Who's to blame?
#1
Posté 02 août 2013 - 01:27
We all know about the geth and quarian war and how they got kicked off their planet by the geth. The question is who do you blame for it, and their continued hatred.
Geth-Do you blame the geth for not understanding that it would be hard for quarians to accept them as equals, and not coming up with a better alternitive. The geth did get influenced by the reapers and attacked colonist because of that. Maybe for reasons like this you would keep them controlled, and can understand why the quarians did what they did.
Quarians- Had the geth as slaves. Also came down with martial law on them.
#2
Guest_Finn the Jakey_*
Posté 02 août 2013 - 01:30
Guest_Finn the Jakey_*
Modifié par Finn the Jakey, 02 août 2013 - 01:31 .
#3
Posté 02 août 2013 - 02:01
#4
Posté 02 août 2013 - 02:16
Modifié par Tron Mega, 02 août 2013 - 02:17 .
#5
Posté 02 août 2013 - 02:25
*retrieves stock response #248-B*
The Quarian government, acting in compliance with Council law on artificial intelligence, was responsible for the start of the conflict - they don't deny it - however, there are far too many people willing to overlook the atrocities the Geth committed in response.
This audience reaction was to be expected, really. ME3 did its damnedest to paint the Geth as hapless victims; to avoid mentioning previously-established facts in the lore casting the Geth in a negative light (such as exterminating 99% of the Quarian species (ME: Revelation), destroying the ancestral VI archives (ME1 codex), allowing the heretics to continue their attacks for TWO YEARS after the events of ME1 without so much as disowning them (ME2, though Shepard never gets to call them out for it), and killing anyone who entered their space, refusing all organic attempts at peaceful contact for centuries (ME: Revelation, ME1)), manipulating sympathies with the obvious intent of making people reluctant to choose Destroy at the end.
#6
Posté 02 août 2013 - 02:31
That is a giant red herring - the geth being synthetics has nothing to do with it: the quarians got cared that they might be eclipsed by their creation, and decided that pre-emotive genocide was the best option. It would have been exactly the same if the geth had been a genetically engineered organic species (I.e. the krogan, except that the salerians didn't botch their genocide)Geth-Do you blame the geth for not understanding that it would be hard for quarians to accept them as equals, and not coming up with a better alternitive
#7
Posté 02 août 2013 - 02:46
Finn the Jakey wrote...
Welcome to Geth vs. Quarians Thread #4307b
Well I haven't been here in awhile and it is a game that has been going on for awhile. You're going to get a lot of these threads. Which is why I take breaks.
#8
Posté 02 août 2013 - 03:13
#9
Posté 02 août 2013 - 03:21
#10
Posté 02 août 2013 - 03:30
#11
Posté 02 août 2013 - 03:30
Modifié par Greylycantrope, 02 août 2013 - 03:31 .
#12
Posté 02 août 2013 - 03:42
#13
Posté 02 août 2013 - 03:50
#14
Posté 02 août 2013 - 03:54
By "atrocities", you mean staying in beyond the veil and keeping to themselves until such a time that the quarians attacked them again in direct violation of Council ordinances?but the atrocities committed by the Geth after the Quarians fled are the Geth fault
#15
Posté 02 août 2013 - 03:56
Steelcan wrote...
I side with the ones who do not run to the Reapers.
I side with the ones who run to the Reapers because, ironically enough, the Reapers are the ones not running to blindly destroy them (at least not yet).
#16
Posté 02 août 2013 - 03:56
DeinonSlayer wrote...
*sigh*
*retrieves stock response #248-B*
The Quarian government, acting in compliance with Council law on artificial intelligence, was responsible for the start of the conflict - they don't deny it - however, there are far too many people willing to overlook the atrocities the Geth committed in response.
This audience reaction was to be expected, really. ME3 did its damnedest to paint the Geth as hapless victims; to avoid mentioning previously-established facts in the lore casting the Geth in a negative light (such as exterminating 99% of the Quarian species (ME: Revelation), destroying the ancestral VI archives (ME1 codex), allowing the heretics to continue their attacks for TWO YEARS after the events of ME1 without so much as disowning them (ME2, though Shepard never gets to call them out for it), and killing anyone who entered their space, refusing all organic attempts at peaceful contact for centuries (ME: Revelation, ME1)), manipulating sympathies with the obvious intent of making people reluctant to choose Destroy at the end.
