so....were they all lies...who is lying?
#76
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 08:28
#77
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 08:32
Detsu wrote...
It's funny that you think this negates the point.ViSeirA wrote...
And both are non-official sources.
Two reviews both saying "no vehicles" is a very good reason to assume that there are no vehicles. You can maintain hope if you want, but don't mistakenly think that your wishes have any affect on reality.
I don't wish, I state facts, if you have two sources, one which it not official who denies something and the official source who says " We'll see".
Now an official source refuses to deny or confirm is more dependable in that case.
#78
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 08:38
Wow, uh... this is really something. I almost want to understand the mental gymnastics required to think like this. It's remarkable in its errors.ViSeirA wrote...
I don't wish, I state facts, if you have two sources, one which it not official who denies something and the official source who says " We'll see".
Now an official source refuses to deny or confirm is more dependable in that case.
I just...
You win, dude. You've outdone me to the point where I'm forced to use ellipses.
#79
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 08:42
Detsu wrote...
Wow, uh... this is really something. I almost want to understand the mental gymnastics required to think like this. It's remarkable in its errors.ViSeirA wrote...
I don't wish, I state facts, if you have two sources, one which it not official who denies something and the official source who says " We'll see".
Now an official source refuses to deny or confirm is more dependable in that case.
I just...
You win, dude. You've outdone me to the point where I'm forced to use ellipses.
There you go sarcastic, I'm just being logical, believe what you will, only the next few days will tell.
#80
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 08:49
I was being dead serious, and no, you're not being logical. You're being illogical.ViSeirA wrote...
There you go sarcastic, I'm just being logical, believe what you will, only the next few days will tell.
Logic: the devs haven't confirmed or denied, but two different reviews have denied the existence of vehicles in ME2, Therefore, I will assume that there is no vehicle gameplay in ME2, and/or that vehicles will be DLC'd.
Not logic: the devs haven't confirmed or denied, but two different reviews have denied the existence of vehicles in ME2, so clearly we can draw no conclusions and will wait and see.
#81
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 08:50
http://www.crymod.co...739&thumbnail=1
I'm not bothering with you both, because like on the old forums you're just here to spread pessimism, cynicism and negativity. All contrary to what Bioware devs have said. This is not the same case as in ME1 because in ME1 most of those were labeled as goals, not thoroughly tested items in the game. If a Bioware dev has talked about it in the last 3 months of development, IT'S THERE. If you don't want to deal with that then by all means, cry wolf falling from the sky, I really don't care.
#82
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 08:52
#83
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 08:53
Sir, I believe you are the troll here. Just because people disagree with you does not make them a troll. Insulting other members is trolling. Acting like a petulant child is trolling.KingDan97 wrote...
I have this to say to Mystranna and Crimson because you are either blind dumb and deaf or just feel like this....
I'm not bothering with you both, because like on the old forums you're just here to spread pessimism, cynicism and negativity. All contrary to what Bioware devs have said. This is not the same case as in ME1 because in ME1 most of those were labeled as goals, not thoroughly tested items in the game. If a Bioware dev has talked about it in the last 3 months of development, IT'S THERE. If you don't want to deal with that then by all means, cry wolf falling from the sky, I really don't care.
You are doing both.
#84
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 08:55
KingDan97 wrote...
I have this to say to Mystranna and Crimson because you are either blind dumb and deaf or just feel like this....
http://www.crymod.co...739&thumbnail=1
I'm not bothering with you both, because like on the old forums you're just here to spread pessimism, cynicism and negativity. All contrary to what Bioware devs have said. This is not the same case as in ME1 because in ME1 most of those were labeled as goals, not thoroughly tested items in the game. If a Bioware dev has talked about it in the last 3 months of development, IT'S THERE. If you don't want to deal with that then by all means, cry wolf falling from the sky, I really don't care.
A white flag if I ever saw one. A particularly pathetic example.
#85
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 08:55
#86
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 09:22
And to those of you using the HH area in the Normandy argument, was this shown in the Normandy tour during the 12 minutes gameplay from gamespot? Because I dont remember seeing that.
Modifié par PathofDaggers, 18 janvier 2010 - 09:23 .
#87
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 09:24
I'm no doubt wrong, but I'm forever optimistic!
#88
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 09:30
#89
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 09:50
No, No and one more No
![]()
The Kodiak Dropship, and the Hammerhead are TWO SEPARATE Vehicles. One is auto pilot, and the other we drive.
That is the Kodiak Dropship, and that we do not pilot
#90
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 09:52
#91
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 10:09
Ktauliss wrote...
I cannot call it truly conclusive but if you check http://social.biowar...624678/1#624851 javierabegazo is pretty clear she has information she is prevented from releasing, but is also quite clear that the Hammerhead is still there and is completely seperate from Kodiak Drop ship [in a quote from that thread]
Just wanna throw it out there that Javier is male, as far as his youtube avatar and name (javier) suggest.
Also, he isn't privy to any knowledge that isn't available to the rest of us. He just scours the web (read: googles) for new info that's been released. So, i wouldn't take that as a confirmation, per se.
However, he was only using the information that devs had provided. The Kodiak dropship and Hammerhead are separate entities, according to the devs (at least at that time). That was pretty recently, too, so i'd bet it hasn't changed.
#92
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 10:10
#93
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 10:14
#94
Posté 18 janvier 2010 - 10:35
#95
Posté 19 janvier 2010 - 07:28
marshalleck wrote...
I think it may be DLC. They've said they'd talk about it this week, and they've also said they'd talk about DLC this week. 2+2=4.
But I could well be wrong.
well it's nice to see myself and few other clear thinkers vindicated
#96
Posté 19 janvier 2010 - 07:35
#97
Posté 19 janvier 2010 - 07:37
#98
Posté 19 janvier 2010 - 07:40




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






