Modifié par Ninja Stan, 09 août 2013 - 08:55 .
Was Cerberus Vindicated?
#76
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:38
#77
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:39
Modifié par BioWareMod05, 10 août 2013 - 03:46 .
#78
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:40
The community isn't as niceDavid7204 wrote...
Enough. Enough of the clumsy lying. Enough. If you really thought those stories did everything better, you would be spending your time discussing them and not Mass Effect.
#79
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:41
Guest_StreetMagic_*
David7204 wrote...
Enough of this very silly nonsense.
First of all, Mass Effect has some of the finest characters of any fiction in existence, and you'd be very deluded to argue otherwise. Particularly since I've personally seen about half the people on this page argue very passionatly in support of one character in other.
Secondly, some of the standards being applied to characters are incredibly ridiculous and contradictory. The sheer hypocrisy and foolishness pf Steelcan's recent post and his clumsy attempt to retroactively change his stance should be very indicative of that. Characters are not walking viewpoints, particularly the ones in Mass Effect. EDI does not exist for the sole purpose of making the player 'feel bad' for choosing Destroy, not to epouse synthetics.
Steelcan never said that about EDI. I did (I think he tried to convey that she served more purpose than that).
Not all characters are written equally to me btw (that's just par for the course in collaborations like this. Some writers are better than others). Some make for more in depth characters than others. While some can be pegged down fairly easily.
It's not an insult to say this. Sci-Fi in general is kind of a whole platform to comment on the future. A way to provide a backdrop for various technological possibilities and philosophies. It's different than a straight up character based drama. That isn't to say it's bad. I love sci-fi. I'm just deconstructing some of it.
Modifié par StreetMagic, 09 août 2013 - 08:41 .
#80
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:42
#81
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:43
For example?David7204 wrote...
And if you're applying it to Mass Effect, your deconstruction is wrong. The characters are and always have been far more than walking viewpoints.
#82
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:43
Modifié par David7204, 09 août 2013 - 08:44 .
#83
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:44
Modifié par Ninja Stan, 09 août 2013 - 08:57 .
#84
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:45
Is this genuinely fun to you? Satisfying? Fulfilling? To post your little pictures and pretend you're proving something to someone?
We've all seen the pictures. They're not clever. They're annoying. You're annoying.
Modifié par David7204, 09 août 2013 - 08:45 .
#85
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:45
Sorry, but banter ranks even lower.David7204 wrote...
Every single line of dialogue in existence that isn't a 'viewpoint.' Which is 99% of them.
#86
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:46
We don't need to prove anything. You are doing it all for us.David7204 wrote...
I've really getting tired of this.
Is this genuinely fun to you? Satisfying? Fulfilling? To post your little pictures and pretend you're proving something to someone?
We've all seen the pictures. They're not clever. They're annoying. You're annoying.
#87
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:46
Guest_StreetMagic_*
David7204 wrote...
And if you're applying it to Mass Effect, your deconstruction is wrong. The characters are and always have been far more than walking viewpoints.
You're just in love with Liara, aren't you? That's what this is all about.
#88
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:47
It proves that you have been reduced to a meme on this site. That is your credibility.David7204 wrote...
The fact that you have to post these ridiculous pictures and chant 'heroism' as if you're making a point is just proving to me you're just not smart enough to do anything else. And that I'm wasting my time being here.
#89
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:47
#90
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:49
No it isn't the best I can do. I've long ceased trying to actually debate you.David7204 wrote...
Steelcan, is this really it? Is this the best you can do? Copy and paste 'HEROISM' or 'CHARACTERZATION' every 10 minutes?
#91
Posté 09 août 2013 - 08:59
#92
Posté 09 août 2013 - 09:08
#93
Posté 09 août 2013 - 09:14
Steelcan wrote...
3. They do not want the Reapers destroyed, a Turian-Krogan Alliance would hurt that goal.
Except that the Allies are the ones buying Cerberus time. Without them the Reapers would far more easily conquer the galaxy, leading to the destruction of the Horizon facility before they got anything done there.
#94
Posté 09 août 2013 - 09:14
#95
Posté 09 août 2013 - 09:21
#96
Posté 09 août 2013 - 09:28
Ravensword wrote...
If Cerberus hadn't become the Sith Empire and and simply remained the morally grey organization as it was in ME2, then they would've definitely been vindicated.
I'm still not sure I would totally go with vindicated, but they would be much more understandable at the very least. ME2 Cerberus I can get empathize with, even support. ME3 Cerberus though... No.
#97
Posté 09 août 2013 - 09:33
I mean seriously, Wilson created a cure for DEATH and still thought he'd get more money by setting the mechs on everything (and wasn't even smart enough to not get shot himself)? How stupid do you have to be, and more to the point, why aren't they selling that technology?
Don't get me wrong, bringing back the dead, studying the geth and trying to control the Reapers are all good ideas that are proven to work. The problem is they execute them in the most shamelessly self-destructive and idiotically evil ways, then try to write it off as the ends justifying the means. It feels like Cerberus getting something right is less of case of the 'triumph of the private sector over government intervention' ideal that someone on the writing team was clearly in love with and more a case of 'a broken clock is right twice a day'.
Modifié par Kataphrut94, 09 août 2013 - 09:34 .
#98
Posté 09 août 2013 - 09:35
#99
Posté 09 août 2013 - 09:48
Throughout the entire trilogy, whenever we "uninvitedly" enter a Cerberus complex, there is death and out-of-control, negligent experiments - even very much so in ME2.
I was always under the impression that Miranda is some sort of proto-Shepard, when it comes to the means of convincing her to stay loyal to the organization: She's just as surprised as the Commander about pretty much anything that is revealed about Cerberus, and you never hear her explain herself along the lines of: "Oh yeah... this. Sorry you see that."
I don't know if this was done to make her less off-putting to a whider array of players, but Miranda's take on what Cerberus is makes them come off a lot more likeable. Depite even being advertised as TIM's #2 however, she doesn't seem to be aware of anything a non-extremist would immediately disapprove of - EDIs explanation on the cell-based structure goes a long way in explaining that maybe, but that would also mean there have to be other "number twos".
With an organization that's basically built from a small number of entirely independent sub-organizations, it's fairly easy to be appealing to any kind of personality.
Modifié par Baelrahn, 09 août 2013 - 09:54 .
#100
Posté 09 août 2013 - 09:58




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





