Aller au contenu

Photo

"You Stand... In Opposition to [the Chantry]" - Mark Darrah


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
191 réponses à ce sujet

#76
DKJaigen

DKJaigen
  • Members
  • 1 647 messages

MisterJB wrote...

Right now, this scares me. It's easy to see why the Chantry might not look favorably upon a new power with an old name whose very rebirth signifies they haven't been sucessfull in their duties, especially if they are accepting mages into their ranks.
However, I hope this does not mean we are forced to become an enemy of the Chantry for 90% or more of the game with one or two Pro-Templar options here and there to appease us.
If a group of templars or Chantry officials demand that I deliver Vivienne to them, for instance, I should either be able to do so or be given a damn good reason as to why I can't.



What are you afraid of ? its a just game afterall. but what i and several other people have said before still holds true. How is a an army that is cut from its supplies and likely branded as herectics and traitors by the chantry and orlesian empire going to survive? likely by rading villages and cities. the templar order will likely will be reduced to a minor enemy.

Im very intrigued what the political cloud is of the the new inquisition. Are they state sponsord by the the empire? Or have the dragon cults a greater role in this as the inquisitor have dragon icons on both his sword and helmet. it may just be common heraldry but that would be an odd choice if dragons are messing up the world wouldnt it?

Modifié par DKJaigen, 08 août 2013 - 08:40 .


#77
Guest_Craig Golightly_*

Guest_Craig Golightly_*
  • Guests

shodiswe wrote...

I still don't understand who or what the Inquisition is, or where they came from...

Though I admit Ihavn't read much about DA3.

I played DA1 and loved it, then I played DA2 and gave it a shrug. Didn't hate it but didn't think ti was great, actualy I feelt the endings were kind of limited and a lot of chocies didn't seem to affect people or the story.

I don't expect the whole world to change, but from the look of it most of the events played out the same way no matter what I did.


The historical Inquisition fought against the "dangers of magic and heretics." It later joined the Chantry and became two groups, the Seekers of Truth and the Templars.

Here's my (possibly wrong) understanding of the new one. It is not sanctioned by the Chantry. It is a reminder of the Chantry's failure to prevent the Mage-Templar War and the disturbances following it. The only comparison that I can make is that it's like a cover band trying to be as good as (or better than) the original band. This group is basically co-opting the name Inquisition. It performs a similar function, but it's alot more inclusive than the original group. So blood mages could probably join, as long as they help the group rather than hinder it.

#78
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 584 messages

brushyourteeth wrote...


Regardless, finding "Chantry secrets" sounds fun. Image IPB

As others have said, this sounds like a sure railroad to pit Inquisition vs Chantry.
We should at least be given the option to keep the secrets...secret in order to preserve stability.

#79
Guest_Craig Golightly_*

Guest_Craig Golightly_*
  • Guests

MisterJB wrote...

brushyourteeth wrote...


Regardless, finding "Chantry secrets" sounds fun. Image IPB

As others have said, this sounds like a sure railroad to pit Inquisition vs Chantry.
We should at least be given the option to keep the secrets...secret in order to preserve stability.


What if revealing those secrets could purge the Chantry of its corruption?

#80
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 584 messages

MasterScribe wrote...

MisterJB wrote...

brushyourteeth wrote...


Regardless, finding "Chantry secrets" sounds fun. Image IPB

As others have said, this sounds like a sure railroad to pit Inquisition vs Chantry.
We should at least be given the option to keep the secrets...secret in order to preserve stability.


What if revealing those secrets could purge the Chantry of its corruption?

What corruption?

#81
Guest_Craig Golightly_*

Guest_Craig Golightly_*
  • Guests

MisterJB wrote...

MasterScribe wrote...

MisterJB wrote...

brushyourteeth wrote...


Regardless, finding "Chantry secrets" sounds fun. Image IPB

As others have said, this sounds like a sure railroad to pit Inquisition vs Chantry.
We should at least be given the option to keep the secrets...secret in order to preserve stability.


What if revealing those secrets could purge the Chantry of its corruption?

What corruption?


Here's the obvious: Exalted Marches, forced lyrium addiction, the Right of Annulment and general treatment of mages, the Divine election process, political pressuring

EDIT: Perhaps the Maker himself is allowing the Chantry to fall

Modifié par MasterScribe, 08 août 2013 - 09:15 .


#82
wolfhowwl

wolfhowwl
  • Members
  • 3 727 messages

DKJaigen wrote...

