Aller au contenu

Photo

Will "Anders" play a role in DA:I?


727 réponses à ce sujet

#626
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

Morocco Mole wrote...

Doesn't mean it's NOT true, either. At no point is the game EVER conclusive on whether Elthina was a sweet old lady trying to maintain peace and just being terrible at it, or whether she was manipulating the parties involved. Your interpretation is no more conclusively supported than mine or anyone else's.


It actually is, since most evidence in the game supports it. Otherwise I can just say Elthina was secretly an apostate mage using blood magic to make everyone in DA2 really stupid.



Image IPB

Elthina with her 3 idiots.

Knight-Commander Meredith, First Enchanter Orsino and the Champion of Kirkwall.

#627
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests
Image needs Anders I'm afraid.

#628
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages
This thread needs more barkspawn.

#629
MissOuJ

MissOuJ
  • Members
  • 1 247 messages

Morocco Mole wrote...

Would say its... speculation for everyone?


Apart from the oh-so-clever ME3 dig here... what's so bad about speculation, or discussion or debate? How is it bad if a game fires up interesting conversations about the subject of Order vs. Freedom, or human rights, or society's institutionalized power dynamics?

IMO, being cookie-cutter and safe is a much bigger crime in the video game business these days than being, as you put it, "speculation for everyone".

#630
PnXMarcin1PL

PnXMarcin1PL
  • Members
  • 3 131 messages
I dont think so because Anders is killable in the end of Act 3

#631
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages
Well that depends, speculation requires more than circumstantial evidence to exist. That's what separates it from, say, conspiracy theories.

#632
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

I dont think so because Anders is killable in the end of Act 3


We could always fight a demon named vengance.

#633
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests

Apart from the oh-so-clever ME3 dig here... what's so bad about speculation, or discussion or debate? How is it bad if a game fires up interesting conversations about the subject of Order vs. Freedom, or human rights, or society's institutionalized power dynamics?


Debate, speculation, and discussion is fine and acceptable, and something I actually greatly enjoy, hence me playing devil's advocate. However,  making stuff up that isn't supported in the game is not. If you were to say, "Elthina was a feeble old woman who was probably going senile" I would nod and say that is possible. Because the codex has evidence that supports it.

IMO, being cookie-cutter and safe is a much bigger crime in the video game business these days than being, as you put it, "speculation for everyone".


It is. But just making **** up is not acceptable in a debate.

Modifié par Morocco Mole, 10 octobre 2013 - 07:49 .


#634
d-boy15

d-boy15
  • Members
  • 1 642 messages

MissOuJ wrote...

Morocco Mole wrote...

Would say its... speculation for everyone?


Apart from the oh-so-clever ME3 dig here... what's so bad about speculation, or discussion or debate? How is it bad if a game fires up interesting conversations about the subject of Order vs. Freedom, or human rights, or society's institutionalized power dynamics?


It's not a good specualation or debate when you using false logic or headcanon and make it's a fact.

The example of good debate or specualation are Bioshock Infinite, Spec Ops The line (story) and
Human Revolution (ideal).  Most of it is civil, use reason and proof more than headcanon.

Modifié par d-boy15, 10 octobre 2013 - 07:50 .


#635
MissOuJ

MissOuJ
  • Members
  • 1 247 messages

Darth Brotarian wrote...

Well that depends, speculation requires more than circumstantial evidence to exist. That's what separates it from, say, conspiracy theories.


True, but in a fictional universe separating circumstantial evidence from facts becomes somewhat difficult since stuff like narrative (particularly in non-linear RPGs), gameplay and story segregation etc. get in the way. Also, seeing as it sometimes seems that half of the plots in video games these days involve conspiracies of some sort (the bigger the better!) I'm not really surprised that people would come to those conclusions.

(( Also quickly pointing out that most of the Codex entries come from Chantry scholars, which is a really interesting nod to the Unreliable Narrator gig they have Varric doing, which is an interesting point as well ))

And, as long as they (or, should I say "we", since I don't believe for a moment that Elthina didn't have her own agendas in DA2) keep it in the fictional worlds and it keeps generating interesting conversations, I can't say that I mind.

#636
Grand Admiral Cheesecake

Grand Admiral Cheesecake
  • Members
  • 5 704 messages

Darth Brotarian wrote...



