883 réponses à ce sujet

[Vilegrim]

RaidenXS wrote...

Allan Schumacher wrote...

Overthinking my comment guys.  I don't actually know what all was shot for GI (I was doing my own thing while the crew was around).  It's simply a comment of 'it seems weird to put the tactical commentary with the single player footage" 

Multiplayer? Confirm or Deny?!

More likely 'single player on screen' as opposed to 'entire party on screen.;

[philippe willaume]

well I liked it
the timing seems deliberate enough and the choice of action in combat seems to have been thought about.
I liked the fact that we will be able to use the environment during combat more.
I assume that the pause button will be there, as my only question is how does it integrated with group combat? (i know that it is supposed to be more tactical and more group oriented than DA:2 but that can really be lots of thing.
IE how do we use our group, as it seems that it can be potentially hands on?

@alan
it might be auto aim but we should still be able to miss once and a while according to how we have built the char.,

[Kelgair]

Yes! I demand realistic combat and a chain hook[horseshoe] weapon like this completely ruins my suspension of disbelief! Wait, I can still summon a storm of fire from thin air right?

Well never mind...

[RaidenXS]

Vilegrim wrote...

RaidenXS wrote...

Allan Schumacher wrote...

Overthinking my comment guys.  I don't actually know what all was shot for GI (I was doing my own thing while the crew was around).  It's simply a comment of 'it seems weird to put the tactical commentary with the single player footage" 

Multiplayer? Confirm or Deny?!

More likely 'single player on screen' as opposed to 'entire party on screen.;

He should have said "one-person-party" then.

CONFIRM OR DENY!

[Allan Schumacher]

Vilegrim wrote...

RaidenXS wrote...

Allan Schumacher wrote...

Overthinking my comment guys.  I don't actually know what all was shot for GI (I was doing my own thing while the crew was around).  It's simply a comment of 'it seems weird to put the tactical commentary with the single player footage" 

Multiplayer? Confirm or Deny?!

More likely 'single player on screen' as opposed to 'entire party on screen.;

Yup.

[The Elder King]

@RaidenDS: Allan has no obligation to tell you if MP will be present. Even less reason to respond to you when you sound so arrogant.

Modifié par hhh89, 18 août 2013 - 08:11 .

[esper]

I am more interested in the dogde roll personally and since I Allen is here.

Are a dogde roll as the one shown something we have to do manually, is it an ability or is it just how the figure animates when an attack miss.

[RaidenXS]

Allan Schumacher wrote...

Vilegrim wrote...

RaidenXS wrote...

Allan Schumacher wrote...

Overthinking my comment guys.  I don't actually know what all was shot for GI (I was doing my own thing while the crew was around).  It's simply a comment of 'it seems weird to put the tactical commentary with the single player footage" 

Multiplayer? Confirm or Deny?!

More likely 'single player on screen' as opposed to 'entire party on screen.;

Yup.

So there is no multiplayer?

[RaidenXS]

hhh89 wrote...

@RaidenDS: Allan has no obligation to tell you if MP will be present. Even less reason to respond to you when you sound so arrogant.

How am I sounding arrogant over text and a question? I saw something that could have been a small reveal and simply wanted clarification. Sure Allan doesn't owe anything, but as far as I know Bioware doesn't have a Communtiy Manager to read, respond, or confirm/deny rumors.

[leaguer of one]

IC-07 wrote...

Jessabeth wrote...

I'm actually surprised that people are blowing up so much over PRE-alpha combat. xD

Dark Souls combat.

In what way?

[leaguer of one]

Allan Schumacher wrote...

1) he presses a control pad button while manipulating a stickand misses by a mile, seems manual to me given that

Can you give me the precise moment in the video when the harpoon missed due to manual aim? I ask this because it's not manually aimed.... Unless you consider choosing a target manual aim.

But if it did miss, then I have a bug to file!

Even I said  basicly the same thing to him.

[The Elder King]

RaidenXS wrote...

hhh89 wrote...

@RaidenDS: Allan has no obligation to tell you if MP will be present. Even less reason to respond to you when you sound so arrogant.

How am I sounding arrogant over text and a question? I saw something that could have been a small reveal and simply wanted clarification. Sure Allan doesn't owe anything, but as far as I know Bioware doesn't have a Communtiy Manager to read, respond, or confirm/deny rumors.

Saying "CONFIRM OR DENY!" sounds arrogant to me. Saying "Could you tell us if MP will be present in DAI" or something similar is an appropriate way to ask something.
Regardless, if Bioware will implement MP in DAI, they're announce it in other ways. Allan and other developers wouldn't confirm it here casually.

[RaidenXS]

hhh89 wrote...