MisterJB wrote...

Right now, this scares me. It's easy to see why the Chantry might not look favorably upon a new power with an old name whose very rebirth signifies they haven't been sucessfull in their duties, especially if they are accepting mages into their ranks.
However, I hope this does not mean we are forced to become an enemy of the Chantry for 90% or more of the game with one or two Pro-Templar options here and there to appease us.
If a group of templars or Chantry officials demand that I deliver Vivienne to them, for instance, I should either be able to do so or be given a damn good reason as to why I can't.



What are you afraid of ? its a just game afterall. but what i and several other people have said before still holds true. How is a an army that is cut from its supplies and likely branded as herectics and traitors by the chantry and orlesian empire going to survive? likely by rading villages and cities. the templar order will likely will be reduced to a minor enemy.

Im very intrigued what the political cloud is of the the new inquisition. Are they state sponsord by the the empire? Or have the dragon cults a greater role in this as the inquisitor have dragon icons on both his sword and helmet. it may just be common heraldry but that would be an odd choice if dragons are messing up the world wouldnt it?


Putting players on an all-expenses paid ride on the Union Pacific is a bad thing.

#83
Guest_Faerunner_*

Guest_Faerunner_*
  • Guests

MasterScribe wrote...

Faerunner wrote...

Looking at this thread brings memories. Seems like just yesterday that 2/3rds of the early DAI threads were people panicking that being an Inquisitor might mean we have to serve the Chantry. Now this comes out and... I don't know, it seems like some people worry that they might have to hate on the Chantry and/or Templars?

I don't know, I'm not worried. I'm sure there are good people working in the Chantry, and the protagonist can sympathize with some of their causes. I just get the impression that the Chantry as a whole, as a worldwide institution, has gotten too corrupt and too divided to function properly (even if there are good people who mean well inside it). I get the impression that we're supposed to stand in opposition to it's corrupt influence, not necessarily to it personally.


On both fronts, people are more worried about possibly being forced to take a stance on a vaguely Judeo-Christian ideology. I mean, that's a point of contention in real life. I don't think most of those people want that thrusted upon them in the midst of a video game. 


I... didn't consider this.

I don't see why it needs to be an issue though. We get pushed into a lot of ethical and philosophical dilemmas in the games. The game itself focuses on what they're doing over what they believe, and we decide whether we agree with their actions and/or beliefs. Like the succession crisis in Orzammar. The player has to help select the next king, but you can decide what you think of it. "Yeah, Bhelen!" "Yeah, Harrowmont!" or "I don't ****ing care! Just get this sorted out so I can get my army for the Blight!"

Same with this. Solve the immediate problem of how their division/corruption affects other people (politics, morale, mage freedom, Templar efficiency, whatever), and decide whether you agree, disagree, like, dislike, don't care, or just want a reward from them now.

#84
Guest_Craig Golightly_*

Guest_Craig Golightly_*
  • Guests

Faerunner wrote...

MasterScribe wrote...

On both fronts, people are more worried about possibly being forced to take a stance on a vaguely Judeo-Christian ideology. I mean, that's a point of contention in real life. I don't think most of those people want that thrusted upon them in the midst of a video game. 


I... didn't consider this.

I don't see why it needs to be an issue though. We get pushed into a lot of ethical and philosophical dilemmas in the games. The game itself focuses on what they're doing over what they believe, and we decide whether we agree with their actions and/or beliefs. Like the succession crisis in Orzammar. The player has to help select the next king, but you can decide what you think of it. "Yeah, Bhelen!" "Yeah, Harrowmont!" or "I don't ****ing care! Just get this sorted out so I can get my army for the Blight!"

Same with this. Solve the immediate problem of how their division/corruption affects other people (politics, morale, mage freedom, Templar efficiency, whatever), and decide whether you agree, disagree, like, dislike, don't care, or just want a reward from them now.


Don't get me wrong, I agree with you completely. I was just trying to explain why other people might not.

#85
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 584 messages

MasterScribe wrote...
Exalted Marches,

Out of three, two were in self-defense and the third was against Tevinter.

forced lyrium addiction,

The alternative is not to have guards capable of fighting mages.

the Right of Annulment and general treatment of mages,

Too vast a topic but I tend to agree with the general treatment of mages
Read my sig.

the Divine election process,

What about it? It's an ellection.

political pressuring

Fair enough but it hardly seems to be a problem of large magnitude.