"Your patron just ensured your suffering will be epic, youngster!"


Best final boss in the whole damn game.

#637
MissOuJ

MissOuJ
  • Members
  • 1 247 messages

Morocco Mole wrote...

Debate, speculation, and discussion is fine and acceptable, and something I actually greatly enjoy, hence me playing devil's advocate. However,  making stuff up that isn't supported in the game is not. If you were to say, "Elthina was a feeble old woman who was probably going senile" I would nod and say that is possible. Because the codex has evidence that supports it.


The codex might support that (which I actually disagree on, since it is made quite clear that that is the way people who oppose her advocate for her removal) but the gameplay and narrative don't support that, like, at all. In Act 3, for example, she basically sends Meredith to her room without dinner without blinking an eye. She is lucid, she isn't spouting nonsense whenever you see her, she's argumentative. Not exactly "feeble, old, senile woman".

Morocco Mole wrote...

IMO, being cookie-cutter and safe is a much bigger crime in the video game business these days than being, as you put it, "speculation for everyone".


It is. But just making **** up is not acceptable in a debate.


d-boy15 wrote...

It's not a good specualation or debate when you using false logic or headcanon and make it's a fact.


Except I haven't really seen people "making **** up" / false logic - I've seen people give alternative interpretations, which is quite another thing altogether. One is going "I despise Elthina because she keeps drowning kittens and skinning innocent elven children to preform blood-rituals to become immortal" - the other is going "You know what? I think there's just enough evidence to imply that maybe Elthina wasn't a complete senile idiot and in stead had her own agendas and reasons to do what she did (or didn't do)".

Modifié par MissOuJ, 10 octobre 2013 - 08:11 .


#638
Nohvarr

Nohvarr
  • Members
  • 1 854 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

Morocco Mole wrote...



Some claim that Elthina's advanced age has rendered her ineffective, and that she allows Knight-Commander Meredith more leeway with each passing year. Some are calling on the new Divine, Justinia V, to appoint a replacement-but they do so quietly, for Elthina is by far the most beloved priest the city has ever known.


That doesn't really support your point. At all.


Yes it does, you just don't want to accept it because it doesn't favor your argument at all.


Interesting, because you've completely ignored the posts I've made using the same source. Allow me to repost them'


By the beginning of the Act, Elthina has rejected Meredith's request for the Right of Annulment 


Right there, she prevents Meredith from enacting the ROA.


In Hightown, Orsino is trying to convince the nobles that Meredith uses the fear of mages to take control of Kirkwall. Meredith accuses him of inciting a rebellion. Then Elthina arrives and asks the templars to "show the First Enchanter back to the Circle," adding an injunction for them to treat him "gently," and Meredith to "go back to the Gallows and calm down, like a good girl." If the Champion asks Elthina why she does nothing when she is in charge of the templars and the Circle, Elthina retorts that Hawke has "quite the estimation of [her] abilities."


And again she intervenes, keeping the peace without taking sides. I mean she essentially put Meredith and Orsino in 'time out'


In the Chantry, Hawke witnesses Sebastian asking what is Elthina's stance on the issue of the mages and the templars. Elthina states that she favors peace and if the Maker is merciful, he will help them find it. She confesses that she did not expect things to deteriorate so fast.


Making her position clear here, wanting peace but not wanting to take sides as her words could give one side an edge and cause chaos further down the line. One thing we've seen is the Oppressed becoming the Oppressors (See Bioshock Infinite for a wonderful example) so a mutually beneficial agreement/resolution is preferable to open war.


Hawke comes to Elthina to discuss the mages and the templars. Elthina claims that she cannot take sides and that she is seeking to balance the needs of everyone. Then Anders shows up. Elthina comments that his soul is troubled and expresses her hope that he found a balm for it in the Chantry.


Honestly these assertions she's evil ring very hollow to my ears after going over the above incidents.


If Meredith is the one to ask Hawke to investigate the matter of Thrask's conspiracy, she explains to the Champion that she needs hard evidence of Orsino's direct involvement to bring before Elthina, because Orsino has persuaded the Grand Cleric that Meredith "is being unreasonable." Alternatively, if it is Orsino who asks for assistance, he expresses his hope that Circle mages are not involved in something sinister, or "Meredith will have what she needs to justify the Right of Annulment."


