Aller au contenu

Photo

Will "Anders" play a role in DA:I?


727 réponses à ce sujet

#326
schalafi

schalafi
  • Members
  • 1 167 messages

Reaverwind wrote...

schalafi wrote...

Haven't any of you "lets kill Anders" people ever heard of a TRIAL? I wouldn't have hesitated if there had been a chance of trying him before a jury of both Mages and Templars, but outright killing him was wrong. It's like having a lynch mob kill a prisoner before having all the facts.
IMO, Anders was possessed and once Justice turned to Vengeance, he really had no chance to undo it, even though he wanted to. My feeling was he was trying to make up for the destruction of the Chantry, by helping defeat Meridith.


He was an abomination that should have been put down long ago, but was protected by plot armor.


And of course, one cannot argue with the plot, frankly I think the whole plot about Anders was cruel, like there had to be a scapegoat for the Chantry destruction, and he was chosen.

Modifié par schalafi, 08 octobre 2013 - 10:39 .


#327
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

schalafi wrote...

Haven't any of you "lets kill Anders" people ever heard of a TRIAL? I wouldn't have hesitated if there had been a chance of trying him before a jury of both Mages and Templars, but outright killing him was wrong. It's like having a lynch mob kill a prisoner before having all the facts.
IMO, Anders was possessed and once Justice turned to Vengeance, he really had no chance to undo it, even though he wanted to. My feeling was he was trying to make up for the destruction of the Chantry, by helping defeat Meridith.


I don't entirely disagree with you, but the context of the setting makes it silly to want to implement, say, U.S. style rules of law and court.

WE DO know all the facts:  on one path, Anders was fully in sync with Justice and happily carried out the destruction of the Chantry.  On the other, Anders tried and failed to fight Justice's influence and the destruction happened anyway.  There's no question at this point as to what Anders did or why, so trying to draw a comparison to a lynch mob doesn't really work.

#328
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

schalafi wrote...

Reaverwind wrote...

schalafi wrote...

Haven't any of you "lets kill Anders" people ever heard of a TRIAL? I wouldn't have hesitated if there had been a chance of trying him before a jury of both Mages and Templars, but outright killing him was wrong. It's like having a lynch mob kill a prisoner before having all the facts.
IMO, Anders was possessed and once Justice turned to Vengeance, he really had no chance to undo it, even though he wanted to. My feeling was he was trying to make up for the destruction of the Chantry, by helping defeat Meridith.


He was an abomination that should have been put down long ago, but was protected by plot armor.


And of course, one cannot argue with the plot, frankly I think the whole plot about Anders was cruel, like there had to be a scapegoat for the Chantry destruction, and he was chosen.


....How is Anders a scapegoat???  The writers aren't somehow scapegoating him, and within the story, he DID it.  He's not being scapegoated at all...

#329
schalafi

schalafi
  • Members
  • 1 167 messages

Silfren wrote...

schalafi wrote...

Haven't any of you "lets kill Anders" people ever heard of a TRIAL? I wouldn't have hesitated if there had been a chance of trying him before a jury of both Mages and Templars, but outright killing him was wrong. It's like having a lynch mob kill a prisoner before having all the facts.
IMO, Anders was possessed and once Justice turned to Vengeance, he really had no chance to undo it, even though he wanted to. My feeling was he was trying to make up for the destruction of the Chantry, by helping defeat Meridith.


I don't entirely disagree with you, but the context of the setting makes it silly to want to implement, say, U.S. style rules of law and court.

WE DO know all the facts:  on one path, Anders was fully in sync with Justice and happily carried out the destruction of the Chantry.  On the other, Anders tried and failed to fight Justice's influence and the destruction happened anyway.  There's no question at this point as to what Anders did or why, so trying to draw a comparison to a lynch mob doesn't really work.


The players who happily murder knifed him thought it worked. But did it really resolve anything? Anders was set up from the beginning to be the bad guy, and you can't argue with a plot, I guess.

#330
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 950 messages
My Hawkes tend to kill Anders in the hope of maintaining the distinction between his action and the cause of the mages.  If you let him get away with it, then it's hard to deny culpability.

