Ce sujet est fermé
If Garrus was *** i'd rage. And Tali dying would be...welcomed.
Why isn't subject zero a lesbian?
Débuté par
ZelaineGW
, janv. 18 2010 02:44
Retour en haut
#77
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 04:26
Dasher10
-
- Members
- 400 messages
Again, she was probably a lesbian initially. Bioware changed it because she'd be too much of a stereotype. It would be like Jacob being all like, "Shepdog, yo man this **** is off the heezy, beeyatch!" Just really ugly stereotyping. And why can we not use the word "g ay" if we can say "lesbian?"
#78
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 04:26
cpolisch
-
- Members
- 353 messages
It would be a shocker if your romance from ME1 said they didn't love you anymore because they decided they preferred only the opposite sex. ME1 love interest questions averted.
#80
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 04:32
asaiasai
-
- Members
- 1 391 messages
First off it is a game, and as such the developers can make it do anything we tell them to do. They have a vision and they also have a bottom line, and alot of the time the bottom line will override the vision. To allow the player the OPTION to spend talent points to foster a relationship with a character that would normally not be interested in no way effects any game play or story line. Who sleeps with who has no bearing on the story, it is a diversion, a side line, an opportunity to add player created depth to the character, and so long as it is an option who cares? If the thought bothers you then do not spend the points to do so, but under no circumstances do you have the right to tell anyone what is right for them. If someone wants a male/male or female/female romance it has no bearing on your game, you play it the way you want to, i just expect that courtsey to be recipicated. Whether it works in real life or not it is irrelevant, we do not have Normandy type space ships but you have no problem accepting that, but get freaked out with an option to romance any character you want. Welcome to the 21st century.
Asai
Asai
#81
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 04:35
DeathCultArm
-
- Members
- 1 130 messages
Alot of people care...Everyone doesn't accpet everything.
#82
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 04:37
jlb524
-
- Members
- 19 954 messages
Some people don't like options if it could possibly lead to two people of the same gender having sex, especially it if it would be two men *gasp*
But no one ever complains about having the option to torture, commit genocide, and kill innocent civilians that the game provides. Weird.
But no one ever complains about having the option to torture, commit genocide, and kill innocent civilians that the game provides. Weird.
#83
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 04:39
DaeJi
-
- Members
- 1 045 messages
My desire at this point is too see a DLC that would give us same sex relationships; Tali and Subject Zero for girls, Jacob and Thane for guys.
#84
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 04:40
DeathCultArm
-
- Members
- 1 130 messages
Double standards....and Human.Never.Change...myself included, I guess. Can't change the world.
#85
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 04:41
ODST 3
-
- Members
- 1 429 messages
Way to generalize, idiot. Why aren't you straight?ZelaineGW wrote...
BioWare dropped the ball on this. All but one of the tat covered, shaved head, violent girls I know in real life are lesbians. And I actually know a few.
But seriously she has lesbian written all over her.
Modifié par ODST 3, 18 janvier 2010 - 04:44 .
#86
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 04:41
Sacae
-
- Members
- 129 messages
As much as I would like her to be, she isn't. Why? Just for the same reason someone else isn't or is. It's just the way they are.
Though, I am slightly annoyed at the Arsia being this scapegoat for f/f. "They aren't really female, so its okay." Pffffft. I wish they did give a human female for a f/f instead of that bull**** line.
lol *goes bakc to playing ac2*
Though, I am slightly annoyed at the Arsia being this scapegoat for f/f. "They aren't really female, so its okay." Pffffft. I wish they did give a human female for a f/f instead of that bull**** line.
lol *goes bakc to playing ac2*
#87
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 04:43
Nozybidaj
-
- Members
- 3 487 messages
Rattleface wrote...
Because then she'd be a huge stereotype. That's why.
And she's not at the moment how?
I too thought she would have been, not that I would have romanced her with my FemShep, but still...
#88
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 04:45
ODST 3
-
- Members
- 1 429 messages
If anything, the Fox News thing boosted sales.DeathCultArm wrote...
b/c of Fox News and prospective new buyers who may have been shunned it.
#89
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 04:47
DeathCultArm
-
- Members
- 1 130 messages
Sure..b/c wasn't about *** sex.
