Anyways, to test the waters and set a basis for further discussion, I want to ask the following question:

Given that Cerberus is single-handedly responsible for re-building Shepard and the Normandy, the entities without which this cycle would have almost certainly been harvested, is the organization as a whole vindicated?
Because of how instrumental Shepard is, you could make a very convincing argument that the survivors of the war owe their lives to him/her. But since Shepard owes his/her existence to Cerberus, do the citizens of the galaxy actually owe the debt to Cerberus (this undoubtedly ties into the Creator-Created conflict, but I won't discuss that here)?
On the other hand, could you ever argue that what happened on Akuze, Nodacrux, or Pragia was justified? If they all would have died to the Reapers anyway?
I think the answer clearly changes based on your view of Cerberus to begin with, as well as how you view what ending the cycles accomplished. This of course means that the answer also changes with the ending. Hopefully we won't all have similar answers.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





