Aller au contenu

Photo

Which Relationship did you choose?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
706 réponses à ce sujet

#601
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages

The Night Mammoth wrote...

You're saying that tv tropes is a less biased place to argue about certain things, as someone who edits things on tv tropes.


Anyone can make edits. I don't own the website. I'm not a moderator. If you disagree with the edits I've made, you have every right to contest them. If you can attain a consensus, my edits go down the drain.

The discussion concerned Liara's supposed plot armor. If the posters here are so certain and I'm just a lunatic, it should be easy to do, right?

#602
Mr.House

Mr.House
  • Members
  • 23 338 messages
You'll just edit it out like normal.

#603
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
At first, yes. But you could easily bring that to the attention of a moderator, who are prompt to respond. If you can convince them that the entry is legitimate, they'll warn me to leave it. And if I continue, they'll simply ban me.

Well, they'll probably have you take it to a discussion first. But either way, you'll get a chance to speak.

Modifié par David7204, 22 juillet 2013 - 01:52 .


#604
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages

JusticarFlareon wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...

David7204 wrote...

Just look at this. 'Lols' and laughy faces and pictures of cakes. This is passes for reason on the BSN.


Image IPB

I have those in my pantry. :3 I think I'll go have one now. Mmmmm... chocolate-covered cake.


chocolates not really my thing,  I prefer strawberry myself.

#605
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 291 messages
Why even bother. The definition that you linked applies perfectly to Liara in LotSB.

#606
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
Because it's right?

Why argue anything?

#607
Capler

Capler
  • Members
  • 31 messages
SO, anyway...my femshep romaced Garrus, because Kaiden was a total jerkwad in ME2, blue alien chicks ain't my thang, Thane creeped me out, and Jacob was overwhelmingly uninteresting.

#608
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 291 messages

David7204 wrote...

Because it's right?

Why argue anything?

.  I dont need to see it listed in the examples section to know that it applies to her.

#609
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
I'm curious why you're upset when I disagree but not when a website that specializes on this sort of thing disagrees. You have the power to influence both.

#610
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 291 messages

David7204 wrote...

I'm curious why you're upset when I disagree but not when a website that specializes on this sort of thing disagrees. You have the power to influence both.

.  The website does not have a personality, it does not like or dislike anything.  The definition on the page applies to Liara in Lair of the Shadow Broker, whether it is listed in the examples is irrelevent.  Plus I am oh so lazy.

Modifié par Steelcan, 22 juillet 2013 - 02:01 .


#611
billy the squid

billy the squid
  • Members
  • 4 669 messages

David7204 wrote...

Tell me, how many tabs of these little phrases do you have open? Over or under a half dozen? Never before have I seen such a display of nonsensical debate jargon being chanted.


Clearly you don't read your own posts properly then.

Image IPB

Modifié par billy the squid, 22 juillet 2013 - 02:10 .


#612
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
What posts of mine have ever displayed improper or random debate jargon?

#613
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

David7204 wrote...

I never used that link as a source of evidence or credibility. I used it as an invitation to for posters here to argue their point against a less...biased crowd, let's say. An invitation that is still open, I might add.


Hmm.

I'm sorry David, what were you lying?

#614
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
Yes. That post confirms exactly what I said. It's clearly an invitation to argue a point, not a source of evidence or credibility. Other than the inherent credibility of someone else possibily disagreeing, obviously.

Modifié par David7204, 22 juillet 2013 - 02:20 .


#615
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

David7204 wrote...

What posts of mine have ever displayed improper or random debate jargon?


It's not debate jargon. It's a list of logical fallacies in your arguments. 

I'll define a fallacy for you:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

fallacy is an argument that uses poor reasoning. An argument can be fallacious whether or not its conclusion is true. A fallacy can be either formal or informal. An error that stems from a poor logical form is sometimes called a formal fallacy or simply an invalid argument. An informal fallacy is an error in reasoning that does not originate in improper logical form. Arguments committing informal fallacies may be formally valid, but still fallacious.

Fallacies of presumption fail to prove the conclusion by assuming the conclusion in the proof. Fallacies of weak inference fail to prove the conclusion with insufficient evidence. Fallacies of distraction fail to prove the conclusion with irrelevant evidence, like emotion. Fallacies of ambiguity fail to prove the conclusion due to vagueness in words, phrases, or grammar.

Some fallacies are committed intentionally (to manipulate or persuade by deception), others unintentionally due to carelessness or ignorance.

Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 22 juillet 2013 - 02:19 .


#616
Teddie Sage

Teddie Sage
  • Members
  • 6 754 messages
Okay... I left the conversation two hours ago and you're still at it? It's like an olympic sport now. People are determined to win over some opinions. I don't even know where this conversation is going anymore.

Modifié par Teddie Sage, 22 juillet 2013 - 02:19 .


#617
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

Teddie Sage wrote...

Okay... I left the conversation two hours ago and you're still at it? It's like an olympic sport now. People are determined to win over some opinions. I don't even know where this conversation is going anymore.


No, it's more like making a certain poster get off their high horse about making false claims

#618
spirosz

spirosz
  • Members
  • 16 356 messages
We need more Jack.

#619
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

David7204 wrote...

Yes. That post confirms exactly what I said. It's clearly an invitation to argue a point, not a source of evidence or credibility. Other than the inherent credibility of someone else possibily disagreeing, obviously.


And now you're trying to use an equivocation fallacy and contextomy on me (as in you are now trying to claim that you mean otherwise in the context, and that I am misusing your statement. It's indirect and passive language, but the intent is clear.)

#620
spirosz

spirosz
  • Members
  • 16 356 messages
I like how we have to define everything.

#621
Barquiel

Barquiel
  • Members
  • 5 848 messages

spirosz wrote...

We need more Jack.


Image IPB

Happy? ^_^

#622
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
These posts of yours are incredibly tedious. I'm curious, do you think people debate in real life by shouting terms like Equivocation Fallacy! or Contextomy! like they're throwing out Pokeballs?

Modifié par David7204, 22 juillet 2013 - 02:28 .


#623
BassStyles

BassStyles
  • Members
  • 359 messages
In my first play through which I consider my "canon play through" I romanced Ashley in 1, but after feeling she left me high and dry to face the suicide mission on my own without her support, Miranda stepped in and filled the void Ash created for my Shep. After that it was Miri and Shep to the end.

#624
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

spirosz wrote...

We need more Jack.


Super Jack!



http://t0.gstatic.co...5kkFQiVXOQITlm3

#625
Dextro Milk

Dextro Milk
  • Members
  • 1 167 messages
Holy hell, is David still posting?...

Lols, lols hahs lol ah lol, is he for reals? lolsz