magic 8 ball, I'd just ask Miranda instead and do the opposite of whatever she tells me, because she gives some sh*tty-ass advice. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the entire point of her character is to challenge the very concept of übermensch, genetic or otherwise (another one of the reasons ME3 cocked up), and examine the sort of damage a person can do to themselves when their entire identity and sense of self-worth centre so powerfully around perpetual excellence and unremitting success, that a single failure or perceived flaw can dash them to pieces. So I don't see how she was handled any worse in the subsequent instalments than she was in ME2. You can argue than her quickness to develop loyalty to Shepard was unconvincing (it is), and I still got whiplash welts from her Normandy personality switch, g. But inconsistent? Seems about right to me minus the bogus-ass plot excuse they give to prevent her from joining the party.MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
It's in her depiction as the series wears on. I'm not as ardent a believer in it as a few others, but look at how she's depicted in ME2, then onto LotSB, then onto ME3. It's not something that's wholly in the game, but it's something we get from... reading between the lines, so to speak. Not the best analogy, but we're seeing changes in her depiction.
Miranda's "perfection" was never supposed to be taken as narrative fact, and her barrenness is presented neutrally. And well hell, it's believable with her Frankenfather f*cking with her genes like Chef Boyardee. Equating fertility with worth just sounds like some gross-ass projection to me. The fact she can't pop one out doesn't diminish her person in any way, and it isn't implied that it does.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





