109 réponses à ce sujet

[NuclearTech76]

More players, more enemies, more maps, etc.

What's possible with the new hardware on these new consoles or is there limitations on how much can be done in ME4MP?

[HoochieHamiltoe]

I think BioWare announcing ME4 being on the Frostbite engine all but confirms a much larger multi player experience.

[SiMpLyNoir]

HoochieHamiltoe wrote...

I think BioWare announcing ME4 being on the Frostbite engine all but confirms a much larger multi player experience.

[Pew Pewer of Beep Boops]

Assuming that the PS4/Xbone will be able to match high-end gaming PCs, i'd assume they will be able to do quite a bit more.

[oO Stryfe Oo]

HoochieHamiltoe wrote...

I think BioWare announcing ME4 being on the Frostbite engine all but confirms a much larger multi player experience.

Yup. 64 player in Battlefield 4 on console? **** YEAH!!!

I mean, if they can do it with 64 players and vehicles, destructibility and whatnot, I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to make it 8 players vs. like 20+ respawning AI. I'm so ****ing pumped for Next Effect. Oh, and Inquisition, too. Well, kinda. I feel like their MP's gonna suck.

[AkuIaTubShark]

One can hope, with the 'upgraded' hardware the new consoles are getting better - and with them using the Frostbite engine, I'd like to see things such as BF3 sized maps and massive hoards of enemies if they keep it the same style it is now.
But anythings possible, sadly, and hopefully it won't be a flop.

[capn233]

Even better, there will probably be commercials within the match.

[GriM_AoD]

IMO the 8 enemy cap, is the main source of balancing woe. Dat  2:1 ratio

TchockTckocky wrote...

The new Battlefield 4 will support 64-man games on the new Gen consoles... so probably.

64 man games on BF2142... Good times.
Maybe Battlefield 4 will hold a candle to 2142, unlike the others.

Modifié par GriM_AoD, 23 juillet 2013 - 03:06 .

[dysturbed0ne]

Do we really want it though?

If they shift to more players the game will completely change. I know there are plenty of CoD and BF fans out there, but IMO the draw for this game was that is really wasn't like those.

Personally I would like to see bigger maps, more enemy types, less bugs, but with the way the game is even doubling the players really shifts the games focus.

[Leland Gaunt]

Imagine a 64 Talon cain-trippin' game...

Me wanna!

[capn233]

Ghostknife72 wrote...

capn233 wrote...

Even better, there will probably be commercials within the match.

Ugg...I know you are kidding, but seriously, don't give them ideas.

They could turn it into a good idea by making them in universe fake commercials.

"Come to the Fish Dog Food Shack!"

"They thought that Blasto, the first Hanar Spectre, would play by the rules..."

[NuclearTech76]

I understand nothing on the tech side of it but will this be more susceptible to lag and bugs in the server side.

[HoochieHamiltoe]

NuclearTech76 wrote...

I understand nothing on the tech side of it but will this be more susceptible to lag and bugs in the server side.

If I remember correctly lag will be a thing of the past. Microsoft will have over 300,000 servers worldwide. 

[Slojack]

So instead of carrying 3 PUGs, you can carry 6 or 7? Gonna need a bigger more comfortable backpack.

Modifié par Slojack, 23 juillet 2013 - 03:44 .

[NuclearTech76]

Slojack wrote...

So instead of carrying 3 PUGs, you can carry 6 or 7? Gonna need a bigger more comfortable backpack.

Hell yeah, more things to complain about. I'm excited.

[R0gueSp3ctre18]

Hmm, an interesting notion. As a matter of fact, some friends and I were discussing this last night.

8 players - 32 enimes active at once

Each difficulty would scale
-wood - 8 enemies active at once with 4 players
-silver - 12 enimes active at once with 4 players
-gold - 16 enemies active at once with 8 players
-platinum 32 enemies active at once with 8 players with higher priority on elite enemies being active

Can you imagine the level of chaos?

Modifié par blackproject18, 23 juillet 2013 - 03:46 .

[Skelly]

blackproject18 wrote...

Hmm, an interesting notion. As a matter of fact, some friends and I were discussing this last night.

8 players - 32 enimes active at once

Can you imagine the level of chaos?

Dude.  8 combat drones active at once.

Can you imagine the level of AWESOME???

Seriously though, I think this idea would be fun so long as playing as a big team was an option and not the only mode.  I mean, you get nights like last night where everyone's online eager to play, but you also get nights where you struggle to fill a PUG lobby.

[R0gueSp3ctre18]

Major Casey wrote...

blackproject18 wrote...

Hmm, an interesting notion. As a matter of fact, some friends and I were discussing this last night.

8 players - 32 enimes active at once

Each difficulty would scale
-wood - 8 enemies active at once with 4 players
-silver - 12 enimes active at once with 4 players
-gold - 16 enemies active at once with 8 players
-platinum 32 enemies active at once with 8 players with higher priority on elite enemies being active

 

Dude.  8 combat drones active at once.

Can you imagine the level of AWESOME???

Seriously though, I think this idea would be fun so long as playing as a big team was an option and not the only mode.  I mean, you get nights like last night where everyone's online eager to play, but you also get nights where you struggle to fill a PUG lobby.

Exactly that's why I'd like to see it scale incrementally

It's not that uncommon that I'm in a party of six - eight people that have two lobbies running at the sma etime. Why not combine them?

Modifié par blackproject18, 23 juillet 2013 - 03:55 .

[NuclearTech76]

More customization would be cool. Say if someone wanted 32 possessed abominations active at once. Maybe a customizable horde option if that's even doable.

[Slojack]

NuclearTech76 wrote...

More customization would be cool. Say if someone wanted 32 possessed abominations active at once. Maybe a customizable horde option if that's even doable.

You would be out of missles and have 15 revives by the middle of Wave 2