David7204 wrote...
Can you bone a dozen non-prostitutes just because your character says romance is meaningless and all s/he cares about is sex?
Modifié par CrustyBot, 28 juillet 2013 - 03:36 .
Mr.House wrote...
I once got put in the back room with nothing but traps around me.Lord Raijin wrote...
KENNY4753 wrote...
you can have pretty much unlimited casual sex in both DA games already...The Pearl and The Blooming Rose...
Not all the time at the Blooming Rose. Madam Lusine likes to be a smartass, especially when you ask her for the bad girl/boy special
:happy:
:pinched:
Mr.House wrote...
I once got put in the back room with nothing but traps around me.Lord Raijin wrote...
KENNY4753 wrote...
you can have pretty much unlimited casual sex in both DA games already...The Pearl and The Blooming Rose...
Not all the time at the Blooming Rose. Madam Lusine likes to be a smartass, especially when you ask her for the bad girl/boy special
Hey, good idea. We should be able to initiate casual sexual encounters with Chantry priests.Lord Raijin wrote...
I didn't mind the booby trap room.... but the idea of sicking one of the chantry preistess on us is far worst. To sit there and listen to her preach, and paying for it on top it off.
Good thing you dpon't work for Bioware then.David7204 wrote...
So there are. I would frown on that and remove it.
David7204 wrote...
So there are. I would frown on that and remove it.
Modifié par Han Shot First, 28 juillet 2013 - 03:39 .
Bionuts wrote...
It doesn't cheapen the romances for me.
My last Hawke was a regular at the brothel, slept with Isabela, etc. However, none of that stopped me fromcrying like a little babyfeeling emotional during the Merrimance scene (alwayscryfeel emotional during it)
David7204 wrote...
So there are. I would frown on that and remove it.
David7204 wrote...
Honestly, I'm not overwhelmingly fond of the sex scenes in Mass Effect. And I've heard the ones in Dragon Age are far worse.
Truth be told, DAO is like Fallout 3 and New Vegas:CrustyBot wrote...
inb4 Dragon Age Origins is a sex simulator.
Modifié par El_Chala_Legalizado, 28 juillet 2013 - 03:44 .
dreamgazer wrote...
David7204 wrote...
So there are. I would frown on that and remove it.
Are you aware of how commonplace they were in the Middle Ages?
What about convincing an NPC to do something by having your LI sleep with them?Han Shot First wrote...
Mr.House wrote...
Again why? WHy can't things exsist to establish the character you are playing.Han Shot First wrote...
David7204 wrote...
I don't think the player should have the ability to have sex with ten women just because their character is that totally awesome when it just doesn't add much meaningful content to the story.
I do agree with this.
If a player character is going to be able to have flings with NPCs it should serve some purpose in the story, and not just be there for the sake of an achievement or wish fulfillment.
I don't think a fade to black and see ya later really adds much depth to the game.
If casual flings were in the game I'd rather there were consequences, both good and bad. Say for example an NPC seduces your character, only for it to later be revealed that the character is an enemy agent who ensnared you in a honeytrap. While your character is sleeping and out of their armor, he/she is ambushed by an assassin sent by the game's Big Bad, and must now fight for survival without armor. Or perhaps your character needs a noble's support for something or other, and that noble isn't inclined to give it, but sex is used as a way of manipulating said noble into giving that support. Or perhaps the NPC is someone you run across on a quest, and the choice to have the fling either inadvertently causes that quest to succeed or fail. Or perhaps pillow talk with the new paramour reveals some crucial bit of intelligence your PC wouldn't have gained otherwise.
There are a lot of possibilities really. But if casual flings are in the game, it is better that they serve a purpose within the story than having them without a purpose.
I'm guessing you're dying to tell me. Why don't you go ahead?dreamgazer wrote...
David7204 wrote...
So there are. I would frown on that and remove it.
Are you aware of how commonplace they were in the Middle Ages?
Zazzerka wrote...
Hey, good idea. We should be able to initiate casual sexual encounters with Chantry priests.Lord Raijin wrote...
I didn't mind the booby trap room.... but the idea of sicking one of the chantry preistess on us is far worst. To sit there and listen to her preach, and paying for it on top it off.
No, it really wouldn't.Fast Jimmy wrote...
What about convincing an NPC to do something by having your LI sleep with them?
Now THAT would be good story-telling.
Modifié par David7204, 28 juillet 2013 - 03:45 .
El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...
Truth be told, DAO is like Fallout 3 and New Vegas:CrustyBot wrote...
inb4 Dragon Age Origins is a sex simulator.
With the correct mods, you can make the game be a sex simulator
David7204 wrote...
No, it really wouldn't.Fast Jimmy wrote...
What about convincing an NPC to do something by having your LI sleep with them?
Now THAT would be good story-telling.
Modifié par CrustyBot, 28 juillet 2013 - 03:47 .
David7204 wrote...
I'm guessing you're dying to tell me. Why don't you go ahead?dreamgazer wrote...
David7204 wrote...
So there are. I would frown on that and remove it.
Are you aware of how commonplace they were in the Middle Ages?
David7204 wrote...
I'm guessing you're dying to tell me. Why don't you go ahead?dreamgazer wrote...
David7204 wrote...
So there are. I would frown on that and remove it.
Are you aware of how commonplace they were in the Middle Ages?
Guest_The Cel_*
Fast Jimmy wrote...
What about convincing an NPC to do something by having your LI sleep with them?Han Shot First wrote...
Mr.House wrote...
Again why? WHy can't things exsist to establish the character you are playing.Han Shot First wrote...
David7204 wrote...
I don't think the player should have the ability to have sex with ten women just because their character is that totally awesome when it just doesn't add much meaningful content to the story.
I do agree with this.
If a player character is going to be able to have flings with NPCs it should serve some purpose in the story, and not just be there for the sake of an achievement or wish fulfillment.
I don't think a fade to black and see ya later really adds much depth to the game.
If casual flings were in the game I'd rather there were consequences, both good and bad. Say for example an NPC seduces your character, only for it to later be revealed that the character is an enemy agent who ensnared you in a honeytrap. While your character is sleeping and out of their armor, he/she is ambushed by an assassin sent by the game's Big Bad, and must now fight for survival without armor. Or perhaps your character needs a noble's support for something or other, and that noble isn't inclined to give it, but sex is used as a way of manipulating said noble into giving that support. Or perhaps the NPC is someone you run across on a quest, and the choice to have the fling either inadvertently causes that quest to succeed or fail. Or perhaps pillow talk with the new paramour reveals some crucial bit of intelligence your PC wouldn't have gained otherwise.
There are a lot of possibilities really. But if casual flings are in the game, it is better that they serve a purpose within the story than having them without a purpose.
Now THAT would be good story-telling.
Retour en haut