Because they never acknowledged it in the first place. They just weren't going to tell Shepard s/he was deluded after saving the Citadel.MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
The big ship that attacked the Citadel that clearly isn't of Geth origins. In fact, I thought everyone knew it wasn't of Geth origins at the end of the first game. Seemed like everyone just panicked at the idea and hit a massive state of denial.
Why did they renege on their acknowledgement?
Cerberus or the alliance
#301
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:33
#302
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:33
MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
garrus and ashley squad wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
Who says he would take orders, he works with the Alliance, not for.garrus and ashley squad wrote...
It would be more over the history they would have to get over. Having the illusive man take orders when he will go to the most extreme to accomplish his goals. I just don't see it happening.
Someone would have to take charge of the situation. The alliance wouldn't hand it over to him. So he would have to take orders for them to work together. He wouldn't be in a spectre type role.
Well my Shepard, who is a Spectre, would be telling them to hand over power to TIM. Who I'd actually want in charge is Miranda. TIM would get Cerberus resources and be the visionary while Miranda would actually take care of the execution.
Meanwhile Hackett, Anderson, and whoever else gets the honor of fighting and dying to keep the Reapers from me.
And meanwhile, I'll be off building my alliances with the galaxy.
You might have a better chance with Miranda. The alliance probably doesn't listen to you if you bring him into it. Then again they don't listen to a lot of things.
#303
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:33
True, but they still managed to find a way to beat the Reapers.Necanor wrote...
ME3 Cerb was indoctrinated, they did far more harm than good. If they hadn't been, this war would've been over before it started.Steelcan wrote...
I was talking about both actually.Necanor wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
Cerberus brought back Shepard, fought the Collectors, found a way to control the Reapers, and was one step ahead of the Alliance at every turn.Necanor wrote...
True, but still better than what the Alliance or Cerberus did.
You're talking about ME2 Cerberus. ME2 Cerb =/= ME3 Cerb
The method of controlling the Reapers is ultimately futile anyway.
#304
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:34
Yep, they hired thousand of mercs, pirates and privateers. When the Reapers hit, they were ordered to target troop transporters. Without sufficient ground forces, the fighting on Illium took far longer than the Reapers expected.Steelcan wrote...
ummmmm no.Necanor wrote...
Illium prepared for the war, Earth did not at all.David7204 wrote...
Okay? Is this supposed to be indicative of something? Some areas fare better in war than others. That's simple and hard reality.Necanor wrote...
Earth was caught completely off-guard. They could at least have fought like Illium, by destroying Reaper troop transporters and turning the cities into urban warzones.
#305
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:34
MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
garrus and ashley squad wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
You at last understand ME.David7204 wrote...
The Alliance doesn't have the CB. And even if a miracle solution from the CB isn't a DEM, it's still a miracle solution. It's still mediocre writing at best.
Cerberus could cut a deal with the Alliance. They will work with them in exchange for..... *insert Cerberus arc of your choosing*
I don't think they would work with cerberus for the simple fact of not trusting them and a betrayal would more than likely happen at some point. Which is why it would be hard to set up any alliance with them. I as well would think cerberus would be up to something or have their own agenda in plan. Also I can see plenty of disagreements that lead to friction and eventually a war between the 2.
If Cerberus wasn't indoctrinated, why would I have to worry about a betrayal? I'd be more worried about some alliance goon getting overzealous with his "we can't do that, it's inhumane/evil!"
It's not an ulterior agenda if I'm working towards it.
They'd probably kill the enitre admiralty board and try to kill hackett, simply so that there would be no question of whose in charge. If they already killed one admiral, what would stop them doing it again? They weren't willing to work with the alliance when the collectors were attacking human colonies, or sharing their findings to give the alliance a chsnce to coordinate a defense, so I really doubt they'd truely cooperate.
But that is just my opinion. The option should exist either way, but I doubt it should be a good idea or thst cerberus will be on the level I this temporary alliance, if that's what you're thinking.
#306
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:34
Steelcan wrote...
Who says they would know all the details, and again *insert Cerberus arc*garrus and ashley squad wrote...
I don't think he is just going to hand over information to the alliance out of the goodness of his heart. He usually does things to benefit Cerberus. Also what if his research goes to far. Remember sanctuary, the alliance wouldn't sign off on some of the things his research would do.
Which means they would have to trust cerberus to do things the right way or what they deem the right way. An organization they already don't trust.
#307
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:34
You do know that Illium got attacked long after the Earth....Necanor wrote...
Yep, they hired thousand of mercs, pirates and privateers. When the Reapers hit, they were ordered to target troop transporters. Without sufficient ground forces, the fighting on Illium took far longer than the Reapers expected.
