Aller au contenu

Photo

Pargon and Renegade in hindsight


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
240 réponses à ce sujet

#126
NeroonWilliams

NeroonWilliams
  • Members
  • 723 messages

Jukaga wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

When does Legion lie in ME2?


I think the consensus is when he said only the geth Heretics were hostile to organics, when the campaign in the Armstrong Nebula in ME1 proves otherwise.


Considering that Legion also says that its platform is the only Geth platform (vs. Heretic platform) outside of Rannoch, I'm inclined to discount any claim that the Armstrong Nebula was an incursion of true Geth which is not backed up by anything except the speculation of the previous poster who is trying to discredit Legion.

#127
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 275 messages

Jukaga wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

When does Legion lie in ME2?


I think the consensus is when he said only the geth Heretics were hostile to organics, when the campaign in the Armstrong Nebula in ME1 proves otherwise.


1. How does anything in ME1 disprove Legion?

2. Unless explicitly stated, that doesn't mean Legion lied about anything. That makes it a retcon, if anything.

#128
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Jukaga wrote...

DeinonSlayer wrote...

This is why you need to pay attention and make your own decisions instead of letting the position of a dialogue option on the wheel dictate your choices to you. Let your own sense of right and wrong guide you.

Paragon and renegade need to go away, if only to encourage players to think for themselves.


Unfortunately it's only with ME3's improved reputation system that we can play Paragades/Renegons without missing key dialog choices. Nowadays, I 'cheat' via gibbed in ME2 to max out one or the other every few missions depending on which way that Shepard is leaning and freely choose appropriate R/P responses without fear or missing content because of a balanced R/P score.

Exactly what I did in ME2. I ignore unlocked persuasion choices if they're out-of-character for the Shepard I happen to be roleplaying.

Canon!Shep sided with Tali in their loyalty confrontation because he already had a bone to pick with the Geth (blew up the heretics, though not for the reason Shepard vocalizes in-game) and was less than thrilled about an act of espionage committed on his ship. Several conversations later, after having come to respect Legion to some degree, he apologized (charm). I liked how there were four different dialogue options, varying levels of trust, for when Legion tries to contact the Consensus (permission denied, chose the neutral option as justification).

Cerberus!Shep, on the other hand, sided with Legion in the same exchange because she was cultivating the Geth as an asset in the coming fight, having rewritten the heretics (Tali was exiled). She later relayed this to Tali (intimidate option), arguing that it was better to have Geth ships "to soak enemy fire." She was a schemer like that - she let Kolyat succeed in his assassination earlier so as to eliminate the anti-human thug politician whilst keeping her own hands clean.

Both could have broken up the fight in the first exchange, but it was more in-character for them not to do so. You can make some interesting characters by working outside the bounds of paragon and renegade. ME3's reputation system was an improvement; unfortunately the first two titles conditioned many people to never stray from their side of the wheel.

#129
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 950 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

Question: did the geth ever attack anyone in the Armstrong Nebula, or were they just setting up outposts on uninhabited worlds?


I can't really remember, but the wiki says there's a base with husks in.

Which would suggest that these are heretics really, because husks were "revealed" as reaper tech in ME2.

#130
Jukaga

Jukaga
  • Members
  • 2 028 messages

Wulfram wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

Question: did the geth ever attack anyone in the Armstrong Nebula, or were they just setting up outposts on uninhabited worlds?


I can't really remember, but the wiki says there's a base with husks in.

Which would suggest that these are heretics really, because husks were "revealed" as reaper tech in ME2.


The final console you activate proves otherwise. You know the one described like it's a sort of Quarian Vaudeville act sent back to the Geth consensus behind the veil.

#131
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

The final console you activate proves otherwise. You know the one described like it's a sort of Quarian Vaudeville act sent back to the Geth consensus behind the veil.

All that implies is that there are heretics somewhere in the Perseus Veil, which is hardly impossible.

#132
Jukaga

Jukaga
  • Members
  • 2 028 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

The final console you activate proves otherwise. You know the one described like it's a sort of Quarian Vaudeville act sent back to the Geth consensus behind the veil.

All that implies is that there are heretics somewhere in the Perseus Veil, which is hardly impossible.


I disagree, Consensus Geth and Heretic Geth cannot co-exist in proximity, which is why they left Rannoch.

#133
DragonIroh001

DragonIroh001
  • Members
  • 110 messages

Wulfram wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

Question: did the geth ever attack anyone in the Armstrong Nebula, or were they just setting up outposts on uninhabited worlds?


I can't really remember, but the wiki says there's a base with husks in.

Which would suggest that these are heretics really, because husks were "revealed" as reaper tech in ME2.


And apart from going to said system in question, you can get the information about the outposts from either their Feros outpost or Saren's Virmire base.

