423 réponses à ce sujet

[Sir DeLoria]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

StreetMagic wrote...

I guess she's a **** if you happen to like 100 year old virgin Asaris. That's about the only case where she's a ****. Those are some high standards.

Hell, it's not even that. Most of the time, fans of the blueberry aren't really that bad. I just wish they'd stop dishing on my Shepard's LI, and my own favorite character, just for craps. 

I don't even go off on Tali unless I'm provoked.

I will never be able to fathom your hatred for that poor Quarian girl.

[Mcfly616]

StreetMagic wrote...

Those are all things I wouldn't bother calling people out on. If the bum has people who support him/her, and don't care, that's their business. Nothing wrong with being an adrenaline junky. I used to smoke a lot of weed myself - not in 20 years though. But I understand it. I've moved past it, and don't care what others do. I have a bigger problem with drunken family and friends - but only if they start disrupting the environment or being jerks. Some people are angry or smartasses when they're drunk. So I call them out. This is what I mean by the difference is how something affects other people. Potheads don't do anything but chill out on the couch.

dude, I never said I was going to "call them out" on it. You witness someones actions and usually your mind will formulate an opinion. That doesn't mean you go and scream to high heavens and point at the person lol


Do I call people out when they deserve it? Sure. But if some chick is wh*ring it up at the club and having a good time, it's not like I'm gonna walk up to her and say: "wow you're a huge sl*t"..... Nonetheless, that will be my opinion on the matter, but its none of.my business nor would it bother me. It's an opinion/point of view

Modifié par Mcfly616, 01 juillet 2013 - 02:35 .

[spirosz]

Mcfly616 wrote...

spirosz wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

spirosz wrote...

And I call it as I see it, Miranda isn't a ****.

and that's your opinion. If you believe it, I'm sure you'll have no problem if your wife has had one-nighters with people she's met over the internet.

Miranda is married or in a commited relationship at that point?  Source please.  

wow, how dense are you ?


Nobody said she was married or in a relationship. Way to miss the point completely. Carry on bro.

If you're going to relate Miranda or people in general, relate to people who are in the same situation.  Miranda being single is comparable to someone who is commited to a relationship?  You're hilarious.  

[Brain7]

I never really had a problem with that information about Miranda, because for me there's absolutely nothing wrong with it when he take the circumstances into consideration. As far as I know, when those encounters occurred, she was single, so she wasn't betraying anyone. Secondly, I understand why she did it. She was 35 years old, had a very demanding job that took a lot of her time, so she basically never really had the time nor do I think she wanted to get into serious relationships, so she basically resorted to casual sex with strangers. She's a human being with necessities after all, just like everyone.

Just my opinion though.

[Sir DeLoria]

Look, I dislike Miranda, but saying she's a **** is ridiculous. Why would anyone blame her for casual sex? Anyone who's been to college should know better.

Too be honest, Liara worries me more with her teacher personality. She seems a bit like a loner, at least for an Asari.

[spirosz]

Brain7 wrote...

I never really had a problem with that information about Miranda, because for me there's absolutely nothing wrong with it when he take the circumstances into consideration. As far as I know, when those encounters occurred, she was single, so she wasn't betraying anyone. Secondly, I understand why she did it. She was 35 years old, had a very demanding job that took a lot of her time, so she basically never really had the time nor do I think she wanted to get into serious relationships, so she basically resorted to casual sex with strangers. She's a human being with necessities after all, just like everyone.

Just my opinion though.

Ding ding. 

[Mcfly616]

spirosz wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

spirosz wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

spirosz wrote...

And I call it as I see it, Miranda isn't a ****.

and that's your opinion. If you believe it, I'm sure you'll have no problem if your wife has had one-nighters with people she's met over the internet.

Miranda is married or in a commited relationship at that point?  Source please.  

wow, how dense are you ?


Nobody said she was married or in a relationship. Way to miss the point completely. Carry on bro.

If you're going to relate Miranda or people in general, relate to people who are in the same situation.  Miranda being single is comparable to someone who is commited to a relationship?  You're hilarious.  

**** Here, let me spell it out for you.

Say your "future" wife is single (at this very moment).......okay, you still with me ****? Tonight she's gonna troll the internet for someone she's never met, in order to find someone to have sex with.

Now, fast forward to the future. You're now getting married or newly married or whatever. And by some set of circumstances, your new bride tells you that she used to go on the internet to look for strangers to have one-nighters with. (Did you get all that ****?)


I'm sure you'd be just fine with it. That's what you're saying atleast

Modifié par BioWareMod05, 01 juillet 2013 - 02:49 .