#308
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:35
CynicalShep wrote...
Guilty as charged.dreamgazer wrote...
Star Wars fans have been doing it for decades.Steelcan wrote...
I can like something and still acknowledge that it is not exceptional writing.
Ehhhh....
Yep....
Bantam era books... Episodes I and II... So many other things...
But it's just so awesome...
#309
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:35
1. No it wouldn't be. The current cycle has many advantages the Protheans did not.CynicalShep wrote...
Yeah, but a conventional victory would rubbish something that has been stated or implied several times throughout the series - that Protheans were superior and still lost. Besides, I don't see any way short of jury-rigging major planets and nuking the Reapers that are stupid enough to park there. The unconventional method would still be a miracle solution, just like the Crucible.
2. That tactic is really stupid, and frankly, the fact that you'd even suggest it makes causes me to seriously doubt your capabilities of judging any kind of conventional victory.
3. No.
Modifié par David7204, 16 août 2013 - 06:35 .
#310
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:35
They have to trust Cerberus to be fighting the Reapers. They need to learn to deal with it. Not all their friends can be white knightsgarrus and ashley squad wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
Who says they would know all the details, and again *insert Cerberus arc*garrus and ashley squad wrote...
I don't think he is just going to hand over information to the alliance out of the goodness of his heart. He usually does things to benefit Cerberus. Also what if his research goes to far. Remember sanctuary, the alliance wouldn't sign off on some of the things his research would do.
Which means they would have to trust cerberus to do things the right way or what they deem the right way. An organization they already don't trust.
#311
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:37
MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
garrus and ashley squad wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
In charge? He is wasting his time on Earth.garrus and ashley squad wrote...
I liked Anderson in charge. He seemed more willing to do more than anyone else. That and it seemed like he would step aside for my Shepard. So I could see him doing the best. As for Hackett, meh he was ok for the 3rd game. He pissed me off in the 1st game.
Sorry I meant I would of liked it if he was in charge.
I told him to come along and help. He decided to stay on Earth for some reason.
Ultimately, I want my Shepard in charge.
I as well want my shepard in charge. If I had to choose I wouldn't mind anderson being in charge.
#312
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:37
Any kind of miracle preparation would be crap writing. That's really the end of it.So all these suggestions are moot. And that doesn't even touch how ridiculous implausible they would be.
The Reapers have been extensively foreshadowed for two games as incredibly powerful. Anything less then the Reapers bulldozing the galaxy, at least at first, would be an utter cop out.
It makes no difference from a meta standpoint anyway. The Alliance has 50 dreadnoughts? 1000 Reapers are going to invade. The Alliance prepares and has 500 dreadnoughts? 10,000 Reapers are going to invade. The Alliance has 5 million dreadnoughts? 100 million Reapers. You get the idea.
Modifié par David7204, 16 août 2013 - 06:39 .
#313
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:38
Darth Brotarian wrote...
MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
garrus and ashley squad wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
You at last understand ME.David7204 wrote...
The Alliance doesn't have the CB. And even if a miracle solution from the CB isn't a DEM, it's still a miracle solution. It's still mediocre writing at best.
Cerberus could cut a deal with the Alliance. They will work with them in exchange for..... *insert Cerberus arc of your choosing*
I don't think they would work with cerberus for the simple fact of not trusting them and a betrayal would more than likely happen at some point. Which is why it would be hard to set up any alliance with them. I as well would think cerberus would be up to something or have their own agenda in plan. Also I can see plenty of disagreements that lead to friction and eventually a war between the 2.
If Cerberus wasn't indoctrinated, why would I have to worry about a betrayal? I'd be more worried about some alliance goon getting overzealous with his "we can't do that, it's inhumane/evil!"
It's not an ulterior agenda if I'm working towards it.
They'd probably kill the enitre admiralty board and try to kill hackett, simply so that there would be no question of whose in charge. If they already killed one admiral, what would stop them doing it again? They weren't willing to work with the alliance when the collectors were attacking human colonies, or sharing their findings to give the alliance a chsnce to coordinate a defense, so I really doubt they'd truely cooperate.
But that is just my opinion. The option should exist either way, but I doubt it should be a good idea or thst cerberus will be on the level I this temporary alliance, if that's what you're thinking.
I'd support killing the admiralty board if they got in the way of actually doing something. If they can't do their job, I'm not going to tolerate them. There is no question of who's in charge - my Shepard is in charge. TIM would support Shepard pretty much because Shepard would fundamentally be working towards Cerberus' agenda.
As for unwilling to work with the alliance, I remember it the other way around; It seemed like it was the alliance who was unwilling to help. TIM even states he's willing to work with them, but that relations would be difficult.
