Aller au contenu

Photo

Director and executive producer Casey Hudson explained that a "polarising" finale was necessary to get fans talking.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
407 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Xamufam

Xamufam
  • Members
  • 1 238 messages
"I didn't want the game to be forgettable," Hudson told Digital Trends.
"Even right down to the sort of polarising reaction that the ends have
had with people - debating what the endings mean and what's going to
happen next, and what situation are the characters left in."

"That to me is part of what's exciting about this story. There has
always been a little bit of mystery there and a little bit of
interpretation, and it's a story that people can talk about after the
fact."

More single-player content is coming however, and Hudson said that, like
other Mass Effect DLC, fan feedback will help shape its design.


But Hudson failed to suggest that the trilogy's finale may be changed
through a patch or DLC, as Retake Mass Effect campaigners hope.

is this why it was so open & felt like it was a dream? It seems they were planning an ending dlc before the release
stargazer: one more story
www.giantbomb.com/profile/comp13/blog/the-truth-behind-mass-effect-3s-ending/91726/

www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/03/17/casey-hudson-responds-to-mass-effect-ending-protests-this-is-not-the-last-youll-hear-of-commander-shepard/
BioWare promises to discuss Mass Effect 3 ending when more have finished game

Mass Effect 3 Ending DLC Was Considered To Be Paid DLC July 2013

Mass Effect 3's True Ending DLC Was Never Supposed To Be Free? april 2012

Jessica merizan twitter
Keep it civil

Modifié par Troxa, 06 août 2013 - 06:01 .


#2
N7PT

N7PT
  • Members
  • 80 messages
IT certainly was polarising.

#3
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 720 messages
Polarizing sounds more like a side-effect than a goal, but not one he has a problem with.

#4
N7PT

N7PT
  • Members
  • 80 messages
Talking after crapping in the whole trilogy is easy. To the OP: you didn't need to change "polarizing" to "polarising" in the topic's title. Both are considered correct, I just use the British English version, while polarizing is used in 'Murica and Canada.

#5
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests
Reminds me of a kid who wipes out on his bike and gets up... "I meant to do that."

#6
GreyLycanTrope

GreyLycanTrope
  • Members
  • 12 709 messages
Isn't this old news?

#7
SDW

SDW
  • Members
  • 182 messages
Yep, they were planning more DLC - stuff like Omega. Just like ME 2 had its Shadow Broker, Kasumi, Zaeed, Overlord etc.

#8
BaladasDemnevanni

BaladasDemnevanni
  • Members
  • 2 127 messages
Not sure if polarizing should be a goal, ever.

#9
Raizo

Raizo
  • Members
  • 2 526 messages

StreetMagic wrote...

Reminds me of a kid who wipes out on his bike and gets up... "I meant to do that."


I love your view point of the situation.

Having said that, I think casey Hudson said what he said before ME3 came out and all he backlash happened. In a way it's very sad that he felt that a proper ending wasn't good enough for the trilogy and that he felt that he had to get all controverial in order for anyone to remember the series.

#10
Element Engine

Element Engine
  • Members
  • 136 messages
Hudson's gotten a lot of undeserved heat. Whether you liked the ending to ME3 or not, the trilogy wouldn't be what it is without him. It's a lot like the George Lucas situation. "LUCAS RUINED STAR WARS!" Yeah, he also created it. So STFU.

People are too quick to knock others down.

#11
SiniisteR

SiniisteR
  • Members
  • 226 messages

Element Engine wrote...

Hudson's gotten a lot of undeserved heat. Whether you liked the ending to ME3 or not, the trilogy wouldn't be what it is without him. It's a lot like the George Lucas situation. "LUCAS RUINED STAR WARS!" Yeah, he also created it. So STFU.

People are too quick to knock others down.


+1

#12
dreamgazer

dreamgazer
  • Members
  • 15 759 messages

BaladasDemnevanni wrote...

Not sure if polarizing should be a goal, ever.


Strongly disagree with this as it applies to fiction.

However, after experiencing the comments on this board over the past year and a half, I do think that it might not be a good idea to aim for "polarizing" in a video game, even under ideal, perfectly-executed circumstances. Especially one with elements of power and persuasion fetishism.

#13
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 377 messages

BaladasDemnevanni wrote...

Not sure if polarizing should be a goal, ever.


Definitely takes "no such thing as bad press" to it's logical extreme

#14
Mr.House

Mr.House
  • Members
  • 23 338 messages
LoU and Infinite where able to get the players talking without having a ending that was bs. Just saying Casey.

#15
ShepnTali

ShepnTali
  • Members
  • 4 535 messages
There are great games that get people talking because they are great games. Now there's a nice goal.

#16
dreamgazer

dreamgazer
  • Members
  • 15 759 messages

Mr.House wrote...

LoU and Infinite where able to get the players talking without having a ending that was bs. Just saying Casey.


Depends on who you talk to about Infinite.