Also because it's something resembling justice. And sometimes because friends don't let friends be murderous abominations.

edit:  I wouldn't kill him in real life.  But Hawke inevitably kills lots of people during the game, so I assume he's got a different philosophy about violence than me.

Modifié par Wulfram, 08 octobre 2013 - 10:45 .


#331
Nohvarr

Nohvarr
  • Members
  • 1 854 messages

Haven't any of you "lets kill Anders" people ever heard of a TRIAL?

Yup, Anders plead guilty and threw himself on the mercy of the court, the decision was a quick and clean death.

#332
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

Morocco Mole wrote...

My friends, I am going to advocate a romance for the first time ever.

Do the rivalry romance with Anders and force him to side with the templars.

No need for romance, Rivalry 100 will do it just fine.
But yes, that is, by far, the best ending. Knowing that Vengeance is forced to watch, powerless, as Anders fights to prevent the rebellion and kills mage after mage after mage...now there is some true justice.

#333
schalafi

schalafi
  • Members
  • 1 167 messages
I'm done here. Some people are just bloodthirsty.

#334
Nohvarr

Nohvarr
  • Members
  • 1 854 messages

Silfren wrote...

The very fact that Anders wants to die should, I think, give someone pause before thinking that's the best punishment. Killing him in order to eliminate him as a threat to other people is one thing, but as a punishment, it fails entirely, because Anders fully expects to die and wants to. If the objective is to punish him, then by rights the best action is to let him live to face the consequences of his actions.


The only way to punish him is to be his rival, and force him to kill the mages. I am not about to kill mages who are not responsible for this just to make him suffer, neither does he get to run off and become a rallying figure. His story ends here because he has proven himself a threat to the stability of the world, a traitor to his friends, and a danger to the cause of free mages.

He ends because it would be irresponsible to let him live free, and I know how much he hates tranquility.

Modifié par Nohvarr, 08 octobre 2013 - 10:49 .


#335
Reaverwind

Reaverwind
  • Members
  • 1 724 messages

Nohvarr wrote...

Haven't any of you "lets kill Anders" people ever heard of a TRIAL?

Yup, Anders plead guilty and threw himself on the mercy of the court, the decision was a quick and clean death. 


Good point.


MisterJB wrote...

Morocco Mole wrote...

My friends, I am going to advocate a romance for the first time ever.

Do the rivalry romance with Anders and force him to side with the templars.

No need for romance, Rivalry 100 will do it just fine.
But yes, that is, by far, the best ending. Knowing that Vengeance is forced to watch, powerless, as Anders fights to prevent the rebellion and kills mage after mage after mage...now there is some true justice.


But that means you have to tolerate taking him along. :sick:

#336
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages

schalafi wrote...

I'm done here. Some people are just bloodthirsty.

Yeah, Anders and Justice. 

#337
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

schalafi wrote...

Haven't any of you "lets kill Anders" people ever heard of a TRIAL? I wouldn't have hesitated if there had been a chance of trying him before a jury of both Mages and Templars, but outright killing him was wrong. It's like having a lynch mob kill a prisoner before having all the facts.

We already know all the facts, Anders has plead guilty to the crimes of mass murder and terrorism. Judging by Awakening, a trial in Thedas consists of the sovereign of the lands where a crime was commited hearing both sides of the issue and deciding what punishment is suitable based on legal guidelines. Unless said sovereign decides to do whatever s/he pleases and execute nobles and take their land like the Warden-Commander can do.

After the deaths of Viscount Dumar and Grand Cleric Elthina, the only figures of authority in Kirkwall are Meredith, Hawke and, possibly, Guard Captain Aveline.
Meredith says "Kill him".
Hawke says "Kill him".
Aveline says "Kill him".

Trial concluded, let's proceed to the execution

#338
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

schalafi wrote...

Silfren wrote...

schalafi wrote...

Haven't any of you "lets kill Anders" people ever heard of a TRIAL? I wouldn't have hesitated if there had been a chance of trying him before a jury of both Mages and Templars, but outright killing him was wrong. It's like having a lynch mob kill a prisoner before having all the facts.
IMO, Anders was possessed and once Justice turned to Vengeance, he really had no chance to undo it, even though he wanted to. My feeling was he was trying to make up for the destruction of the Chantry, by helping defeat Meridith.


