Aller au contenu

Photo

Templars = Cerberus *Updated: "Red Templars"*


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1470 réponses à ce sujet

#1401
TTTX

TTTX
  • Members
  • 9 890 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

According to Alistair in DA:O Templars do not need lyrium to develop their templar ability. While lyirum maybe more effective in the ability, the fact to the matter is every warrior can develop templar skills if they truly have the desire and the displicine.

I know, but he only believes it's not a requirement, there is nothing to prove that what he says is true.

Even if it was, true all the templars would go through a withdrawal if they don't get their lyrium and that would be bad, because it affect their state of mind and they will also lose most of their resistance to Magic which also comes from Lyrium and it also would make their anti magic attack less effective then if they had lyrium.

#1402
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 583 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...
According to Alistair in DA:O Templars do not need lyrium to develop their templar ability. While lyirum maybe more effective in the ability, the fact to the matter is every warrior can develop templar skills if they truly have the desire and the displicine.


That was just an excuse to not have the Warden drinking Lyrium everyday or going insane. David Gaider has since claimed Alistair was wrong and lyrium is absolutely necessary.

Modifié par MisterJB, 03 septembre 2013 - 04:41 .


#1403
Taleroth

Taleroth
  • Members
  • 9 136 messages

TTTX wrote...

I know, but he only believes it's not a requirement, there is nothing to prove that what he says is true.

He never took any. He has Templar abilities. That's the proof right there.

Lyrium for Templars seems more likely to be used just as a way for the Chantry to control them than something they genuinely need. Though it likely enhances them.

Of course, I have a bias in this argument. I've come to the conclusion that everyone in Thedas has magical potential, even Dwarves. But there's something holding it back. DA:I might hold the key to that particular lock.

Modifié par Taleroth, 03 septembre 2013 - 04:43 .


#1404
The Elder King

The Elder King
  • Members
  • 19 630 messages
Unless the writers change their minds, I believe that the lyrium being needed for the templars abilities.
I have a theory about Alistair being able to use them without lyrium, based on the comics. Though I don't particulary like it.

#1405
Shadow Fox

Shadow Fox
  • Members
  • 4 206 messages

DarkKnightHolmes wrote...

MisterJB wrote...

DarkKnightHolmes wrote...
Umm, how is the blood on her hand? It's on Adrians hand because she's the one who killed Pharamond, it's on Fiona's hand because she's the one who ruined the meeting and it's on Lamberts hand for deciding to attack when the Divine told him not to intervene.


All three of them also have blood on their hands. But Evangeline, along with Wynne, Cole, Shale and Leliana, assisted the mages in their escape.
Had they stayed put, the war wouldn't have started. My Warden couldn't be more ashamed of his "companions".


The war started because Lambert was going to execute Rhys. Not tranquil or kept in prison for ever but actually execute him. Lambert knew about Cole but he still wanted to frame a mage for all this. He wanted Rhys to admit he was a blood mage when he clearly wasn't.

Wynne just went back because she wanted to save her son from lies and their is even as scene where she is angry enough to kill anyone who stands in her but Evangeline destroys her staff to stop her. If Evangeline really was a traitor she could have easily let Wynne go on a rampage and kill every Templar. Wynne was actually pro-chantry and pro-templar before her son was about to wrongly murdered.

Leliana helped because she is the left hand of the divine and Lambert is now a traitor because he didn't follow orders and she is a friend of Wynne.

Cole doesn't even know what's happening and his only objective is to save Rhys. Nothinge else matters.

And Shale....... well why the hell would she give a damn about templars or mage? She's just their to crack any head Wynne asks her to.

And no, Evangeline and Wynne didn't free the mages. It was Leliana and Cole. So yes, I can understand why templar supporters are angry with Leliana but there is no need to blame Evangeline for that one.

Also you know why the mages have gone to war? Because they asked Rhys in the end.
You know why Rhys decided to go to war even though he didn't want to at first? Because his mother was dead.
You know why his mother was dead? Because she gave her self to bring Evangeline from death.
You know why Evangeline died? Because Lambert killed her.

And well your Warden might feel disgraced or whatever but my Warden would have gladly stood with them all to save an innocent man. Hell, my Warden would have killed Lambert himself.

As would mine.

