SiniisteR wrote...
Element Engine wrote...
Hudson's gotten a lot of undeserved heat. Whether you liked the ending to ME3 or not, the trilogy wouldn't be what it is without him. It's a lot like the George Lucas situation. "LUCAS RUINED STAR WARS!" Yeah, he also created it. So STFU.
People are too quick to knock others down.
+1
Hudson is in the same realm as Lucas in this - they have a lot in common.
They both created something far beyond what their personal talent is capable of. In other words, if you look at what Star Wars was before it got edited (and it was not edited by Lucas) - it was utter garbage. Sure - he had some great ideas, and all in all I loved the originals. Same can be said of ME1 and 2. Those games were stellar.
What Lucas and Hudson fell into was the thought that all of the creativity sprouted from them. Lucas went on to write this prequel trash story of Anakin and his fall from grace. It was a great idea, but there was a lot of badness involved. Darth Vader made C3PO. *riiiiight* Jar Jar sucked, and pretty much all Gungans were badly written. The whole 'Phantom Menace' was basically a menace. Lucas lost the spark - mostly because he 1) is a bad writer and 2) does not listen to critique.
Same story with Hudson and Walters going in to write the ending with no peer review. The story was bad, the overall arc was pretty terrible. Lets introduce a new bad guy in the last 11 minutes, and have no boss-fight even though we got trolled by Reapers for 2 games in a row. After dealing with Harbinger for ALL of ME2, I was ready to punch his ticket! No dice!! *In my Vader voice 'Noooooooo!"
Hudson dropped the ball with ME3. All he was trying to do here with this old article is to perform damage control and save face.