#134
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

Wulfram wrote...
I can't really remember, but the wiki says there's a base with husks in.

Which would suggest that these are heretics really, because husks were "revealed" as reaper tech in ME2.


Wait, what? I thought the Codex totally spelled that out for us in ME1, with it's whole "why would the geth do this/where would they get the tech". 

#135
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

The final console you activate proves otherwise. You know the one described like it's a sort of Quarian Vaudeville act sent back to the Geth consensus behind the veil.

All that implies is that there are heretics somewhere in the Perseus Veil, which is hardly impossible.

Legion claims they were kicked out of the Veil by the true Geth.

What it comes down to is, the existence of the heretics was a retcon introduced in ME2. They wanted to set up the Geth in a sympathetic position, which is why no dialogue options exist to ask Legion why they let the heretic attacks continue for two years after Sovereign attacked the Citadel before the True Geth decided to do anything about it (least of all denounce their actions).

Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 13 août 2013 - 11:58 .


#136
Jukaga

Jukaga
  • Members
  • 2 028 messages

NeroonWilliams wrote...

Jukaga wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

When does Legion lie in ME2?


I think the consensus is when he said only the geth Heretics were hostile to organics, when the campaign in the Armstrong Nebula in ME1 proves otherwise.


Considering that Legion also says that its platform is the only Geth platform (vs. Heretic platform) outside of Rannoch, I'm inclined to discount any claim that the Armstrong Nebula was an incursion of true Geth which is not backed up by anything except the speculation of the previous poster who is trying to discredit Legion.


Well that part is true, because all of the Armstrong Geth are smoking wrecks.

#137
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Jukaga wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

The final console you activate proves otherwise. You know the one described like it's a sort of Quarian Vaudeville act sent back to the Geth consensus behind the veil.

All that implies is that there are heretics somewhere in the Perseus Veil, which is hardly impossible.


I disagree, Consensus Geth and Heretic Geth cannot co-exist in proximity, which is why they left Rannoch.

Well, they have husks. They're clearly not orthodox geth. Eliminate the impossibilities...

#138
Jukaga

Jukaga
  • Members
  • 2 028 messages

o Ventus wrote...

Jukaga wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

When does Legion lie in ME2?


I think the consensus is when he said only the geth Heretics were hostile to organics, when the campaign in the Armstrong Nebula in ME1 proves otherwise.


1. How does anything in ME1 disprove Legion?

2. Unless explicitly stated, that doesn't mean Legion lied about anything. That makes it a retcon, if anything.


Well yes it is a retcon as obviously they hadn't thought up the Consensus/Heretic split back in ME1 so I feel we have to proceed with the evidence as shown and draw our conclusions from the context.

#139
Jukaga

Jukaga
  • Members
  • 2 028 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

Well, they have husks. They're clearly not orthodox geth. Eliminate the impossibilities...


I don't recall facing husks in those missions, just 4 semi-fortified Geth bases.

#140
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 275 messages

DeinonSlayer wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

The final console you activate proves otherwise. You know the one described like it's a sort of Quarian Vaudeville act sent back to the Geth consensus behind the veil.

All that implies is that there are heretics somewhere in the Perseus Veil, which is hardly impossible.

Legion claims they were kicked out of the Veil by the true Geth.

What it comes down to is, the existence of the heretics was a retcon introduced in ME2. They wanted to set up the Geth in a sympathetic position, which is why no dialogue options exist to ask Legion why they let the heretic attacks continue for two years after Sovereign attacked the Citadel before the True Geth decided to do anything about it (least of all denounce their actions).


This isn't a retcon.

#141
Jukaga

Jukaga
  • Members
  • 2 028 messages
Why is arguing/discussing this still fun? lol.

#142
NeroonWilliams

NeroonWilliams
  • Members
  • 723 messages

Jukaga wrote...

Why is arguing/discussing this still fun? lol.


Because discrediting the Geth is a prerequisite for demanding that Destroy is the ONLY possible ending to choose. :innocent:

#143
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
For most people, unfortunately. I pick Destroy.

#144
Gold Dragon

Gold Dragon
  • Members
  • 2 399 messages

NeroonWilliams wrote...

Jukaga wrote...

Why is arguing/discussing this still fun? lol.


Because discrediting the Geth is a prerequisite for demanding that Destroy is the ONLY possible ending to choose. :innocent:


I choose Destroy, and like the Geth.  So I don't discredit them.


I'd say more, but it's off-topic for this thread.


:wizard:

#145
NeroonWilliams

NeroonWilliams
  • Members
  • 723 messages

David7204 wrote...

For most people, unfortunately. I pick Destroy.