#1406
DarkKnightHolmes

DarkKnightHolmes
  • Members
  • 3 601 messages

MisterJB wrote...
You should reread the book. First, what Lambert wants Rhys to do is confess that he has been commiting the murders under the sway of a demon which he actually had. All evidence points in that direction; such as the murders only starting after Rhys met Cole; and, at the end of the book, Rhys even admits that there is a good chance Cole was controlling him without knowledge. And we know Cole is not of Thedas.
Lambert was rigth all along and he only threatens to murder Rhys and the First Enchanters only if Rhys didn't confess. This would have made the rebellion sound like the wills of a demon.
And why was there a need to do this? Because Fiona hijacked a meeting destined to discuss what was to be done with the Rite of Tranquility; an olive branch by the Chantry; in order to propose world war and because Adrain killed Pharamond and planted evidence.
Does that exempt Lambert of all guilt? No but it shows that we can go further back in order to find a culprit for this war.

But, bottom line, had Evangeline&Co stayed put, Lambert would have controlled the mages and there would have been no rebellion.


.... But Rhys hasn't been commiting murders. Cole has and Rhys could see him but so could Wynne and she even remembered him when they were in the sewers and Rhys even hints that Wynne probably could see Cole all along but said nothing. Are you going to say Wynne was commiting murder for Cole next? Also if Rhys was commiting all the murders for Cole then how do you explain the ending where Cole has a knife to Lambert's throat and is about to kill him. True, I believe that Cole does use blood magic to make people forget but I doubt his going around controlling people to kill for him especially since we haven't seen any concrete evidence showing him controlling people. Besides, the end of the book even shows that he can finally control his killing after getting out of the fade as he let Pharamont live even after he begged for his death.

Also yes, Fiona hijacked it. I agree she was being stupid but Lambert could have waited for the voting to at least finish. It's shown in the ending the only reason they even went to war was because Rhys choose it. Imagine if none of the destruction had happened and they had asked Rhys then it would have probably ended with just Mages returning to their normal lives instead of this long war.

And why should Evangeline stay put? Adrian did the murder, even if Lambert doesn't know it and thinks it's Cole/Rhys. He was going to punish Rhys for the wrong reason and so Evangeline should be able to defend him.

MisterJB wrote...

I don't begrudge mages like Wynne for placing their needs above that of others, it's just the nature of the world. I dislike them when they do this but that's all.
On the other hand, unless Evangeline is capable of policing every mage in the continent by her lonely self, then aiding in the escape of hundreds of mages who now obey to nu authority but their own and are free to do whatever they wish to whomever they wish whenever they wish is a betrayal of the highest order.
Wynne stood by her people, I can understand that. Wynne and Leliana and Justinia betrayed theirs.


Leliana, Evangeline and Wynne answer to the divine. She's the leader, she makes the rules. Lambert is the traitor and had no right to decide what happens to the mages in the tower at that point. He didn't listen to his own boss and so I don't expect why Evageline and Leliana should just give in and listen to a mad paranoid man.

MisterJB wrote...
Lambert could have been court-martialed after things had settled down. His actions, at least, had no one interfered, would have lead to the containment of mages and the protection of the people. Leliana's and the Divine's will lead to the deaths of thousands.

Court-martialed? Did you see the ending? He thinks the Divine is weak and believes that they don't need her. I'm sure even if he had got the mages under controlled he still would have turned against the Chantry. And, honestly, His action woud have failed to contorl the mages. He wanted Rhys but the other mages loved Rhys. They believed him to be their speaker even though he wasn't involved in much politics. Killing Rhys would have definitely pissed off the mages. As shown by the book, him being captured certainly did ****** off Wynne.

MisterJB wrote..
He isn't malicious but he still helped start this war. Perhaps more than any other.


Like Anders said in DA2, the circle was a time bomb just waiting to explode. If it wasn't Cole, something else would have.

MisterJB wrote..
I wish my Warden had been there. Then we could see to whom Shale was truly loyal.


Wouldn't make much of a difference anyway. The only thing she did was destroy the phylactery, Wynne could have just make a hurricane or something to destroy that.

MisterJB wrote..
They might have been separate in two groups but they are both equality guilty since they worked towards the same plan. Free the mages. Evangeline was even part of the group that destroyed the Phylactery Room.


Because it's blood magic. Evangeline feels that it's extremely hypocritical that mages are not allowed to use blood magic but the templars doing it is never shunned upon.

MisterJB wrote..
Rhys was a Libertarian from the very beginning. He, unlike Adrians, might have some boundaries and doubts but he never spoke against war.


When he came back from his little adventure of finding Pharamont and his discusisons with Wynne, he became extremely unsure of who is right. Adrian even says in the ending the reason she put the dagger in Rhys room is because it would make Wynne turn against the templars which would also help to push the Rhys against the templars. He also wasn't much of a Libertarian anyway as he says he only hangs out with them because of Adrian and he doesn't even get much involved in their politics and never spoke about seperating from the chantry before.