They did exterminate a lot of their species but had the chance to kill them all and decided to let them go. I don't think anyone would rush off to help organics, and stop the heratics attacks after dealing that type of history with them. Even if they did disagree with what the they were doing. I think it was explained on why they didn't want peace when you bring legion aboard. He said they weren't against it but would need more data, because when the quarians had the oppurtunity to eliminate them, they choose that route.
Modifié par garrus and ashley squad, 02 août 2013 - 03:57 .
#17
Posté 02 août 2013 - 03:58
Greylycantrope wrote...
I find the Quarians to largely be the architects of their own destruction, will side with Geth if it comes down to it.
All of my arguments over the months, all of my opinions, all the hurt feelings and butthurt I've caused to a particular Quarian fan essentially boil down to this.
Also, I simply find the Geth have more utility in a fight. I'd rather have their high tech fleet and army.
#18
Posté 02 août 2013 - 04:01
Steelcan wrote...
I side with the ones who do not run to the Reapers.
Brief and practical. I like it.
#19
Posté 02 août 2013 - 04:01
#20
Posté 02 août 2013 - 04:09
CrutchCricket wrote...
Both have made incredibly dumb decisions yet even at the peak of their stupidity, neither really deserve to die.
Pretty much how I feel.
#21
Posté 02 août 2013 - 04:09
That's the equivalent of pouring petrol into an ant nest, setting it on fire, then not bothering to squish a pair of worker ants as they flee. I've never understood those who think the Geth should be lauded for it - by their own admission, it was uncertainty over the ramifications (for them) of a total genocide, and not mercy, which made them cease pursuit of the fleeing survivors.garrus and ashley squad wrote...
DeinonSlayer wrote...
*sigh*
*retrieves stock response #248-B*
The Quarian government, acting in compliance with Council law on artificial intelligence, was responsible for the start of the conflict - they don't deny it - however, there are far too many people willing to overlook the atrocities the Geth committed in response.
This audience reaction was to be expected, really. ME3 did its damnedest to paint the Geth as hapless victims; to avoid mentioning previously-established facts in the lore casting the Geth in a negative light (such as exterminating 99% of the Quarian species (ME: Revelation), destroying the ancestral VI archives (ME1 codex), allowing the heretics to continue their attacks for TWO YEARS after the events of ME1 without so much as disowning them (ME2, though Shepard never gets to call them out for it), and killing anyone who entered their space, refusing all organic attempts at peaceful contact for centuries (ME: Revelation, ME1)), manipulating sympathies with the obvious intent of making people reluctant to choose Destroy at the end.
They did exterminate a lot of their species but had the chance to kill them all and decided to let them go.
That doesn't excuse it. The species the heretics were attacking had never done anything to the geth (besides sending ambassadors whom the Geth killed on arrival).I don't think anyone would rush off to help organics, and stop the heratics attacks after dealing that type of history with them. Even if they did disagree with what the they were doing.
They allowed the heretics to be their ambassador to the galaxy. Is it any surprise they have no allies to turn to?
DoD tried that one time to deactivate Skynet. That comes out to 100%.I think it was explained on why they didn't want peace when you bring legion aboard. He said they weren't against it but would need more data, because when the quarians had the oppurtunity to eliminate them, they choose that route.
Evidently, generations spent not attacking them wasn't evidence enough. How they were supposed to think peace with the Geth was remotely possible in light of the Geth's actions is beyond me. It's like expecting Shepard to walk up to the Reapers and ask them nicely to give Earth back.
Bottom line, both sides contributed to the situation seen in ME3.
Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 02 août 2013 - 04:13 .
#22
Posté 02 août 2013 - 04:13
Geth: You are welcome to return to Rannoch. We don't consider it our home and only remain near it to maintain it for your eventual return.
Quarians: We really don't trust you. If you have no attachment to Rannoch leave the system so we can reinhabit it. We'd rather rebuild it ourselves.
Geth: Ok.
Done.
#23
Posté 02 août 2013 - 04:18
Rather than someone I use AI Hacking on the battlefield to turn into a traitor to his own kind.
The Geth are machines, just tools, you do beep boop and they all become hostile again.
And I rather have a perfect mechanic than a doubtful machine which lacks laws of robotics.
#24
Posté 02 août 2013 - 04:22
DeinonSlayer wrote...
That's the equivalent of pouring petrol into an ant nest, setting it on fire, then not bothering to squish a pair of worker ants as they flee. I've never understood those who think the Geth should be lauded for it - by their own admission, it was uncertainty over the ramifications (for them) of a total genocide, and not mercy, which made them cease pursuit of the fleeing survivors.garrus and ashley squad wrote...