RaidenXS wrote...

hhh89 wrote...

@RaidenDS: Allan has no obligation to tell you if MP will be present. Even less reason to respond to you when you sound so arrogant.

How am I sounding arrogant over text and a question? I saw something that could have been a small reveal and simply wanted clarification. Sure Allan doesn't owe anything, but as far as I know Bioware doesn't have a Communtiy Manager to read, respond, or confirm/deny rumors.

Saying "CONFIRM OR DENY!" sounds arrogant to me. Saying "Could you tell us if MP will be present in DAI" or something similar is an appropriate way to ask something.
Regardless, if Bioware will implement MP in DAI, they're announce it in other ways. Allan and other developers wouldn't confirm it here casually.

I asked once before and that wasn't in all caps. I repost so it doesn't get lost in the mix

[RaidenXS]

Filament wrote...

RaidenXS wrote...

hhh89 wrote...

@RaidenDS: Allan has no obligation to tell you if MP will be present. Even less reason to respond to you when you sound so arrogant.

How am I sounding arrogant over text and a question? I saw something that could have been a small reveal and simply wanted clarification. Sure Allan doesn't owe anything, but as far as I know Bioware doesn't have a Communtiy Manager to read, respond, or confirm/deny rumors.

Don't BS, you're asking the same question over and over in an obviously pushy way, and one he very likely isn't allowed to answer if he even knows at this point.

If it bothers you so much, please make another thread about it and stop derailing this one.

I doubt feedback threads will get derailed seeing is that most people only respond to the original post or clikc that Bioware icon and respond to the DevTeam.

[PillarBiter]

RaidenXS wrote...

Allan Schumacher wrote...

Vilegrim wrote...

RaidenXS wrote...

Allan Schumacher wrote...

Overthinking my comment guys.  I don't actually know what all was shot for GI (I was doing my own thing while the crew was around).  It's simply a comment of 'it seems weird to put the tactical commentary with the single player footage" 

Multiplayer? Confirm or Deny?!

More likely 'single player on screen' as opposed to 'entire party on screen.;

Yup.

So there is no multiplayer?

There is never no way of knowing definetely if no not-single playerversions will not be there. Probably.
 

[RaidenXS]

Filament wrote...

RaidenXS wrote...

Filament wrote...

If it bothers you so much, please make another thread about it and stop derailing this one.

I doubt feedback threads will get derailed seeing is that most people only respond to the original post or clikc that Bioware icon and respond to the DevTeam.

We were having a great conversation about harpoon realism and the properties of magical lightning before you showed up.

Actually, fine. Keep asking.

you could ignore my post

[In Exile]

RaidenXS wrote...

So there is no multiplayer?

There will definetly be MP. Bioware just hasn't confirmed it yet, and likely won't until much later in the cycle. 

[In Exile]

Fast Jimmy wrote...

I'm not sure why this would neccessarily be a better solution on consoles? Having the moves such as a barrel roll or dodge be tied to the Tactics screen while also being stat driven in their usage would work just as well on PC as it would on console. 

No, that part is fine, I mean the control scheme that you were discussing. 

[RaidenXS]

Filament wrote...

RaidenXS wrote...

you could ignore my post

RaidenXS wrote...

I repost so it doesn't get lost in the mix

You could not make it a pain in the ass to do so.

Your pain the the ass is simply blowback

[Nerevar-as]

esper wrote...

I am more interested in the dogde roll personally and since I Allen is here.

Are a dogde roll as the one shown something we have to do manually, is it an ability or is it just how the figure animates when an attack miss.

There should be a tactic that goes kind of: Self: Target of Special attack - > Dodge

Rolling in what looks like heavy armor it´s kind of silly. And as Witcher 2 proved, it gets tiring soon. Odd as Witcher 1 got dodging much better.

[Zanallen]

So, why is throwing a harpoon not realistic? 'Cause it seems plenty realistic to me. Throwing a small spear is a very real, very fundamental way of attacking. Humans have done it quite often over the years. Attaching a rope to the spear isn't terribly unrealistic either. Would the attack work better as a grappling hook? Maybe, but I have no problem with the javelin/harpoon/spear thing.

[andar91]

One thing I will mention about the combat video is that abilities appear to integrate very well with regular attacks. At 3:00 in the video, the Inquisitor Warrior makes a few normal strikes against a foe, and then does a quick spin attack, which takes out a big chunk of his stamina. At first, I thought it was just a standard combo.

Unless ordinary attacks can drain stamina now. I doubt it, though.

Edit: Okay, I was wrong about the time. But I'm pretty sure I saw it. Either way, I like the animations.

Modifié par andar91, 18 août 2013 - 09:20 .