304 réponses à ce sujet

[ziloe]

Knowing that there's a potential multiplayer mode, I really, really hope we get to play it like we did the beta MP for ME3. I mean seriously, every game I want, isn't out until 2014. If we could get at least a brief glimpse into the combat system and MP mode, I think that could do wonders for this horrible waiting game. D:

((Discuss))

[NoForgiveness]

sure, if it sucks I want to know ahead of time so I can not play it when the game comes out(much like me3)

[ziloe]

MR_PN wrote...

sure, if it sucks I want to know ahead of time so I can not play it when the game comes out(much like me3)

What? ME3 MP was one of the best parts of the game.

I might not have liked how they ended the main game (and never want to see the same happen again), but that doesn't mean I didn't enjoy the rest of it.

[Frozenkex]

Pls no multiplayer, will take important resources/time for something vast majority fans of dragon age don't want/need. Really. Even if it was funnish, it would definitely not be something that people would buy the game for, or keep playing the game for. Thats my opinion.

[NoForgiveness]

well I generally don't like the horde mode style. but when I first heard about it I thought it would be like actual missions, so I was really disappointed. not to mention how it was connected to sp /lame. but im not really expecting anything out of mp in dai, if it sucks ill be right and if its good ill be pleasantly surprised.

Modifié par MR_PN, 10 août 2013 - 07:04 .

[Maria Caliban]

Pls yes multiplayer. ME 3 MP was one of the best parts of the game.

[Dubozz]

It's EA game. There will be multiplayer. And there is nothing bad about it.

[ziloe]

Frozenkex wrote...

Pls no multiplayer, will take important resources/time for something vast majority fans of dragon age don't want/need. Really. Even if it was funnish, it would definitely not be something that people would buy the game for, or keep playing the game for. Thats my opinion.

You're too late. They've already talked about doing it, as far as I understand.

[Cirram55]

^ Not really, (back in June, maybe?) Aaron Flynn said they're focussing on SP since it's they're first time using Frostbite and they don't want to mess up the main campaign. While that's not a flat out "no" to MP, it's still something to ponder.

And no, MP does not take away resources, EA would actually give Bioware more money for it.

[phunx]

I was opposing ME3 MP for stupid reasons. I am not making the same mistake.

[ziloe]

Cirram55 wrote...

^ Not really, (back in June, maybe?) Aaron Flynn said they're focussing on SP since it's they're first time using Frostbite and they don't want to mess up the main campaign. While that's not a flat out "no" to MP, it's still something to ponder.

And no, MP does not take away resources, EA would actually give Bioware more money for it.

Ooh, I'd love to see the article. I just remember reading they weren't knocking the idea and thought I'd cover my bases.

[AppealToReason]

Frozenkex wrote...

Pls no multiplayer, will take important resources/time for something vast majority fans of dragon age don't want/need. Really. Even if it was funnish, it would definitely not be something that people would buy the game for, or keep playing the game for. Thats my opinion.

What is this stupid myth about MP taking money away from the rest of the game? Budgeting doesn't go that way. Biower would get x monies for voice acting, x monies for advertising, x monies for SP, x monies for MP. If the VA comes in at 3 dollars less than anticipated its not like that 3 dollars is going to other areas of the game. EA gets 3 dollars back after asking why something came under budget the same way they'd be curious why something came over budget.

__

I'd love MP. Co-op would be terrific. A castle/defence seige thing could be really neat. IEven a level crawling thing and your loots in some way transfer across to SP in a minor way would be fun. 

Even they had a co-op story mode like Saints Row the Third I literally wouldn't be able to contain my boner.

Playing games with friends is fun.

[Maria Caliban]

AppealToReason wrote...

What is this stupid myth about MP taking money away from the rest of the game? Budgeting doesn't go that way.

It won't work. No matter who you are, no matter how you explain it.

I've watched this discussion play out dozens of times. They won't believe you.

[Druk-Qs]

Having a few people controlling your other party members sounds interesting.