EDIT: Perhaps the Maker himself is allowing the Chantry to fall

I support the Chantry but I don't actually believe in the Maker.

Modifié par MisterJB, 08 août 2013 - 09:34 .


#86
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

brushyourteeth wrote...

*snip*
Regardless, finding "Chantry secrets" sounds fun. Image IPB


That's what I'm worried about, though. We've seen how railroaded the writers can be, this seems very reminiscent to the information released about Cerberus during the Game Informer article and our expectations were disappointingly completely correct.

We've seen how the writing tends to go from one extreme to another, everyone complained about being forced to work with Cerberus and suddenly we're forced to oppose them in every possible way. DA2's version of those complaints were people crying about not being athiest and now the first thing we hear is we're opposing the Chantry, it leaves a bad first impression.

The worst part? This first impression will linger until game release, I'm far too cynical after the marketing laughed in Cerberus supporter faces and the writers lied to us. I wouldn't be surprised if they'd come out and say that Chantry isn't evil and then discover they're exterminating everyone and sunder the veil to summon "The Maker".

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 08 août 2013 - 09:51 .


#87
xnode

xnode
  • Members
  • 180 messages
In my world the mages will burn! muahah!


edit; btw you guys did look and see the vids right? We have a choice to help not to help or not to help any and burn it all down. IE quote " Well if you want to stop the chantry you could just seige the keeps along the way" basicly his point was "the player will choose what happens not us". (*us being the devs when he was saying that)

Modifié par xnode, 08 août 2013 - 10:22 .


#88
Guest_Craig Golightly_*

Guest_Craig Golightly_*
  • Guests

xnode wrote...

In my world the mages will burn! muahah!


Indeed, they will burn.....the templars, courtesy of our magic.:devil:

#89
xnode

xnode
  • Members
  • 180 messages

MasterScribe wrote...

xnode wrote...

In my world the mages will burn! muahah!


Indeed, they will burn.....the templars, courtesy of our magic.:devil:


lol i knew this would happen, so many mage lovers in these forums, I honestly get the whole mage plight, but in the end in my world I realize the mages are just to dangerous period. Sure a world where everyone could live togather in peace would be awsome however that NEVER happens. A world where I can fight back without being worried about insta pile of dust and give everyone an equal footing? That's my kind of world :)



My inquisition posters....

"Eliminate the demon threat! Burn a mage today!"

Modifié par xnode, 08 août 2013 - 10:24 .


#90
draken-heart

draken-heart
  • Members
  • 4 009 messages
My opinion? The Inquisition is formed to deal with the problems the Chantry can't/won't deal with, and the Chantry does not want people getting involved in problems that are for the Chantry.

#91
Ausstig

Ausstig
  • Members
  • 580 messages

Reznore57 wrote...

I think the current (sort of ) nice Divine is going to die ,and a pro templar divine will be put on the invisible throne by people like Lambert.
The chantry will go thru a witch hunt , burning books , (that you need), etc...

I guess you could still be pro chantry , but if you want to solve your problem you have no choice but to go against the chantry on some levels.

I really hope it's really cool hidden knowledge like the Apocrypha title hinted.


I hope the current Divine isn't dead:crying:


I want to kill that female dog my self:pinched:, given that they war is mostly due to her manipulations. 

I think the statement was made in response to all those knee-jerk thread where people whined about being 'forced to be anti-mage' and 'pro-chantry' (cause story sense does not matter, what matters is how evil relgion is <_<) so I don't know how much of the Chantry is with the BDivine (the one from the book) she is likely to suppourt you given Cas is with you and how much is with the Templars.

Speaking of Templars, my fear is that they are given the Cerberus treatment in DA:I, especially given their treatment in the latest book. Tempars are protectors and mages are really, really dangerous, why do people put current values on a society that is a best medevial (or renaissance at best). People need to do more reading about history. 

#92
Jedi Master of Orion

Jedi Master of Orion
  • Members
  • 6 911 messages
I'll admit I am a little concerned about being railroaded into being anti-Chantry after ME3 and given how many players seemed to want to wage war against it, because it's definitely not what I'd want to do. I'm still hopeful, considering that that Bioware said they aren't forcing the player into a moral stance. If they aren't forcing you to be anti mage, they aren't forcing you to be pro mage either. The last video even mentioned that they aren't deciding your role as being anti-templar.