Most of my Shepards have picked Destroy as well, but the Shepards that think along lines that are closest to my own usually choose Control.  I happen to think that ALL of the endings (including Refuse) is a perfectly legitimate choice during that confrontation.

#146
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages
Was I the only one who listened to Legion talk during his loyalty mission?

#147
NeroonWilliams

NeroonWilliams
  • Members
  • 723 messages

Br3ad wrote...

Was I the only one who listened to Legion talk during his loyalty mission?


Nope, but apparently some of us decided that Legion was lying in order to retcon their own agenda on the story.

#148
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 818 messages

Br3ad wrote...

Was I the only one who listened to Legion talk during his loyalty mission?


No, I thoroughly explored its entire dialogue tree. I was hoping to get it to dance. It would not. Damn.

Well in ME3

Legion: Do we deserve death?

Shepard: I'm sorry but I can't let you upload the code.

Legion: We cannot let you decide our fate. Uploading the code.

Shepard: Tali! ..... *pop* *pop* *pop*

#149
The Heretic of Time

The Heretic of Time
  • Members
  • 5 612 messages

David7204 wrote...

For most people, unfortunately. I pick Destroy.


*reads your post*

*looks at your avatar*

*reads your post again*

Okay, that was unexpected. I expected you to pick synthesis.

#150
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

Turbo_J wrote...

How easily we forget:

In ME1 - all Geth were hostile. Legion flat out lies to Shep in ME2.


They were, but for different reasons. The Mainstream Geth, the Geth that Legion is a part of, are defensively hostile; they will attack, unprovoked, but only on their own turf. They don't actively engage against the galaxy, and they rarely if ever leave the Perseus Veil (which I think is a bit larger than is shown in ME3). Legion tells you this. All Geth in ME1 were Heretics. These are Geth that actively crusaded throughout the Galaxy with Saren and Sovereign. They're not accepted as part of the Mainstream Geth.

Tali's 'loyalty' mission in ME1 - get data on non heritic geth. We did that - or some of us did. What happened leading up to that? We find out these geth - not associated with the Geth who follow Sov. are massing in the Armstrong cluster. Regardless of their intentions, when we come upon their compounds - they attack. They are hostile and intend harm on Shep and squad.


There is no evidence - no evidence - to say that these were the Mainstream Geth. You're basing this point off of a faulty premise with evidence against it. The primary evidence being Legion, who tells you that all Geth you encounter are Heretics. If you choose not to believe him, that is your perogative, but don't claim it as fact without evidence. I'll withhold my point on the nature of the Geth and why they would attack anyway even if they weren't Heretics until you give me evidence to your point that would require me to use it.

The Quarians: Retcon or clue. Listen to Tali in ME1 on how her government works... then play her loyalty mission and her ME3 mission and - yeah - that's not how things should go. The Admirals should have been dispanded in ME2 after Tali's trial... In fact, I don't think they would have been involved at all given it would cost them their jobs... they would have left the trial up to the Ship captains/owners. Further to that, even if we let that go, in ME3 the Admiralty Board only gets involved to override matters/decisions within the flotilla - and their decisions have to be unanimous with regards to the matter at hand. If they did go to war against the Geth via unanimous vote, again - they would be dispanded. Tali would have had to vote yes - to go to war - and she would no longer be an Admiral after the vote. According to Tali, her and Koris opposed the war. It should have never happened.


An interesting way of looking at it, though I'll have to fact check this later.

Regardless of these 'problems', the geth are not trustworthy. We've never seen a friendly one... not really. Legion is 1183 all rolled into one amazing concept... who eventually proves to be less than trustworthy.


I disagree. The Geth may not seem trustworthy. I think it's mainly due to their secretive and reclusive nature as synthetics. I think Legion is doing the best he can for the Geth while also knowing that he's going to have to deal with organics who naturally going to be very irrationally spiteful and untrustworthy towards synthetics. We have seen friendly Geth. Legion is the counter-argument. He is friendly. He is Geth. And I think the problems with the Quarians as well as the broad generalization that the war could have been preventable if the Quarians actually used their brains and didn't persecute a war based on vengeance that would leave their forces heavily depleted along with the Geth when the rest of the galaxy needed them most, I might feel more sympathy for them. As it is, I feel very little for them at all. If I can't make peace, I feel the Quarians have engineered their own demise and leave them to it. It's beyond my capacity to care any longer.

Within the context of ME3 - Peace if possible - Quarians if not... and this is my personal choice. Roll Playing some Sheps; the results are - problematic.


I agree with peace, though I would always choose the Geth over the Quarians. Personal choice as well based on facts that I have at hand, I consider it the best decision to make given the information at my disposal. I role-play a pretty practical Shepard.

Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 14 août 2013 - 12:54 .