I don't entirely disagree with you, but the context of the setting makes it silly to want to implement, say, U.S. style rules of law and court.

WE DO know all the facts:  on one path, Anders was fully in sync with Justice and happily carried out the destruction of the Chantry.  On the other, Anders tried and failed to fight Justice's influence and the destruction happened anyway.  There's no question at this point as to what Anders did or why, so trying to draw a comparison to a lynch mob doesn't really work.


The players who happily murder knifed him thought it worked. But did it really resolve anything? Anders was set up from the beginning to be the bad guy, and you can't argue with a plot, I guess.


Again, it depends on your motive in killing him.  I don't ever kill him, but I can appreciate that many do NOT to punish him but to effectively prevent him from being able to kill anyone else.  (leaving aside the question of whether it even is possible to kill him, which seems to be something the Devs didn't consider).  Some, of course, do kill him out of spite or justice or whatever, but so what?

I don't think Anders was set up to be the bad guy at all, and I played the very same game you did, so understand that that is a perception on your part, not something the Devs did themselves.  

For me, Anders is one of the most sympathetic characters in the entire series.  I'm not sure what all this stuff is about arguing with a plot, though.  A plot can be badly written or written well, and I have plenty of gripes with it, but some of the comments here seem almost to be treating Anders as if he existed outside of the plot and was somehow treated unfairly by it, which is a little bizarre.  

#339
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

schalafi wrote...

I'm done here. Some people are just bloodthirsty.


And you're taking them probably a mite too seriously. 

#340
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages
[quote]Nohvarr wrote...

[quote]I'd cry were it not for the fact that all of that was happening anyway, and the point of the war is to stop it.[/quote]
Then, considering what we know of DAI, it failed. All hell is literally breaking loose, Mages and Templars are focused more on killing one another than stopping a horde of demons, and innocent people across the land are being maimed, killed and worse in these terrible times. All because Anders couldn’t see a better solution than war.


[quote]Constant repetition of the "in chains" line intrigues me. You feel personally damaged by his action somehow, so you want to reassert your own power by taking control of him as a visceral thing, it seems.[/quote]
When someone decides to plunge the entire world into war because they themselves are not smart enough to figure out a better way to solve a problem I tend to take it kind of personal. Then there’s my dislike of people who kill innocents either to send a message or because they don’t care about collateral damage.


[quote]Meredith wanted to slaughter every mage in the Circle prior to what Anders did. [/quote]
“And I want a puppy, doesn’t mean I’m going to get one.”
-Elizabeth, Bioshock Infinite


[quote]How exactly is Anders to blame for “starting up a war” when it was already in progress to begin with? [/quote]
Well, the Divine and the Grand Cleric had both told Meredith “NO” and without their approval she’d need justification to enact her wish. Other Templars within her Command were taking steps to undermine her influence and her command. At the same times the nobles of Kirkwall we’re about ready to revolt against the Commander, and likely could’ve been talked into an alliance of coneniance since she was just as much a threat to them as she was to the Mages. Then Anders hands her the excuse she needs on a silver platter with a pretty pink bow wrapped around it. Not since Jar Jar Binks have I seen someone hand the obvious villain everything they need.


[quote]And here I thought your Quanri mage Inquisitor would learn a thing or two about the mistreatment of mages.[/quote]
Let’s see, as a Qunari Mage, my goal is to bring stability to the world in order to fight a greater threat. Anders played a significant role in plunging the world into Chaos. If he’s alive his Capture would deny the Templars a boogey man to use to continue their war, while denying the Mages a figure head to rally behind. Another step in getting both sides to stop their squabbling and focus on the real threat.
 

[quote]I don't quite endorse Anders' action, but I won't kill him for it.[/quote]
If you knew he was about to blow up the Chantry before hand, would you stop him?


[quote]I wouldn't call ok, but necessary. If someone doesn't take an stand, the Chantry will continue to opress people forever. The world sure as hell won't change simply by going down the streets shouting that the chantry is wrong.[/quote]
I’m sure that’s what the Templars tell their young initiats when they voice a concern about the treatment of mages.