So this is the woman some of you feel deserves to die? I don't think I can agree with you on this.

Modifié par Nohvarr, 10 octobre 2013 - 10:20 .


#639
PnXMarcin1PL

PnXMarcin1PL
  • Members
  • 3 131 messages

Darth Brotarian wrote...

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

I dont think so because Anders is killable in the end of Act 3


We could always fight a demon named vengance.


Good point which I like :D Venegeance would have to find another 'host' which he would corrupt or make abomination of.

#640
bubs

bubs
  • Members
  • 204 messages

Darth Brotarian wrote...

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

I dont think so because Anders is killable in the end of Act 3


We could always fight a demon named vengance.


Pretty sure Vengeance died with Anders, since they were "one."

#641
d-boy15

d-boy15
  • Members
  • 1 642 messages

MissOuJ wrote...

d-boy15 wrote...

It's not a good specualation or debate when you using false logic or headcanon and make it's a fact.


Except I haven't really seen people "making **** up" / false logic - I've seen people give alternative interpretations, which is quite another thing altogether. One is going "I despise Elthina because she keeps drowning kittens and skinning innocent elven children to preform blood-rituals to become immortal" - the other is going "You know what? I think there's just enough evidence to imply that maybe Elthina wasn't a complete senile idiot and in stead had her own agendas and reasons to do what she did (or didn't do)".


Well... do you even read the entire debate or just a few? The entire Elthina debate came a long way after
some pro-mage here try to tell that Anders absolutly right to kill people in Chantry. Which me and some
peoples seem to disagree. After long discussion, they try to blame it all on Elthina which to be fair, is a
victim of Anders action.

Also, in several previous pages, some peoples here try to tell that blowing building full of non-combatant
is not an act of terror but a fight for freedom. It's not and will never be. You not going to kill civilian and
called that a fight.

Just because you put "freedom" in your cause donsn't make it to justify killing peoples.

And I said it again, if we go by that logic then all act of terror in this world are noble fight for freedom.

Modifié par d-boy15, 10 octobre 2013 - 10:52 .


#642
frankf43

frankf43
  • Members
  • 1 782 messages

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

I dont think so because Anders is killable in the end of Act 3


That was my first response as well. Only after reading the thread above on Varric's framed narrative made me realise that we only have Varric's word on anything that happened it DA:2. We also know that he lied plenty of times and that on occasion Cassandra called him on his lies.

#643
bubs

bubs
  • Members
  • 204 messages

frankf43 wrote...

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

I dont think so because Anders is killable in the end of Act 3


That was my first response as well. Only after reading the thread above on Varric's framed narrative made me realise that we only have Varric's word on anything that happened it DA:2. We also know that he lied plenty of times and that on occasion Cassandra called him on his lies.


If they seriously retcon my choices and just say "Varric lied" I'll be really, really pissed. If I made the choice of Anders dying, Anders should be dead. That's that.

#644
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages
[quote]Nohvarr wrote...
Interesting, because you've completely ignored the posts I've made using the same source. Allow me to repost them'


[quote]By the beginning of the Act, Elthina has rejected Meredith's request for the Right of Annulment [/quote]

Right there, she prevents Meredith from enacting the ROA.[/quote]

clap clap clap she did something right.

[quote]
[quote]In Hightown, Orsino is trying to convince the nobles that Meredith uses the fear of mages to take control of Kirkwall. Meredith accuses him of inciting a rebellion. Then Elthina arrives and asks the templars to "show the First Enchanter back to the Circle," adding an injunction for them to treat him "gently," and Meredith to "go back to the Gallows and calm down, like a good girl." If the Champion asks Elthina why she does nothing when she is in charge of the templars and the Circle, Elthina retorts that Hawke has "quite the estimation of [her] abilities." [/quote]

And again she intervenes, keeping the peace without taking sides. I mean she essentially put Meredith and Orsino in 'time out'[/quote]

Did you heard what Varric said in his epilogue loading screen after you completed the Deep road expedition? It doesn't sound like Elthina did a good job keeping the peace when you have Meredith making everyones life miserable, especially for the mages. She didn't do a goood job stopping meredith from essentinally taking over the city, and thus refusing to allow the nobility of the city cast their vote for a new Viscount. This scene, as you quoted, seems pretty touchy but it wasn't good enough to keep the peace. Elthina were treating these two full grown adults like children instead of adults. These two are backed up with armies, and could very well start a war within the city if they started fighting with each other.