Hell no to competitive tho

[Diefenbaker]

As long as you don't have to play it to get the best outcome in your SP game I have no issues with MP in DA:I.

[Ziggeh]

I'm not overly clear how mulitplayer would work, especially with an increased focus on tactics.

ME3 worked because it was basically a third person cover based shooter with some squaddies thrown in. This is a party based tactical, pause and play, maths based rpg. Unless they really focus on the "action combat", rendering all three of those things irrelevant (ie, the opposite of the stated focus) it would just be wierd.

[ziloe]

Ziggeh wrote...

I'm not overly clear how mulitplayer would work, especially with an increased focus on tactics.

ME3 worked because it was basically a third person cover based shooter with some squaddies thrown in. This is a party based tactical, pause and play, maths based rpg. Unless they really focus on the "action combat", rendering all three of those things irrelevant (ie, the opposite of the stated focus) it would just be wierd.

The pause wouldn't be necessary since each individual would issue orders for their characters. You could suggest certain tactics via voice chat, etc, I imagine. But I suppose it would run similarly to utilizing one single character.

[Blooddrunk1004]

Using ME3 multiplayer as an excuse to implant it in Dragon Age is silly.
It was boring, broken controls on PC, dumb AI and no creativity at all. Bioware even went back on their own words when they said they will try to make multiplayer loyal to ME plot. Few months later, out of nowhere Collectors appear!

"Hey guys you know what would serve as the perfect complement the last 7 waves of respawning Cerberus Assault Troops and Centurions? 7 more waves of Assault Troops and Centurions!"

I don't want multiplayer. SP is Bioware's strong point and it always was. If they will make multiplayer then at least give us more mods, missions or something, instead of spending time increasing size of Ashley and Liara's boobs.

Modifié par Blooddrunk1004, 10 août 2013 - 12:00 .

[Jerrybnsn]

considering how small a group of gamers actually play multiplayer, I'm surprised EA sinks good money into it. I find it a dull addition to a game.

Modifié par Jerrybnsn, 10 août 2013 - 12:11 .

[DrunkenGamerTrae]

Jerrybnsn wrote...

considering how small a group of gamers actually play multiplayer, I'm surprised EA sinks good money into it. I find it a dull addition to a game.

Because quite a large group of gamers enjoy gaming socially. I would have been finished with ME3 months ago if not for co-op. As is, a year later I still play on a fairly regular basis and see many others, many of them friends I've made in game, doing so as well. Say what you will but it really added to the longevity, repeatability, and for many fun of the game.

[Gewehr_fr]

Actually I'd like a multiplayer similar to ME3's. It was surprisingly fun and addictive.

And if there's one, allow us play as characters from the previous games too.

[Naughty Bear]

What is with multiplayer needed for every game?

ME3 multiplayer was horde set in the ME universe, nothing else. But the funny thing is, the campaign was **** that it made the multiplayer actually the best part of the game.

[badboy64]

Not do not include it at all. It doesn't belong in the Dragon Age games.

[ziloe]

Naughty Bear wrote...

What is with multiplayer needed for every game?

ME3 multiplayer was horde set in the ME universe, nothing else. But the funny thing is, the campaign was **** that it made the multiplayer actually the best part of the game.

It's not needed. But if does exist, an early beta release would be fantastic.

[cjones91]

DrunkenGamerTrae wrote...

Jerrybnsn wrote...

considering how small a group of gamers actually play multiplayer, I'm surprised EA sinks good money into it. I find it a dull addition to a game.

Because quite a large group of gamers enjoy gaming socially. I would have been finished with ME3 months ago if not for co-op. As is, a year later I still play on a fairly regular basis and see many others, many of them friends I've made in game, doing so as well. Say what you will but it really added to the longevity, repeatability, and for many fun of the game.

No it isn't.Co-op and multiplayer aren't needed to make a game have longevity or have replay value.I'd rather play a good single player game than one with a multiplayer mode that's average at best.Also Skyrim says hello.