Aller au contenu

Photo

ANd ME4 confirmed


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
452 réponses à ce sujet

#326
Guest_EntropicAngel_*

Guest_EntropicAngel_*
  • Guests

iakus wrote...

You have a very strange concept of what's amusing.

Me, I find it amusing that after burning so much of Mass Effect's credibility, they foist the product onto a new development team to clean up the mess.

I do not envy those people.  They have a colossal task ahead.


What I find amusing is how those people's sensationalist cries were nullified.

And the only "mess" ME3 had, in terms of a new game, was multiple endings.

#327
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 388 messages

EntropicAngel wrote...

What I find amusing is how those people's sensationalist cries were nullified.





scha·den·freu·de/ˈʃɑdnˌfrɔɪdə/ noun
satisfaction or pleasure felt at someone else's misfortune.

And the only "mess" ME3 had, in terms of a new game, was multiple endings.


...and the sheer number of people who hate them.

Modifié par iakus, 18 juillet 2013 - 04:47 .


#328
Sanunes

Sanunes
  • Members
  • 4 391 messages
I just hope BioWare stops making design decisions around what the fans consider something important and makes the game they want to make. That is what made the previous games so much fun was because it wasn't designed by a committee. I am not sure how many people feel the way I do, but so many of the issues I see with Mass Effect 3 relate back to the comments people made about Mass Effect 2. They wanted numbers with the suicide mission, a story that is more connect to all the areas of the game instead of a bunch of side missions, they wanted all their favorite companions to return, and there are probably other. After shoehorning those ideas into the game the story took a major hit.

Modifié par Sanunes, 18 juillet 2013 - 04:48 .


#329
Guest_EntropicAngel_*

Guest_EntropicAngel_*
  • Guests

iakus wrote...

scha·den·freu·de/ˈʃɑdnˌfrɔɪdə/ noun
satisfaction or pleasure felt at someone else's misfortune.


Allow me to quote myself:

EntropicAngel wrote...

What I find amusing is how those people's sensationalist cries were nullified.


Pleasure at the nullification, not their misfortune. I took and take no pleasure in people hating ME3.


...and the sheer number of people who hate them.


There's nothing to be done about that. People hating it is irrelevant to the next game (except in ending concepts, which won't be on that scale anyway).

#330
IntelligentME3Fanboy

IntelligentME3Fanboy
  • Members
  • 1 983 messages

iakus wrote...

EntropicAngel wrote...

What I find amusing is how those people's sensationalist cries were nullified.





scha·den·freu·de/ˈʃɑdnˌfrɔɪdə/ noun
satisfaction or pleasure felt at someone else's misfortune.

And the only "mess" ME3 had, in terms of a new game, was multiple endings.


...and the sheer number of people who hate them.

these people are a lot fewer than you think

#331
Guest_EntropicAngel_*

Guest_EntropicAngel_*
  • Guests

Sanunes wrote...

I just hope BioWare stops making design decisions around what the fans consider something important and makes the game they want to make. That is what made the previous games so much fun was because it wasn't designed by a committee. I am not sure how many people feel the way I do, but so many of the issues I see with Mass Effect 3 relate back to the comments people made about Mass Effect 2. They wanted numbers with the suicide mission, a story that is more connect to all the areas of the game instead of a bunch of side missions, they wanted all their favorite companions to return, and there are probably other. After shoehorning those ideas into the game the story took a major hit.


While I pretty much agree with your point, a huge part of many people's PROBLEM with ME3 was that they considered what THEY wanted to do--and stuck to their guns (mostly) while the fans raged. The fans wanted it their way.

#332
BaladasDemnevanni

BaladasDemnevanni
  • Members
  • 2 127 messages

iakus wrote...

Oh and Bioware pulling a "You Chose Wrong" is generally considered a bad thing. 


Well, it certainly wouldn't be the first time they've done this.

See Red Cliffe, the Rachni, the Geth-Quarian conflict, etc.

#333
BaladasDemnevanni

BaladasDemnevanni
  • Members
  • 2 127 messages

jtav wrote...

I've been playing BW games since KOTOR. ME1 has the dullest cast outside of the OC of NWN to the point where I have to forcibly remind myself to talk to them (ME3 isn't much better there by virtue of being stuck with people I didn't like the first time). The plot feels like warmed over KOTOR. Shepard is best here, but I find it weakest overall.


