. Ignoring the question will get you nowhereDavid7204 wrote...
"Bob killed Alice. What evidence do you have that Bob didn't kill Alice?"Steelcan wrote...
What evidence do you have that the Normandy would not be moving at a very fast rate into the atmosphere?
Ill ignore the ad hominem.
What would a laywer say to that, Steelcan?
Friends, fellow haters, lend me your ears.
#201
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 01:54
#202
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 01:55
Modifié par David7204, 31 juillet 2013 - 01:57 .
#203
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 01:56
https://encrypted-tb...DtrB8wqenxj94mt
#204
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 01:56
Steelcan wrote...
Ignoring the question will get you nowhere
That's just it, Steelcan. I don't have to 'get' anywhere. I'm perfectly fine where I stand. I only need to show you don't have conclusive proof.
#205
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 01:57
dreamgazer wrote...
How about an eye-witness account, like Jacob?
Or Liara:
Shepard: "I didn't realize it was that bad"
Liara: "I saw what was left of you. I thought you knew"
#206
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 01:58
#207
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 01:59
I'll take this one.David7204 wrote...
Iakus, I'd explain you to explain to me exactly how the methane/ammonia atmosphere is going to affect human tissues. I'd also like you to explain to me how this 'irreversible brain damage' works.
With the lack oxygen in Shepard's blood the brain cells would start to degrade due to their reliance on aerobic respiration. These vrain cells are not easily replacable and ven if they are replaced the memories of the original cell would not be saved. Shepard would have no memory of anything prior to the establishment of new neurons. The atmosphere itself would not damage the tissue, but given its lack of oxygen the cells would also be destroyed by prolonged anerobic conditions.
#208
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:00
#209
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:01
Guest_StreetMagic_*
When I'm handed a mess, my response is more like "Dude WTF?" That's a lost cause. Laziness wins every time.
#210
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:02
Steelcan wrote...
I'll take this one.David7204 wrote...
Iakus, I'd explain you to explain to me exactly how the methane/ammonia atmosphere is going to affect human tissues. I'd also like you to explain to me how this 'irreversible brain damage' works.
With the lack oxygen in Shepard's blood the brain cells would start to degrade due to their reliance on aerobic respiration. These vrain cells are not easily replacable and ven if they are replaced the memories of the original cell would not be saved. Shepard would have no memory of anything prior to the establishment of new neurons. The atmosphere itself would not damage the tissue, but given its lack of oxygen the cells would also be destroyed by prolonged anerobic conditions.
And why wouldn't the memories be saved or salvageable, Steelcan? How are memories preserved when cells naturally die? Or when humans suffer extensive physical trauma to the brain and survive with intact memories, as has happened on multiple documented occansions?
Modifié par David7204, 31 juillet 2013 - 02:03 .
#211
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:03
Brain cells damaged or destroyed due to an anerobic environment would not store Shepard's old memories. Furthermore there are not enough cells that could be used to completely reform his brain. They would need to clone additional stem cells, but this would not result in the end product we got in Lazarus.David7204 wrote...
Are we done here? I think I've heard everything I'm going to hear. Does anyone have any actual reasoning explaining why Shepard's body being a mess should prevent Cerberus from restoring function to it with the technology available?
#212
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:03
David7204 wrote...
Are we done here? I think I've heard everything I'm going to hear. Does anyone have any actual reasoning explaining why Shepard's body being a mess should prevent Cerberus from restoring function to it with the technology available?
Are you pulling Clarke's law here?
#213
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:03
#214
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:04
#215
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:05
#216
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:05
Guest_StreetMagic_*
AresKeith wrote...
Don't you just love when college students act like they know everything about everything
No.
Oh, wait.. That was a joke.
Modifié par StreetMagic, 31 juillet 2013 - 02:05 .
#217
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:07
I'll admit that I don't really don't either. The great thing is I don't have to.
#218
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:08
. Right you are a physicist in training.David7204 wrote...
You've got no idea how the brain works, Steelcan. You're clumsy.
I'll admit that I don't really don't either. The great thing is I don't have to.
And since you clearly have no clue what you are talking about, Ill ignore the second ad hominem.
#219
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:09
David7204 wrote...
You've got no idea how the brain works, Steelcan. You're clumsy.
I'll admit that I don't really don't either. The great thing is I don't have to.
And yet you act like you do but claims Steel doesn't, when he probably does
#220
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:09
#221
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:12
AresKeith wrote...
Don't you just love when college students act like they know everything about everything
If he's a college student, then I've already lost faith in humanity. We're boned.
Modifié par BaladasDemnevanni, 31 juillet 2013 - 02:12 .
#222
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:12
However, that does mean that any declarations about what Lazarus could or couldn't do are not only meritless, but incredibly foolish.
#223
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:13
I may not be a neuroscientist, but I know what is hokum passing off as science to advance a plot.David7204 wrote...
It's very clear to me that nobody here has any clue how such phenomena in the brain actually function. Which is hardly unexpected - it's highly specialized knowledge few people have access to.
However, that does mean that any declarations about what Lazarus could or couldn't do are not only meritless, but incredibly foolish.
#224
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:14
Modifié par David7204, 31 juillet 2013 - 02:15 .
#225
Posté 31 juillet 2013 - 02:15
. Just because you reject my arguments doesnt mean they are wrong. It simply means you are full of yourself.David7204 wrote...
You very clearly don't, Steelcan.





Retour en haut