[spirosz]

Again, what you're relating to has no concern or relevence to Miranda's situation as this is strictly about Miranda being a so called ****. You can keep going with that argument, but as it stands, there is no indication from your information that provides any influence in proving Miranda as being a ****.

She's single.

She's not married.

Her work is her life.

She has needs.

Her childhood has had certain influence with this type of behaviour, obviously. 

Modifié par spirosz, 01 juillet 2013 - 02:48 .

[Mcfly616]

spirosz wrote...

Again, what you're relating to has no concern to Miranda's situation as this is strictly about Miranda being a so called ****. You can keep going with that argument, but as it stands, there is no indication from your information that provides any influence in proving Miranda as being a ****.

having sex with someone you dont know is sl*tty. Its subjective, so you have no chance of convincing me otherwise.


And once again you fail to understand what I'm saying. I'm asking you if you were about to get married to your fiance, and she told you the night before the wedding that she used to do exactly what Miranda did when she was single before becoming engaged to you.......you would be cool with that yes? You wouldn't have any opinion about the person you're about to marry, that used to look for strangers to screw back when she was single?

[spirosz]

Mcfly616 wrote...

spirosz wrote...

Again, what you're relating to has no concern to Miranda's situation as this is strictly about Miranda being a so called ****. You can keep going with that argument, but as it stands, there is no indication from your information that provides any influence in proving Miranda as being a ****.

having sex with someone you dont know is sl*tty. Its subjective, so you have no chance of convincing me otherwise.


And once again you fail to understand what I'm saying. I'm asking you if you were about to get married to your fiance, and she told you the night before the wedding that she used to do exactly what Miranda did when she was single before becoming engaged to you.......you would be cool with that yes? You wouldn't have any opinion about the person you're about to marry, that used to look for strangers to screw back when she was single?

Someone's past is someone's past.  Again, keep going with the whole "future marriage thing".  It still has no relevence to Miranda.  

[Mcfly616]

StreetMagic wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...


Say your "future" wife is single (at this very moment).......okay, you still with me genius? Tonight she's gonna troll the internet for someone she's never met, in order to find someone to have sex with.

Now, fast forward to the future. You're now getting married or newly married or whatever. And by some set of circumstances, your new bride tells you that she used to go on the internet to look for strangers to have one-nighters with. (Did you get all that son?)


I'm sure you'd be just fine with it. That's what you're saying atleast

That never stopped me. I almost got married to a girl who did just that. We both met on the internet ourselves - for the same purpose. We just happened to like each other more than we thought. Do you really think people who do this are worth calling names?

I think we've established that we both have different opinions. You live in a world where a **** can't exist unless that person is a cheater. I on the other hand, see a world full of sl*ts regardless of whether they're single or not. I have nothing against internet daters. But imo a person getting online for the sole purpose of finding sex with a stranger, is the same thing as the person that goes home with somebody they just met in the bar. Is it necessary to call them names? No, and I don't call them names, why would I? They're not bothering me. I'm just stating my opinion based on their actions.

[spirosz]

Also, Mcfly, I understand exactly what you're stating, but again, it has no correlation with what Miranda has done.

[Mcfly616]

spirosz wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

spirosz wrote...

Again, what you're relating to has no concern to Miranda's situation as this is strictly about Miranda being a so called ****. You can keep going with that argument, but as it stands, there is no indication from your information that provides any influence in proving Miranda as being a ****.

having sex with someone you dont know is sl*tty. Its subjective, so you have no chance of convincing me otherwise.


And once again you fail to understand what I'm saying. I'm asking you if you were about to get married to your fiance, and she told you the night before the wedding that she used to do exactly what Miranda did when she was single before becoming engaged to you.......you would be cool with that yes? You wouldn't have any opinion about the person you're about to marry, that used to look for strangers to screw back when she was single?

Someone's past is someone's past.  Again, keep going with the whole "future marriage thing".  It still has no relevence to Miranda.  

sure does have relevance. Miranda is single. Your wife was single at one point. What youre saying is if your wife had the exact same past as Miranda, you'd be totally fine with it. Relevance.

[Mcfly616]

StreetMagic wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

StreetMagic wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...


Say your "future" wife is single (at this very moment).......okay, you still with me genius? Tonight she's gonna troll the internet for someone she's never met, in order to find someone to have sex with.

Now, fast forward to the future. You're now getting married or newly married or whatever. And by some set of circumstances, your new bride tells you that she used to go on the internet to look for strangers to have one-nighters with. (Did you get all that son?)