Very well said.

Although to its (very small) credit, ME1 cast>Baldur's Gate 1 cast.

#334
jtav

jtav
  • Members
  • 13 965 messages

BaladasDemnevanni wrote...

jtav wrote...

I've been playing BW games since KOTOR. ME1 has the dullest cast outside of the OC of NWN to the point where I have to forcibly remind myself to talk to them (ME3 isn't much better there by virtue of being stuck with people I didn't like the first time). The plot feels like warmed over KOTOR. Shepard is best here, but I find it weakest overall.


Very well said.

Although to its (very small) credit, ME1 cast>Baldur's Gate 1 cast.

Well, yes, but I never played BG without BG1NPC which livens things up considerably.

#335
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages

jtav wrote...

And I should watch TOS and TNG because I want to watch DS9? More to the point: I played BG2 first and the game still took time to explain what was going on and who these people were. And besides, a decent imported save is much less grim with fewer difficult choices than a non-import.


Well obviosuly becuase it worked to try and orientate you to the setting instead of being uncomprehensible to you, it's a horrible game, according to the mass effect fans.

And lord of the rings took time to explain everything you needed to know of the story in the films. Ir wasn't something you;d be completely lost in if you watched two towers or return of the king first instead of fellowship.

Watching the films, in any order, you could pick up the gist pretty quickly. The ring needs to be destroyed, these hobbits are trying to do it, sauron is the big bad of the movie, he has an army of orcs, aragorn is important, gimli's a dwarf, legolas is an elf, humans are screwed, ring wraiths equal bad news.

Not that much confusion unless you look into the smaller details, and like I said in my later post, people shouldn't need to pay a fandom tax just to try and enjoy the series, it should be able to give you a bit of exposition to get your orientated into the world your in, instead fo slamming you head first into a contextless mess that you needed to do every side quest and read every codex entry from the previous games to understand.

Modifié par Darth Brotarian, 18 juillet 2013 - 05:17 .


#336
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages

iakus wrote...

Mr Massakka wrote...

Have you really expected anything different than a complete focus on newcomers? There is a reason so many of the acclaimed personalities escaped BioWare.


Well, since fan retention no longer seems to be a priority, you have a point there...B)


I love how yanick roy's statement of "Too soon to say, but we'll be sure to be friendly both to old fans and to newcomers." translates in your twisted little head as "Only focus completely on newcomers".

Maybe you should give the new generation of fans a chance to come into the series, and than out of a desire for more understanding go back to the old games if they want to , instead of constantly shutting them out and barring their entrance with a over 100 dollar fandom tax.

#337
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests
New fans won't enjoy Mass Effect as much as I do.

#338
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 388 messages

Darth Brotarian wrote...

iakus wrote...

Mr Massakka wrote...

Have you really expected anything different than a complete focus on newcomers? There is a reason so many of the acclaimed personalities escaped BioWare.


Well, since fan retention no longer seems to be a priority, you have a point there...B)


I love how yanick roy's statement of "Too soon to say, but we'll be sure to be friendly both to old fans and to newcomers." translates in your twisted little head as "Only focus completely on newcomers".

Maybe you should give the new generation of fans a chance to come into the series, and than out of a desire for more understanding go back to the old games if they want to , instead of constantly shutting them out and barring their entrance with a over 100 dollar fandom tax.


Man, you can't joke about anything anymore.

Particularly since I am on record as saying I want no canon established going into this next game.  Heck I'd rather not even have ME3 games be importable to the next one.  Best case scenerio it might win a few alienated fans back.

So believe it or not, a clean slate is in fact what I want, which would probably be the best interst for new players.

But claiming to be friendly to new and old fans brings flashbacks of ME3's "this is the best place to start" marketing.  Which ended up only confusing new fans and annoying old ones.  Do we really need a repeat of that?

#339
BaladasDemnevanni

BaladasDemnevanni
  • Members
  • 2 127 messages

iakus wrote...

But claiming to be friendly to new and old fans brings flashbacks of ME3's "this is the best place to start" marketing.  Which ended up only confusing new fans and annoying old ones.  Do we really need a repeat of that?


