107 réponses à ce sujet

[DarthLaxian]

iggy4566 wrote...

A clean state is the best for ME.

i can't agree more (yes - a sequel is acceptable, too (prequels are not and games happening at the same time as ME1-3 are not either))

ME has so much potential left (in the original storyline - the one with dark energy not the "we kill you so you aren't killed" crap ME3 was/is)

greetings LAX
ps: start of by filling out plotholes like why sheppard never gets a high ranking Asari to meld with him (in order to show her the vision of the beacon) etc. and let play decisions stand (no, Rachni like crap or Anderson stepping down as councilor (and Udina getting the billet - also Sheppard who supposedly has soooooo much influence, tells people not to put that jerk into office!) etc.)

[KotorEffect3]

A reboot is unnecessary, just make ME 4 a few decades after the events of ME 3.

[N7 Shadow 90]

There's WAY too much to lose if the series was rebooted.

[Iakus]

N7 Shadow 90 wrote...

There's WAY too much to lose if the series was rebooted.

Including ending baggage.

Totally worth it, imo

[Cainhurst Crow]

Yeah. Cause rebooting a series that's not at least a decade old always works out well. Just look at the new spiderman shows and movie and how utterly popular they are, I mean so unbelievably popular that nobodies screaming for them to just die already.

Rebooting the series would do nothing but ****** people off because it'll be weaker, less rpg versions of mass effect 1 and 2 and than only a moderately better mass effect 3, or possibly worse depending on how they handle it.

[Iakus]

Darth Brotarian wrote...
Rebooting the series would do nothing but ****** people off because it'll be weaker, less rpg versions of mass effect 1 and 2 and than only a moderately better mass effect 3, or possibly worse depending on how they handle it.

Right, because that wasn't happening anyway from ME1-ME2-ME3

[Dominus]

To be perfectly frank, they've likely made a decision of where they're taking the series, well after a year since the last game was released. A reboot has a very low chance of happening.

Modifié par DominusVita, 23 juillet 2013 - 05:36 .

[Cainhurst Crow]

iakus wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...
Rebooting the series would do nothing but ****** people off because it'll be weaker, less rpg versions of mass effect 1 and 2 and than only a moderately better mass effect 3, or possibly worse depending on how they handle it.

Right, because that wasn't happening anyway from ME1-ME2-ME3

And would you like to see mass effect 1 redone in the same style as mass effect 3? Conversation and choice style and all? With action mode included?

Mass effect 1 now, complete with sovereign discussing organic vs synthetic conflicts and enough of it shoved down your throat to never be seen as poorly foreshadowed again.

[Iakus]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

iakus wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...
Rebooting the series would do nothing but ****** people off because it'll be weaker, less rpg versions of mass effect 1 and 2 and than only a moderately better mass effect 3, or possibly worse depending on how they handle it.

Right, because that wasn't happening anyway from ME1-ME2-ME3

And would you like to see mass effect 1 redone in the same style as mass effect 3? Conversation and choice style and all? With action mode included?

Mass effect 1 now, complete with sovereign discussing organic vs synthetic conflicts and enough of it shoved down your throat to never be seen as poorly foreshadowed again.

You misunderstand.  I don't want to redo Commander Shepard's story, I want a brand new story with zero connection to the old one.  It would be nice to go back and redo Shepard's story "right" but that's not gonna happen.  THe story's been torched and it's not getting fixed.

I don't want ME3 anywhere near any future installments of this universe.

No prequel
No sequel
No sidequel

Start over.  Same time period, same species, worlds, lore (what hasn't been smashed to pieces yet) new cast of characters, new adventures.  If you want Shepard's story, those games are over there.  This is something new.

Go back and stop being ashamed of making rpgs

Modifié par iakus, 23 juillet 2013 - 06:18 .

[Cainhurst Crow]

Why not just make a new story sequel, like legend of korra was for avatar? It sounds redundant to prevent time from advancing, and still just make a new story and setting.

Modifié par Darth Brotarian, 23 juillet 2013 - 06:21 .

[Iakus]

Because personally, I despise these endings so much I want no part of any future setting where any of them took place. I know what horrific acts society will have been rebuilt upon, and I want nothing to do with it.