I was never a Cerberus fan and honestly didn't care that we had to fight them in ME 3. It might not have been the route I would have opted for if it was up to me, but they were an underground terrorist organization with a reputation for recklessness and a ruthless leader. It was always a distinct possibility that they would go off the deep end at some point. I didn't have a problem with Orsino turning on the pro-mage player in Dragon Age 2 either. Desperate mages can sometimes be pushed to desperate measures.To me, siding with either of them were both risky situations that always had the chance of backfiring. The Chantry also has a very diffrent role.

I left BSN for a while long before ME 3 came out but I remember complaints about the early marketing about how it didn't make sense that Cerberus was working for the reapers. A valid concern of course, but as it turned out in the game, they weren't.

Modifié par Jedi Master of Orion, 08 août 2013 - 11:14 .


#93
xnode

xnode
  • Members
  • 180 messages
Nice post Orion and your correct, the assumptions here where already answered in a video, they are not making the choice for us, we have that choice. Tis why I will LOVE THE CHANTRY and KILL ALL MAGES!

hehe ;)

then with my evil twin rogue I will play it again and LOVE THE MAGES and KILL THE CHANTRY!

then with my alter ego character....

I WLL KILL THEM ALL! LET THE MAKER SORT IT OUT!

and finally.....

I Wont do jack, Im to busy crafting!

Modifié par xnode, 08 août 2013 - 10:53 .


#94
Todd23

Todd23
  • Members
  • 2 042 messages
@xnode Actually it was more along the lines of you will have to siege the walls, but what you do from there is up to you.

#95
brushyourteeth

brushyourteeth
  • Members
  • 4 418 messages
There are a lot of people on these forums and even in this thread who have no idea what the Inquisition is or what it exists to do.

Interesting!

I'm not going to explain because the information is already out there, and anyone who wants to be educated has already checked it out, while fans who would rather make up their own reality and then complain about it are going to do that anyway.

I can see the concern about railroading. I also agree with what others have said that being able to hoard some of those secrets to yourself to maintain a balance of power and secure your continued existence sounds like a great option. Like Reznore has said, one of the previous titles being "Apocrypha," we're likely to discover some old truths that will hopefully give us the option to reform, destroy, or maintain the status quo in the Chantry as we see fit. Or ignore it. That should be an option too.

I do wonder if the Maker (if he's real, and even if he's not, if even just by Andraste's perception of him) would approve of the current Chantry or if he would lay the hammer down on a few of their policies. I expect with how divided its leadership can be, he'd likely disapprove of at least a few of the individuals that make up the face of it. :/

Modifié par brushyourteeth, 08 août 2013 - 11:01 .


#96
lil yonce

lil yonce
  • Members
  • 2 319 messages
We can express an opinion on magic, but I didn't hear we can choose our allies. What I heard is that no matter what early game, and perhaps all game, the Inquisition opposes the Chantry. Railroad potential. Cerberus treatment potential. I'll have to wait and see how this turns out or wait for a dev comment before buying the game.

Modifié par Youth4Ever, 08 août 2013 - 11:13 .


#97
Guest_Craig Golightly_*

Guest_Craig Golightly_*
  • Guests

Youth4Ever wrote...

We can express an opinion on magic, but I didn't hear we can choose our allies. What I heard is we that no matter what early game, and perhaps all game, the Inquisition opposes the Chantry. Railroad potential. Cerberus treatment potential. I'll have to wait and see how this turns out or wait for a dev comment before buying the game.


From my understanding, the CHANTRY opposes the player and his or her companions. And we have to either earn its respect or outright reject its authority.

Modifié par MasterScribe, 08 août 2013 - 11:12 .


#98
Jedi Master of Orion

Jedi Master of Orion
  • Members
  • 6 911 messages
It does make sense that the Chantry might not look kindly on a new unauthorized alternative to it's influence but that doesn't mean that the "opposition" will stay that way throughout the game. Origins even let the Warden ally with the guy that had been your main enemy for most of the game after the Landsmeet.

#99
Todd23

Todd23
  • Members
  • 2 042 messages
@brush What the Inquisition IS hasn't been established yet, and won't be by anyone except the player with there own individual playthrough. The only Inquisition that is established took place before the existance of the templars.

#100
lil yonce

lil yonce
  • Members
  • 2 319 messages
@MasterScribe; Semantics. And being grudgingly respected is not the same as having an ally. There are factions within the Chantry that I don't want to oppose, and would like to have the option to ally with later.