1913 réponses à ce sujet

[Giltspur]

ConvictedFish wrote...

I killed liliana when I poured the blood on the ashes, she attacked me, and had to fall with the guardian.. What will that mean? for my DA:I?

Maybe it means in your game you'll get resurrected Leliana.  And since she's resurrected she'll be more certain of her divine purpose than before you killed her.  Perhaps Leliana's that didn't get scattered, smothered, chunked (waffle house hashbrown) will be more moderate in terms of religious conviction. People that haven't come back from the dead are probably more mellow. 

[ConvictedFish]

Ultimashade wrote...

ConvictedFish wrote...

I killed liliana when I poured the blood on the ashes, she attacked me, and had to fall with the guardian.. What will that mean? for my DA:I?

In my opinion, I think it was lyrium that healed Liliana's injuries. Ohgren states that the place is brimming with lyrium, which means that the ashes, originally powerless, were imbued with the same powers as the lyrium. It makes sense that she'd survive that if this is the case.

I'm replaying my story, I didn't kill her the first time. I'm not to anything about her being healed, or anything yet. I think I'm missing something.

[BioFan (Official)]

rosalindlutece wrote...

ManchesterUnitedFan1 wrote...

TKavatar wrote...

Hopefully Gamescon will something more substantial than this tomorrow.

I don't think bioware is at gamescom, but I may be wrong.

they are. we're getting a livestream of some dragon age info tomorrow at 7pm.
(http://o.ea.com/16676)

It's actually 7 AM, not PM

Modifié par Ericander77, 19 août 2013 - 08:45 .

[ConvictedFish]

Giltspur wrote...

ConvictedFish wrote...

I killed liliana when I poured the blood on the ashes, she attacked me, and had to fall with the guardian.. What will that mean? for my DA:I?

Maybe it means in your game you'll get resurrected Leliana.  And since she's resurrected she'll be more certain of her divine purpose than before you killed her.  Perhaps Leliana's that didn't get scattered, smothered, chunked (waffle house hashbrown) will be more moderate in terms of religious conviction. People that haven't come back from the dead are probably more mellow. 

Either way, if I miss out on some content, I will play all three in a row again, to make sure I get everything out of DA:I possible

[Khayness]

Go bowstrings or go home!

[LPPrince]

Khayness wrote...

Go bowstrings or go home!

Mhm!

[Aolbain]

esper wrote...

All in all I have to admit I have never wondered what it was like to start the Jedi Organisation considering that I think it a pretty evil one. (The Sith organisation too, but that is neither here nor there).

Yeah, I always wondered why the these people were allowed to hold any authority,

[phunx]

EntropicAngel wrote...

Also a nice point for all those people thinking the Chantry is evil.

They're pragmatic to the point of being evil. The Grand Cleric did not support Alistair's father's rebellion in Ferelden until it was looking like they will win.


Now when the mages are free, suddenly the Chantry acts like: "Oops, we didn't know! We love the mages really, it was the templars!"

They're only concerned with remaining in power.

[Dave of Canada]

EntropicAngel wrote...

There we go, a nice rebuttal to those people claiming that Templars in DA ][ were "normal."

Do you think it'll discourage them? Thesepeople think anyone who disagrees with them is evil.

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 19 août 2013 - 08:47 .

[biffbitrot]

WHY oh WHY IS THE MOST NAUSEATINGLY CLOYING CHARACTER EVER CREATED BEING BROUGHT NOT ONLY BACK BUT SHOVED DOWN OUR THROATSas a party member AGAIN!

VARRICK is that gross kid that insisted on hanging out with you and wiping his nose on your shirt and just UGH!
AND a DISGRACE
TO THE BEAUTIFUl, FUNNY, POWERFUL INVENTIVE lore created for the dwarves, I loved their way of speaking - how all their slang referred back to mines and caves and dust and digging etc. BRILLIANT!
BUT VARRICK JUST THROWS IT ALL OUT THE NEAREST WINDOW TO BECOME some twisted version of a "SLICK"
side kick. DWARVES ARE NOT SLICK! AAARGH!

[Suzzy123]

biffbitrot wrote...

WHY oh WHY IS THE MOST NAUSEATINGLY CLOYING CHARACTER EVER CREATED BEING BROUGHT NOT ONLY BACK BUT SHOVED DOWN OUR THROATSas a party member AGAIN!

VARRICK is that gross kid that insisted on hanging out with you and wiping his nose on your shirt and just UGH!
AND a DISGRACE
TO THE BEAUTIFUl, FUNNY, POWERFUL INVENTIVE lore created for the dwarves, I loved their way of speaking - how all their slang referred back to mines and caves and dust and digging etc. BRILLIANT!
BUT VARRICK JUST THROWS IT ALL OUT THE NEAREST WINDOW TO BECOME some twisted version of a "SLICK"
side kick. DWARVES ARE NOT SLICK! AAARGH!

We heard you the first time Sunshine. 