[quote]Ridiculous. Elthina is Meredith's superior and could have called her off. [/quote]
[quote]If the Champion asks Elthina why she does nothing when she is in charge of the templars and the Circle, Elthina retorts that Hawke has "quite the estimation of [her] abilities."
[/quote]


[quote]And if that was somehow impossible, she could have alerted the Chantry superiors, especially Leliana, that Meredith had effectively launched a coup against the Chantry. She deliberately tried to make the Chantry less interested in affairs in Kirkwall, making it seem as though everything was under control.[/quote]
Yes she was, because the Divine was considering calling for an Exalted March against Kirkwall. So, she choose to let Meredith and Orisino calm down and work things out rather than have the Divine order an army into Kirkwall to do it for them. And then Anders rolls in an sets fire to everything.


[quote]Grand Cleric Elthina was an arrogant old hag that thought that she was untouchable. Anders showed her :)[/quote]
Let’s take a look at her actions

[quote]After Sebastian was forced into the Chantry, Elthina helped him escape in the dead of night, telling him that people should enter the Chantry through the front door, not the back. She gave him a purse full of gold and told him to go and live his life. Thanks to her words, Sebastian returned to the Chantry - through the front door this time - with his faith restored.
….
Hawke can show Ser Alrik's letter to Elthina after investigating his "Tranquil solution". Elthina says that Ser Alrik made a suggestion, but they turned him down. She insists that the Rite of Tranquility is a last resort.
◾ Hawke can inform Elthina that a templar used her seal to make a member of the guard ignore the Qunari delegates being abducted. Elthina replies that she hoped this would not go so far and that she will step in when it's time.
…..
Hawke tells Elthina that Petrice is behind the murder. Elthina replies that Petrice has erred in her judgment and that a court will decide her fate. Then she turns away and walks up the stairs. Seconds later a Qunari assassin kills Petrice with an arrow. Elthina looks back only to tell Hawke to send for the Viscount.
….
By the beginning of the Act, Elthina has rejected Meredith's request for the Right of Annulment[5] and, according to Ser Karras, Meredith has sent for the permission of the Divine in Val Royeaux instead.
In Hightown, Orsino is trying to convince the nobles that Meredith uses the fear of mages to take control of Kirkwall. Meredith accuses him of inciting a rebellion. Then Elthina arrives and asks the templars to "show the First Enchanter back to the Circle," adding an injunction for them to treat him "gently," and Meredith to "go back to the Gallows and calm down, like a good girl." If the Champion asks Elthina why she does nothing when she is in charge of the templars and the Circle, Elthina retorts that Hawke has "quite the estimation of [her] abilities."
….
In the Chantry, Hawke witnesses Sebastian asking what is Elthina's stance on the issue of the mages and the templars. Elthina states that she favors peace and if the Maker is merciful, he will help them find it. She confesses that she did not expect things to deteriorate so fast. Then she tells him that the Divine sent an agent to Kirkwall to assess the danger of the Free Marches becoming another Imperium. Elthina is afraid that the Divine will treat the whole city as enemies, so she asks the Champion and Sebastian to meet the agent and to convince her that drastic measures won't be required. Elthina adds that the Divine has heard her protests already.
When Hawke returns only to pass the agent's message that Elthina must leave Kirkwall for Orlais because she will not be safe in the city, Elthina refuses to abandon her flock. She asserts that she is in no personal danger since nobody would dare attack the Grand Cleric. Later Elthina tells that she has been talking with both Orsino and Meredith and that Orsino "is not an unreasonable man;" she feels, therefore, that a compromise can be reached.
When Anders asks Hawke to help him gather ingredients for a "potion" and then to distract Elthina for him to get inside the Chantry unseen, Hawke can:
◾ Agree. Hawke comes to Elthina to discuss the mages and the templars. Elthina claims that she cannot take sides and that she is seeking to balance the needs of everyone. Then Anders shows up. Elthina comments that his soul is troubled and expresses her hope that he found a balm for it in the Chantry.[/quote]

She’s too passive, but that’s not a justification for murder.[/quote]

Oddly enough I think if you look at Elthina's actions more closely she's not passive in the least, but extremely manipulative.