The alliance made their choice. Fuck em'
#314
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:39
Making the Crucible staying hidden ridiculousDavid7204 wrote...
Here's the bottom line -
Any kind of miracle preparation would be crap writing. That's really the end of it.So all these suggestions are moot. And that doesn't even touch how ridiculous implausible they would be.
The Reapers have been extensively foreshadowed for two games as incredibly powerful. Anything less then the Reapers bulldozing the galaxy, at least at first, would be an utter cop out.
#315
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:39
Steelcan wrote...
You do know that Illium got attacked long after the Earth....Necanor wrote...
Yep, they hired thousand of mercs, pirates and privateers. When the Reapers hit, they were ordered to target troop transporters. Without sufficient ground forces, the fighting on Illium took far longer than the Reapers expected.
Eh, we never actually are told when Illium got attacked.
#316
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:40
David7204 wrote...
1. No it wouldn't be. The current cycle has many advantages the Protheans did not.CynicalShep wrote...
Yeah, but a conventional victory would rubbish something that has been stated or implied several times throughout the series - that Protheans were superior and still lost. Besides, I don't see any way short of jury-rigging major planets and nuking the Reapers that are stupid enough to park there. The unconventional method would still be a miracle solution, just like the Crucible.
2. That tactic is really stupid, and frankly, the fact that you'd even suggest it makes causes me to seriously doubt your capabilities of judging any kind of conventional victory.
3. No.
Sounds like you're dismissing the idea because you don't like it. And being insulting. Feeling powerful?
#317
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:41
Steelcan wrote...
They have to trust Cerberus to be fighting the Reapers. They need to learn to deal with it. Not all their friends can be white knightsgarrus and ashley squad wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
Who says they would know all the details, and again *insert Cerberus arc*garrus and ashley squad wrote...
I don't think he is just going to hand over information to the alliance out of the goodness of his heart. He usually does things to benefit Cerberus. Also what if his research goes to far. Remember sanctuary, the alliance wouldn't sign off on some of the things his research would do.
Which means they would have to trust cerberus to do things the right way or what they deem the right way. An organization they already don't trust.
It's more of doing what they deem right which is why that alliance would not work. both sides would have problems with it. One would be to extreme the other doesn't trust this organization because of it.
#318
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:41
Well seeing as how other asari worlds weren't attacked until laterMassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
You do know that Illium got attacked long after the Earth....Necanor wrote...
Yep, they hired thousand of mercs, pirates and privateers. When the Reapers hit, they were ordered to target troop transporters. Without sufficient ground forces, the fighting on Illium took far longer than the Reapers expected.
Eh, we never actually are told when Illium got attacked.
#319
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:41
Actually, I'm dismissing it because it's a really stupid idea.MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Sounds like you're dismissing the idea because you don't like it. And being insulting. Feeling powerful?
Modifié par David7204, 16 août 2013 - 06:41 .
#320
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:43
#321
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:43
#322
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:43
'Cause that'd make ME1 pointlessRavensword wrote...
What I don't understand about the Reapers is why they didn't go straight for the Citadel and shut down all the relays in the galaxy, download all the information on the Citadel like star charts and census data and begin their extermination they way they always did in the past cycles.
#323
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:44
Also I remember the illusive man being none too happy when I destroyed the base, and more or less saying humanity could go **** itslef as long as cerberus was still around and thst I had no right to against his orders.
#324
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:44
MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
You do know that Illium got attacked long after the Earth....Necanor wrote...
Yep, they hired thousand of mercs, pirates and privateers. When the Reapers hit, they were ordered to target troop transporters. Without sufficient ground forces, the fighting on Illium took far longer than the Reapers expected.
Eh, we never actually are told when Illium got attacked.
True. It doesn't change the fact however, that despite an overwhelming invasion force, the defending forces of Illium managed to keep a cool head and managed to do critical, precise damage at the beginning of the battle.
#325
Posté 16 août 2013 - 06:44
David7204 wrote...
1. No it wouldn't be. The current cycle has many advantages the Protheans did not.CynicalShep wrote...
Yeah, but a conventional victory would rubbish something that has been stated or implied several times throughout the series - that Protheans were superior and still lost. Besides, I don't see any way short of jury-rigging major planets and nuking the Reapers that are stupid enough to park there. The unconventional method would still be a miracle solution, just like the Crucible.
2. That tactic is really stupid, and frankly, the fact that you'd even suggest it makes causes me to seriously doubt your capabilities of judging any kind of conventional victory.
3. No.
1. Like what?
2. It is stupid, which is why I said that "I don't see any way". I like the idea of a conventional victory but I can't see it happening. That was an exaggeration, David.
3. Yes





Retour en haut