DeinonSlayer wrote...
*sigh*
*retrieves stock response #248-B*
The Quarian government, acting in compliance with Council law on artificial intelligence, was responsible for the start of the conflict - they don't deny it - however, there are far too many people willing to overlook the atrocities the Geth committed in response.
This audience reaction was to be expected, really. ME3 did its damnedest to paint the Geth as hapless victims; to avoid mentioning previously-established facts in the lore casting the Geth in a negative light (such as exterminating 99% of the Quarian species (ME: Revelation), destroying the ancestral VI archives (ME1 codex), allowing the heretics to continue their attacks for TWO YEARS after the events of ME1 without so much as disowning them (ME2, though Shepard never gets to call them out for it), and killing anyone who entered their space, refusing all organic attempts at peaceful contact for centuries (ME: Revelation, ME1)), manipulating sympathies with the obvious intent of making people reluctant to choose Destroy at the end.
They did exterminate a lot of their species but had the chance to kill them all and decided to let them go.That doesn't excuse it. The species the heretics were attacking had never done anything to the geth (besides sending ambassadors whom the Geth killed on arrival).I don't think anyone would rush off to help organics, and stop the heratics attacks after dealing that type of history with them. Even if they did disagree with what the they were doing.
They allowed the heretics to be their ambassador to the galaxy. Is it any surprise they have no allies to turn to?DoD tried that one time to deactivate Skynet. That comes out to 100%.I think it was explained on why they didn't want peace when you bring legion aboard. He said they weren't against it but would need more data, because when the quarians had the oppurtunity to eliminate them, they choose that route.
Evidently, generations spent not attacking them wasn't evidence enough. How they were supposed to think peace with the Geth was remotely possible in light of the Geth's actions is beyond me. It's like expecting Shepard to walk up to the Reapers and ask them nicely to give Earth back.
1. Even if it wasn't mercy it's more than the quarians would of done. If they had the chance they would of killed them all. Even after all that the geth still said they were open to the idea of bringing them back. They also helped the quarians get back on their feet if you save both of them. Which is probably a lot more than what the quarians would do.
2. The species the heretics attacked did nothing to the geth but that doesn't mean the geth should save them out of the kindest of their hearts or hardware, whatever. They were not bothing them at the time. why bother with them, especially with that type of history. They may of let the hertics be their embassador but that would be with trusting them over organics. Who wouldn't trust them more after what the quarians have done.
3. Just because they don't attack doesn't mean they are neccisarily friendly or peaceful. It's more you stay on your side of space I'll stay on mine. You would still need some type of interaction to be peaceful. That area was just unknown to them.
#25
Posté 02 août 2013 - 04:57
You've never done a Geth VI playthrough, have you?garrus and ashley squad wrote...
1. Even if it wasn't mercy it's more than the quarians would of done. If they had the chance they would of killed them all. Even after all that the geth still said they were open to the idea of bringing them back. They also helped the quarians get back on their feet if you save both of them. Which is probably a lot more than what the quarians would do.
Also, who is "they" when you refer to the Quarians? They aren't a monolithic gestalt entity. A big reason they never tried to take back the planet they're physiologically dependent on is multigenerational guilt over what their long-dead ancestors did to the Geth, according to dialogue in ME2.
Really, what needs to change is the Council laws on AI which compelled the Quarians to try to shut them down in the first place.
I never cease to be amazed by what Geth apologists are willing to forgive. If you know your brother is going to go on a killing spree and do nothing to stop him, report him, or warn the target, that makes you (at best) an accessory to murder, if not an accomplice.2. The species the heretics attacked did nothing to the geth but that doesn't mean the geth should save them out of the kindest of their hearts or hardware, whatever. They were not bothing them at the time. why bother with them, especially with that type of history. They may of let the hertics be their embassador but that would be with trusting them over organics. Who wouldn't trust them more after what the quarians have done.
If you knowingly allow him to continue killing for years after he starts...?
Interaction which the Geth were actively rejecting by killing anyone who entered their space and ignoring all hails.3. Just because they don't attack doesn't mean they are neccisarily friendly or peaceful. It's more you stay on your side of space I'll stay on mine. You would still need some type of interaction to be peaceful. That area was just unknown to them.
Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 02 août 2013 - 05:03 .





Retour en haut






