d4eaming wrote...
Selling him back to the person who abused him is pretty sick, especially
to enforce some stupid "faustian bargain" as if torturing someone is
the lesser evil than breaking a vow that he, according to his writer, did not know
would end with him being tortured to the point of trauma induced
amnesia. Fenris didn't know what Denarius had in mind for him- that is
not a decision made with all facts available, and therefore, has no
"bargain" that needs to be enforced.
That is very much the nature of a Faustian pact, though, not fully knowing what that pact entails. In the case of Goethe's work, Faust himself sets the condition whereby his soul is forfeit to good Mephistopheles, true, but meanwhile Faust is granted all the unvirtuous excitement and occult insight he asked for.
I read up the synopsis of the details given for Leto's deal with the magister, and it doesn't read too different: he did it so that his family are freed from slave-status in return, which is done. And the good Leto does appear to appreciate the...gift...he received, given his tendency to employ it to gruesome effect during his violent outbursts.
Leto also doesn't strike me as a particularly broken character - imbalanced, yes, what with his anger management issues, but not broken. Which actually makes me respect the man a good deal more. That he was willing to sacrifice himself for the good of his family also speaks well of him to me, as well as him not going on a rampage when returned to his master.
I will not deny that getting the full picture on the deal Leto struck with his master requires meta-knowledge gained through playing both outcomes of his act 3-quest, but even ignoring that, there are more pragmatic reasons stated by others to humour Danarius's proposal.
Regardless of all that, I am not disinclined to see or at least hear of the DA2 cast in DA:I again, Fenris included, nor do I discourage that.
Modifié par Chashan, 04 septembre 2013 - 03:24 .





Retour en haut