MisterJB wrote..
Mine would have requested the presence of Templars to speak for the non-mages at the conclave because their lives would be affected as well. Failing that, he would have advised Lambert against intefering. Had the mages voted for separation, he would have advised to use the Templars to stand as a human shield between the mages and Val-Royeaux; to not move an inch but to not attack first. Falling all that, he would have fought by Lambert's side against Rhys and his cohorts.
Better a few dozen enchanters die than the thousands of innocents that will in this war.


And you think Lambert would listen? If his not willing to listen to the most powerful woman and leader of a biggest religion in all of Thedas (The Divine), you think your Warden can magicaly convince him?

Also if the mages had voted for seperation (Highly doubt that anyway before the fight broke out), I doubt most of them would even attack. It says specifically in the book that the templars attacked first, a mage who surrendered was killed while everything was going crazy and that's when the mages got angry. It's his hate for Rhys that started this war and if he had actually listened to Evangelien and apprehanded Cole before going after Rhys. This wouldn't have happened.

And last time I checked, mages include innocent people as well. Just because Lambert doesn't like some of the enchanter doesn't mean he can just jail all of them regardless of their loyalty. Some of the enchanter (like Loyalist) support the templars, yet they still got killed or thrown in the dungeon. If the templar supporting mages aren't safe than no mage is and you shouldn't be surprised if they revolt after that.

Modifié par DarkKnightHolmes, 03 septembre 2013 - 05:10 .


#1407
Mykel54

Mykel54
  • Members
  • 1 180 messages

MisterJB wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...
According to Alistair in DA:O Templars do not need lyrium to develop their templar ability. While lyirum maybe more effective in the ability, the fact to the matter is every warrior can develop templar skills if they truly have the desire and the displicine.


That was just an excuse to not have the Warden drinking Lyrium everyday or going insane. David Gaider has since claimed Alistair was wrong and lyrium is absolutely necessary.


To be fair that could be changed just as quickly. Writters usually have a lot of ideas they fiddle with (ex. Loghain only wanted to incapacitate Eamon? That is nowhere in the game) but at some point they must decide what will it be and write it down. So far we have an ambiguous "Maybe lyrium isn´t necessary but who knows" from Alistair, which basically means the writer saying: I don´t know yet so i won´t commit giving an answer.

About the leak, it sounds very worrying, specially the part about the red templars being one of the main enemies of the game, their leader being the big bad. I didn´t mind a small subfaction of lyrium addled templars, sort of like a dragon cult but with templars, but i hate the idea of these red templars being the main human antagonists. I know videogames aren´t exactly the best storytelling platform, but after DAO i expected better.

#1408
The Elder King

The Elder King
  • Members
  • 19 630 messages
I wouldn't trust that 'leak', since it seems to me that they watched/ read the news about the PAX demo and changed the things that were presented. I want to point out that there isn't a direct link for the leak, only a screenshot of it dated to February and May.
If people want I can make a post for the reason why I believe that.

#1409
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 583 messages
As far as the leak goes, I think you should take a look at my latest post in the "Insane enemies" thread, hhh89.

#1410
The Elder King

The Elder King
  • Members
  • 19 630 messages

MisterJB wrote...

As far as the leak goes, I think you should take a look at my latest post in the "Insane enemies" thread, hhh89.


I see it and I responded to you. Did you just see the images or you watch the full demo?
Even in the case the leak is right, the advisor groups  would've  changed in the keeps function, so main plot could've changed as well. Though I believe that is fake, for the reasons I posted in that thread, and that people created it based on the demo informations.

Modifié par hhh89, 03 septembre 2013 - 05:55 .


#1411
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

MisterJB wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...
According to Alistair in DA:O Templars do not need lyrium to develop their templar ability. While lyirum maybe more effective in the ability, the fact to the matter is every warrior can develop templar skills if they truly have the desire and the displicine.


That was just an excuse to not have the Warden drinking Lyrium everyday or going insane. David Gaider has since claimed Alistair was wrong and lyrium is absolutely necessary.


You've intrigued me to get to the bottom of the truth. Where did David say this? Was it from an interview?

#1412
cjones91

cjones91
  • Members
  • 2 812 messages
@MisterJB Your hatred of mages is consuming you....the fact you don't see them as being innocents is one of the reasons I'm staying neutral.I will help the mages if pushed by the templars and  anyone who objects will either stand down or die.

Modifié par cjones91, 03 septembre 2013 - 09:55 .


#1413
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages

cjones91 wrote...