No, but on the other hand, none of the issues I really had with ME3 stemmed from their efforts nominally at least to open Mass Effect up to new players.

The game was built pretty heavily on elements from both ME1 and ME2, both plots and characters, so that claim of "best place to start" really did ring hollow.

For all my criticisms of ME3, I never got the impression that concessions were made to acquire a new group of fans, James Vega aside, and I ended up enjoying him. It's not like they put all the ME1 and 2 characters on a bus to make room for a new cast.

Modifié par BaladasDemnevanni, 18 juillet 2013 - 05:55 .


#340
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages

iakus wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...

iakus wrote...

Mr Massakka wrote...

Have you really expected anything different than a complete focus on newcomers? There is a reason so many of the acclaimed personalities escaped BioWare.


Well, since fan retention no longer seems to be a priority, you have a point there...B)


I love how yanick roy's statement of "Too soon to say, but we'll be sure to be friendly both to old fans and to newcomers." translates in your twisted little head as "Only focus completely on newcomers".

Maybe you should give the new generation of fans a chance to come into the series, and than out of a desire for more understanding go back to the old games if they want to , instead of constantly shutting them out and barring their entrance with a over 100 dollar fandom tax.


Man, you can't joke about anything anymore.

Particularly since I am on record as saying I want no canon established going into this next game.  Heck I'd rather not even have ME3 games be importable to the next one.  Best case scenerio it might win a few alienated fans back.

So believe it or not, a clean slate is in fact what I want, which would probably be the best interst for new players.

But claiming to be friendly to new and old fans brings flashbacks of ME3's "this is the best place to start" marketing.  Which ended up only confusing new fans and annoying old ones.  Do we really need a repeat of that?


TBH I was more refering to Massakka than your point, but it was the one that got my attention and I was too lazy to go back and find Massakka's original post.

#341
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests
The only time I recall it being particularly bad was during the geth dreadnought mission where Shepard needs to have a refresher course on how the geth function. Though in general, I think that ME3 wasn't that accommodating to new players. The game throws names, places, concepts, and species at you and expects you to know what they are.

Modifié par Morocco Mole, 18 juillet 2013 - 06:07 .


#342
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests
What I'm most concerned about is ME4 having that same spin-off feeling that DA2 had. No returning characters, different setting, different game mechanics, different focus, different game in essence. If there is nothing about what made me enjoy the original games in the new ones, then what is the point of playing them?

#343
BaladasDemnevanni

BaladasDemnevanni
  • Members
  • 2 127 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...

What I'm most concerned about is ME4 having that same spin-off feeling that DA2 had. No returning characters, different setting, different game mechanics, different focus, different game in essence. If there is nothing about what made me enjoy the original games in the new ones, then what is the point of playing them?


New things, potentially?

Why do some people enjoy Legend of Korra, despite taking place 100 years after the last airbender?

Why do people enjoy KotOR 2, despite having a completely different tone/setting/characters/narrative than KotOR?

Even if there's little in comparison to the original, that doesn't negate there being the possibility of other things you enjoy.

Bioware's caught between a rock and a hard place on that one. They can't make a game too soon after ME3's ending, or risk having to canonize choices which will ****** everyone off whose choice lost out. But some people really want to see old faces/settings again.

I guess one potential is making ME4 about some concurrent plot during one of the other games, but I think many (myself included) would find that bland.

#344
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 388 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...

What I'm most concerned about is ME4 having that same spin-off feeling that DA2 had. No returning characters, different setting, different game mechanics, different focus, different game in essence. If there is nothing about what made me enjoy the original games in the new ones, then what is the point of playing them?


And that's the exact opposite for me.

I say keep the universe, the relays, teh worlds, the species, and populate it with an entirely new cast.

No Shepard
No Garrus
No Liara
No Tali
No James

All new story, all new cast, keep the Mass Effect trilogy as a self-contained story, and go do an entirely different one here.  Old fans get the same universe they're familiar with.  New fans don't have to worry about returning characters they've never met.

#345
DirtyPhoenix

DirtyPhoenix
  • Members
  • 3 938 messages

Darth Brotarian wrote...

iakus wrote...

Mr Massakka wrote...

Have you really expected anything different than a complete focus on newcomers? There is a reason so many of the acclaimed personalities escaped BioWare.


