Kataphrut94 wrote...
I never got the whole 'Citadel DLC as the true ending' thing. There's too much stuff in it that contradicts that idea. For a start, you can't finish Mass Effect 3 without Anderson and at least EDI or Shepard being dead and they're all alive and doing things in Citadel. There's denial and then there's just wilful ignorance.
From a lot of the posts I've seen on this thread, I feel like people are taking it way too seriously. Seriously guys, it's a silly sci-fi game that ended with some silly sci-fi nonsense, not the goddamned Red Wedding!
At least the Red Wedding served a greater narrative purpose beyond "grimdark art".

Even if it was pretty grimdark itself.....

But I can definitely see how people could use the Citadel as the "true" ending. Because its plot is so absurdly disconnected from everything else in the narrative, one can easily play it as an "epilogue" DLC, especially after choosing the Destroy ending (or Refuse, if you want to headcanon an offscreen victory).
As for why EDI shows up, one can always headcanon that the Catalyst was lying to you. And in regards to Anderson, well Shep's already potentially hallucinating about a dead Thane and dreaming obsessively about some 10 year old boy he never knew, so Anderson's just a figment of your imagination.... or maybe you open up an Anderson VI he left in his will that tells you about the apartments.

Mind you, I'm just speculating as to how people can see Citadel as the true ending, considering I don't even have any of the DLC.
Modifié par grey_wind, 10 juillet 2013 - 08:22 .