[quote]
[quote]In the Chantry, Hawke witnesses Sebastian asking what is Elthina's stance on the issue of the mages and the templars. Elthina states that she favors peace and if the Maker is merciful, he will help them find it. She confesses that she did not expect things to deteriorate so fast. [/quote]

Making her position clear here, wanting peace but not wanting to take sides as her words could give one side an edge and cause chaos further down the line. One thing we've seen is the Oppressed becoming the Oppressors (See Bioshock Infinite for a wonderful example) so a mutually beneficial agreement/resolution is preferable to open war.[/quote]

It's blantly obvious that Elthina 100% supports the Templars. Meredith maybe the Commander, but Elthina is the actual leader in this outfit. And if she did not expect things to deteriorate so fast then it only proves that shes fit to be Grand Cleric.
[/quote]

[quote]
[quote]Hawke comes to Elthina to discuss the mages and the templars. Elthina claims that she cannot take sides and that she is seeking to balance the needs of everyone. Then Anders shows up. Elthina comments that his soul is troubled and expresses her hope that he found a balm for it in the Chantry. [/quote]

Honestly these assertions she's evil ring very hollow to my ears after going over the above incidents.[/quote]

[quote] The Order is composed of numerous branches, each of them centered around
a specific community or region they are assigned to defend and monitor.
Templars may be assigned to the Circles of Magi but also to individual Chantries. Each main branch of the organization is led by a Knight-Commander. In Thedas there are fifteen Knight-Commanders, who in turn answer to the head of the local chantry, often a Grand Cleric,
depending on the region in question.
The size and strength of each
branch also differs, depending on the community they serve or their
specific mandate. For example, the templars present in Lothering
are few in number, and may in fact be a smaller unit within a larger
chapter. Meanwhile, the templars assigned to watch over the Circles of
Magi in Kinloch Hold and Kirkwall are much more powerful, and in the case of Kirkwall, perhaps more powerful even than the civilian government in the city.
[/quote]

Wouldn't you think it would be silly for Elthina to take the mages sides when shes in fact in charge of the Templar order in Kirkwall?
[quote]
[quote]If Meredith is the one to ask Hawke to investigate the matter of Thrask's conspiracy, she explains to the Champion that she needs hard evidence of Orsino's direct involvement to bring before Elthina, because Orsino has persuaded the Grand Cleric that Meredith "is being unreasonable." Alternatively, if it is Orsino who asks for assistance, he expresses his hope that Circle mages are not involved in something sinister, or "Meredith will have what she needs to justify the Right of Annulment." [/quote]
So this is the woman some of you feel deserves to die? I don't think I can agree with you on this.[/quote]

Yes I do. She did NOTHING to stop this conflict between Orsino and Meredith. She made it worst, not better. Anders thought he could reason with her, but proven to be wrong. She is very manipulative by using her title of Grand Cleric to preach about "peace" and "Oh I can't take sides and blah blah and blah" when she knew that she could not side with the mages base on her title as Grand Cleric. Elthina truly did not want peace, at all. Her actions says otherwise.

Meredith was nothing but a war monger. Despite what Orsino did at least he tried talking sense to Meredith by asking her to revoke the ROA.. and was willing to surrender himself to her, but only if she discontuines ROA.

#645
Nohvarr

Nohvarr
  • Members
  • 1 854 messages

It's blantly obvious that Elthina 100% supports the Templars. Meredith maybe the Commander, but Elthina is the actual leader in this outfit. And if she did not expect things to deteriorate so fast then it only proves that shes fit to be Grand Cleric.

Wrong, she wouldn’t have denied Meredith’s request to use the ROA earlier if she did, and she would’ve approve the Tranquil Solution as put forth by another Templar in Act 2. She did neither and kept out of the conflict, only stepping in when she thought it necessary to keep the two side from killing one another. Something Anders took note of as he killed her to prevent her from doing just that.

Yes I do. She did NOTHING to stop this conflict between Orsino and Meredith. She made it worst, not better. Anders thought he could reason with her, but proven to be wrong.