Well, since fan retention no longer seems to be a priority, you have a point there...B)


I love how yanick roy's statement of "Too soon to say, but we'll be sure to be friendly both to old fans and to newcomers." translates in your twisted little head as "Only focus completely on newcomers".

Maybe you should give the new generation of fans a chance to come into the series, and than out of a desire for more understanding go back to the old games if they want to , instead of constantly shutting them out and barring their entrance with a over 100 dollar fandom tax.


Impossibru! Newcomers are the root of aall problems that afflict ME. Those filthy casuals..

Seriously though, this is a problem hardly confined to ME fandom. Go to any game forum and you'll find fans treating their games sacrosanct and looking down on newcomers as something despicable and a symbol to everything that's wrong with their precious franchise. 

#346
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests
I guess there is some merit to going in a completely new direction. The biggest concern I have is that them trying new things will turn out just like their most recent attempt to do it, Dragon Age 2. Don't get me wrong, Dragon Age 2 was a good game. It just wasn't a good Dragon Age game, if that makes any sense. When I think of Dragon Age, I think of an epic fight against all odds. DA2 didn't capture that feeling for me. When I think of Mass Effect a lot of things come to mind. Characters, a galaxy that feels large, politics. If they can keep the essence of what made the Mass Effect games good to me, then I will enjoy the sequels. If they don't have those things, then I probably won't enjoy them, but I would hope that other people do.

What made LoK good is that even though it was a new cast and setting, it still had that Avatar feel to it. It had the humor, the action, the good characters and the attention to detail. That's sort of what I'm getting at. If the Mass Effect team lives up to it's potential, then they should be fine moving ahead. If they don't, then they'll have to try a different approach.

#347
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 733 messages

BaladasDemnevanni wrote...

iakus wrote...

Oh and Bioware pulling a "You Chose Wrong" is generally considered a bad thing. 


Well, it certainly wouldn't be the first time they've done this.

See Red Cliffe, the Rachni, the Geth-Quarian conflict, etc.


Is this even in play? The non-canon endings wouldn't necessarily be non-canon because they were wrong. They might be non-canon because they were too good to make interesting sequels, for instance.  

#348
BaladasDemnevanni

BaladasDemnevanni
  • Members
  • 2 127 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

Is this even in play? The non-canon endings wouldn't necessarily be non-canon because they were wrong. They might be non-canon because they were too good to make interesting sequels, for instance.  


I guess it depends on how you want to approach it.

If they see potential for more interesting stories going with certain canons, I really don't mind. It's the same reasoning why I'm against save imports for Dragon Age but want the Dark Ritual canonized: it has plot threads to consider for future games.

Similarly, I think Synthesis has the most potential for interesting storytelling. Personally, I'm less concerned with Bioware allowing for my chosen ending, which was control, than I am for them telling a good story in the future. I'm comfortable with looking at them both as alternate universes.

Modifié par BaladasDemnevanni, 18 juillet 2013 - 06:33 .


#349
Guy On The Moon

Guy On The Moon
  • Members
  • 162 messages

pirate1802 wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...

iakus wrote...

Mr Massakka wrote...

Have you really expected anything different than a complete focus on newcomers? There is a reason so many of the acclaimed personalities escaped BioWare.


Well, since fan retention no longer seems to be a priority, you have a point there...B)


I love how yanick roy's statement of "Too soon to say, but we'll be sure to be friendly both to old fans and to newcomers." translates in your twisted little head as "Only focus completely on newcomers".

Maybe you should give the new generation of fans a chance to come into the series, and than out of a desire for more understanding go back to the old games if they want to , instead of constantly shutting them out and barring their entrance with a over 100 dollar fandom tax.


Impossibru! Newcomers are the root of aall problems that afflict ME. Those filthy casuals..

Seriously though, this is a problem hardly confined to ME fandom. Go to any game forum and you'll find fans treating their games sacrosanct and looking down on newcomers as something despicable and a symbol to everything that's wrong with their precious franchise. 




Same reason why I hate people in Calc II who still ask questions about how to do the derivative of "x"

#350
TheProtheans

TheProtheans
  • Members
  • 1 622 messages
Oh for frack sake, "gaymers".
What is the gaming world coming to, destroy the link.

Mass effect 4 was confirmed 4 years ago, old news.