David7204 wrote...
Honest question. Why are people so defensive about this utterly simple concept and obvious concept? The player does not make Shepard great any more than the movie viewer makes Batman or James Bond great. Any more than the reader makes Harry Potter great.
Because Shepard is a video game character, an interactive medium that requires active audience participation within the plot via a Player character, in this case, one whom we can define down to Shepard's appearance, gender, background, capabilities, choices, philosophies, demeanor, behavior, attitudes, ideas, beliefs, relationships, etc.
You can't do that with 007. It's in a novel form by Ian Fleming, or a movie by Cubby Broccoli. Same with Batsy. Same with Harry Pothead. It's passive audience participation. We don't control the flow of the story. We don't control the outcomes of events. We're just passive observers.