I'm sure you'd be just fine with it. That's what you're saying atleast

That never stopped me. I almost got married to a girl who did just that. We both met on the internet ourselves - for the same purpose. We just happened to like each other more than we thought. Do you really think people who do this are worth calling names?

I think we've established that we both have different opinions. You live in a world where a **** can't exist unless that person is a cheater. I on the other hand, see a world full of sl*ts regardless of whether they're single or not. I have nothing against internet daters. But imo a person getting online for the sole purpose of finding sex with a stranger, is the same thing as the person that goes home with somebody they just met in the bar. Is it necessary to call them names? No, and I don't call them names, why would I? They're not bothering me. I'm just stating my opinion based on their actions.

Sounds like they're bothering you, if even a video game character managed to spark your comments.

Anyways.. whatever. Good luck. Seriously

lol yeah, I'm human and have opinions due to the way people act.....therefore theyre bothering me. Hahaha get a grip kid. You must be a robot.

[spirosz]

Mcfly616 wrote...

spirosz wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

spirosz wrote...

Again, what you're relating to has no concern to Miranda's situation as this is strictly about Miranda being a so called ****. You can keep going with that argument, but as it stands, there is no indication from your information that provides any influence in proving Miranda as being a ****.

having sex with someone you dont know is sl*tty. Its subjective, so you have no chance of convincing me otherwise.


And once again you fail to understand what I'm saying. I'm asking you if you were about to get married to your fiance, and she told you the night before the wedding that she used to do exactly what Miranda did when she was single before becoming engaged to you.......you would be cool with that yes? You wouldn't have any opinion about the person you're about to marry, that used to look for strangers to screw back when she was single?

Someone's past is someone's past.  Again, keep going with the whole "future marriage thing".  It still has no relevence to Miranda.  

sure does have relevance. Miranda is single. Your wife was single at one point. What youre saying is if your wife had the exact same past as Miranda, you'd be totally fine with it. Relevance.

If the person I was with has had a very healthy and sexual past, by all means, good for them.  That still has no relation to the person being a ****.  Or is this so called term used because we're using woman?  

[Mcfly616]

spirosz wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

spirosz wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

spirosz wrote...

Again, what you're relating to has no concern to Miranda's situation as this is strictly about Miranda being a so called ****. You can keep going with that argument, but as it stands, there is no indication from your information that provides any influence in proving Miranda as being a ****.

having sex with someone you dont know is sl*tty. Its subjective, so you have no chance of convincing me otherwise.


And once again you fail to understand what I'm saying. I'm asking you if you were about to get married to your fiance, and she told you the night before the wedding that she used to do exactly what Miranda did when she was single before becoming engaged to you.......you would be cool with that yes? You wouldn't have any opinion about the person you're about to marry, that used to look for strangers to screw back when she was single?

Someone's past is someone's past.  Again, keep going with the whole "future marriage thing".  It still has no relevence to Miranda.  

sure does have relevance. Miranda is single. Your wife was single at one point. What youre saying is if your wife had the exact same past as Miranda, you'd be totally fine with it. Relevance.

If the person I was with has had a very healthy and sexual past, by all means, good for them.  That still has no relation to the person being a ****.  Or is this so called term used because we're using woman?  

and thats all I've been waiting to hear from you. We obviously see things different. Obviously everybody has a past. I just wouldn't take a girl that used to have sexual escapades with internet strangers, and bring her home to meet the fam. That's just me. I totally respect your take on it. That's just not me. So can we play nice, now....you can stop.twisting my words. I can stop explaining myself over and over....

[What a Succulent Ass]

Random Jerkface wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Random Jerkface wrote...

We really serving up 1950's realness over one-night stands, though?

I never said I haven't had one....or a few. I'm just saying it isn't classy no matter how you twist it. I'm not sure I know anybody that would say its classy.

Define "classy."

Because here, all my life, I'd thought it had to do with moral character.

[Mcfly616]

StreetMagic wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...] lol yeah, I'm human and have opinions due to the way people act.....therefore theyre bothering me. Hahaha get a grip kid. You must be a robot.

What?

You're telling me to get a grip? I just told you good luck and somehow that set you off. You know, like.. lets move on.. take it easy.. hope that works out for you. Good luck. Seriously. Relax.

good luck isn't the problem. The problem is that once again, you twist my words and try to tell me that I'm "bothered" by sl*tty people, when really I couldnt care less. (I've had my share of sl*tty nights.....the difference is, I'm not scared to say it was indeed "sl*tty" like some people seem to be here). You act like its such a drastic term. Nope, its quite descriptive.

No, if I sound bothered, its because I've spent the last 2 pages explaining myself to you, when really one post summed it up. But here I am, repeating myself for the bajillionth time.