#17
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

dreamgazer wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

LoU and Infinite where able to get the players talking without having a ending that was bs. Just saying Casey.


Depends on who you talk to about Infinite.


And with LoU :unsure:

#18
Guest_Fandango_*

Guest_Fandango_*
  • Guests

StreetMagic wrote...

Reminds me of a kid who wipes out on his bike and gets up... "I meant to do that."


That's perfect Image IPB

#19
Guest_Fandango_*

Guest_Fandango_*
  • Guests

SiniisteR wrote...

Element Engine wrote...

Hudson's gotten a lot of undeserved heat. Whether you liked the ending to ME3 or not, the trilogy wouldn't be what it is without him. It's a lot like the George Lucas situation. "LUCAS RUINED STAR WARS!" Yeah, he also created it. So STFU.

People are too quick to knock others down.


+1


- 100

#20
Mr.House

Mr.House
  • Members
  • 23 338 messages

Element Engine wrote...

Hudson's gotten a lot of undeserved heat. Whether you liked the ending to ME3 or not, the trilogy wouldn't be what it is without him. It's a lot like the George Lucas situation. "LUCAS RUINED STAR WARS!" Yeah, he also created it. So STFU.

People are too quick to knock others down.

So without Casey, the ME trilogy would not be a inconsistant mess that is not even a trilogy with one of the worst endings possible for a story that insults the IQ of it's player?

Also Lucas did create SW, you do know many of the things people loved about 4,5 and 6 where not even created by Lucas right? It was all peer review as lucas did not have laot of freedom in 4,5 and 6. He did have freedom in ep 1,2 and 3. It shows. Casey might have created ME but he destroyed it because he wanted people to talk.

Modifié par Mr.House, 04 août 2013 - 09:27 .


#21
chemiclord

chemiclord
  • Members
  • 2 499 messages

Raizo wrote...

Having said that, I think casey Hudson said what he said before ME3 came out and all he backlash happened. In a way it's very sad that he felt that a proper ending wasn't good enough for the trilogy and that he felt that he had to get all controverial in order for anyone to remember the series.


Let's be perfectly blunt... ME was not particularly memorable.  In was, in fact, a fairly generic space opera.  Had it ended in a perfectly "normal" fashion, it WOULD have been forgotten pretty quickly.

Now, with that said, the PROPER solution to that is to actually compose a memorable story, not resort to the M. Night Sham-a-layman "twist" that you stole pretty much verbatim from someone else.

Modifié par chemiclord, 04 août 2013 - 09:27 .


#22
chemiclord

chemiclord
  • Members
  • 2 499 messages

Fandango9641 wrote...

SiniisteR wrote...

Element Engine wrote...

Hudson's gotten a lot of undeserved heat. Whether you liked the ending to ME3 or not, the trilogy wouldn't be what it is without him. It's a lot like the George Lucas situation. "LUCAS RUINED STAR WARS!" Yeah, he also created it. So STFU.

People are too quick to knock others down.


+1


- 100


+100.  Now we've cancelled each other out.  Oh no!

#23
Omega Torsk

Omega Torsk
  • Members
  • 1 548 messages
Well, he certainly did succeed, didn't he? >:(

Edit: *removed GIF* Forget it, I don't want to be banned.

BaladasDemnevanni wrote...

Not sure if polarizing should be a goal, ever.


Modifié par Omega Torsk, 04 août 2013 - 09:35 .


#24
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

chemiclord wrote...

Fandango9641 wrote...

SiniisteR wrote...

Element Engine wrote...

Hudson's gotten a lot of undeserved heat. Whether you liked the ending to ME3 or not, the trilogy wouldn't be what it is without him. It's a lot like the George Lucas situation. "LUCAS RUINED STAR WARS!" Yeah, he also created it. So STFU.

People are too quick to knock others down.


+1


- 100


+100.  Now we've cancelled each other out.  Oh no!


-1 :devil:

#25
Element Engine

Element Engine
  • Members
  • 136 messages

Mr.House wrote...

Element Engine wrote...

Hudson's gotten a lot of undeserved heat. Whether you liked the ending to ME3 or not, the trilogy wouldn't be what it is without him. It's a lot like the George Lucas situation. "LUCAS RUINED STAR WARS!" Yeah, he also created it. So STFU.

People are too quick to knock others down.

So without Casey, the ME trilogy would not be a inconsistant mess that is not even a trilogy with one of the worst endings possible for a story that insults the IQ of it's player?

Also Lucas did create SW, you do know many of the things people loved about 4,5 and 6 where not even created by Lucas right? It was all peer review as lucas did not have laot of freedom in 4,5 and 6. He did have freedom in ep 1,2 and 3. It shows. Casey might have created ME but he destroyed it because he wanted people to talk.


If you're so negative towards the series gtfo the forums and move on with your life. Focus on the things that make you happy. Talk about self-entitlement.

Modifié par Element Engine, 04 août 2013 - 09:32 .