IC-07 wrote...
Vilegrim wrote...
Argahawk wrote...
1)Why people make so big problem from having a harpoon as a warrior ?? If you don't like something then just don't use it. They don't force you to use something just because they add it in game right ?
2)Ps. the witcher is one of the worst games i played - but that just me
1) by the sounds of the commentry it was pretty much required, either 1 use the harpoon (not a fan) or 2 combat roll (not a fan) both are action game rubbish with no place in an RPG.
2)Can see why people would think so, the story and setting carried me past the flaws, if they didn't for you, then yes, the under lying mechanics, especially of 1, are pretty bad.
Amazing. Everywhere I go on BSN, I hear about the Witcher. Brilliant game, brilliant.
It is, in spite of it's flaws, and 2 is better than one, for me 2 owns everything BW have done since DA:O, blows it all out of the water, Dragon age and Msss effect series, both totalled, but I can see why people wouldn't like it.
Il Divo wrote...
Somehow, I'd forgotten about the Omni-blade fiasco. Good comparison.
bad comparison: Omni tools where a thing already, as wwhere forcefields..combing the two into a power blade wasn't a stretch (ME3 was a flawed game for alot of reasons, that wasn't one of them)
in this case combat rolls and spear guns are action game tropes, the very same type of tropes that ruined 2 and they said they where moving away from. Apparently they lied.
Modifié par Vilegrim, 18 août 2013 - 06:55 .