#341
Mr.House

Mr.House
  • Members
  • 23 338 messages

schalafi wrote...

I'm done here. Some people are just bloodthirsty.

He commited a crime, he pleaded guilty and accepted what judgement would happen to him. His trial was there, and Hawke was the judge with her companions the jury. There is nothing bloodthirsty about it.

#342
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

Nohvarr wrote...

Silfren wrote...

The very fact that Anders wants to die should, I think, give someone pause before thinking that's the best punishment. Killing him in order to eliminate him as a threat to other people is one thing, but as a punishment, it fails entirely, because Anders fully expects to die and wants to. If the objective is to punish him, then by rights the best action is to let him live to face the consequences of his actions.


The only way to punish him is to be his rival, and force him to kill the mages. I am not about to kill mages who are not responsible for this just to make him suffer, neither does he get to run off and become a rallying figure. His story ends here because he has proven himself a threat to the stability of the world, a traitor to his friends, and a danger to the cause of free mages.

He ends because it would be irresponsible to let him live free, and I know how much he hates tranquility.


No, that's not the only way to punish him.  As I already said, the best punishment is simply not permitting him his death wish--essentially Anders wants to be freed of the responsibility of dealing with the fallout of what he created.  Not letting him have this Get Out of Jail Free card is the proper response to that.  As Merrill herself seems to be the only one to realize.

#343
Guest_greengoron89_*

Guest_greengoron89_*
  • Guests
Executing a mass murderer is not anywhere near the same level of "wrong" as blowing up a building full of innocent people.

Modifié par greengoron89, 08 octobre 2013 - 11:05 .


#344
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

Mr.House wrote...

schalafi wrote...

I'm done here. Some people are just bloodthirsty.

He commited a crime, he pleaded guilty and accepted what judgement would happen to him. His trial was there, and Hawke was the judge with her companions the jury. There is nothing bloodthirsty about it.


I think that actually was directed at MisterJB's comment about true justice being forcing Vengeance to watch helplessly as Anders kills mage after mage after mage.  I find it a little odd myself, as there's nothing just about killing innocent people just to make another person suffer, but it's not something to take so seriously you pick up your toys and go home...

And I find it odd that Vengeance wouldn't put up one hell of a fight.  By rights we should've gotten SOMETHING, even if only a cutscene, of Anders struggling to hold Vengeance back, because we're supposed to believe that Anders has been fighting an epic battle for control of his self...but then suddenly Vengeance apparently goes all helpless?

#345
billy the squid

billy the squid
  • Members
  • 4 669 messages
He should have his mouth sown shut, made tranquil and then passed onto the care of the Qunari, they know how to properly deal with mages.

Modifié par billy the squid, 08 octobre 2013 - 11:10 .


#346
ScarMK

ScarMK
  • Members
  • 820 messages

Silfren wrote...
 Vengeance apparently goes all helpless?


Either the writers dropped the ball or Anders lied about that too.

#347
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

Reaverwind wrote...
But that means you have to tolerate taking him along. :sick:

Ah, but sometimes there are perks for bringing Anders along.

Image IPB

His self awareness does him credit.

#348
wolfhowwl

wolfhowwl
  • Members
  • 3 727 messages

ScarMK wrote...

Silfren wrote...
 Vengeance apparently goes all helpless?


Either the writers dropped the ball or Anders lied about that too.


What game are we talking about again?

#349
Guest_greengoron89_*

Guest_greengoron89_*
  • Guests
Anders will change his story depending on whether he's a friend or rival. He'll say Justice made him do it if he's a rival, and that he did it of his own accord if he's a friend.

That definitely makes him a liar... but which is the truth?

#350
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

Silfren wrote...
I think that actually was directed at MisterJB's comment about true justice being forcing Vengeance to watch helplessly as Anders kills mage after mage after mage.  I find it a little odd myself, as there's nothing just about killing innocent people just to make another person suffer, but it's not something to take so seriously you pick up your toys and go home...

The fact that Vengeance suffers IS justice, regardless of how said suffering is achieved. I'm going to Annul the Circle regardless and not for reasons of guilt or innocence but damage control. If I get to make the truly guily party in all of this disaster suffer in the process then, all the better.