[Sir George Parr]

iakus wrote...

N7 Shadow 90 wrote...

There's WAY too much to lose if the series was rebooted.

Including ending baggage.

Totally worth it, imo

Every cloud has a silver lining. Feels like it would be worth it to do away that ending baggage.

[Iakus]

Morocco Mole wrote...

iakus wrote...

Because personally, I despise these endings so much I want no part of any future setting where any of them took place. I know what horrific acts society will have been rebuilt upon, and I want nothing to do with it.

Then I guess you wont be buying any sequels.

No.

I won't

Edit:  or rather, the odds of a sequel allowing for my personal canon are so microscopically tiny that it's a virtual certainty I won't buy.

Modifié par iakus, 23 juillet 2013 - 06:35 .

[Cainhurst Crow]

iakus wrote...

Because personally, I despise these endings so much I want no part of any future setting where any of them took place. I know what horrific acts society will have been rebuilt upon, and I want nothing to do with it.

Your personal porogative, I feel, is preventing you from seeing the utter redundancy and ludicrous tip toeing and double speak your idea is, espically since it requires more mental gymnastics to arrive at the exact same location.

[Cainhurst Crow]

So if we go with the iakus plan, does that mean the krogan are still chemically castrated?

[Iakus]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

iakus wrote...

Because personally, I despise these endings so much I want no part of any future setting where any of them took place. I know what horrific acts society will have been rebuilt upon, and I want nothing to do with it.

Your personal porogative, I feel, is preventing you from seeing the utter redundancy and ludicrous tip toeing and double speak your idea is, espically since it requires more mental gymnastics to arrive at the exact same location.

Whatever, man.  But I stand by my statement, I want nothing to do with the galaxy where any of those events took place.  I wil not in any way condone them.  Certainly not with money. 

I'll take IT, of all things, over them.

[Iakus]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

So if we go with the iakus plan, does that mean the krogan are still chemically castrated?

I dunno.  are they still in your sequel?

[Iakus]

Morocco Mole wrote...

It's a videogame. Not an actual warcrime.

So? I don't like to play them out either.

I also don't play games where I go around shooting cops.  Or act in an otherwise villainous manner.  I will not play games that force me to do so.

[Cainhurst Crow]

iakus wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...

So if we go with the iakus plan, does that mean the krogan are still chemically castrated?

I dunno.  are they still in your sequel?

It's your plan, you should know.

[shingara]

A full reboot would be worse then bobby waking up and taking a shower, ow it was all a dream. It would revoke all previous titles of mass effect as redundant for alot of players. Im not apposed to them reworking 1-3 within the frostbite engine as a 1 huge game you play back to back refined to incorperate all the best of the 3 like the scanning and exploration and a real boss fight and ultimate ending on 3 but as the next stage of mass effect nah. There would be a bloody cival war within the fanbase.

Modifié par shingara, 23 juillet 2013 - 07:11 .

[Son of Shepherd]

iakus wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...

iakus wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...
Rebooting the series would do nothing but ****** people off because it'll be weaker, less rpg versions of mass effect 1 and 2 and than only a moderately better mass effect 3, or possibly worse depending on how they handle it.

Right, because that wasn't happening anyway from ME1-ME2-ME3

And would you like to see mass effect 1 redone in the same style as mass effect 3? Conversation and choice style and all? With action mode included?

Mass effect 1 now, complete with sovereign discussing organic vs synthetic conflicts and enough of it shoved down your throat to never be seen as poorly foreshadowed again.

You misunderstand.  I don't want to redo Commander Shepard's story, I want a brand new story with zero connection to the old one.  It would be nice to go back and redo Shepard's story "right" but that's not gonna happen.  THe story's been torched and it's not getting fixed.

I don't want ME3 anywhere near any future installments of this universe.

No prequel
No sequel
No sidequel

Start over.  Same time period, same species, worlds, lore (what hasn't been smashed to pieces yet) new cast of characters, new adventures.  If you want Shepard's story, those games are over there.  This is something new.

Go back and stop being ashamed of making rpgs

 

Do you mean start in 2183 but without Sovereign, and the reapers aren't coming?