@MisterJB Your hatred of mages is consuming you....the fact you don't see them as being innocents is one of the reasons I'm staying neutral.I will help the mages if pushed by the templars and  anyone who objects will either stand down or die.


It's pointless to argue, he's more red lyrium than man now.

#1414
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

Darth Brotarian wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

@MisterJB Your hatred of mages is consuming you....the fact you don't see them as being innocents is one of the reasons I'm staying neutral.I will help the mages if pushed by the templars and  anyone who objects will either stand down or die.


It's pointless to argue, he's more red lyrium than man now.

This is the replacement for all the pro-cerberus people.

#1415
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages
Templars are only jealous that mages have something that they otherwise do not have. Having giant size swords over their shoulders seems to be their way of compensating for something.

Haters will always hate but at the end of the day the Mages will win :) We can fling a fireball where they cannot.

#1416
cjones91

cjones91
  • Members
  • 2 812 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

Templars are only jealous that mages have something that they otherwise do not have. Having giant size swords over their shoulders seems to be their way of compensating for something.

Haters will always hate but at the end of the day the Mages will win :) We can fling a fireball where they cannot.

The problem is templars have the numbers and from the recent screenshots the mages appear to be disorganized.Also the templars will try to stir the public's resentment of magic in order to gain their support so the mages will have to win the people's trust.

#1417
Splinter Cell 108

Splinter Cell 108
  • Members
  • 3 254 messages
So are these leaks something to worry about? Are they just unsubstantiated nonsense made up by some fellow with tendencies to do that? They did talk about Red Templars in one of those videos and red lyrium does make people crazy, I don't want to have an enemy to which I can't relate because they're just insane and not people with their own agendas.

#1418
Taleroth

Taleroth
  • Members
  • 9 136 messages

Splinter Cell 108 wrote...

I don't want to have an enemy to which I can't relate because they're just insane and not people with their own agendas.

They attack a village and slaughter everyone in it. They're not going to be relateable.

#1419
dragonflight288

dragonflight288
  • Members
  • 8 852 messages

Taleroth wrote...

Splinter Cell 108 wrote...

I don't want to have an enemy to which I can't relate because they're just insane and not people with their own agendas.

They attack a village and slaughter everyone in it. They're not going to be relateable.


The red templars won't be relatable. Who knows about the other templar/chantry factions.

#1420
Daerog

Daerog
  • Members
  • 4 857 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

Templars are only jealous that mages have something that they otherwise do not have. Having giant size swords over their shoulders seems to be their way of compensating for something.

Haters will always hate but at the end of the day the Mages will win :) We can fling a fireball where they cannot.


Yes, woohoo, go mages. Loyalists ftw! Image IPB

#1421
Splinter Cell 108

Splinter Cell 108
  • Members
  • 3 254 messages

Taleroth wrote...

Splinter Cell 108 wrote...

I don't want to have an enemy to which I can't relate because they're just insane and not people with their own agendas.

They attack a village and slaughter everyone in it. They're not going to be relateable.


Ugh, I don't want cardboard villains as enemies. I guess in DA:O you had the darkspawn but Loghain was pretty relatable even then. I hope the same occurs in DA:I, I don't want to be fighting a bunch of maniacs the majority of the time. 

#1422
The Hierophant

The Hierophant
  • Members
  • 6 907 messages
Hopefully the RT will have as much depth as Skeletor, and crew.

#1423
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 583 messages

The Hierophant wrote...

Hopefully the RT will have as much depth as Skeletor, and crew.

C'mon, now you're just overreaching. I mean, there was that time Skeletor learned the meaning of Christmas. No way the Reds will ever reach that level of depth.

#1424
Ausstig

Ausstig
  • Members
  • 580 messages
So these leaks (if true) show us that biowaer is recycling the plot of ME3, as well as the combat focus. So yeah cerberus templars, cause you know who the most memorable villian in DA:O was, the Arch Daemon. Not the man with good intentions and relatable goals and emotions. Nope all villians have to have 1d and can not be reasoned with, like the Joker in the Dark Knight, but less fun.

#1425
Shadow Fox

Shadow Fox
  • Members
  • 4 206 messages

Ausstig wrote...

So these leaks (if true) show us that biowaer is recycling the plot of ME3, as well as the combat focus. So yeah cerberus templars, cause you know who the most memorable villian in DA:O was, the Arch Daemon. Not the man with good intentions and relatable goals and emotions. Nope all villians have to have 1d and can not be reasoned with, like the Joker in the Dark Knight, but less fun.

I'd rather have EVUL villians then one were they try to justify the villian's attrocities.

Just my opinion ofcourse.