#90
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 05:01
ODST 3
-
- Members
- 1 429 messages
This isn't the Sims, it's part of a well-planned story and characters are as they are. Homosexuality doesn't bother me at all, but going after the developer for not including gay love interests is silly. This isn't a political statement, it's a game and Bioware's going to make the decisions that they think will make them the most money.asaiasai wrote...
First off it is a game, and as such the developers can make it do anything we tell them to do. They have a vision and they also have a bottom line, and alot of the time the bottom line will override the vision. To allow the player the OPTION to spend talent points to foster a relationship with a character that would normally not be interested in no way effects any game play or story line. Who sleeps with who has no bearing on the story, it is a diversion, a side line, an opportunity to add player created depth to the character, and so long as it is an option who cares? If the thought bothers you then do not spend the points to do so, but under no circumstances do you have the right to tell anyone what is right for them. If someone wants a male/male or female/female romance it has no bearing on your game, you play it the way you want to, i just expect that courtsey to be recipicated. Whether it works in real life or not it is irrelevant, we do not have Normandy type space ships but you have no problem accepting that, but get freaked out with an option to romance any character you want. Welcome to the 21st century.
Asai
#91
Guest_gmartin40_*
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 05:05
Guest_gmartin40_*
Guest_gmartin40_*
-
- Guests
Naltair wrote...
This thread is insulting to homosexuals.
Then don't be a homosexual.
#93
Guest_gmartin40_*
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 05:07
Guest_gmartin40_*
Guest_gmartin40_*
-
- Guests
ODST 3 wrote...
This isn't the Sims, it's part of a well-planned story and characters are as they are. Homosexuality doesn't bother me at all, but going after the developer for not including gay love interests is silly. This isn't a political statement, it's a game and Bioware's going to make the decisions that they think will make them the most money.asaiasai wrote...
First off it is a game, and as such the developers can make it do anything we tell them to do. They have a vision and they also have a bottom line, and alot of the time the bottom line will override the vision. To allow the player the OPTION to spend talent points to foster a relationship with a character that would normally not be interested in no way effects any game play or story line. Who sleeps with who has no bearing on the story, it is a diversion, a side line, an opportunity to add player created depth to the character, and so long as it is an option who cares? If the thought bothers you then do not spend the points to do so, but under no circumstances do you have the right to tell anyone what is right for them. If someone wants a male/male or female/female romance it has no bearing on your game, you play it the way you want to, i just expect that courtsey to be recipicated. Whether it works in real life or not it is irrelevant, we do not have Normandy type space ships but you have no problem accepting that, but get freaked out with an option to romance any character you want. Welcome to the 21st century.
Asai
Bioware isn't a company worrying about money. I think they are trying to cross genres and bring in more people to play their games. They don't want the money, they want the popularity.
#95
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 05:09
DeathCultArm
-
- Members
- 1 130 messages
EA..is.on.the.box. They do care about the $ now, or at least better, or they get shutdown.
Modifié par DeathCultArm, 18 janvier 2010 - 05:10 .
#96
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 05:10
DaeJi
-
- Members
- 1 045 messages
gmartin40 wrote...
Bioware isn't a company worrying about money. I think they are trying to cross genres and bring in more people to play their games. They don't want the money, they want the popularity.
No, no they want money. Trust me, they want money.
#97
Guest_gmartin40_*
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 05:11
Guest_gmartin40_*
Guest_gmartin40_*
-
- Guests
People don't notice Fox News is one-sided. They are Republicans who look at things to argue about because that's what Republicans do. They complain. I mean, look at em, now they have Sarah Palin on their show. What is the world coming to?
#98
Guest_gmartin40_*
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 05:12
Guest_gmartin40_*
Guest_gmartin40_*
-
- Guests
DeathCultArm wrote...
EA..is.on.the.box. They do care about the $ now, or at least better, or they get shutdown.
Lol. I could agree with that.
#99
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 05:12
asaiasai
-
- Members
- 1 391 messages
DeathCultArm wrote...
Alot of people care...Everyone doesn't accpet everything.
That is thier problem and in no way should it have any bearing on me. The only right anyone has is the right to decide what is right ONLY for themselves.
And no romances had no bearing in ME and DAO, none that were integral to the plot. The only people it effected were the players who made those choices. All i said was that i wanted the option to do pretty much what i wanted with any character in the game. As this has NO real effect on the story what difference does it make, and if it is an option only those who want to experience the game play that way will be effected, unless your insecure, and that is your problem and your problem alone.
Asai