[esper]

Aolbain wrote...

esper wrote...

All in all I have to admit I have never wondered what it was like to start the Jedi Organisation considering that I think it a pretty evil one. (The Sith organisation too, but that is neither here nor there).

Yeah, I always wondered why the these people were allowed to hold any authority,

Which is why I really, really hope we are not going to make a Jedi-like organisation.

[Hellion Rex]

EntropicAngel wrote...

Ultimashade wrote...

In my opinion, I think it was lyrium that healed Liliana's injuries. Ohgren states that the place is brimming with lyrium, which means that the ashes, originally powerless, were imbued with the same powers as the lyrium. It makes sense that she'd survive that if this is the case.

What proof do we have that lyrium ever actually HEALS anything?

Arl Eamon?

[Aolbain]

esper wrote...

Which is why I really, really hope we are not going to make a Jedi-like organisation.

The properly just meant the "big, powerful and legendary organization" thing. Not "black and white but suprisingly  questionable morality".

[RepHope]

That was the ashes that cured Eamon and Oghren is the only one who suggests lyrium. What's this about the Maker being malevolent? As far as I know the worst thing he's done is say screw this I'm outta here. 

Modifié par RepHope, 19 août 2013 - 09:05 .

[esper]

EntropicAngel wrote...

phunx wrote...

They're pragmatic to the point of being evil. The Grand Cleric did not support Alistair's father's rebellion in Ferelden until it was looking like they will win.


Now when the mages are free, suddenly the Chantry acts like: "Oops, we didn't know! We love the mages really, it was the templars!"

They're only concerned with remaining in power.

Pragmatism isn't evil.

Dave of Canada wrote...

Do you think it'll discourage them? Thesepeople think anyone who disagrees with them is evil.

True enough.

Pragmatism isn't evil, the individual priest isn't evil, but the head goal of the Andrastian faith is bringing back the attention of a malevoent and short tempered god, and that I will never support. Even if I don't exactly believe in the God.

The second thing is that the chantry is have had their chance and failed. Rather spectaculary.

I don't think that anyone who opposse me is evil. I do however think that the Andrastian faith is dangerous, the current Divine have proven to be completely incompetent, and the faith itself is splitting into two different branches (at the very least) and their behavior towards different minorities is not tolerable for a group of people forming spiritual guidiance.

None of these things are evil, but they are the reason I will never support the chantry.

[RepHope]

^ what are you talking about? What has the maker done exactly?

[Reofeir]

biffbitrot wrote...

WHY oh WHY IS THE MOST NAUSEATINGLY CLOYING CHARACTER EVER CREATED BEING BROUGHT NOT ONLY BACK BUT SHOVED DOWN OUR THROATSas a party member AGAIN!

VARRICK is that gross kid that insisted on hanging out with you and wiping his nose on your shirt and just UGH!
AND a DISGRACE
TO THE BEAUTIFUl, FUNNY, POWERFUL INVENTIVE lore created for the dwarves, I loved their way of speaking - how all their slang referred back to mines and caves and dust and digging etc. BRILLIANT!
BUT VARRICK JUST THROWS IT ALL OUT THE NEAREST WINDOW TO BECOME some twisted version of a "SLICK"
side kick. DWARVES ARE NOT SLICK! AAARGH!

Oh calm down will ya. Sheesh, you're so loud you almost woke up boo.

[esper]

Aolbain wrote...

esper wrote...

Which is why I really, really hope we are not going to make a Jedi-like organisation.

The properly just meant the "big, powerful and legendary organization" thing. Not "black and white but suprisingly  questionable morality".

I really hope that. I mean, if we do get to influence how the Inqusition operates I would not make a goody, goody hero group. (That's boring), but the Jedi were... well... really not what I look up to.

[Wulfram]

RepHope wrote...

^ what are you talking about? What has the maker done exactly?

Send the Blight, according to the Andrastean faith.

[Aolbain]

esper wrote...

Aolbain wrote...

esper wrote...

Which is why I really, really hope we are not going to make a Jedi-like organisation.

The properly just meant the "big, powerful and legendary organization" thing. Not "black and white but suprisingly  questionable morality".

I really hope that. I mean, if we do get to influence how the Inqusition operates I would not make a goody, goody hero group. (That's boring), but the Jedi were... well... really not what I look up to.

It takes a lot of balls to proclaim yourself Protector Of Fredoom, Justice And Goodguy-ness when you employ a slave army.

[Mr.House]

Well that was disappointing.

[Sol Downer]

RepHope wrote...

That was the ashes that cured Eamon and Oghren is the only one who suggests lyrium. What's this about the Maker being malevolent? As far as I know the worst thing he's done is say screw this I'm outta here. 

Oghren is the only one that can sense the lyrium. Further, as stated, it is very likely that said lyrium imbued the ashes with healing properties. Haven't you ever touched plain old lyrium in any one of your DA:O playthroughs? If you're dying, it'll pick you right up. It's not just in the Fade either.