202 réponses à ce sujet

[spirosz]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Miranda is perfect.

In game fact.

Perfectly flawed like any other human, ha! 

[MassivelyEffective0730]

David7204 wrote...

I would consider plenty of characters from Mass Effect perfect.

This is a Dragon Age forum.

[MassivelyEffective0730]

spirosz wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Miranda is perfect.

In game fact.

Perfectly flawed like any other human, ha! 

Genetically perfect, ****!

Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 23 juillet 2013 - 10:31 .

[Bionuts]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

David7204 wrote...

I would consider plenty of characters from Mass Effect perfect.

This is a Dragon Age forum.

Origins is not his type of game (I think). He believes that doing what feels "morally right" should have the best outcome.

[David7204]

Miranda is actually probably one of the most flawed. In fact, that's the exact reason why Miranda fails to achieve the things other characters do, despite having every other obvious advantage. 

That's the reason she falls behind Shepard.

Modifié par David7204, 23 juillet 2013 - 10:33 .

[Dextro Milk]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

spirosz wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Miranda is perfect.

In game fact.

Perfectly flawed like any other human, ha! 

Genetically perfect, ****!

Only a fool would call a genetically modified beaver perfect tbh... 

[Bionuts]

^ Like Goku and Vegeta?

[SlottsMachine]

What the hell do you have against genetically modified beaver's?

[SlottsMachine]

David7204 wrote...

Miranda is actually probably one of the most flawed. In fact, that's the exact reason why Miranda fails to achieve the things other characters do, despite having every other obvious advantage. 

That's the reason she falls behind Shepard.

Oh? Here we go...

[MassivelyEffective0730]

Bionuts wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

David7204 wrote...

I would consider plenty of characters from Mass Effect perfect.

This is a Dragon Age forum.

Origins is not his type of game (I think). He believes that doing what feels "morally right" should have the best outcome.

Oh, believe me. I know how he is.

He also believes that characterization comes before practicality and utility for character uniforms.

He has a terrible tendency to mind project his views. Which are also pretty far-fetched and absurd. He is entitled to them, but he loves to whack people over the head with them. He also claims that he has a right to disrespect and insult them since he's standing by his principles. 

I'm surprised he hasn't been perma-banned yet.

[AresKeith]

David7204 wrote...

Miranda is actually probably one of the most flawed. In fact, that's the exact reason why Miranda fails to achieve the things other characters do, despite having every other obvious advantage. 

That's the reason she falls behind Shepard.

David play DA:O

[Dextro Milk]

General Slotts wrote...

What the hell do you have against genetically modified beaver's?

Nothing, only when people call them perfect. 

[David7204]

Oh yes. Miranda is dishonest. Intentionally by the writers, I might add.

Also, enough of this "play DA:O" nonsense. This has nothing to do with morality. Just simple logic. Miranda has a flaw, and is weaker because of it. And thus never quite on the level of Shepard and some of the others.

it's an inevitability.

Modifié par David7204, 23 juillet 2013 - 10:39 .

[Dextro Milk]

David7204 wrote...

Oh yes. Miranda is dishonest. Intentionally by the writers, I might add.

Also, enough of this "play DA:O" nonsense. This has nothing to do with morality. Just simple logic. Miranda has a flaw, and is weaker because of it.

Wait, you never played DA:O? 

[MassivelyEffective0730]

David7204 wrote...

Miranda is actually probably one of the most flawed. In fact, that's the exact reason why Miranda fails to achieve the things other characters do, despite having every other obvious advantage. 

That's the reason she falls behind Shepard.

And the epic reverse statement fallacy.

Because I say something, you are inclined to state the opposite. Whether you believe it or not is irrelevant, the simple fact is that you're trying to get a rise out of me.

Not to mention that we're in a thread unrelated to Mass Effect, so, argumentum ad nauseum too. 

Really David, this is a Dragon Age thread. You haven't played the game, so you have no ground to stand on when criticizing the story or even talking about the story. 

Reported for spam.

Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 23 juillet 2013 - 10:41 .

[David7204]

The simple fact is that I rarely post at all unless I'm confronting someone. What exactly is the point of being the 500th person on the thread to nod and smile and say, "Yup, Allers has a bad voice actor" or somesuch stupidly obvious nonsens?

Modifié par David7204, 23 juillet 2013 - 10:42 .

[spirosz]

David7204 wrote...

The simple fact is that I rarely post at all unless I'm confronting someone. What exactly is the point of being the 500th person on the thread to nod and smile and say, "Yup, Allers has a bad voice actor" or somesuch stupidly obvious nonsens?

Do not bring that thing into this. 

[dreamgazer]

Just because a character's perfect, doesn't mean you have to like 'em.

[SlottsMachine]

David7204 wrote...

The simple fact is that I rarely post at all unless I'm confronting someone. What exactly is the point of being the 500th person on the thread to nod and smile and say, "Yup, Allers has a bad voice actor" or somesuch stupidly obvious nonsens?

So your own opinions cannot stand on merit, you need to tear down someone else's?

Modifié par General Slotts, 23 juillet 2013 - 10:46 .

[MassivelyEffective0730]

dreamgazer wrote...

Just because a character's perfect, doesn't mean you have to like 'em.

That is very true.

But we all know that Alistair, Leliana, Anders, Ohgren, and Dog are perfect. 

Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 23 juillet 2013 - 10:45 .

[AresKeith]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

Just because a character's perfect, doesn't mean you have to like 'em.

That is very true.

But we all know that Alistair(to an extent), Leliana, Morrigan, Ohgren, and Dog are perfect. 

I agree

Modifié par AresKeith, 23 juillet 2013 - 10:47 .

[MassivelyEffective0730]

AresKeith wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

Just because a character's perfect, doesn't mean you have to like 'em.

That is very true.

But we all know that Alistair(to an extent), Leliana, Morrigan, Ohgren, and Dog are perfect. 

I agree

Jerkoff. 

What do do you have against sarcastic apostates?

[AresKeith]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

Just because a character's perfect, doesn't mean you have to like 'em.

That is very true.

But we all know that Alistair(to an extent), Leliana, Morrigan, Ohgren, and Dog are perfect. 

I agree

Jerkoff. 

What do do you have against sarcastic apostates?

I was fine with Anders until DA2 happened where he just pissed me off

Even though I spared him in my "canon Hawke" playthrough 

[Sylvius the Mad]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Origins is not his type of game (I think). He believes that doing what feels "morally right" should have the best outcome.

What?

What if people disagree about what "feels" morally right?  What if someone (correctly) declares that the very idea of moral feelings is absurd?