452 réponses à ce sujet

[DirtyPhoenix]

Wasn't the "primary way of dealing with the enemy" in ME1 was to shoot at them? I didn't see a dialog wheel come up everytime I was facing a a hostile..

And Remember me has no guns, the stuff that seems like a gun is not a gun, its called a spammer and it doesn't shoot projectiles.

[LucasShark]

EntropicAngel wrote...

LucasShark wrote...

Try reading what I've actually written, and the clarifications I've already given 3 or 4 times now, troll.

Put them in your OP or tell me them. I don't have time to go through six pages.

And I'll point out that the Unreal engine was developed for Unreal Tournament, an FPS. And allowed games like ME1, ME2, and ME3.

WHERE IS YOUR DOG NOW

You want me to read: read yourself, and again, you've mistaken genre for focus.

[LucasShark]

pirate1802 wrote...

Wasn't the "primary way of dealing with the enemy" in ME1 was to shoot at them? I didn't see a dialog wheel come up everytime I was facing a a hostile..

And Remember me has no guns, the stuff that seems like a gun is not a gun, its called a spammer and it doesn't shoot projectiles.

Not I also said "Core experience", not just "means of dealing with opposition".

My do people have a problem with subtlty.

[IntelligentME3Fanboy]

Mass Effect is a role playing shooter,like Borderlands.Deal with it

[crimzontearz]

"EA‘s influence over bioware" implies Bioware is its own entity.....that is not the case, Bioware=EA

[AlanC9]

EntropicAngel wrote...

LucasShark wrote...

You want me to read: read yourself, and again, you've mistaken genre for focus.

You're kidding, right? The "focus" of Unreal Tournament was BALLS TO THE WALL fast PvP. And it was used for ME1,2,3. The Battlefield series was undoubtedly, indesputably, a slower game focused more on dialog and on story (UT didn't HAVE a story or single-player, did it now scratch that, apparently that part isn't true--the single player was multiplayer with bots:P). FB>>>>>Unreal, in terms of FOCUS.

Keep tryin', I'll keep shooting them down.

You do realize that there's no actual argument here, right?

[Cainhurst Crow]

EntropicAngel wrote...

AlanC9 wrote...

You do realize that there's no actual argument here, right?

His argument is that because ME4 is using FB, its focus will be on being a shooter and not on dialog and story. At least, that's what his OP said. It's so very, very wrong.

Apparently he's shifted focus to, "Because frostbite 3 has pretty graphics, all the other parts of the game suffer for it."

It comes back to the resource fallacy these forums like to use so much.

[crimzontearz]

it is a common misconception that an engine can only produce one kind if game.....which is bull

[AtreiyaN7]

*yawns at the OP's little rant-fest*

After years of reading other BW fans complaints, one of them that seems to constantly crop up is the issue of BioWare's dated graphics. Pick a forum, and you can probably find a thread or a post where someone has mentioned the graphics, the textures, etc.

So they're finally getting with the program and at least trying to use a new engine at long, long last. What...is...the...problem? Oh, right - the problem is that you, the OP, are ignorant and seem to be incorrectly making associations between a game you don't like (Battlefield), its engine (which can be used for things OTHER than shooters), an entire genre you dislike (shooters), and the future course of ME development...all because you're disgruntled and are still throwing a hissy fit over ME3's game endings.

And in other ancient news about which no one (other than the OP) will be surprised...DA:I is based on Frostbite 3. WOOPS! I guess I should expect it to be a shooter, right? Maybe I'll see soldiers dressed in desert camo running around or watch an Apache helicopter fly across the skies of Thedas - all because of the Frostbite 3 engine! After all, the engine is hardcoded to ONLY allow you make militaristic shooters! *sarcasm to the infinite power*

[dreamgazer]

Think this topic might have given my brain a bit of frostbite.

Modifié par dreamgazer, 17 juillet 2013 - 07:18 .

[ShepnTali]

Chill out with the Frostbite, and don't be so cold to it's potential, which is well above sub zero.


Otherwise, cool thread.

[SilJeff]

Han Shot First wrote...

Sometimes I think people on the BSN are negative just for the sake of being negative.

There is literally no reason to complain about ME4 yet. This is a case of someone having already made up their mind that the next game is going to be a disaster, and looking for any bit of news to confirm that bias.

[dreamgazer]

I foresee a turret sequence on the back of a dragon.

[AresKeith]

People really taking this thread serious?

[IntelligentME3Fanboy]

dreamgazer wrote...

I foresee a turret sequence on the back of a dragon.

this seems like a good idea for a Skyrim mod

[Han Shot First]

You know what really rustles my jimmies?

Overly emotional people that like to jump to conclusions.

That goes for both Negative Nancys and Fanboys.

My opinion of ME4 is that I have no opinion. I know next to nothing about the game other than it is going to be set in the Mass Effect universe. I certainly don't know anywhere near enough to form an initial impression on the game.

Modifié par Han Shot First, 17 juillet 2013 - 08:07 .

[johnj1979]

With the mess of Mass Effect 3 how on earth can there be a Mass Effect 4?

[JamesFaith]

AresKeith wrote...

People really taking this thread serious?

OP certainly yes.

But rest of people here...