Now I know you’re just ignoring things you don’t like. Meredith points out that the Grand Cleric was beginning to view the Knight-Commander as unreasonable. I also pointed out a scene where in she stops the conflict between Orsino and Meredith from getting worse by separating them and giving them time to calm down. Meredith knew she couldn’t enact the ROA without support from the Grand Cleric and knew that without evidence that support would never come. Yet you still claim Elithina was firmly supporting Meredith despite blocking her more dangerous excesses again and again.

She is very manipulative by using her title of Grand Cleric to preach about "peace" and "Oh I can't take sides and blah blah and blah" when she knew that she could not side with the mages base on her title as Grand Cleric. Elthina truly did not want peace, at all. Her actions says otherwise.

You can claim she misjudged the situation, you can even say she didn’t do enough to stop Meredith (though that is debatable since having power on paper is very different than having it in actuality.) However saying she deserved to die because she was evil and manipulating events is not supported by what is seen. You keep pointing to the part of the codex that says the GC had control over the Knight-Commander. Yet the Templars abandoned the Divine when they were not allowed to kill mages as they wanted. Elthina was in the same boat. Sure she had some power over Meredith, but Meredith had the trained soldiers and the weapon meaning Elithina could only push so far.

'Here I stand with my bayonets, there you stand with your law! We'll see which counts for more!'

The above quote encapsulate the Chantry’s tenuouse relationship with the Templars, and Elthina’s position nicely.

#646
d-boy15

d-boy15
  • Members
  • 1 642 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

Yes I do. She did NOTHING to stop this conflict between Orsino and Meredith. She made it worst, not better. Anders thought he could reason with her, but proven to be wrong. She is very manipulative by using her title of Grand Cleric to preach about "peace" and "Oh I can't take sides and blah blah and blah" when she knew that she could not side with the mages base on her title as Grand Cleric. Elthina truly did not want peace, at all. Her actions says otherwise.


Anders reason with her? LOL He just another one who try to use her reputation to gain adventage for his cause.
He is not different from Meredith, try using Elthina as thier tool.

Just because people didn't want to take side doesn't mean you have a right to kill them. In that case you 
should kill most citizen of Kirkwall because they do nothing to help mage. And don't tell me about  influence
or the power of title. If all people of Kirkwall just rise up to Meredith, she wouldn't stand a chance at all.

"How dare you to not risk you life to support my cause! If you not with me then you are with them..." that's actually
funny because that what most terrorist thinking.  

Also, the grand clearic might had an authority over knight comander but what really happen is who control the
biggest army hold the power which in this case, it's Meredith. Anyone who watched Game of Throne knows.

Modifié par d-boy15, 10 octobre 2013 - 12:25 .


#647
General TSAR

General TSAR
  • Members
  • 4 384 messages
Only as a corpse, maybe.

#648
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Darth Brotarian wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

So she has the seekers killed, or removed, or spun in circles on a wild goose chase. Why not that instead of pulling a palpatine?

Elthina's specialty seems to be avoiding blame for anything; I suspect she may also have been backing Petrice while setting her up to be conveniently killed off in a way that would incite the populace against the qunari even more.


Can your provide any evidence of this? It seems unlikely the qunari would listen to her of all people, and it doesn't seem like she was very supportive of her so called conspirator during the events of the game. And funny how petrice seemed to not want hawke to talk, even though she was working with elthina, instead of being like "You think she didn't already know?" or after she gets cut loose wouldn't say something like "But I only did what you asked, you can't do this!"

Petrice doesn't seem the type to not gloat, or angerly spill the plan, following her emotions. I mean even using the star wars reference, when dooku was double crossed, he at least gave a "what the **** are you doing?" face. Petrice doesn't seem to do anything and seems generally surprised that Elthina knew anything about her plan.

Well, obviously she can't be openly supportive, and Petrice loses nothing by claiming to want Hawke to not talk about anything (nor does Petrice have any power to prevent Hawke from doing so). And after she gets cut loose, the whole "you can't do this" thing was exactly what she sounded like to me, just not explicitly stated.

#649
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages
You're over-reaching your logic and seeing what ain't there.

Modifié par Darth Brotarian, 10 octobre 2013 - 02:57 .


#650
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Darth Brotarian wrote...

You're over-reaching your logic and seeing what ain't there.

Interpretation. She's dead anyway, so it no longer matters much.