Harden ayyy? *magines AL as a golem* wait what?Monica21 wrote...
Well, yes, better for me. If I had to choose between an efficient but racist ruler and one who didn't like politics but still managed to lead, then I'd pick the latter. In my first character I ended up playing from the Landsmeet through the ending twice, the first time making Anora the ruler and the second time Alistair. If I were a citizen of Ferelden, especially elven, I would prefer Alistair.KnightofPhoenix wrote...
"Better" morally speaking perhaps, for you that is. When I say a good ruler, but "good" I mean efficient.
And yes there is difference. If Alistair is king, he isn't interested in the actually governance of the kingdom (like bureaucracy, trade and all that), except if he is hardened. Anora on the otherhand opens a university and she shows great skill in bureaucratic management.
In fact, the best ending for Ferelden, imo, is where the PC and Anora rule. It is described as a Goden age for Ferelden (only if they don't fight each other of course).
And I'm about to the point of my current game where I can harden him *ahem* so I'll have to see how that goes. And my next character was going to be male, so I'll see about that too.
Just as an aside, one thing I really like about this game is that you really can't get everything you want. There isn't a Disney ending, you have to make hard choices, and the hard choices actually affect the gameworld. Absolutely brilliant.
anyway im inclined to agree Popularity factors in a huge deal on who is remembered as a good ruler and who is considered some total ****
i think Al has the raw potential to be the best ruler in ferelden other than the PC but thats just my opinion and i wouldent take the ending little notes as anything serious god knows what awakenings will have in store for us.





Retour en haut




